Baba_Booey;480506 said:For everyone that uses this, how does your length in the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]extender[/words] compare to your BPenis EnlargementL & BPFSL? In the [words=https://www.internetzahlung.de/cc-aktuell/bestellung.php3?PID=PM0440A&Sprache=en]PMP[/words], I'm close to my BPenis EnlargementL, but more than an inch less than my BPFSL.
I tried an un-lubricated condom, but it came off in record time. Your mileage may vary.CaptainCaveman;480534 said:Hey guys, an idea just popped into mind. What do you guys think about wearing a condom and using the [words=https://www.internetzahlung.de/cc-aktuell/bestellung.php3?PID=PM0440A&Sprache=en]pmp[/words]? I haven't tried it but I wonder if it would give some added protection against fluid buildup...Hydromaxmm
Baba_Booey;480563 said:I sold my original [words=https://www.internetzahlung.de/cc-aktuell/bestellung.php3?PID=PM0440A&Sprache=en]PMP[/words], but bought another one and I'm glad I did because it's really comfortable and I'm going to try the low tension long hours approach.
With my first set, all of the diaphragms looked about the same size and when they were on the glans chamber they were tight (looked like a drum). With the new set that I got yesterday, the diaphragm that came on the chamber was tight, but the spare ones are quite a bit bigger and aren't smooth when they are on the chamber. The sluices are the same size (I didn't get the XLs) and there is no mention of different sized diaphragms on the website.
I'm thinking that this may have been a change they made with the design, either that or they had a batch that came out too big. It seems like the tighter design would work better to minimize the amount of air in the chamber, and therefore reduce fluid buildup, but the larger ones would make t easier to get into.
Has anyone else ordered recently and gotten these larger diaphragms?
You haven't joined any rooms.