Christianity vs. PE - can they co-exist?

I don't see what one (Penis Enlargement) would have to do with the other (religion). At least I would hope so.

I believe that they are two entirely different things that have no reason to be lumped together.

Does your religion have anything to do with taking a leak? Or a dump? Or breathing?

Why clump the two together? Because it involves your penis? I don't get it.

Thinking like that only proves that religion has ruined your life.
 
well, jesus was a liberal, so I dont think he would mind if you looked at pictures.
 
I think he's using "radical" and "liberal" to mean the same thing. There is a difference.
 
its written that Jesus was the person who accepted the outcasts of society. He openly accepted people who others hated. Like prostitutes, tax collectors and probably gay people.

Was Jesus more of an aristocratic, wealthy conservative Republican? I doubt it.
 
zxcvbnm9000 said:
i always felt i couldn't look at ���� or nudity without thinking about having sex with the women. try bikini pics and stuff like that, and see how you feel. im still up in the air about that.
Click to expand...

BWAHAH

Sorry but that was funny.

Lets make and analysis of the two options

scenario 1) you use ���� as a Penis Enlargement tool - you are committing one sin because ���� is condemned

scenario 2) you switch from ���� to bikini pics - you are committing two sins: 1- you are trying to fool God. 2- The sin of stupidity for thinking you can fool God (not to mention that the sin of trying to fool God must be very high on the pyramid of sins)



I think I will stick to option 1 because I would be committing less sins... so guys... ���� IS THE WAY TO GO
 
NeXus said:
its written that Jesus was the person who accepted the outcasts of society. He openly accepted people who others hated. Like prostitutes, tax collectors and probably gay people.

Was Jesus more of an aristocratic, wealthy conservative Republican? I doubt it.
Click to expand...


Well, Republicans (to some extent) today accept the outcasts of society: gun nuts, pill poppers, tax evaders, business people, producers,etc.
 
nitro said:
BWAHAH

Sorry but that was funny.

Lets make and analysis of the two options

scenario 1) you use ���� as a Penis Enlargement tool - you are committing one sin because ���� is condemned

scenario 2) you switch from ���� to bikini pics - you are committing two sins: 1- you are trying to fool God. 2- The sin of stupidity for thinking you can fool God (not to mention that the sin of trying to fool God must be very high on the pyramid of sins)



I think I will stick to option 1 because I would be committing less sins... so guys... ���� IS THE WAY TO GO
Click to expand...

By whom is ���� condemned? Does it say in the Bible "Thou shalt not look at ����?" If you're talking about Catholicism, that's another story. For a Catholic to look at ���� would be against his beliefs. For a Protestant to look at ����, well, whether its a sin or not is between him and God.

Stupidity is not a sin. And also there is no "pyramid of sins." No sin is any worse in God's eyes than any other sin.

NeXus, considering that Republican and Democrat are two political parties, I'm pretty sure Jesus would have identified himself with neither of them. Was He radical? Yes. What He taught was VERY different from what the Jewish leaders of the day taught. He opposed them completely. But does that mean He was liberal? No. What He taught was more "conservative" than what the Jews were doing, but what made the difference was the reason behind his principles. It wasn't "do not _____ because God said not to." It was "do not ______ because you should love your brothers. Do not ______ because you will be a stumbling block to others." And so on. So I don't think Christ could be put into either of the categories of "liberal" and "conservative."
 
���� is a sin IMO, because its coveting a woman, its even brushed over in the 10 commandments, because it is a definite form of adultery. So yes i do think ���� is a sin
 
I was watching NOVA the other day, and it has proven that the Universe is about 14 billion years old.

This is flat out contradiction to what the Bible says. So who is right? Scientist who have used tools to PROVE the age of the universe, or some old mythological "bible"?

This proves that the Bible is just a guide and not truth. Same as religion.
 
NeXus said:
I was watching NOVA the other day, and it has proven that the Universe is about 14 billion years old.

This is flat out contradiction to what the Bible says. So who is right? Scientist who have used tools to PROVE the age of the universe, or some old mythological "bible"?

This proves that the Bible is just a guide and not truth. Same as religion.
Click to expand...

14 billion years huh! Well read 2nd Peter 3 and verse 8. Or, maybe I'll just share it with you and save you the time of looking it up. It says, But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

I'm sure you are an intelligent guy so you do the math. "IF" as most people believe that the Bible says that the earth is approximately 6000 years old, multiply that times 365 days. Thats a lot of days bro. Then as the Bible just stated to you that each day is as a thousand years. Well , Hydromaxmmm the earth is pretty old huh. Maybe nova has been slipping ariound and reading some "old " book as well.
 
Well...I don't think that verse in the Bible means literally that a day is exactly 1000 years, but I see your point.

Sorry, but no, that isn't in "flat out contradiction to what the Bible says." It never says "God created the heavens and the earth in about 4000 BC."

I think it is possible that God created the universe at one point billions of years ago. I think he may have let it sit for a few billiion years or whatever and then created the earth. Maybe after a long time he finally created animals and plants and humans and such. I don't think the book of Genesis is intended to be a science book.

As far as saying that they have proven that the universe is 14 billion years old, I don't buy it. They cannot prove the age of the universe, only come up with a really close estimation. And I'm sure 'proven' was your own word, and not the word they used. Because no real scientist would ever say that they have proven the age of the universe.

The Bible is mythological, is it? Show me one time where anything in the Bible is proven wrong. It is extremely historically accurate. I don't think you can say that the Bible is a mythological book. But if you can show me even ONE legitimate reason that the Bible should be viewed as mythology, let's have it. But until you can show me that, I would appreciate it if you would respect my views and quit attacking my faith. Because you have yet to come up with any good reason NOT to believe, so your posts in this thread are worthless and a tribute to your own ignorance. Let's have some facts, please. Or at least some decent philosophical discussion.
 
The Bible says God made the world in 6 days. That is a flat out contradiction of what has been proven, that the Earth was made over billions of years. And is about 14 billion years old.
 
The Bible says God made the world in 6 days. That is a flat out contradiction to what has been proven about Earth. The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old. According to the Bible, it would be less than 1 billion years old.

Science is about EVIDENCE to PROVE your theory. Religion is about blindly puttin your faith into a organization and excepting whatever bullshit they fill your brain with. Kinda like a cult.
 
9cyclops9 said:
As far as saying that they have proven that the universe is 14 billion years old, I don't buy it. They cannot prove the age of the universe, only come up with a really close estimation. And I'm sure 'proven' was your own word, and not the word they used. Because no real scientist would ever say that they have proven the age of the universe.

QUOTE]

They have proven it to a 99.99% accuracy. That is FACT. The fact that you "dont buy it" is the same reason that you think the Bible is absolute truth. Which it is not.

Its a guide. Just like religion. Its just supposed to be a guide. Not to be taken literally. Christianity dosent want you to ask questions, just like a cult. Adams and Eve were casted out of Eden for eating an apple from the Tree of Knowledge.

Get it KNOWLEDGE?!? Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!
Click to expand...
 
How can you ever prove the existence of the universes age when you can't even get out of galaxy? Its too huge to measure. This galaxy might be 14 billion years old, but what about Infinite amount of space in the universe? Humans are fallible. The word of God is not. Amen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Uli vs Clamping - Why I like the ULI
Replies
6
Views
309
DLD
DLD
DLD
N
Erect Jelqing Dangerous??
Replies
11
Views
287
DLD
DLD
DLD
B
What does it mean when my penis is more dense than before ?
Replies
3
Views
114
DLD
DLD
DLD
I
Newbie Gains.
Replies
6
Views
660
squirt_inducer_man
squirt_inducer_man
squirt_inducer_man
T
New in the game
Replies
5
Views
272
DLD
DLD
DLD
Back
Top Bottom