I didn't mean, by saying full sexual pleasure, that he would be a gigolo, but that he would experience full sexual sensation during intercourse, as he will not be missing some 30 square inches of sensitive foreskin tissue, his frenelum (male clit) or the ridged band, all removed by circumcision. The sensations of lovemaking will bond him ever so much closer with his mate, and she will experience none of the side-effects of intercourse with a circumcised male...namely dryness and irritation.
Why do the doctors want that foreskin? Money, my friend! Not only do they make a nice little wad of cash by removing them, they also sometimes sell the tissue to pharmaceutical companies for medical experiments, and some are even processed to make a kind of breathable surgical bandage. It is horrifying but true. We are not mutilated at birth for health reasons...it is not cleaner, healthier nor does it prevent masturbation, its original intention. Circumcision is a billion dollar a year industry...and that's not even counting residual income from lubricants to soothe sore, dry pussies and medicines like viagra, so the mutilated man can still get it up when his glans is so keratinized that he no longer feels much pleasure or sexual urges.
Why do the doctors want that foreskin? Money, my friend! Not only do they make a nice little wad of cash by removing them, they also sometimes sell the tissue to pharmaceutical companies for medical experiments, and some are even processed to make a kind of breathable surgical bandage. It is horrifying but true. We are not mutilated at birth for health reasons...it is not cleaner, healthier nor does it prevent masturbation, its original intention. Circumcision is a billion dollar a year industry...and that's not even counting residual income from lubricants to soothe sore, dry pussies and medicines like viagra, so the mutilated man can still get it up when his glans is so keratinized that he no longer feels much pleasure or sexual urges.