Hey there Supra...
I have recently made my own ROP. Have been wearing it around (dick+balls) for about a week now (7 days), even when going to the pool for my swimming training and at the gym as well. So far, I have not seen nor felt any difference. When I have it on, I do not feel any tingling or any type of current flowing around so far. Perhaps at a biological level something might be happening, but I cannot back that up until I get my testosterone levels checked.
I'm an Engineer and got knowledge on the field of chemistry and electricity, as well as mechanics. I was wondering exactly how are you getting the reading for the voltage created by the ROP when is in contact with the body? How are you measuring it? What is the protocol you follow to being consistent in the measuring? The sizing of the rods is an important factor to take into consideration in this case.
Would it be possible to have a clear photograph of the ROP you make? The diagram you show in one of the posts is just a "representation", not the real product.
The metals I got, both Cu and Zn are 99,999% purity. I've tried the classical experiment with different media (solutions where you immerse the rods (cathodes / anodes)) to test for the voltage you might get depending on the size of the rod (length and diameter wise). But it is a total different media when simply putting the rods against the skin with some moisture between them, which can greatly vary since it is not really constant, from: weather conditions, types of clothes worn, biological response to the possible electrical current created by the circuit, and the list goes on.
Would be nice to hear more about the science behind it, not just the threads that have been already posted here (I have read them all), but something more "scientific" to it.
Perhaps a new thread could be started as a Sticky and name it: "Blood Test results backing up ROP positive impact + effectiveness on Testosterone levels (before and after results)" -- set the protocol for people to follow as to the T as possible and then make a comparison. I believe this is the right way to make this man-made solution very reliable with enough scientific data to prove it.
I have access to lab equipment and I could try to take some time to further run extra tests and see what happens.
Hope to get a real reply to this... after all, science beats most of the myths around the internet.![Wink ;) ;)]()
Thanks in advance for everything!
I have recently made my own ROP. Have been wearing it around (dick+balls) for about a week now (7 days), even when going to the pool for my swimming training and at the gym as well. So far, I have not seen nor felt any difference. When I have it on, I do not feel any tingling or any type of current flowing around so far. Perhaps at a biological level something might be happening, but I cannot back that up until I get my testosterone levels checked.
I'm an Engineer and got knowledge on the field of chemistry and electricity, as well as mechanics. I was wondering exactly how are you getting the reading for the voltage created by the ROP when is in contact with the body? How are you measuring it? What is the protocol you follow to being consistent in the measuring? The sizing of the rods is an important factor to take into consideration in this case.
Would it be possible to have a clear photograph of the ROP you make? The diagram you show in one of the posts is just a "representation", not the real product.
The metals I got, both Cu and Zn are 99,999% purity. I've tried the classical experiment with different media (solutions where you immerse the rods (cathodes / anodes)) to test for the voltage you might get depending on the size of the rod (length and diameter wise). But it is a total different media when simply putting the rods against the skin with some moisture between them, which can greatly vary since it is not really constant, from: weather conditions, types of clothes worn, biological response to the possible electrical current created by the circuit, and the list goes on.
Would be nice to hear more about the science behind it, not just the threads that have been already posted here (I have read them all), but something more "scientific" to it.
Perhaps a new thread could be started as a Sticky and name it: "Blood Test results backing up ROP positive impact + effectiveness on Testosterone levels (before and after results)" -- set the protocol for people to follow as to the T as possible and then make a comparison. I believe this is the right way to make this man-made solution very reliable with enough scientific data to prove it.
I have access to lab equipment and I could try to take some time to further run extra tests and see what happens.
Hope to get a real reply to this... after all, science beats most of the myths around the internet.
Thanks in advance for everything!
Last edited: