My Penis Surgery Experience Phalloplasty

I am a "newbie" with regards to MOS.

I am not a newbie in any manner with regards to phalloplastic surgery.

Something that started out in general to be extremely promising it appears has degraded.

There definitely ARE good surgical outcomes. The problem appears now that the percentages are all wrong. It also appears that a far higher than acceptable percentage of these procedures degrade over time. In the beginning the big thing was "lipo-transfer" this was simpluy removing fat from one location of a person's body and in this case injecting it into the penis. It was quickly discovered that without a blood supply to maintain it that it would re-absorb. The next "incredible discovery" was dermal grafts. Though it appears that the degrading took longer, these too as a whole were not a great success. In addition, scarring at the graft harvest site was often so bad as to require plastic surgery and other corrective measures to get it down to acceptable levels. The final transition was the incorporation of implants of a substance called Alloderm which is made by a company called "Life Cell". Problems have taken place with this in some individuals. I have heard of "re-absorbtion" in reference to this on another board, but I have never been able to actually substantiate this. What I have seen with Alloderm are two problems. One of these is the implant coming "loose" (for lack of a better term) and shifting requiring repairative surgery, and I have seen encapsulation with Alloderm. Encapsulation is an immune response, it is unpredictable, impossible to forcast and will happen in a small percentage of men. If that happens it is back under the knife with a very painful procedure to remove a great deal of tissue leaving the patient worse off than before.

If you have the option try everything else in the "natural Penis Enlargement realm" before you decide to go under the knife. It should not be the first thing on your list, but the final consideration.

There ARE successful procedures, but if you re-visit the patients after 5 years the percentage that have had problems will far exceed the percentage that is still satisfied.

Best of Luck
Fuzzy Ken

I am a "newbie" with regards to MOS.

I am not a newbie in any manner with regards to phalloplastic surgery.

Something that started out in general to be extremely promising it appears has degraded.

There definitely ARE good surgical outcomes. The problem appears now that the percentages are all wrong. It also appears that a far higher than acceptable percentage of these procedures degrade over time. In the beginning the big thing was "lipo-transfer" this was simpluy removing fat from one location of a person's body and in this case injecting it into the penis. It was quickly discovered that without a blood supply to maintain it that it would re-absorb. The next "incredible discovery" was dermal grafts. Though it appears that the degrading took longer, these too as a whole were not a great success. In addition, scarring at the graft harvest site was often so bad as to require plastic surgery and other corrective measures to get it down to acceptable levels. The final transition was the incorporation of implants of a substance called Alloderm which is made by a company called "Life Cell". Problems have taken place with this in some individuals. I have heard of "re-absorbtion" in reference to this on another board, but I have never been able to actually substantiate this. What I have seen with Alloderm are two problems. One of these is the implant coming "loose" (for lack of a better term) and shifting requiring repairative surgery, and I have seen encapsulation with Alloderm. Encapsulation is an immune response, it is unpredictable, impossible to forcast and will happen in a small percentage of men. If that happens it is back under the knife with a very painful procedure to remove a great deal of tissue leaving the patient worse off than before.

If you have the option try everything else in the "natural Penis Enlargement realm" before you decide to go under the knife. It should not be the first thing on your list, but the final consideration.

There ARE successful procedures, but if you re-visit the patients after 5 years the percentage that have had problems will far exceed the percentage that are still satisfied.

Best of Luck
Fuzzy Ken

I am a "newbie" with regards to MOS.

I am not a newbie in any manner with regards to phalloplastic surgery.

Something that started out in general to be extremely promising it appears has degraded. In the beginning the main procedure was "lengthening" and this was done in various techniques by making cuts in the ligament structure composed of mainly the suspensory, fundiform and penile web. When it was only that procedure it appeared that things might just over time as the best techniques were adopted go great. The problems started and began to multiply when the "girth enhancement" procedures came into the picture.

There definitely ARE good surgical outcomes. The problem appears now that the percentages are all wrong. It also appears that a far higher than acceptable percentage of these procedures degrade over time. In the beginning of girth enhancement the big thing was "lipo-transfer" this was simply removing fat from one location of a person's body and in this case injecting it into the penis. It was quickly discovered that without a blood supply to maintain it, that it would re-absorb. The next "incredible discovery" was dermal grafts. Though it appears that the degrading took longer, these too as a whole were not a great success. In addition, scarring at the graft harvest site was often so bad as to require plastic surgery and other corrective measures to get it down to acceptable levels. The final transition was the incorporation of implants of a substance called Alloderm which is made by a company called "Life Cell". Problems have taken place with this in some individuals. I have heard of "re-absorbtion" in reference to this on another board, but I have never been able to actually substantiate this. What I have seen with Alloderm are two problems. One of these is the implant coming "loose" (for lack of a better term) and shifting requiring repairative surgery, and I have seen encapsulation with Alloderm. Encapsulation is an immune response, it is unpredictable, impossible to forcast and will happen in a small percentage of men. If that happens, it is back under the knife with a very painful procedure to remove a great deal of tissue leaving the patient worse off than before.

If you have the option try everything else in the "natural Penis Enlargement realm" before you decide to go under the knife. It should not be the first thing on your list, but the final consideration.

There ARE successful procedures, but if you re-visit the patients after 5 years the percentage that have had problems will far exceed the percentage that are still satisfied.

Best of Luck
Fuzzy Ken

I am a "newbie" with regards to MOS.

I am not a newbie in any manner with regards to phalloplastic surgery.

Something that started out in general to be extremely promising it appears has degraded. In the beginning the main procedure was "lengthening" and this was done in various techniques by making cuts in the ligament structure composed of mainly the suspensory, fundiform and penile web. When it was only that procedure it appeared that things might just over time as the best techniques were adopted go great. The problems started and began to multiply when the "girth enhancement" procedures came into the picture.

There definitely ARE good surgical outcomes. The problem appears now that the percentages are all wrong. It also appears that a far higher than acceptable percentage of these procedures degrade over time. In the beginning of girth enhancement the big thing was "lipo-transfer" this was simply removing fat from one location of a person's body and in this case injecting it into the penis. It was quickly discovered that without a blood supply to maintain it, that it would re-absorb. The next "incredible discovery" was dermal grafts. Though it appears that the degrading took longer, these too as a whole were not a great success. In addition, scarring at the graft harvest site was often so bad as to require plastic surgery and other corrective measures to get it down to acceptable levels. The final transition was the incorporation of implants of a substance called Alloderm which is made by a company called "Life Cell". Problems have taken place with this in some individuals. I have heard of "re-absorbtion" in reference to this on another board, but I have never been able to actually substantiate this. What I have seen with Alloderm are two problems. One of these is the implant coming "loose" (for lack of a better term) and shifting requiring repairative surgery, and I have seen encapsulation with Alloderm. Encapsulation is an immune response, it is unpredictable, impossible to forcast and will happen in a small percentage of men. If that happens, it is back under the knife with a very painful procedure to remove a great deal of tissue leaving the patient worse off than before.

If you have the option try everything else in the "natural Penis Enlargement realm" before you decide to go under the knife. It should not be the first thing on your list, but the final consideration.

There ARE successful procedures, but if you re-visit the patients after 5 years the percentage that have had problems when compared against any other of a very large list of cosmetic procedures is very high.

Best of Luck
Fuzzy Ken

Apologies to board members and management for the 4 posts. I have had some PC problems this evening and in trying to transmit something once ended up with multiples. Please feel free to edit out the duplicate postings

Thanks,
Fuzzy Ken

I had surgery a feew years ago too. Dr. Guinta in Alexandria, VA. did ithttp://i5.tinypic.com/14v458g.jpg
It went very well, took me from about 6-BPenis EnlargementL to 7-7.2, and 5.2 to 6.2 or 6.5 EG. I had 2 fat transfers done, and he does them free for life, with only the cost of the anesthesia. There was minimal pain (managed by Oxycodone), and it has worked great. My wife thought I didn't need it but loves the result. This is a pic after the surgeryhttp://i6.tinypic.com/14v41mg.jpg
It is a bit bigger now from Androextender and Penis Enlargement. About 7.75 to 8 BPenis EnlargementL and 6.5 EG. After the surgery I used weights for awhile. Have had no problems at all. I got it when I was about 42, so it may have been my mid-life crisis treat, instead of a sports car.
Glad

man was that pic in the link right after surgery?

loco said:

man was that pic in the link right after surgery?

Click to expand...

No, that was awhile after the surgery.

are you happy with it? because it looks sort of lumpy from what I see. and not a natural smooth transition from one part to the other.

I've been very satisfied with it Loco, it works great . Your right about the sides though. That seems to have gotten better and evened out some with time, and the use of weights and the Androextender. My biggest concern going into it was the surgery reulting in impotence or some sort of other malfunction, but I've had no problems that way. It doesn't feel spongy either, and there was definitely no loss in sensation. My wife especially doesn't think there was any loss in sensation:s , that pic cut a good part of the base off, and it is a bit longer and thicker now then it was then. The other day my wife and I were having sex, and when I first went in, she said "good Lord I feel like a virgin" then just broke out in the biggest grin. I would like to get it up to around 9.5 in BPenis EnlargementL and 7.2 in EG. Of course there will be a price to pay for that. My wife won't give me much oral sex now because she says it makes her jaw hurt, so at that point it will be out the window totally. I guess that is just the price I'll have to pay:cool: :mrgrin:

That's wild b21wayne! You got an awesome size going, and your life must have been improved upon. Have you noticed an increased sense of well being, and confidence? That's crazy that Guinta offers free refills! How much does it cost to knock you out, or is it even necessary for injections?


~BTC

Thx BTC, it has boosted my self-image I think, seems that lately I have taken to walking up to my wife alot and dropping my pants, and kidding her, saying "want to lick it I bet". She just smiles, sort of a devilish grin. The last procedure I had cost about $800 for the anesthesia, and probably another $250 for the lodging and meals. The first time I had it done, it seemd like they were telling me to count back from ten, and the next thing I knew I was waking up in their recovery room, with a nice nurse asking me if I wanted some O.J. When I first woke up I reached down to feel it, and didn't even think about it being bandaged or anything, and when I felt it, I thought to myself, "WOW I've GOT SOMETHING NOW:bouncesqu, and wait until my wife gets a load of this monster", then it hit me it was wrapped up.

Flying back from San Luis Obispo, airport security was tight! They scanned down my leg, and noticed my bandaged bulge, asking repeatedly, "are you SURE you have nothing in your pants?" I said no, but wanted to say I had a WMD, but didn't want to get grounded.



A true story,

~BTC

What happened to T.O. by the way (the starter of this thread)? Did he die of some horrid complication?

He's probably busy using his new size on his wife/gf...

Any new cases?

I've heard that Dr. Rheinschild used to be the best but that's not the case anymore. Also I know that he now uses only your own tissue for the grafts, leaving big scars that I don't want.

What, if anything, do you guys know about Dr. Douglas Whitehead?

Thanks!

I decided to stick this to allow those interested in surgery to have an idea about it, although I dont support surgery in anyway shape or form to modify the penis unless it was for something that needed medical intervention such as tight foreskin that wouldnt retract.

Anyone else with stories from the knife? please tell us about it.

Do you have any erect pics post op?