Is Everything Really What it Seems? Links Updated
- Thread starter DLD
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 7 inches 8 inches 9 inches average big penis curve dating doublelongdaddy dysfunction eight equipment erect erection erections exercises fat pad flaccid gains growing hands huge cock jelq larger massive massive cock p.e penis penis enlargement pills phallosan phallus posts pump question research results sex short shortdick shower size skin small penis stretch stretched stretching support testicles thick uncircumcised wide
Very excellent work, DLD.
It's almost impossible to really add anything else to such a comprehensive study, but I do want to say this:
I think that one additional reason (besides the ones you mentioned) why we are so quick to believe such fraudulent claims is because we are taken by the sheer VOLUME of such penises.
For example, an 8 x 6, in terms of cubic volume, is literally almost twice the penile mass of a 6 x 5. About 22 cubic inches versus 11.8 cubic inches.
Literally, almost twice the dick.
So when we see an 8 x 6 - assuming "we" are average - we think - "Holy shit! That thing is almost twice the size of mine!" - because, in a way, it IS.
Therefore, it becomes easier to believe claims of, say, 10" for what is really an 8 incher. Most men think in terms of length, not in terms of volume - so if it looks almost twice the size of the average (which it is, at 8 x 6) then it must be almost twice the length of the average (which it is NOT). Therefore 10", though a lie, becomes very easy to believe.
When dealing with the really big boys like Holmes, it gets even worse. Assuming Holmes was 10 x 7 - a reasonable estimate based on your studies - that works out to more than *three times* (!) the cubic volume of the average penis. Simply amazing size - when confronted with a dick that is more than three times the volume of their own, many men will feel so overwhelmed with inferiority that are ready to believe almost any ridiculous claim, such as 14".
Thanks so much for your study. There is an old interview with Holmes where he states that fully erect he is 10" (this was before his days of living on cocaine, so this was his best ever size). Therefore we can conclude that he was not, and never was, even a single millimeter over 10" - because NO ONE understates their own size. Ever.
He was still insanely huge, of course, at "only" 10".
One last thing. What were the results on __________ and Lexxington Steele? Those links were added on the thread at Thunder's. They are not here.
I wouldn't doubt that Lex is a good 10" ; his own claim of 11 x 7 looks slightly (but not very) suspect.
It's almost impossible to really add anything else to such a comprehensive study, but I do want to say this:
I think that one additional reason (besides the ones you mentioned) why we are so quick to believe such fraudulent claims is because we are taken by the sheer VOLUME of such penises.
For example, an 8 x 6, in terms of cubic volume, is literally almost twice the penile mass of a 6 x 5. About 22 cubic inches versus 11.8 cubic inches.
Literally, almost twice the dick.
So when we see an 8 x 6 - assuming "we" are average - we think - "Holy shit! That thing is almost twice the size of mine!" - because, in a way, it IS.
Therefore, it becomes easier to believe claims of, say, 10" for what is really an 8 incher. Most men think in terms of length, not in terms of volume - so if it looks almost twice the size of the average (which it is, at 8 x 6) then it must be almost twice the length of the average (which it is NOT). Therefore 10", though a lie, becomes very easy to believe.
When dealing with the really big boys like Holmes, it gets even worse. Assuming Holmes was 10 x 7 - a reasonable estimate based on your studies - that works out to more than *three times* (!) the cubic volume of the average penis. Simply amazing size - when confronted with a dick that is more than three times the volume of their own, many men will feel so overwhelmed with inferiority that are ready to believe almost any ridiculous claim, such as 14".
Thanks so much for your study. There is an old interview with Holmes where he states that fully erect he is 10" (this was before his days of living on cocaine, so this was his best ever size). Therefore we can conclude that he was not, and never was, even a single millimeter over 10" - because NO ONE understates their own size. Ever.
He was still insanely huge, of course, at "only" 10".
One last thing. What were the results on __________ and Lexxington Steele? Those links were added on the thread at Thunder's. They are not here.
I wouldn't doubt that Lex is a good 10" ; his own claim of 11 x 7 looks slightly (but not very) suspect.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 20,066
exellent this.
Really good work DLD man.
Really good work DLD man.
I'm really impressed by this thread. It answered a LOT of lingering questions I had in my head. One of the points you brought up was the black on white ���� and how black penises seem to look larger in them. I was thinking the exact same thing the other day! Anyway, this has been a real self confidence booster, thanks for all the great info!
J
Jen
Guest
i used to have a name there. i can't remember my id or secret word. didn't they have this paper before?
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 124,700
Female Average Body Measurements
Measurement (inches)
Specifically, a female 18 year old, 59 inches high with a 115lb weight
Sitting knee height 17.9
Buttock.heel length sitting 34.0
Hip breadth sitting 12.3
Head breadth 5.4
Max. head height 7.5
Chin.pupil height 3.8
Hand length 6.4
Hand breadth @ metacarpal 2.7
Foot length 8.7
Ball of foot width 3.2
Head circumference 20.4
Neck circumference 11.3
Chest circumference (not bust) 30.4
Waist circumference 24.1
Hip circumference 32.1
Sitting eye height 27.4
Measurement (inches)
Specifically, a female 18 year old, 59 inches high with a 115lb weight
Sitting knee height 17.9
Buttock.heel length sitting 34.0
Hip breadth sitting 12.3
Head breadth 5.4
Max. head height 7.5
Chin.pupil height 3.8
Hand length 6.4
Hand breadth @ metacarpal 2.7
Foot length 8.7
Ball of foot width 3.2
Head circumference 20.4
Neck circumference 11.3
Chest circumference (not bust) 30.4
Waist circumference 24.1
Hip circumference 32.1
Sitting eye height 27.4
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2003
- Messages
- 668
threads like this are why i believe in DLD and only believed in Penis Enlargement after visiting this sight. why would the operator of a penis enhancement website go to so much trouble to debunk myths about penis size and make men feel more secure?
i'm constantly amazed at how genuine you are DLD, you're a rare bird man, you deserve unlimited success even if you aren't doing yourself that many favors by making men feel better about themselves.
i'm constantly amazed at how genuine you are DLD, you're a rare bird man, you deserve unlimited success even if you aren't doing yourself that many favors by making men feel better about themselves.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 20,066
great stats their dld.....these will help me do some stuff now I wanted ta do.
Can ya get some more stats for more ages? maybe also race - latina average, black average, asian average etc etc.
Can ya get some more stats for more ages? maybe also race - latina average, black average, asian average etc etc.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 20,066
hey dld I got a job for ya.....get __________ up on here, size him up we want his stats god-damn it :blahblah:
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 124,700
__________ is so hard to find a picture of that is not straight on. In the latest video shot with Judy Star __________ with Judy he measures at 11+" non bone pressed if the girls hand breadth is 3". The difficulty with those shots is the type of angle and lens being used. Notice how huge his base is in comparison to a little further up his shaft. This happens when a picture is taken with a camera angle close to the starting point of a tubular object. i.e. (take a tubular object like a paper towel roll. Close one eye and and place the base of the paper towel roll very close to your open eye going straight out. Notice how thick the base of the roll becomes and how the length seems to go on forever.) This same method is used in the video posted. According to that video he appears to have a base that is close to 9" in girth that narrows to 6.5 at the upper shaft. He appears to be over 11" in length.
Now checking his size in other pictures where some of these effects are not used he does not measure as large. This thread is also __________ where he is shot with a more realistic angle: __________ with a Tiny Asian Girl Here is appears to be 9" long if the girl has a hand breadth of 3". His girth also looks less impressive.
My point here is that it is very hard to tell when you are dealing with a tiny guy like __________ with a massive cock. If they hire an even smaller girl with tiny hands and use the best "BIG DICK" photographer or director he is going to look larger than life. If you take the same guy and pair him with a girl with huge hands and a shit director he may appear smaller than he is. I have seen tons of footage on __________ and I think this guy has about 10" non bone pressed, but than again he has almost no fat pad.
Now checking his size in other pictures where some of these effects are not used he does not measure as large. This thread is also __________ where he is shot with a more realistic angle: __________ with a Tiny Asian Girl Here is appears to be 9" long if the girl has a hand breadth of 3". His girth also looks less impressive.
My point here is that it is very hard to tell when you are dealing with a tiny guy like __________ with a massive cock. If they hire an even smaller girl with tiny hands and use the best "BIG DICK" photographer or director he is going to look larger than life. If you take the same guy and pair him with a girl with huge hands and a shit director he may appear smaller than he is. I have seen tons of footage on __________ and I think this guy has about 10" non bone pressed, but than again he has almost no fat pad.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 20,066
confirms what I thought....around 10-11 inches in length 
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 20,066
I just saw a members pix.
The 1st one looked HUGE.
heres the link http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/attachment.php?s=&postid=28343
His stats are 7X5.5
Now I post that here as a note to peeps that angles play a massive part - alot already know this but FORGET it easy....I mean Lex and Man'' are big but are they as big as we think???? probably not as most of us have gotten other members sizes wrong many times when asked, and ���� stars pump, use alsorts of gizmos on lenses to make it look bigger.
To the guy above whose picture I have linked...its nuthing personnal - not at all - just thought your picture was a GREAT example of angles palying trix.
cyaz
The 1st one looked HUGE.
heres the link http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/attachment.php?s=&postid=28343
His stats are 7X5.5
Now I post that here as a note to peeps that angles play a massive part - alot already know this but FORGET it easy....I mean Lex and Man'' are big but are they as big as we think???? probably not as most of us have gotten other members sizes wrong many times when asked, and ���� stars pump, use alsorts of gizmos on lenses to make it look bigger.
To the guy above whose picture I have linked...its nuthing personnal - not at all - just thought your picture was a GREAT example of angles palying trix.
cyaz
Similar threads
- Sticky
Equipment modification
Modification to Bathmate HydroXtreme 7 with a pressure gauge
- Sticky
- Sticky
