NeXus said:
The Bible says God made the world in 6 days. That is a flat out contradiction to what has been proven about Earth. The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old. According to the Bible, it would be less than 1 billion years old.

Science is about EVIDENCE to PROVE your theory. Religion is about blindly puttin your faith into a organization and excepting whatever bullshit they fill your brain with. Kinda like a cult.

So, Science is about evidence to prove your theory???? That is questionable? You can't find any proof for anything. You can find theories but not evidence. That is all evolution is based on anyway, theory. There is little proof for anything. Too much theory based on theory.

And further.....??? You are wrong, Religion is not about blindly putting your faith into a organization.....! True Christianity is not about blind faith but faith based on fact. The continual rejection of the bible is the unbelieving heart of man. Too many facts in the Bible are provable. We have debated this before, and then when faced with the facts those who reject the bible run and hide. NeXus, you read too much from people who reject the bible and believe them. I don't mean to mention just you, many more keep hammering away on this theme too. Sorry, but you don't have a "leg to stand on" to reject the bible and the truth of the Bible. Have your way with religion, organizations and slander them all you want, they often deserve it, but Christ, the bible and the truth of the Bible you can't touch. You can attempt to hurt them but you can't, Men have tried for years and centuries to destroy Christ, but to no avail. Just thought I would step in and offer some words of encouragement. GS
 
NeXus said:
The Bible says God made the world in 6 days. That is a flat out contradiction to what has been proven about Earth. The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old. According to the Bible, it would be less than 1 billion years old.

Science is about EVIDENCE to PROVE your theory. Religion is about blindly puttin your faith into a organization and excepting whatever bullshit they fill your brain with. Kinda like a cult.

OK, here we go again. Most of this will look familiar because you don't seem to pay attention to what anyone else says.

They have not proven anything. Sorry, but you cannot absolutely prove the age of anything unless you were there when it was "born" or formed or whatever. So, while 14 billion years is the closest estimate they have, they have not proven anything. And for you to keep saying that they have is nonsense, like most of the rest of what you say.

I never said I don't buy that the universe is 14 billion years old. I think that's quite possible, and probably pretty accurate. I said I don't buy that they have PROVEN it. You need to read more closely what I type so you don't misquote me anymore.

Who said that Christianity doesn't want us to ask questions? It isn't in the Bible anywhere. Can you show it to me? No, I think you heard that from some other agnostics or atheists or whatever. It's ok for us to ask questions. It's ok for us to search for truth. It's even ok for us to question God. But you probably won't believe me on this because you have probably been told otherwise by agnostics and the like. Whatever.

As I said earlier, Genesis was not intended to be a science book. So all this crap about your so-called proof contradicting the Bible doesn't fly with me. And besides, I don't care whether the universe is 6000 years old or 6 trillion years old. It makes absolutely no difference to me and has nothing to do with Christianity.

So once AGAIN, before I'm going to take you seriously whatsoever, I want you to show me one good reason not to be a Christian. If you think you can, try me. But I doubt it. Until then, you can keep posting this rubbish that has absolutely nothing to do with Christianity, and I'll keep showing you why it has nothing to do with it, and we'll go 'round and 'round in these pointless circles that you seem so fond of, and get absolutely nowhere.

Don't get me wrong, I love circles.

Any more?
 
It baffles me how people take books that were written thousands of years ago, by a bunch of people who heard stories from other people, and take that as absolute truth.

All Im saying is that the Bible is NOT absolute truth! Adam and Eve never happened, neither did Noah's Ark or Jonah in the Whale. Its just supposed to be a guide.

I believe in "God" or a Creator of everything, but I dont believe that ANY human knows who God is. Because they dont. And if they do, thier lying, plain and simple. They make believe they know, but in reality, they have no idea.

Maybe Islam is the right religion? How would you guys know the difference if you grew up in Suadia Arabia as opposed to San Fransico? You cant choose where you come from or who you ancestors are.

At least with science, it can change with TRUTH. Thats something that religion cannot do.
 
NeXus said:
It baffles me how people take books that were written thousands of years ago, by a bunch of people who heard stories from other people, and take that as absolute truth.

All Im saying is that the Bible is NOT absolute truth! Adam and Eve never happened, neither did Noah's Ark or Jonah in the Whale. Its just supposed to be a guide.

I believe in "God" or a Creator of everything, but I dont believe that ANY human knows who God is. Because they dont. And if they do, thier lying, plain and simple. They make believe they know, but in reality, they have no idea.

Maybe Islam is the right religion? How would you guys know the difference if you grew up in Suadia Arabia as opposed to San Fransico? You cant choose where you come from or who you ancestors are.

At least with science, it can change with TRUTH. Thats something that religion cannot do.

You really don't make any sense, and you make a terrible argument. Can you back this stuff up? No, you cannot. You just say it because it fits your beliefs but you have ABSOLUTELY NO SUPPORT for what you are saying. Why is the Bible not absolute truth? How can you say Adam and Eve, Noah's Ark, or Jonah and the big fish (it never said whale) never happened? What evidence do you have to back this nonsense up? Nothing at all!

What do you have to back up your claims that we can't know God? What philosophising can you do to support yourself? How do you know you are right? Just because you are?

Nah, I don't think Islam is right. But that's a WHOLE other thread. Aren't there Muslims in San Fransisco?

In every country in the world that is predominantly Islamic, there is no freedom of religion. You can check on that one, I guarantee you. Christians are not forced into their beliefs like that. Of course, that doesn't have much to do with which religion is right...just a thought.

I really am interested in why you believe what you believe. I'd really like to hear about it. Because I can talk Christian apologetics all day, but I have yet to see you back up any of your beliefs whatsoever. And I don't mean I want to read this again: "Nobody can know God. They just can't, and that's all there is to it." I want to know why I can't know God. Convince me. Give me some agnostic material to read. Quote a great agnostic philosopher. Because I can do that as much as I want, and back up my beliefs as much as I need to. But I have yet to see you do the same.
 
Gods laws in the bible, not too hard to follow or comprehend. Why is it so hard to follow?
Did you all think to why there isn't an enemy called ANTIBUDDA or Antimuslim
but there is the ANTICHRIST? Why do you suppose Jesus Christ is hate MOST OF all? If he is so fake, why even bother. The easter bunny is not real, but we dont see you faltering trying to prove us that he isn't real. Why even care if you believe he isn't there, or even think about it?
Why do people say for CHRISTS SAKES, or JESUS!! and not For Buddha sakes? Cause Christ is the most real, he has made the most grand impact on the world. You cannot deny him to your death without hurting yourself.
 
BusterSword said:
Gods laws in the bible, not too hard to follow or comprehend. Why is it so hard to follow?
Did you all think to why there isn't an enemy called ANTIBUDDA or Antimuslim
but there is the ANTICHRIST? Why do you suppose Jesus Christ is hate MOST OF all? If he is so fake, why even bother. The easter bunny is not real, but we dont see you faltering trying to prove us that he isn't real. Why even care if you believe he isn't there, or even think about it?
Why do people say for CHRISTS SAKES, or JESUS!! and not For Buddha sakes? Cause Christ is the most real, he has made the most grand impact on the world. You cannot deny him to your death without hurting yourself.


LOL I tried that for a while to see peoples reaction when I was a teen. I got tired of people taking Christ's name of God's name in vain. and this thought crossed my mind if they can slander my God or someone who is BIG in my life I should be able to return the jesture. So I'd randomly start with "oh budda" or "mahomid" or whatever. heck the best responces came when you'd stop them and ask who was thier best friend or was the most important person in thier life and substitue thier profanity of God and Jesus with thier special person. at first you get the wierdo look then it gets ugly quick...goes over like a lead baloon.
 
NeXus said:
The Bible says God made the world in 6 days. That is a flat out contradiction of what has been proven, that the Earth was made over billions of years. And is about 14 billion years old.


bottom line is prove it. 14 billion years old? that's nothing more than a theory. cabon dating has been shown not to accurate as well as some other methods of dating once thought to be accurate measurements of dating. Going with the info you posted I would assume you believe in evolution as well. If you anyone is crazy enough to believe that I'd like to see proof. heck in over 200 years nobody has seen any evidence of it?
 
NeXus said:

I'm in the process of reading this. What I've read so far is rubbish. Don't worry, I'll tell you why after I get done with it in a few days. He seems to be another person who doesn't have any concept of what real Christianity is about. His idea of Christianity is some little boy's watered down crap. That isn't what I'm talking about. He also takes most of the verses he quotes WAY out of context (to fit his beliefs, of course. I'm seeing a pattern).

He talks a lot about rituals. I don't care about rituals, and the rituals really are not essential to the faith. But I'll touch on all of that in a few days when I have some time to write you a book.
 
I don't claim to know everything but I took a year outta my life to do nothing more than study the bible...and nothing but. So 9cyclops9 write on bro. I'll read till I'm blue in the face and my eyes can't take anymore.
 
loco said:
bottom line is prove it. 14 billion years old? that's nothing more than a theory. cabon dating has been shown not to accurate as well as some other methods of dating once thought to be accurate measurements of dating. Going with the info you posted I would assume you believe in evolution as well. If you anyone is crazy enough to believe that I'd like to see proof. heck in over 200 years nobody has seen any evidence of it?

Its funny how Cyclops calls the site "rubbish" but his man-made bible is "absolute truth". I didnt know Cyclops was a religious scholar AND a scientist.

They measure the universe by taking space photographs of light and measure the light and how long it has been traveling. They're are light rays that have been traveling since the beginning of the universe.

14 billion, 140 billion, 1 billion, the point is the Bible bases its age on NOTHING but speculation and religious beliefs. This is a scientific process and is the most accurate estimation we have today. Its been PROVEN to an accuracy of 99.99%.

Come on, dont tell me you all dont believe in Evolution? We came from monkeys, just like alligators and lizards came from dinosaurs.
 
Christianity and Pe can they coexist? I say so. God gave us a body, a clay piece. Its our duty to improve upon it and make it better. Heck, why not?
 
NeXus said:
Its funny how Cyclops calls the site "rubbish" but his man-made bible is "absolute truth". I didnt know Cyclops was a religious scholar AND a scientist.

They measure the universe by taking space photographs of light and measure the light and how long it has been traveling. They're are light rays that have been traveling since the beginning of the universe.

14 billion, 140 billion, 1 billion, the point is the Bible bases its age on NOTHING but speculation and religious beliefs. This is a scientific process and is the most accurate estimation we have today. Its been PROVEN to an accuracy of 99.99%.

Come on, dont tell me you all dont believe in Evolution? We came from monkeys, just like alligators and lizards came from dinosaurs.

Man-made? Yes. God-inspired? Yes. Absolute truth? Yes.

And don't even think about telling me there is no absolute truth.

I don't claim to be a religious scholar OR a scientist, but I know enough about science and enough about the Bible (which neither you nor the author of that pamphlet know very much about, apparently) to know that there is no contradiction between science and the Bible. Let me make this statement once again:

THE BOOK OF GENESIS IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A SCIENCE BOOK.

It says nothing about the age of the universe. Only about the history of man. Sure, it says God created the universe. But it does not say how long passed between "day" one and "day" two. So it is ENTIRELY plausible that billions of years could have passed before God saw fit to create the earth.

Evolution? I believe in evolution. From monkey to man? No. From monkey to new type of monkey? Yes. This happens all the time. It would be utterly stupid to say that evolution is completely bogus.

HOWEVER, there is absolutely NO proof, or even evidence, that we came from monkeys, and that monkeys came from some goop. NONE WHATSOEVER!!! You want to talk about something based on speculation? The theory that we came from goo is completely based on a guess! What evidence have we that this is even possible? Nothing!

The chance for life to have appeared out of non-living matter (what you call evolution) is one in 10 to the 60th power. Here's what that looks like:

.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001%

(sorry about the space...not sure why it does that)

This is about the same chance you have of aiming at a one inch target 20,000,000,000 light years away (that's about 117,572,802,186,120,000,000,000 miles away) and hitting the target. Makes the probability of creation seem more likely, yes?

I'll give you this link again. You probably won't watch the video, but if you don't, then I'm not going to listen to any more of your arguments for evolution. You have to look at both sides.

Although I don't necessarily agree with everything he says (he's very conservative) he does a good job showing exactly why this theory is so ridiculous. Check it out. Video number 1.

http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=seminarset_online

Enjoy.
 
also if you are looking for a good creation backed site check out answersingenesis.org . Many good scientist once supporting evolution and through heavy research had found it made more sense to believe in creation over evolution.

and cyclops bro I'll stand up for this one. Going back to the languages in which the bible was orginally written in and doing some literal translation would support that that it was 6 literal days for creation. and why not in order? God being the creator of all doesn't need to wait for his creation to "evolve" to be able to continue His work. If by His very words things can come into being why would anyone limit Him to having to wait spans between His creation? The only thing from scripture someone could take and try and apply to this is "a day is to 1,000 years, and a 1,000 years is to a day" which would be taken outta context.

Evolution is silly at best. God's creation was designed to pro-create within the species. If you believe in evolution there would really be no seperation of species as it would have you believe. But rather we all came from cosmic dust which over time evolved. If that was so when was the last time anyone one you know has desires to mate with fish, monkey's, elephants, or whatever? unless someone is really messed up the answer would honestly be no one. Because it's not the way God intended it.
 
I didn't mean to imply that God waited for the creation to evolve. And I do believe that each day of creation was literally one day as we know it. But I don't see where it says they were six consecutive days. But I'll look into that.

The thing is, I don't care how old the universe is. If God made it 6000 years ago, that's His business. And if He made it 14 billion years ago that's also His business. It makes no difference to me. I believe either is possible. The scientists that say it is 14 billion years old could very likely be wrong (they have been wrong about atoms many times, and those are much easier to observe than the whole universe). And the people that believe it is 6000 years old could also be wrong.

The thing is, it makes no difference to my faith. My belief in Christ is not based upon anyone's belief of how old the universe is.

It's really great to see how many Christians we have here. You guys rock!
 
also bro just so you know from a fundamentalist christian view and from my study of the bible we would say the earth is roughly 10,000 yrs old give or take a little. (talking a few thousand years) If you are looking for some great reading material on the subject, the guy from the web site I posted on above-Dr. Ken Ham, has some awesome info and books on the subject. I've had privledge to meet him in person at a couple conferences, bible college, and to read his books. He has a strong Aussie accent but is a wealth of knowledge. and usually starts off with his history on how he became a creationist from an evolutionist background.
 
loco said:
also bro just so you know from a fundamentalist christian view and from my study of the bible we would say the earth is roughly 10,000 yrs old give or take a little. (talking a few thousand years) If you are looking for some great reading material on the subject, the guy from the web site I posted on above-Dr. Ken Ham, has some awesome info and books on the subject. I've had privledge to meet him in person at a couple conferences, bible college, and to read his books. He has a strong Aussie accent but is a wealth of knowledge. and usually starts off with his history on how he became a creationist from an evolutionist background.

Loco, Ham is an awesome speaker. I have seen a number of his tapes/videos and he really knows his subject. GS
 
NeXus...I have gone to that site you reccomended and will honestly say it is nothing that convinces me. If you read only that stuff, you will never be knowledgeable in the truth. The premise and statements made are easy to refute. If you honestly want something refuted, tell me which statement and I will give you an honest answer. To try and refute the whole would be an effort in futility. But, NeXus, if you want answers they are readily available. Some of us still stand...the Bible is truth and can defend itself. Try all you want to destroy it or prove it false, as some on the website try to do, and still you find it stands the fire you throw at it. Men have been trying to do it for centuries, but they all have lost. Your premise that it is man written is where you are in error. It is God breathed and thus it is a God Book. There are over 40 different authors, over a period of 1500 years and yet they all agree. GS
 
I agree, GS. If you take an honest look at both sides of the argument, it is easy to see that the author was an idiot.

Thinking man...yeah right. Some of the stuff he said was just downright ridiculous. And to state that believers are not "thinking men" is utterly stupid. It isn't a question of intelligence. Some of the greatest thinkers of all time have been Christians, and some have been atheists, and some have been agnostics and all other sorts of things. It has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence or one's ability to reason.
 
Omul_Paianjen said:
You said that Onan didn`t sin because he spilled the seed outside, but it was because he was meant to make a woman pregnant. Well, that`s where semen is supposed to go. You shouldn`t spill it outside. Masturbation IS a sin, whatever you`ll say. I don`t mean that I don`t masturbate, but it is a sin.

Penis Enlargement must be also a sin.... Body-building too.... A lot of things must be sins....
Now Penis Enlargement and body-building must be sins because I bet you spend more time and dedication with those that with God through prayer.. And also you should remain the way God left you, because it doesn`t matter your physical appearance, but your soul that isn`t anymore a priority.
I tell you it`s a sin.
But on the other hand you`ll say that if God didn`t want us to Penis Enlargement than He wouldn`t have revealed it to us... But maybe it wasn`t Him that had revealed it to us, if you know what I mean.... Or maybe it was just invented by a man and that`s that.

You probably wonder why the hell do I Penis Enlargement if I know that it`s a sin and I`m still doing it. It sound really stupid... Guess my faith isn`t that strong or maybe I believe that I won`t fulfill myself only by religion... I also have a physical part which I must satisfy.... I looking for a balance I think. Don`t know if it exists....



Now Nexus, marriage used to be sacred when people believed in God. IF there aren`t people that believe in the holyness binding them togheter through marriage, than who will for them?
If people believed in God they wouldn`t cheat, they wouldn`t steal, they wouldn`t KILL... The world would be perfect... A Holy world......
Now there are more and more non-believers that attract more non-believers to their side...... We`re turning Earth to Hell.....


No my brother--No---It is not a SIN---NOT---

And this world--we are living in a world where there is a war going on between the light and the dark--the holy and the non-holy---the evil and the good---------It is up to us to choose which side we arre going to be on!!!
 
Do you guys think the Bible should be taken literally? Because the one way to doubt the Bible, is the fucked up passages in the Bible.

If taken literally, the Bible promotes sexism, inequality, intolerence, and even murder.

So is this literal word of God?
 
nexus bud post passages that are in context that support the "sexism, inequality, intolerence, and even murder." in no case is it just because as all sins have a punisHydromaxent, so some of these may be under certain conditions.
 
Back at it again Nexus? I thought we were done with this crap.

You are very mistaken. End of story. Unless you can show me any verse that says any of that is ok.

But I will still show you how you are mistaken. Again.
 
"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church" (1 Corinthians 14:34-35, KJV).

"Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence" (1 Timothy 2:11-12, KJV).
 
Hmm I believe those are the things in the bible that were taught before Christ came., not to say the old testament is useless, but the old ways man..
There are things that are not of today's ways, like pork, you can eat it today. Why? cause we no longer 99% of pigs filled with ridiculous diseases. The laws then and now, yeah I can say thats in the bible, but i need more on it
 
buster bro these are things of new testament and I do believe they are relavent to today but also to a point were of custom of that day. but without a doubt I believe as scripture shows it is not fit for a woman to teach a man. and if you look at the term "man" back in those days it'd be more a teenage boy on up. because in the culture of the that day it was fitting for a young man to marry at what we'd call an early age today. Scripture clearly shows it's the man the was given authority in the home and in forms of leadership like heading up the church organizations, etc. look at 2 timothy for pre-reqs for a pastor...husband of 1 wife. anyone know of a woman who be a husband (man)? or pre-reqs for a decon, etc...all positions of leadership given to men by scripture. and teh scripture that talks about women talking to thier husbands about questions they may have etc...is more of a manors thing, so there wouldn't be chaos in the house of GOD. God created Adam first then Eve and so the wife should be suBathmateissive to her husband. but not in the since of a master/slave relationship, but in a loving way. Such as the way Christ loves his bride the "church".

and as far as the mention of pigs in the new testament there is a passage where that was discussed. Romans 14:14 says " I know and am persauded by the Lord Jesus, that there is nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him it is unclean" verse 15 continues.
 
buz et al,

so glad to see this discussion. i've struggled with the whole compatibility of p.e. with biblical Christianity, too; great to know i've got a number of brothers in Jesus here on [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MoS[/words]. i'll give my quick position on a few of the recurring issues in this post:

1) buz is right that scripture never speaks directly to masturbation. while "arguments from silence" are not hard evidence for a position, considering the amazing spectrum of sexual practices discussed and condemned in scripture, i find it VERY hard to believe that God would have failed to include this essentially universal sexual practice from His prohibitions if it was altogether wrong and offensive to Him. while masturbation certainly CAN become an addiction, i strongly believe the practice, in moderation, can help the single man who desires to please God from engaging in the many illicit alternatives that tempt him as he waits. God's design, without question, is that sex should be shared between a married man and woman, but for those who seek this end and do not yet enjoy matrimony, i think it benefit their efforts to maintain chastity.

2) Onan's sin was selfishness (and masturbation often, though not always, is a purely selfish act)--i.e., not providing his brother's wife with an heir. God hated Onan's disregard for the old-covenant provision He established to protect the cause of widows. the means Onan used to deny the widow an heir was coitus interruptus; solo sex isn't mentioned anywhere in that passage or the rest of scripture.

3) on pornography: it's impossible for me to get around what Jesus states in His sermon on the mount: "whoever looks at a woman to lust after her has already committed adultery with her in his heart." gawking at a girl's tit's to get yourself off is adultery in the mind's eye--and sin in the eye's of God. however, i know from my own scrupulous and absolute keeping of Job's "covenant with [his] eyes" that complete ignorance of a woman's sensual beauty can open the door to perversions (fetishes or homosexual fantasies, etc.) in the mind of a young man whose raging hormones chemically determine a persistent horniness that's beyond his control. when, in my twenties, my parents and a Christian counselor became aware of my significantly-more-troubling-than-lustful thoughts and my virtually unheard of complete ignorance of the feminine shape and charms and way with a man, they had me view explicit material of a sexual nature to create a catalog of mental images that could replace the only sexual images of function (my own) and anatomy (mine and other guys) in my head when the sexual urges became too strong and trying to push out sexual thoughts did not suffice. As shocking and un-Christian as this seems, replacement enabled me to get rid of perverted thoughts i could not be rid of simply by trying not to think about them. the women in the material i saw (which, as with the women in virtually all instructional, erotic, and actually pornographic material) where not "real" women. while lust is lust, Jesus specifically uses "adultery," not "fornication" or "uncleanness" when talking about the wandering eye and the eye of the mind. i'm not saying that adult entertainment (or its softer cousins) is okay, but i am saying that a major component of the Law is the impact of transgressions on others in the community (it's all summed up in love your neighbor...). it seems that the lust Jesus specifically mentions is the lusting after another man's wife (coveting). you can't commit adultery with an unmarried woman, even if you bed her; it's fornication then--still a sin, but not adultery. i tend to think there's a lesser degree of evil (though not anything like innocence) in lusting after a swimsuit issue model than after your neighbor's wife. feel free to disagree with that, though. in a case like mine, i picked the lesser of the two evils and actually--crazy as it sounds--experienced sanctification of my thought life through heterosexually arousing imagery.

4) the big issue for me now is, "godliness with contentment is great gain..." the argument that your virgin wife who, like you (and me), has never been with another person, will not be satisfied with an average size cock and might be tempted to commit adultery seems a bit of a stretch. all of us in [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MoS[/words] and similar forums want a dick that's bigger than the one God gave us and one that is bigger than other guys. yeah, you (and i) may be on the smaller half of normal, but it's not like any of us in this forum are one-inch wonders. my fear is that this really is about the male ego--my pride--because i'm embarrassed in the locker room when others see my flaccid penis in the showers. unlike fat (which i, like you, buz) need to work off for body stewardship reasons, P.E. is all about aesthetics--the outward appearance, machismo, "confidence in the flesh."

5) final thought: i've just made an investment in the Max-Vac II. i can't wait to start hanging. i want a bigger penis and will feel more confident with it. i still am not sure i can reconcile this with my faith. i should be content with what God gave me, not worry about what others think, focus on the inner man, not the outward appearance, strive for modesty, humility, etc. that investment could be used to help others, not just my ego. all the P.E.; exercises are going to take time i could invest for the benefit of others in a different pursuit. i really enjoy posting and love a community here and at mynewsize (RoosterChalleng) where i can be open about this stuff and be encouraged by other guys like me. however, at mynewsize, virtually everyone's avatars and/or signatures have girls stripping or sucking or fucking, multiple partners, cumshots either erupting from some guy's dick or landing on naked chicks. it's not uplifting/edifying. it seems like others--maybe we should see it revealing the same about us--are obsessed with sex. i'm hoping i can limit p.e. time and thoughts and discreetly gain the 1.5"-2" in length and .5"-1" in girth i want. i'm hoping it can be a hobby (like working out) and a non-obsessive aspect of improving my appearance (like shaving). if it gets out of hand, i'm gonna have to stop.

i'd love to know the thoughts of the other bible-believing Christians out there.

your 27-year-old virgin bro in Christ
 
yeh, saw the dates. thought there might be other more recent members to the forum, like myself, who had these concerns, though. obviously you read it, maxameyes, and maybe others who'd be interested in it will, too.
 
I am a Christian, I've been Penis Enlargement-ing for 3 yrs.

I'm sorry that my brother who initially started this thread is no longer here.

I've always felt my wife was stronger than me sexually.
One day I felt I just needed to be bigger so I prayed to God that He would make me bigger.
Shortly after that prayer I found a site that taught exercises. I've never even thought those things exist.
Well I did it. I'm glad I did too and I thank God for that too
I've grown and even grown stronger in the exercises lasting longer in bed.
I've never had to watch adult entertainment to perform my exercises.

In answer to Supra I don't use adult entertainment and I don't think it's a good idea.
Do I like adult entertainment? Do I respond to adult entertainment? Yes.
Do I want to watch it? Yes.
Do I think I'm going to hell if I watch it? No. But I know God isn't pleased if I do and His Spirit convicts me that He is saddened by my choice to disobey.

God isn't against sex He created it. He is against its use that contradicts His guidelines that He gave to us in its use.
He doesn't want to limit us, His guidelines are for our protection because He knows what would happen if we didn't have safeguards in a world that has been corrupted due to man's disobedience a long time ago.

The apologetic stuff is fun to read and I'm glad for people on this forum like German Stallion who are ready to answer the call when objections arise.

Good job brothers and keep up the good work!

anth
 
anth1225, AWESOME post. so glad there are brothers out there...still (even if buz and his friends have left). i totally agree about the adult entertainment stuff--lust is wrong. as i mentioned, i went until i was 22 without ever having checked out a girl--seriously. i had no clue what a nice shape looks like--even clothed--because it was so ingrained in my mind that lust = adultery = displeasing the God i love. i also mentioned that when sexual fantasy popped into my consciousness/crept (uninvited) into my thought-life that it was homo-erotic, because the male anatomy/sexual response was the only thing i knew. i looked at a swimsuit issue a playboy and some very mild instructional sex videos for married couples strictly so i'd have images i could replace the perverted ones with. generally (and now that it's served its limited usefulness for me) that stuff is no good. i know several guys whose minds were really messed up by that stuff and for whom the internet beauties/babes/whores became an addiction. i shredded up my swimsuit issue and the playboy long ago. i still own the dvds, but i rarely view them. this sounds weird, but they're nothing like the gawking/lusting/idolizing thing that the magazines were. most of the time i'm really good about avoiding sexual temptation, but sometimes--especially with the pics (avatars and signatures) on the other forum i'm in (MyNewSize) and the links to free adult entertainment on both P.E. sites--i give in. i actually broke down and bought the new swimsuit issue the other day. i've looked at it once. after my quiet time today, i realized i need to get rid of it. pray for me, bro, that God will bring me a godly wife--like He did for you. being a 27-year-old virgin is really tough.
 
Last edited:
I agree with you guys that adult entertainment is not what God has in mind for us. You need to take that sexual energy and focus it on the one you love.
 
goinfor11x7;299403 said:
I agree with you guys that adult entertainment is not what God has in mind for us. You need to take that sexual energy and focus it on the one you love.

Amen bro

To everyone, my opinion in short, I believe that if you can avoid a grey area solely for God, he will reward you greatly! and if youre gunna smack your monkey leave the bad images and lust out of it, but i do believe its good to jack off sometimes.
 
I don't mean to undermine anyone's beliefs, but all I can say is its so much freer to be agnostic and Penis Enlargementing than christian. I don't think anyone should feel ashamed of their sexuality unless its extreme. Repression doesn't lead to progression.
 
I'm an Atheist and I don't think p.e is for christians but these days there so many pseudo-christains out there that flat out ignore what the bible says to carry out their own desires.


One of you " Christains" on here ,go to your pastor and tell him what you're doing and see what he says. rofl
 
longstretch;302026 said:
I don't mean to undermine anyone's beliefs, but all I can say is its so much freer to be agnostic and Penis Enlargementing than christian. I don't think anyone should feel ashamed of their sexuality unless its extreme. Repression doesn't lead to progression.

I don't feel undermined at all thank you.

I think the fact that there are Christians here shows that we are certainly not repressed sexually.
I'm married and my Penis Enlargement experience has enhanced that aspect of my marriage greatly.

But there are limits to our freedom and as a Christian I understand that I've been bought by the precious sacrifice of my Lord who has chosen to take my perpetual unrighteousness and present me as righteous to the Father whom I believe all humanity and creation is accountable to.

I don't deserve it, in fact I deserve the opposite but there you go, and I'm not going to argue with Him about it.
I just receive His free gift gratefully full of joy!

I don't think that's being repressed at all if He asks me to obey the rules He's set for His creation.

As for Bazooka Joe I think it figures that if a Christian wants to ask the question if taking care of his God given sexuality sans promiscuity is ok for him to do so then someone has to attack either Christianity or Christians.

It would seem to me that if the atheists truly believed what they said, then they wouldn't worry what Christians believe or feel the need to attack them with their pseudo logic.

Short and simple atheism is a logical contradiction; a double negative and is self refuting.

It's the little dog making a lot of noise with its bark while biting at the boot with it's little teeth unable to penetrate.
It would be cute if it wasn't so annoying and loud.
 
anth1225;302067 said:
I don't feel undermined at all thank you.






It would seem to me that if the atheists truly believed what they said, then they wouldn't worry what Christians believe or feel the need to attack them with their pseudo logic.

Short and simple atheism is a logical contradiction; a double negative and is self refuting.

.


Oh really? You call that an attack? HA! Don't be so sensitive.

You don't make any sense,how is an Atheist's logic,pseudo? Please do your best to explaine that to me.

Also explaine to me how Atheism is self-refuting.

I'll go grab my pop corn. :)
 
btw, If you have to use a biblical verse to prove that Atheist's logic self-refutes then you don't have a logical bases to prove anything.

It's true I don't believe In Jesus,allah,krishna ect. I've read the bible,koran,gitas . Nothing but myths and fairy tales to me . I can base my belief that those gods aren't real off my studies in those books and with the help of science. Science is getting more advanced and in my prediction in a few more hundred years there wont be any christanity




when you point the finger at an Atheist for having a self-refute logic, at the same time the Christain is saying that his belief and knowledge and logic he gets from the bible is abosloute . Perhaps it's you with illogical logic and high hopes.
 
BazookaJoe;302074 said:
Oh really? You call that an attack? HA! Don't be so sensitive.

You don't make any sense,how is an Atheist's logic,pseudo? Please do your best to explaine that to me.

Also explaine to me how Atheism is self-refuting.

I'll go grab my pop corn. :)

Ha you're funny. You attack and say you're not attacking.
I don't blame you though seeing how you follow a contradictory belief I wouldn't expect you to be able to think logically regarding other things in life.

Put some butter on that popcorn and save me some.

Why atheism is self refuting:

1. Atheism states that God does not exist.
(Please don't play games and say that you are merely stating that it can't be known if God exists. That is agnosticism. Atheism makes a truth claim right off the bat:God does not exist)

2. To know that God does not exist the atheist must:

(a) Know everything there is to know 100% of the time about everything in the universe

(b) Know everything at every place in the universe at the same time.

3. In other words the atheist must be both Omnipresent and Omniscient; both of which are attributes of God.

The atheist would have to be God to state that God does not exist.
Therefore the argument is self refuting; illogical and does not deserve rational consideration.


Perhaps it is you who hijacked this thread to attack my faith who is being sensitive and I might add argumentative.
Don't punch someone in the eye and cry about it when they punch you back.

anth
 
anth1225;302090 said:
Ha you're funny. You attack and say you're not attacking.

2. To know that God does not exist the atheist must:

(a) Know everything there is to know 100% of the time about everything in the universe

(b) Know everything at every place in the universe at the same time.

3. In other words the atheist must be both Omnipresent and Omniscient; both of which are attributes of God.


Yeah you've been reading a christain aplogetic website to gather that information. Don't you have thoughts of your own sheep?
I know you copy and pasted that. That's all you can do rofl
You like the pseudo-intellectual who wrote that article is Incorrect.
Why didn't you post the rest of that article when it starts using BIBLICAL scipture to back up that argument 1tim or 2tim I believe the sheep was using to prove his point.

To sum it up for you with out the help of some biblical scripture your lil atheist belief that Atheism self-refutes itself argument doesn't work.

Yeah Like I'm going to believe what a christain says about Atheist when he's using the same book that talks about zombies and talking donkeys.

You don't know anything about Atheism.... you proved it this morning.




NEXT!
 
typos it should read like this.....

your misguided argument that Atheism self-refutes itself doesn't work.


Yeah Like I'm going to believe what a christain says about Atheist when he's using the same book that talks about zombies and talking donkeys to prove my belief is incorrect.


Also, I didn't attack you I spoke my opinion. You got offended. you should have just turned the other cheek but I wouldn't say you were Christain enough or at all to do that sort of thing.
 
BazookaJoe;302074 said:
Oh really? You call that an attack? HA! Don't be so sensitive.

You don't make any sense,how is an Atheist's logic,pseudo? Please do your best to explaine that to me.

Also explaine to me how Atheism is self-refuting.

I'll go grab my pop corn. :)

I think a lot of people, sadly a lot of christians, feel that any views that don't match theirs is an attack. Thier belief is that they have the only real religion. I'm not knocking it, I was a very devout christian for 18 years of my life and I wouldn't be the same person without the morals and discipline that it instilled in me. But I've always been a little more open minded than youth pastors would like.
 
BazookaJoe;30207 said:
Science is getting more advanced and in my prediction in a few more hundred years there wont be any christanity

QUOTE]

The bible does speak of a time where there will be no more believers shortly before the "end".

I think as a community with the same goals we should be open minded and open to each others opinions and not continue with a bitter dispute as religious beliefs are sacred. I mean if you believe you shouldn't watch adult entertainment because its lustful thinking and will hinder your walk with your god then don't and I think we should be mature enough to respect that. I don't think Penis Enlargement in itself is bad for the christian, its just like bodybuilding for the cock. Most christians would have a problem using adult entertainment and thats okay. If your married tape or have pics of your wife. Its a good thing to be lustful with your wife.

I know christians believe they have to try and proselytize everyone but in reality another soul in hell doesn't mean that much and if there is no hell or heaven it doesn't matter all the more. A christain will never change a staunch athiests views no matter how many evangellical stories you've heard and an athiest would likewise have a very difficult time changing a christians views. When you see the world as one way you start seeing things to prove those beliefs and over time theres really no going from one extreme to the other.

So to answer the ultimate question of this thread. YES. Christianity and Penis Enlargement can coexist but you have to be open minded enough to know that stretching and jelqing your penis is not a sin to the almighty.
 
longstretch;302094 said:
I think a lot of people, sadly a lot of christians, feel that any views that don't match theirs is an attack. Thier belief is that they have the only real religion. I'm not knocking it, I was a very devout christian for 18 years of my life and I wouldn't be the same person without the morals and discipline that it instilled in me. But I've always been a little more open minded than youth pastors would like.

I definitely agree with you on a lot of that.

I use to be Christain,and my pastors where very stubborn and narrow minded.
That's not the reason why I'm an Atheist today( that's a different story). i always thought that my pastors were so hard and strict on people because thats what bible says how to be.

The bible does have good morals in it but then on the same token the bible teches some bad morals as well. The thing about the good morals that if they're not followed then there is some sort of death sentence or fire and brimstone waiting for a person. People aren't allowed to think outside the box because of fear.

Scare tactics shouldn't be used to teach people morals. imo

It was nice talking to you bro.

I'm going to do a warm up and do some p.e rofl

take care.
 
longstretch;302095 said:
BazookaJoe;30207 said:
Science is getting more advanced and in my prediction in a few more hundred years there wont be any christanity

QUOTE]

The bible does speak of a time where there will be no more believers shortly before the "end".

I think as a community with the same goals we should be open minded and open to each others opinions and not continue with a bitter dispute as religious beliefs are sacred. I mean if you believe you shouldn't watch adult entertainment because its lustful thinking and will hinder your walk with your god then don't and I think we should be mature enough to respect that. I don't think Penis Enlargement in itself is bad for the christian, its just like bodybuilding for the cock. Most christians would have a problem using adult entertainment and thats okay. If your married tape or have pics of your wife. Its a good thing to be lustful with your wife.

I know christians believe they have to try and proselytize everyone but in reality another soul in hell doesn't mean that much and if there is no hell or heaven it doesn't matter all the more. A christain will never change a staunch athiests views no matter how many evangellical stories you've heard and an athiest would likewise have a very difficult time changing a christians views. When you see the world as one way you start seeing things to prove those beliefs and over time theres really no going from one extreme to the other.

So to answer the ultimate question of this thread. YES. Christianity and Penis Enlargement can coexist but you have to be open minded enough to know that stretching and jelqing your penis is not a sin to the almighty.


The bible speaks of a lot of things that are down right absurd or things that are supposed to happen but never have. Let me say in a few hundred years there my prediction is that no religion will be left standing. it wouldn't be only Christainity gone.


I doubt these christains are getting off to their wife to get erect all of the time. I find that funny to believe. 80+ are Christain in America and in adult entertainment in America is a billion dollar industry,it's not the 10-12% Atheist and agnostics in America buying it all. I'm being honesty here. That's All i can be.


I'm not here to make someone an Atheist I gave my opinion like you gave yours.

Id still be curious to ask a pastor what he'd say about one of his sheep p.e.

I might call a church today and ask..


I have no problems with staying away from christain themed topic on here....
In fact I did my best to avoid them.... but I couldn't resist...
 
BazookaJoe;302093 said:
typos it should read like this.....

your misguided argument that Atheism self-refutes itself doesn't work.


Yeah Like I'm going to believe what a christain says about Atheist when he's using the same book that talks about zombies and talking donkeys to prove my belief is incorrect.


Also, I didn't attack you I spoke my opinion. You got offended. you should have just turned the other cheek but I wouldn't say you were Christain enough or at all to do that sort of thing.

"Turn the other cheek" is when I've been personally offended.

While I find your comments offensive I am not personally offended.
It just seems to me that you are quick to attack Christians but can't take the same self evaluation regarding your own beliefs.

Ad hominum attacks prove nothing. If you want to refute my argument don't attack the source; attack the argument.

You can't touch the argument because it's too strong.
So you say some inane things about some supposed web site I allegedly visited.

I don't know which website you are refering to but yes I have studied Christian apologetics in the past.
It's the argument set forth that is under evaluation not where the argument came from.

I guess if you're not going to listen to a Christian regarding atheism are you going to listen to a Buddist?
Perhaps you'd listen to a Muslim, Taoist, or any other belief system or are you only going to listen to fellow atheists regarding your world view?

Just who is being circular now?

Sounds more narrow than the Christians you criticize.

Atheism is self refuting and unless you can attack the argument and not the person giving it well then you'll just have to continue to live in conflict because you don't have answers and are too stubborn to admit it or at least look and find some.

It's funny, I defend the faith and I get accused of being hypersensitive when I respond to unfair characterizations or because I defended the faith therefore I am un-Christian because I don't run away like the critics would like.

Well once again Bazooka Joe you are wrong and I could quote you the Scripture which tells me to defend the faith but of course this would mean nothing to you.

Oh and go ahead and call a pastor I'm sure he would love to hear from you.

:)
 
Back
Top