grinder1;364143 said:
"That's the higher responsibility one has when making claims of this nature."
I couldn't disagree more.
1) You're whole stance has been one of an assumption that Penis Enlargement is a basic life necessity. It's not and me saying this isn't going to damage this site.
MOS is a great place where 99.9% of members are probably going to have very happy Penis Enlargement lives, but it is VOLUNTARY.
2) The HIGHEST responsibilty should be safety and caution. You have it backwards. I am not a urologist,
3) so there is no way I can provide whatever it is you are looking for. Drug companies don't say "let's release this drug until we here it causes adverse effects." They do testing for safety and then release the drug.
All i've done is bring up a concern of someone who thought his aliment was Penis Enlargement related. This may inspire someone with more knowledge about the subject, or, maybe even someone who was afflicted with the same condition that can speak to it medically.
4) But, please don't tell people not to broach a subject because it may not be proven true. It's the subject itself and the subsequent discussion where the value to all Penis Enlargement'ers will come from whether it proves to be a true concern or not.
1) Wrong. My whole stance has been: You claim something as being factual; back it up with your facts.
2) Yep, that's why, with no factual basis your cautionary posting is worthless and the necessity of finding any factual basis- if one actually exists- is even more important; to move this from urban legend status to an actual, rational practice to be followed when endeavouring penis enlargement if such need actually exists.
As I've stated before: You have made a claim, divulge the basis of this claim. Support your contention with fact. From the complete lack of said fact so far, I'm quite inclined to believe there is none whatsoever.
Because:
3) It (the absent data for your assertion) doesn't exist. You can provide no support at all for your nebulous claim of "erection valve" injuries damaging erection quality for an equally unsubstantiated and unspecified segment of the population via some equally unspecified types of penis enlargement exercises.
Why? If this is actully your reason for joining
MOS and opening this thread,
please provide any basis whatsoever, any reputable data whatsoever, any anything reliable whatsoever to substantiate your claim.
Anything, anything at all.
4) Personally I don't care at all what subject people broach, in fact I enjoy good, healthy debate and intellectual exploration. But let's distinguish between practical, useful reality and mere speculation.
If someone, YOU, present something as true, then yes, it MUST be provable as true.
Otherwise you are engaged in deceit. For reasons which may not have the best interests of the general membership in mind.
You presented a position as if it were established, accepted medical fact. I, once again, ask you: Where are your facts? Without them your claim is just that, a claim, conjecture, speculation.
Might make for a good conversation over a beer or two, but nothing more.
Without any true basis for concern the best you could hope to succeed in is inducing unnecessary fear, doubt and stress in the minds of anyone who may already have doubts about Penis Enlargement in the first place. May induce someone to seek a completely unnecessary medical procedure or expend time and money chasing a "problem" which doen't exist. And that kind of baseless fear-mongering has no place in any fact-based discussion or forum.
My final statement: What are, and where are your facts?
If you have none, as I fully suspect; I sincerely suggest you drop this thread as completely useless and potentially destructive.
