I tend to agree with this as well Swank. This most recent problem occured because Kong tried to defend or clarify a statement he did not make nor could have he have known any intent of that statement. Whether it was made to purposefully deceive or was just made out of hand. I only iniatially asked to which polls Graves was reffering to. That was it. I recall I was equally harsh and detailed as to my assesment of the Poll posted by you.
I also agree that Graves was very mature and level headed in his own reply and did not seem to take any offense that I could tell. And I take none as well concerning his reply. I think Graves and my statements are perfect examples of how things should be debated around here to begin with. He and I did not quote each other out of context nor did we put words in the others' mouth. I hope to continue discussions with Graves and I support his most of his opinions.
Without speaking for him, I seriously doubt DLD would condone the banning of a "Gold Level Support" member such as myself without me being way, way out of line and over board.
kooky
I also agree that Graves was very mature and level headed in his own reply and did not seem to take any offense that I could tell. And I take none as well concerning his reply. I think Graves and my statements are perfect examples of how things should be debated around here to begin with. He and I did not quote each other out of context nor did we put words in the others' mouth. I hope to continue discussions with Graves and I support his most of his opinions.
Without speaking for him, I seriously doubt DLD would condone the banning of a "Gold Level Support" member such as myself without me being way, way out of line and over board.
kooky
Last edited: