- Joined
- Dec 10, 2003
- Messages
- 1,623
Spinner2, Solid response. Are you currently practicing any Chemical Penis Enlargement methods? I'll be the first to admit to not having read into great detail about the process, but I'm still curious.
Why no advanced techniques from the start?
- Thread starter enkant
- Start date
yer i was just thinking the past week cause ive been learning quite a bit about my penis,,,not everyone is gunnd get the best out of dlds routine some people if they just follow tat it mite slow them down in other areas,,for example,,someone mite need more work on there tunica in order fot there ligs to be streched and other stuff there pc muscle mite be too week making it harder for blood flow ,,well ive been hammering my pc muscle and its amazing the difference ive seen in my erections ,,ther alot quicker and i can just pump blood straight up into my penis starting flacid with out any hormonal motivation its great,,yer i fugured my tunica as slwoed me down from my lenghth gains so im working on that now,,doing my pc muscle as made it alot better for jelqing amazing difference,,,
Wow! A handful new replies today. Thanks fellas.
First off, chemical Penis Enlargement, what's that?
The PC training, for how long do you have to train to gain good effects, like being able to come two times etc?
Now here is what i been thinking since my last post. A lot people here seems to be judging the training and gaining by how many red spots you see. I find that a bit weird.
For example, if i do 300 Jelqs with good decent pressure, i will get a LOT of red spots. Then you tell me; good, that means you ain't ready for the next step.
But if I instead do 200 Jelqs and 50 Uli's, i might not get any red spots at all. How does that make sense, if Uli's are supposed to (and really do) put more direct pressure on the penis?
Still i think, it's all about putting just about enough pressure on your dick. I can't see why i can't do other techniques, with lower pressure, and still be safe and sound. Maybe it's my brain. I'm always to logical for my own good. Or maybe stupid i don't know.
happy sunday
First off, chemical Penis Enlargement, what's that?
The PC training, for how long do you have to train to gain good effects, like being able to come two times etc?
Now here is what i been thinking since my last post. A lot people here seems to be judging the training and gaining by how many red spots you see. I find that a bit weird.
For example, if i do 300 Jelqs with good decent pressure, i will get a LOT of red spots. Then you tell me; good, that means you ain't ready for the next step.
But if I instead do 200 Jelqs and 50 Uli's, i might not get any red spots at all. How does that make sense, if Uli's are supposed to (and really do) put more direct pressure on the penis?
Still i think, it's all about putting just about enough pressure on your dick. I can't see why i can't do other techniques, with lower pressure, and still be safe and sound. Maybe it's my brain. I'm always to logical for my own good. Or maybe stupid i don't know.
happy sunday
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2003
- Messages
- 1,623
Spinner, Could you explain, in very simple terms, what the arrangement of chemicals are for, and ultimately what sort of gains one could see from going this direction?
I'm wondering if Chem. Penis Enlargement is more about shortening the total amount of time spent Penis Enlargementing or if it will in actuality help an individual surpass their possible gains from NPenis Enlargement alone?
I'm wondering if Chem. Penis Enlargement is more about shortening the total amount of time spent Penis Enlargementing or if it will in actuality help an individual surpass their possible gains from NPenis Enlargement alone?
PGE-1 injections 3-4 times a week for an erection 2-4 hours long. This provides pressure from the erection which wears down the tunica surprisingly well on its own. The drug also upregulates androgen receptors, unweaves collagen cross-linkage to make the tunica respond better, and does a bunch of other things I can't remember.
That's the building block. There's things you can add to speed up the gains. The hormones responsible for growth in the first place like DHT and HGH are common. You can also add things to break down the tunica like POTABA, DMSO, relaxin. None of these are necessary, though.
I think this will speed up gains and allow people to gain more than they WOULD gain from NPenis Enlargement. I don't think there's a limit on NPenis Enlargement gains (within physiological reason), though. They CAN gain the same amount from both, but for whatever reason most people aren't going to be able to put in the effort or time for massive NPenis Enlargement gains. The function for chemical Penis Enlargement seems to be tunica reformation, which is basically the same action by which NPenis Enlargement works.
That's the building block. There's things you can add to speed up the gains. The hormones responsible for growth in the first place like DHT and HGH are common. You can also add things to break down the tunica like POTABA, DMSO, relaxin. None of these are necessary, though.
I think this will speed up gains and allow people to gain more than they WOULD gain from NPenis Enlargement. I don't think there's a limit on NPenis Enlargement gains (within physiological reason), though. They CAN gain the same amount from both, but for whatever reason most people aren't going to be able to put in the effort or time for massive NPenis Enlargement gains. The function for chemical Penis Enlargement seems to be tunica reformation, which is basically the same action by which NPenis Enlargement works.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2006
- Messages
- 424
Spinner2,
Yesterday, I read much more about Chem Penis Enlargement and was pleased to be much further enlightened than I allowed myself to be previously. I think your points on collagen breakdown are significantly valid and they do, and further reading I did does, slightly change my perspective. However, I still do not believe that any of our points about the penis and discourse are really mutually exclusive.
I will explain more later when I have more time.
jsqderrida,
I figured you would respond with something very close to that, which is why I said "somewhat oxymoronic", but I did not want my parenthetical to become a paragraph.
"Umbrage" may or may not be the right word, and to my recollection your count is - again - in err. Actually, the only other "umbrage" I really remember applying to any of our civil discourse has been one occasion where you took umbrage to my statement. However, such triviliaty is not something to dwell on; I merely mention to counter your post with a light heart.
Best to all.
Yesterday, I read much more about Chem Penis Enlargement and was pleased to be much further enlightened than I allowed myself to be previously. I think your points on collagen breakdown are significantly valid and they do, and further reading I did does, slightly change my perspective. However, I still do not believe that any of our points about the penis and discourse are really mutually exclusive.
I will explain more later when I have more time.
jsqderrida,
I figured you would respond with something very close to that, which is why I said "somewhat oxymoronic", but I did not want my parenthetical to become a paragraph.
"Umbrage" may or may not be the right word, and to my recollection your count is - again
- in err. Actually, the only other "umbrage" I really remember applying to any of our civil discourse has been one occasion where you took umbrage to my statement. However, such triviliaty is not something to dwell on; I merely mention to counter your post with a light heart. Best to all.
Similar threads
- Sticky
- Sticky