longstretch;571969 said:
I don't have a Bib but I could see where it would work similar to the
LM. If you have a Bib try it out and let us know what you think. Also just out of curiosity why did Bib say base hanging was worthless? Does he think its too much skin stretch?
Base hanging is brilliant! It embodies the very heart of Expressive Stretching. It may not effect shaft gains but it certainly stretches the internal penis we so desperately want to expose. __________ has a highly trained and exposed base where he has pulled forward much of his internal penis to become part of his shaft. It is very evident with __________ as the internal penis that was exposed is a bit thicker than the rest of his shaft. Now, this can be avoided and expressed equally using the
LengthMaster as the stretches can be directed in rolls, twists and bundles that train ALL areas of the base and the internal components.
Expressive Stretching should not embody the entire workout, it should be a part of the workout. Other stretching is needed to make gains come with greatest speed. This is why, even in
SRT Routine, which is the newest of the new as far as my routines go, Basic Stretching still plays a very big role. In basic stretching we are hitting all angles allowing for gains to come from many places, that if went un-stretched would leave the gain unclaimed. I am a very big believer in covering all my bases and not leaving any area uncharted. This is, again, why
SRT draws exercise and method from so many areas. For me,
SRT is the biggest "just in case" routine in the world! It leaves no stone unturned and it will allow every man, who practices it, to make the fastest possible gains with the best possible healing, without ignoring penile health. Some may say that it is overkill but I disagree. I believe that the penis needs to be trained in very specific areas (as outlined in
SRT) in order to develop with the greatest expedience.
Limiting ourselves by theory or conjecture in sili and debilitating. A good example of such would be LOT theory and how it claims that no ligamental gains can be made when a certain measurement of LOT (loss of tug back which is measured from 12:00 being a high LOT while 6:00 being a low LOT) is reached. If the very original study is read it is plain to see that I was a VERY BIG ANOMALY according to LOT. I was the one who had a LOT that ligamental stretching determined would not benefit me but, low and behold, the ligament stretching I continued to practice brought much more length, MUCH MORE. One simple exercise in basic stretching completely eliminates any accuracy from LOT theory, Behind the Cheeks Stretching, in this stretch position any man with any LOT measurement can certainly make even greater ligament gains through stretching BTC. If 6:00 is the lowest LOT measurement, look at Behind the Cheeks as a 11:00 measurement in the other direction!
I think that limiting anyone with theory that advocates avoiding any of the necessary parts of penis enlargement is a complete disability. As I said and have said since the beginning,
"do it all, just in case"
