For some strange reason, I'm reminded of the following:

"When a man is wrong and won't admit it, he always gets angry.
-- THOMAS C. HALIBURTON"




grosso;469295 said:
Well, I have spent lots of words, my post is really detailel, so if one really wants to understand what it concerns on e would just need to read it.
Anyway I see that here nobody wants/is able to understand my post. My post doesn't feel welcome here. You can continue to criticizing my post and make fun of it. you are welcome! I don't care any more.
And hey, DLD's penis is definitely not longer than 7 inches- according to his tutorial-video. Besides, none of you was able to show me a proof picture of DLD penis. There are no pictures to be found in this forum.
Besides, it's a shame that nobody here is able to answer to my questions. Yet, they are concrete questions.
Anyway, don't worry, I won't disturb you anymore.
 
Here is an epic and very funny vid that shows a little of DLDs size at not more then maybe semi erect.

A 3!!! hander, I'm soon 8' but I can only use my 2 hands to cover all my penis. So 11' is all there under the 3 hands!!! =)

I also have heard or read somewhere that DLD says that when he did the DVD he wasn't more the 7-9' or so! The vids are old!

http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/showthread.php?538-Dld-3-Hander&highlight=3+hander
 
REDZULU2003;469332 said:
They are the ones, thanks. For some reason they dont appear instantly since the forum mod.

No worries!

@ aclaim
Thats exactly what I was trying to put forward, sure DLD doesn't look huge in the DVD because of the camera angles but comparing to hands he is no way as small as 6"
 
i have always been fascinated by the mind of a preset loser (someone who never gives him self the opportunity to fail. therefor never gets the change to win)

he asks some questions about an old program with dld. taking it as the current info on DLD's size.

he has brought up a subject that has been discussed a thousand times here. and he comes with accusations of cheating.

im just a member on this forum. but i just don't get it?

either you try it out. or you don't.

why wasting time on this? why wasting time on asking what i see as the "wrong" questions.

DLD's size has little influence on my size. all it says is that he has had the time, consistancy, dedication to get there. it doesn't mean i have the same options (work personal time and so on)

perhaps he doesn't have the best system. he is just the hardest worker?

i found MOS. because i was googling around the Penis Enlargement sites alot.

and i always got this:
less is more.
and pictures was a rarity on those sites. first thing i did was to post a picture. as a before picture. and people had this: dude no reason for that. attitude.

here it made sense

work hard: hard results.

and there is alot of picture proof. if your assed to look for it.

3 months with pretty much any of the workouts on this site and 99% would have results in growth.

perhaps not an inch. some more some less. i wasnt the easiest gainer on this page.

when all come down to it.

DLD's cock might be the mascot of this forum,

but MOS is the masterpiece.

and peoples repeatedly attack on DLD's size. is just weird in my world. i don't get it.

instead of pointing at DLD. start stretching that cock of yours!
 
Aimingforthetop;469398 said:
instead of pointing at DLD. start stretching that cock of yours!
lol It will become a habit I tell ya! I find myself taking a piss and end up doing stretches. Just hope its alright without warming up sometimes but something about it feels sooo good!
 
grosso;469138 said:
But if it really works, why is there still no reliable scientific proof, or at least a study, that pe does really work? On the contrary, doctros, urologists, andrologysts firmly believe that pe cannot work. Grosso

There is nothing wrong with asking for scientific proof - that shows a certain degree of rational and reasonable thinking. The problem is that your statement is just plain wrong. There is plenty of scientific proof. It's how I got started in Penis Enlargement. There were plenty of articles in the mainstream press about how penis extenders actually do work to increase the size of the penis. Check out the thread I started several months ago entitled "Extenders - Clinical Trials, Doctor Recommendations, Media Reports": http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/...ctor-Recommendations-Media-Reports&highlight=

The scientific basis of Penis Enlargement is that the shape and size of the penis is determined by the size and shape of the three tunica abuginea that run the length of the shaft. The tunicae is made of the same material that surrounds your eyeball and your testicles. It is strong and difficult to stretch. Scientific studies, however, have proven that prolonged tension on the tunicae will result in lengthening of the penis, with some minor growth in girth, as well.

What DLD and others on this site have done is taken that scientific knowledge and experimented with other approaches. Basically, if you can hit the tunicae by stretching, why not by bending, jelqing, etc? A lot of it is simply theoretical, but is worth experimenting with. That being said, however, there is little scientific support for pumping, largely because pumping causes fluid to build up between the tunicae and the skin, so all you are doing is stretching skin, not the tunicae. It might look and feel fat, but it's all fluid build up. Some people, however, like the look and feel of a pumped dick and choose to experiment with pumping anyway.

Your question is a good one, but be rest assured, there is definitely scientific backing for most of Penis Enlargement theory.
 
Back
Top Bottom