WildTiger;484768 said:
No, I asked her a lot of questions about girth in general, and she said while the 5.5 is quite satisfying, its still "fairly easy to take" - as in does a good job, but it doesn't feel like she's at her limit for girth.

She's actually more of a length girl. She said length is more important because she's fairly tight anyway, and she feels girth more then the average woman, and its posterior fornix stimulation which really does it for her, but big girth is still definitely a bonus.

From the model this seems correct:)
 
doublelongdaddy;484866 said:
From the model this seems correct:)

There are actually two models. The one in the image isn't the one she's using. The one she's using has a much smaller head. She wanted two toys - one that stimulated depth, and another that had an exaggerated head girth, and wasn't shaped like a penis head. I'll post pics of both of the toys in a couple of hours.
 
Okay this is pic of the dildo she's used for posterior fornix stimulation. This image was taken while it was still in its modelling stage, so it looks a bit different, but the insertable dimensions are the same - 9 x 6

View attachment 25436


This one is designed for stimulation via the head mostly. The shaft is wide, but not very deep to compensate for the total volume taken up by the huge head. Its insertable length is 9 x 5. She has yet to try this one.
Still waiting on more detailed reports of the first one.

View attachment 25437
 

Attachments

  • mos-pic-1.jpg
    mos-pic-1.jpg
    268.3 KB · Views: 4
  • mos-pic-2.jpg
    mos-pic-2.jpg
    265.5 KB · Views: 3
WildTiger;485037 said:
This one is designed for stimulation via the head mostly. The shaft is wide, but not very deep to compensate for the total volume taken up by the huge head. Its insertable length is 9 x 5. She has yet to try this one.
Still waiting on more detailed reports of the first one.

View attachment 25437

This one looks painful!
 
doublelongdaddy;485062 said:
This one looks painful!

Well, I guess only time will tell. She said she wanted something that was different from a real dick, and when i came up with this idea, she said she liked the look of it. The head has an 8" girth around the rim, but is otherwise within normal sizes. The rim is also flexible too, so there is some give in it.
 
Very interesting thread. I like the idea of your large head prototype intended for fornix stimulation. Some docs say that it's not just about pushing this zone, but also massaging it somehow. The big head should be useful for that.

About the differences between the silicon thing and the real thing, I remember a post in the forum mentionning about girth sizes and dildos, that some silicon or dildo girth feels "bigger" than the real thing.

For example, if you're 6", maybe it'll feel like a 5.6"-5.7" dildo because the dildo will be harder than the real thing, whereas, your penis can be compressed by the vagina muscles up to a certain point.

So the idea is, your real "dildo" girth would be the one you get, if you're really holding the measuring tape very tight basically. You could basically measure the dildo and your penis as tight as possible with a measuring tape to try to see if they match in girth.

Keep up the good work, nice stuff !
 
I think depends on eq. If your erections are super hard it wont compress as much.
@wildtiger do you think its better to have some flexibility or to have super hard erections?
 
WildTiger;485220 said:
Well, I guess only time will tell. She said she wanted something that was different from a real dick, and when i came up with this idea, she said she liked the look of it. The head has an 8" girth around the rim, but is otherwise within normal sizes. The rim is also flexible too, so there is some give in it.


Looking forward to updates on this:)
 
magiksock;486270 said:
There was a database issue and about a weeks worth of comments were lost. It's not censorship.


That would be an awful thing if I edited posts and deleted opinions that did not meet my satisfaction, that would make me into a Thunder!
 
doublelongdaddy;486280 said:
That would be an awful thing if I edited posts and deleted opinions that did not meet my satisfaction, that would make me into a Thunder!

Funny you mention that. I heard the exact same thing about them roughly a year before I joined MOS. I believe "fascist dickheads" was the term used.
 
WildTiger;486356 said:
Funny you mention that. I heard the exact same thing about them roughly a year before I joined MOS. I believe "fascist dickheads" was the term used.


I let anyone say whatever they want to say as long as it is not meant to hurt. If we did not have an open, free forum where users could say what they want without fear of retaliation, we would not be where we are today.
 
Okay bit of an update. I was speaking with her recently, and she hasn't made much progress, but she admits its because she hasn't been using it much due to a hectic work timetable. We did discuss girth more though, and she said that different sizes were good for different situations.

She doesn't do one night stands, but she said if she did, and obviously wouldn't have repeated exposed to get used to the girth, then 5.5 was good, but if it was a boyfriend, or a fuck buddy, then 6 is ideal. She said while she has adapted to a 6.3 (dildo) and was fine with it once she was used to it, that it took too long, and was a chore. She said a 6 was a size that she could adapt to within 1-2 weeks provided the sex was regular.
 
doublelongdaddy;486405 said:
I let anyone say whatever they want to say as long as it is not meant to hurt. If we did not have an open, free forum where users could say what they want without fear of retaliation, we would not be where we are today.

Good man. A true advocate of the First Amendment. Pity we don't have one here in Australia. Free speech is a standard here to a degree, but we have no laws guaranteeing us the right.
 
WildTiger;469902 said:
Hey guys,

I am currently conducting an experiment with the help of an ex gf.

I have devised a method for creating a dildo that has properties very close to that of an erect penis. The dildos have the firmness of an erection, but the softness of flesh and realistic flexibility without losing the ability to withstand bending during heavy thrusting. An ex of mine, who now thinks size matters after being with me (no brag, I'm 7.5 x 6 bp, so not huge or anything) has agreed to test different sizes and give me a detailed report about the pros and cons of them.

She has already tested the first prototype design, and when asked to score it against a real big dick, she gave it 7.5 out of 10, if 10 were the real thing.

Btw, I haven't been with a lot of women (10) but this girl was by far the tightest of them all.

The first dildo she tried was a commercial one. The Lex Caliber (8.5 x 6.4). She was only able to get 7.5 of the 8.5 insertable inches. Originally I thought that 7.5 was her limit, because I have actually bottom this girl out in her deep spot. Then she said the issue was that the Lex dildo was too rigid to angle into her deep spot properly, as it is dead straight, and has very little flexibility. She was able to hit bottom in the anterior fornix, but said it was uncomfortable, but if she tried for the posterior fornix, she said it felt like something in her would break.

She tried the first prototype (8.75 x 5.5) I made for 8 weeks, and said she was able to take 7.5 of it in the anterior fornix, and because of the flexibility, she was able to do so without it being uncomfortable. She also said it was easy to take. The issue was trying to get into the posterior fornix (deep spot). The dildo is constructed out of a simple two step process. Firstly a three part silicone mixture - the binary silicone mix, and then the silicone oil to soften it to flesh texture. Then 2 flexible plastic rods bound together with gaffer tape. The mixture is poured into the mould, and the rods inserted into the centre and the silicone allowed to set.

I asked her a lot of questions trying to figure out why she couldn't get the dildo into her deep spot, and finally figured out the problem. When I made the prototype, I set the rod into the silicone, but didn't let it sink down into the head of the toy because I wasn't sure how strong the silicone would be with so much softening oil in the mix, and was worried if there was an accident, the rod might bust through the head and hurt her.

This is what was also stopping the toy going deep - no rod in the head area meant that every time she tried to push it in there, the head would bend a bit, and direct the penetration off into the anterior fornix, and the whole dildo would follow. So now I am sending her two more designs to try, an 8 x 5.5 and an 8 x 6.25 (sizes she requested), apart from the size difference, the core rods will now be in the head, making sure they won't bend on initial entry into the deep spot. Now I know this will be safe due to testing the movement of the rod when hit with heavy impacts, and it won't budge at all.

I'll report the results from the new designs when I hear from her, but my guess is that if you want to go deep, having a very firm erection helps a lot.

Cheers

Tiger

Too bad you weren't conducting the experiment on her.
I'd ask you to see how many inches can be inserted into her after an amount of time, say 15 minutes. I'd really like to know how much a woman's vagina can stretch when she is really aroused. Like with serious foreplay and slowly penetrating her with the dildo, then increasing speed and intensity as she gets more turned on, I wonder if she would be able to get it in her 8" or more? This is very important data, because if the vagina is able to stretch that much when a woman is aroused, that would really explain why they like long cocks.
You think you could get her to try some sort of 20 minute session with the 9" dildo, where she is extremely turned on and ask her to see how deep she can get it in her by the end of the session, once she is at peak arousal? I'd be very interested to hear the results.

PS. I once tried something similar with a girl. I used an 8x6 store bought dildo. She was able to get 7 inches in her, but I only used it on her for about 5 minutes. It made her cum 3 times, the first time within about one minute. I had to stroke very very hard and fast though. It would seem very hard to stroke that fast with my real penis, because it's easier to move your arm back and forth faster than your hips. Also my penis is small, 6.85x5.75. I am wondering if with a larger dildo (9"x6.5"-7") would she have cum with less force applied? Also, would she still be able to cum as hard with a smaller cock, would it just take more time and consistent pace? I'm also wondering if I had kept it up on her would it have been able to get the whole 8" in?
These are all questions you should be testing out if you can. I'd test them myself but I'm lacking in the department of willing girls.
Maybe you could ask her for the good of mankind if she could bear the load and test these theories? I'm sure she would have fun doing it. Also, reading the results would make other men aroused. I am aroused reading this thread.

Thanks!
 
MikeShlort;492042 said:
Too bad you weren't conducting the experiment on her.
I'd ask you to see how many inches can be inserted into her after an amount of time, say 15 minutes. I'd really like to know how much a woman's vagina can stretch when she is really aroused. Like with serious foreplay and slowly penetrating her with the dildo, then increasing speed and intensity as she gets more turned on, I wonder if she would be able to get it in her 8" or more? This is very important data, because if the vagina is able to stretch that much when a woman is aroused, that would really explain why they like long cocks.
You think you could get her to try some sort of 20 minute session with the 9" dildo, where she is extremely turned on and ask her to see how deep she can get it in her by the end of the session, once she is at peak arousal? I'd be very interested to hear the results.

PS. I once tried something similar with a girl. I used an 8x6 store bought dildo. She was able to get 7 inches in her, but I only used it on her for about 5 minutes. It made her cum 3 times, the first time within about one minute. I had to stroke very very hard and fast though. It would seem very hard to stroke that fast with my real penis, because it's easier to move your arm back and forth faster than your hips. Also my penis is small, 6.85x5.75. I am wondering if with a larger dildo (9"x6.5"-7") would she have cum with less force applied? Also, would she still be able to cum as hard with a smaller cock, would it just take more time and consistent pace? I'm also wondering if I had kept it up on her would it have been able to get the whole 8" in?
These are all questions you should be testing out if you can. I'd test them myself but I'm lacking in the department of willing girls.
Maybe you could ask her for the good of mankind if she could bear the load and test these theories? I'm sure she would have fun doing it. Also, reading the results would make other men aroused. I am aroused reading this thread.

Thanks!


A woman can expand to the point of pushing a baby out so I think the threshold would be how much she can take with pleasure.
 
doublelongdaddy;492137 said:
A woman can expand to the point of pushing a baby out so I think the threshold would be how much she can take with pleasure.

Well I'm curious to know how long the vagina can stretch before it reaches the max. I mean, it can't be endless, unless she has no intestines or a womb. I'm wanting to find out what the average maximum stretch is for a woman. Like say it's 9 inches - that way I can shoot for 9 inches in length, and not have to feel like shit about all the guys who are over 9 inches. Ya, sure, a woman will always get more turned on and wetter from a bigger penis in her face, but I'm mostly worried about functional purposes, not so much the aesthetics in this case.
Length is a bitch. It's hard to gain. there is no temporary way for gaining a half inch-inch in length. If I had a 10 inch cock that was 4.5 inches in girht, I'd be set because girth is so much easier to gain (for me at least). I've had temporary girth increases of 1.3 inches from using Bathmate, 9 hours after the session. I realize girth is very important but the length is the fundamental property of a good penis.
I'm basically wondering if a woman will feel stretched out and full with, say, an 8.5 inch, or will she always be able to stretch more for a 10 inch?
This is important information to me because my theory is women are as loyal as they are satisfied, and since they are always capable to get more, if they aren't satisfied, they will want more. I want to know what the maximum for "good enough" is. These "women's penis size preference" charts are probably bullshit, when they say 8x6-8.5x6.5 is ideal. I'm sure most of the women interviewed had never had a 9.5+ penis, and even if it did "hurt them" I'm sure in time they will grow to love it. My theory is an 8 inch penis to a woman will be amazing at first, but once she's been worked and worn out, she'll always be wanting a bigger one. Like trading up for a bigger minivan to drive the kids to soccer practice.

Also, DLD, how come MOS doesn't send notification emails to our emails anymore to alert us of a response in a thread? Thanks.
 
All this talk about women having babies as if there is no limit is not dealing with reality.

When a woman gives birth her hips displace and hormones are flooded in her so the baby can be delivered. It is an extra normal event and the body reacts extra normally if you will.
Yes those sexy woman's hips and how they walk; those things that attract us is the very thing that enables them to give birth.

Women have different lengths. You can bottom out in some hitting the cervix; no fun.
Some may have a culdesac so length is a real good thing there;
some have the g-spot: girth applies here and some just enjoy clitoral orgasms.
 
Back
Top Bottom