Powersnake12;492896 said:
That's an interesting point. The vagina does tent depending on arousal levels.

How big around is your fist?

Now I've got to try and make my fist bigger too. :s

Before I started Penis Enlargement I was convinced I'd have to cut off my hand to be able to please a woman.
 
MikeShlort;493020 said:
Before I started Penis Enlargement I was convinced I'd have to cut off my hand to be able to please a woman.

Thank god you started then, or we'd be finding quivering masses of women saying, "I just got stump fucked to the most unbelievable orgasm ever......."

:s
 
MikeShlort;493020 said:
Before I started Penis Enlargement I was convinced I'd have to cut off my hand to be able to please a woman.


That is not true? Oh no, I just hacked a hand off!:)
 
Okay another update. We've identified the problem. It wasn't the girth, it was the head. Too big. After a long talk with her, we figured out that if the head is too big, it can prevent the toy/dick getting in deep, especially in a really tight girl like the one in this experiment. If no decent depth can be reached, it can be difficult to get any significant arousal. Its a catch 22. She wasn't aroused enough to take it deep yet, but she won't get aroused enough for serious depth unless its a decent depth already.

The toy used (not the one with the "flying saucer" shaped head) had a head width of 2.5 inches, and was 8 x 6. Going to send her two more models, one 8 x 5.5 and one 8 x 6. Both with 2 inch wide heads, as she took that size fine before, but the toy wasn't stiff enough to push under the cervix for posterior fornix (deep spot) penetration.
 
WildTiger;493423 said:
Okay another update. We've identified the problem. It wasn't the girth, it was the head. Too big. After a long talk with her, we figured out that if the head is too big, it can prevent the toy/dick getting in deep, especially in a really tight girl like the one in this experiment. If no decent depth can be reached, it can be difficult to get any significant arousal. Its a catch 22. She wasn't aroused enough to take it deep yet, but she won't get aroused enough for serious depth unless its a decent depth already.

The toy used (not the one with the "flying saucer" shaped head) had a head width of 2.5 inches, and was 8 x 6. Going to send her two more models, one 8 x 5.5 and one 8 x 6. Both with 2 inch wide heads, as she took that size fine before, but the toy wasn't stiff enough to push under the cervix for posterior fornix (deep spot) penetration.

I wish I had a friend like her..
 
wildtiger;493423 said:
the toy used (not the one with the "flying saucer" shaped head) had a head width of 2.5 inches, and was 8 x 6. Going to send her two more models, one 8 x 5.5 and one 8 x 6. Both with 2 inch wide heads, as she took that size fine before, but the toy wasn't stiff enough to push under the cervix for posterior fornix (deep spot) penetration.


squirt
 
Okay the first tester has dropped off a bit, due to the stressful job she is doing, but she will be moving to a new job in a the next month, so we are likely to hear from her again. Good news is there is a new tester. She's 28, Caucasian, 6ft tall, and has a curvy (but not overly so) and fit frame.

She will be testing a 9 x 6 toy which is shaped like a regular dick. I'll have the results in about 5 weeks as she needs a month to text before proper results can be achieved.

Stay tuned!
 
awesome thread!! This is great so guys can get a realistic number on how big they want to be while not being too big.
 
Wang Chung;521492 said:
you are like some mad penis scientist haha

Mad? Perhaps, dedicated is more like it :)

Anyhow, I have prepared a multiple choice questionnaire for her once she's been using it for a month and has adjusted to it. I'm looking for feedback from you guys. Do you think it needs anymore questions, or perhaps different phrasing?


Question 1

What was the maximum length you were able to take?

1: 7 inches

2: 8 inches

3: 9 inches

Answer:





Question 2

How did you find the girth:


1: It was much too big.

2: It was too big, but only by a little.

3: It was too big at first, then it was good once I got used to it.

4: It was the ideal thickness

5: It was quite good, but a little thicker would have been better.

6: It was okay, a lot thicker would have been better

7: It was too thin.

Answer:





Question 3

How did the texture feel?

1: It was okay, nothing special.

2: It didn't feel much different to other toys.

3 : It felt good.

4: It felt really good, but not close to the real thing.

5: It felt really good, and fairly close to the real thing.

6: It felt really good, and very close to the real thing.

Answer:





Question 4:

How did the head feel?

1: The shape was fine, but it was too big.

2: The size was fine, but the shape could have been better.

3: The size was okay, but bigger would have been better.

4: The size was too small, a lot bigger would have been better.

5: The size was too small, wider would have been better.

6: The size was too small, deeper (vertical width) would have been better.

7: The size was too big, thinner would have been better.

8: The size was too small, shallower (vertical width) would have been better.

9: The shape and size felt good.

10: The shape and size felt great

Answer:





Question 5:

How was the flexibililty?

1: It was too rigid, this made it uncomfortable to take to full depth.

2: It was too rigid. This prevented me taking it to full depth.

3: It was fine, but could be more flexible.

4: It was good, it felt fairly realistic.

5: It was great, very close to the real thing.

6: It wasn't rigid enough. It bent too much during vigorous use.

Answer:





Question 6:

How was the material?

1: It wasn't any different to others toys.

2: It felt more life-like than other toys.

3: It was fairly close to the real thing.

4: It was very close to the real thing.

5: It was too hard, not that life-like.

6: It was too soft, needs to be firmer to be more life-like.

Answer:



Question 7:

What was your experience when taking the toy to maximum depth?

1: I enjoyed deep penetration.

2: I enjoyed deep penetration, but only once I got used to it.

3: I enjoyed deep penetration a lot.

4: I enjoyed deep penetration a lot, but only once I got used to it.

5: Deep penetration was OMG amazing.

6: Deep penetration was OMG amazing, but only once I got used to it.

7: I didn't like deep penetration.

8: I hated deep penetration.

9: I didn't like deep penetration, but only because the size of the head made it uncomfortable.

10: I didn't like deep penetration, but only because the toy is too rigid.

11: I didn't like deep penetration, but only because the girth is too big.

Answer:


In an overall rating 1-10, 1 being totally unrealistic, and not enjoyable at all, and 10 being a real penis, how did the toy score?

Answer:




Marketability section:

What is the most you would pay for a professionally made, realistic flesh coloured version of the toy?

1:$30

2:$50

3:$80

4:$120


Answer:
 
Good questions.

Another question I might add is what was the maximum depth you were able to take it once you were fully aroused? How deep?

Then, which positions were you able to get it the deepest? How deep?
Which positions the shallowest? How deep?

This would be great information that could be applied to sex
 
The failings of most commercial dildos are two fold. Most of the large ones are not realistic in feel. They are either too rigid or too floppy. The first tester identified rigidity as the issue preventing deep penetration when she used the __________ dildo, and when she tried the home made ones from me, said that she was able to get it significantly deeper because there was some flexibility.

The floppy dildos bend to a woman's internal shape well, but they often don't have any semi rigid part in them which is needed for thrusting, and giving the dildo enough firmness to push under the cervix and enter the Posterior Fornix. I don't know much about the Shane dildo, but I guess it would have the same issues as most commercial dildos.

I should write up a step by step process of how to make a quality home made dildo which reflects the physical qualities of a real penis in a fully erect state.

There are certain percentages of silicone binary mixture ratio to silicone oil to achieve the right firmness, yet be soft enough to bend a bit. There's also the trick of casting the rods in the middle of the toy to give it firmness against bending when force is applied to the end of the toy.
 
WildTiger;522378 said:
The failings of most commercial dildos are two fold. Most of the large ones are not realistic in feel. They are either too rigid or too floppy. The first tester identified rigidity as the issue preventing deep penetration when she used the __________ dildo, and when she tried the home made ones from me, said that she was able to get it significantly deeper because there was some flexibility.

The floppy dildos bend to a woman's internal shape well, but they often don't have any semi rigid part in them which is needed for thrusting, and giving the dildo enough firmness to push under the cervix and enter the Posterior Fornix. I don't know much about the Shane dildo, but I guess it would have the same issues as most commercial dildos.

I should write up a step by step process of how to make a quality home made dildo which reflects the physical qualities of a real penis in a fully erect state.

There are certain percentages of silicone binary mixture ratio to silicone oil to achieve the right firmness, yet be soft enough to bend a bit. There's also the trick of casting the rods in the middle of the toy to give it firmness against bending when force is applied to the end of the toy.

I used two different dildos for the Matters of Size DVD shoot we did this past few months. One was 7.5" x 5.25" and the other was 5" x 4.5". I do not know the brand but they were super realistic. One thing that reall blew my mind was how much larger the 7.5 was compared to the 5...It was a MASSIVE size difference. I thought to myself, wow, this is what most people come to MOS with and what most leave with:) Truly amazing, off topic, but amazing:)
 
WildTiger;522378 said:
The failings of most commercial dildos are two fold. Most of the large ones are not realistic in feel. They are either too rigid or too floppy. The first tester identified rigidity as the issue preventing deep penetration when she used the __________ dildo, and when she tried the home made ones from me, said that she was able to get it significantly deeper because there was some flexibility.

The floppy dildos bend to a woman's internal shape well, but they often don't have any semi rigid part in them which is needed for thrusting, and giving the dildo enough firmness to push under the cervix and enter the Posterior Fornix. I don't know much about the Shane dildo, but I guess it would have the same issues as most commercial dildos.

I should write up a step by step process of how to make a quality home made dildo which reflects the physical qualities of a real penis in a fully erect state.

There are certain percentages of silicone binary mixture ratio to silicone oil to achieve the right firmness, yet be soft enough to bend a bit. There's also the trick of casting the rods in the middle of the toy to give it firmness against bending when force is applied to the end of the toy.

I think that in pursuing simplicity in manufacturing the dildo they have to compromise on the firmness and softness of it. If they make it too firm then the outside will not feel soft like a real penis, but if they make it soft then the thing just isnt firm enough for good penetration. I think the solution would be to either put in some sort of skeleton in the center of a soft dildo to get both rigidity and the outside softness, or perhaps make the center of the dildo with the firm kind of silicone and then cover just the outside with a more soft kind.
 
I think Mikeshlort was taking the piss. He's getting at the fact that shane diesels cock is soft when erect.
 
Progress update.

Tester 1 has been using the 8 x 5.5 again, and has managed to take the whole length. That is half an inch more than the previous max record. However she did say that it was uncomfortable. The dildo was taken in front of her cervix, the Anterior Fornix, which is most women, is not as deep as the Posterior Fornix. She had to stretch the tissue to get the entire length in. So far she's been unable to get the right angle to get into the Posterior Fornix, so I can only speculate that perhaps she might be able to take 8 inches there without discomfort. Tester 2 gets her dildo in a few days, and will begin soon.
 
bigdex28;522746 said:
I think Mikeshlort was taking the piss. He's getting at the fact that shane diesels cock is soft when erect.
Yes, we all know he was.
 
Back
Top Bottom