sweets,
>1)Can one gain just as much length working the tunica vs. the ligs.
In the previous year hanging BTC I never gained, finding out my lot is 6 so I started SO and OTS stretching. 2) Do you think one can gain just a much from his tunica if he didn't gain from his ligs.<
Yes, I believe one can gain more from the tunica than ligs. I believe I had great potential for gains from lig stretch, and made two inches of gain from pulling inner penis down and out. I believe the rest of my gains were made from tunica stretch/growth.
The fact is, actual gains from lig stretch are limited to the amount of inner penis which can be exposed. Tunica gains are only limited by the amount of stress you can apply and withstand, to the tunica.
Now, surely some guys will have an easier time than others. First, the ligs surely appear to be much easier to stretch and deform than the tunica. Some guys tunica stretch much easier than others. The failure level for the tunica fibers of some guys will be well under ten lbs. For others, it is over 30 lbs.
>How much (do u)(can everybody get 4inches like u?) can it be lengthened.<
I know of two other hangers that have reported gains as much or more than mine (4 inches BPenis EnlargementL or more). I know of several in the three inch range. However, that is surely not the norm. In fact, those reported gains are outlyers, and should not be considered as generally possible.
Most guys do not wish for that much of a gain. Then, other guys do not wish to delve into the stress amounts needed for greater and greater gains. Many guys tire of the Penis Enlargement grind, even hanging. That is why I always recommend that hangers get as comfortable as possible, and have plenty of multi-tasking duties to perform while hanging. Just let it happen.
>3)Are tunica lengthing harder to get then ligs past a "newbie" stage.<
I believe, from reports and my own experience, tunica gains are always tougher than gains from lig stretch.
>also, 4) is it true that this lot theory is just a guide and doesn't neccessarily mean that having a low lot means you will not gain as much.<
The LOT theory is a guide. The only point of the theory that I can find in question is the difference in the angle of the pubic bones of different guys. That can create a different reading. However, the basics of the theory is true, and if understood, will lead to a better understanding of how a guy's Penis Enlargement program should be structured.
I do not understand how anyone can conclude that the LOT theory can predict gains whatsoever. The potential for gains from lig stretch do matter, but perhaps the individual relative strength of each tunica matters more. In fact, there are a huge number of variables that determine how much one can or will gain. The LOT theory does not address most of those variable.
Example, one could have an LOT of 12, but extremely tough ligaments, which make it tough to realize that potential for gains from lig stretch.
Or, one could have an LOT of 6, but extremely weak tunica collagenous tissue, and make great gains.
>I read a lot of people sounding discouraged that their lot is low, but my Q is that isn't this just a reference or is it that having a lower lot means less length gains?<
There is absolutely no reason to be discouraged because of one's LOT. The LOT theory simply points that individual to stress the entire tunica, inner and outer, by working at the upper angles, and therefore stressing the entire tunica.
Bigger
