Satyr;574305 said:
As I understand a deficient EQ is usually supposed to be thought of as a suBathmateaximal level of blood circulation in the penis while being erect, which is what you also seem to suggest. Therefore one would have to conclude that your erect penis is softer than he would be under optimal conditions, thus not allowing to be considered as "fully" erect. But I think I see where you are coming from because like you I'm normally also with lessened EQ able to get to max blood circ. level and to measure the expected inches. But for once it's more difficult to get there and moreover it's even more difficult to hold that level upright for an extended time line. Is that what you're saying? If it is we should clarify the def. of a "bad" EQ as appearing in different variations.
But still - at least intuitively (never checked it) I would disagree with your assumption that length is not affected proportionally to girth, i.e. measurements of the two measures relatively differ from each other under the same conditions. ok, to make it more K.I.S.S. (rofl): given a certain EQ level, you should also measure your usual length if you are able to measure your usual girth.
I think we are both over thinking this.
I replied to this: “That's weird. I had the same exact experience but with length and put it in my progress thread. I was at 8.65 inches BPenis EnlargementL, took 2 weeks off while visiting family, and I was at 8.75 when I got back because of the improved EQ. I don't think that it necessarily HELPS with gains, but it does seem to help EQ which in turn helps with MEASUREMENTS not overall gains. Now that I'm back in my normal routine, my BPenis EnlargementL is back to 8.65.”
And my basic response was that I didn’t think your statement where you said, “Though there was the usual temporary expansion I wasn't able to grow a damn tenth of an inch to get to 6, I was stuck at 5,9. So this is a quite exciting and motivating achievement,” was the result of improved erection quality.
The erection quality I am comparing is a fully erect but Penis Enlargemented the day before penis versus a nine days rested (from Penis Enlargement) raging hard on penis. I have gained girth size recently and have had both of the EQs I mentioned above and the difference for me isn’t noticeable.
All I am saying relative to fully erect but Penis Enlargemented the day before penis versus a nine days rested (from Penis Enlargement) raging hard on penis is that the extra length (raging hard on) means that there is more blood in the penis (length wise) and since there is more blood it can be pushed around girth wise.
All in all I believe intense girth work requires more rest time (or cialis) for healing and growth. I believe we were both in the situation of overtraining where we healed enough to do our next workout; however, the penis never had time to “overheal” or overcompensate for the load placed on it (like bodybuilding).
