I didn't mean to correlate it having growth factors to it being successful. Instead, just having a place in chemPE, be it successful or not. A lot of current chems have their place ATM, but don't live up to the science behind them in relation to PE. Then again, a lot of people were reporting bunk peptides. However, nobody from what I know actually ponied up the money to take things to a lab to report whether or not a provider was reputable. That's where a big problem lies as well. Also not sure on their COA statuses either.
The docs that were doing it for $1k were doing it through the trial phase I think. Not sure if that's a nationwide thing or if it's just a doctor trial thing and them introducing it to their services w/ the help of guinea pigs. Some people got the injections for more than $1k, then following injections were around $1k. Probably cause most results were bunk. Either way, I wouldn't pay to get it done unless reputable people were reporting results. I agree w/ the tissue thing as it was initially used for peyronies corrections and it seems like those people had the best results (if the photos are not skewed). Wasn't aware of the heating issues. I thought the premix stuff that you put into the blood dealt w/ the bodies responses to the new prp/growth factors. I also seen them state the use of hyaluronic acid, but I think I seen a necrosis report w/ that or at least one of them. Do you know if it was a body temperature thing or something to mimic inflammation?