6.5 length and 6.5 girth. Too much girth??
Yes.
That length-to-girth ratio is not going to be very acrobatic compared to the amount of positions that a longer penis can reach/provide without popping out all the time and derailing the mood/orgiastic escalation, and that 6.5 girth is going to be realllly pressing your luck for oral and anal .. and for over half of the chicks you'll run into for comfortable/enjoyable vaj sex either.
Have you seen the Visualizer site?
The Visualiser - The Cock Comparison site
Check it out there 6.5x6.5 ^ vs average, and then change the 'Custom Cock' setting to 8.4 x 6.2, which is what I'd recommend to you based upon where you are already [6.5L x 6.0G]. I think you'd pick up that additional 0.2 girth accidentally/concomitantly, so this would be almost exclusively length training.
There's this idea out there that 'chicks dig the girth' [and so therefore
more is automatically always better], but such preferences are based upon comparisons to average sizes of (in PE terms, a tiny) 4.7 to 5 inches.
5.3, obviously better. 5.5 obviously better. 5.7 obviously better. But 6.0 is, lately, where they're already saying it's too girthy.
(Time was that none of them knew what the heck any measurement meant .. I've written on that many times .. and they'd base their professed preferences upon the, umm ..
embellished, figures that guys said to them. - "yeah Baby, that 6.3 x 5.2 is totally an 8 x 6, I swear" - But most chicks have multiple dildos/vibes now, they know how big they are, and they openly discuss this stuff with their peers. Their stated preferences are getting much more objectively reliable, and we should monitor that and adapt to it.)
They "like the feeling of being spread apart", but they do not like the feeling (and will actively seek to not feel it) of being
split apart.*
That's not happening for most chicks at 'just' 6, being split apart, .. but it's already getting above their apparent preference/sweet-spot. If the point is to chase a dysmorphic or aesthetic dragon, then a sensible stopping point doesn't matter and we should go however big we can get before plateauing or burning out. But if the point is to hit a size that's enjoyable to the chick .. and can still be put wherever we might want to put it so it's enjoyable to us as well .. then we might want to use chicks as a benchmark instead of going for random numbers that sound good in our head. These numbers add up fast, especially for girth. A couple of tenths of girth is a total change in size.
*(Just because there's occasionally someone who thinks their unique circumstance is somehow magically transferable to all humankind: Yes, chicks can
"get used to" X,Y,Z, .. If you've had a longterm chick while you PE'ed they've tried to adapt with you. But they don't speak for all humankind, though, for all humankind didn't try to adapt with you. There are even a few chicks out there that can take two fists in their ass, but they didn't start out that way, and the odds of finding anyone like that randomly at a bar or a church or chemistry or tinder or 3nder etc etc is really really really really low. The mean will fall within a normal range of expressing 5.7 as the top range of 'better', and anything girthier than that being 'less' better, and then less better, and then tolerable, and then less tolerable, etc. Any Ideal will play to the odds, not to a special circumstance. A random unadapted chick will feel split, not spread, by girths in the less tolerable range, and typically, after some initial curiosity trades out for physical inconvenience, not want to keep banging it.)
(And then go Say So to their friends, which isn't great advertising. Might be
good advertising,
but the same dynamics are going to remain and repeat.)
And while they do "like" the feeling of being spread apart (versus considerably smaller 4.7 to 5 inch girths) , being spread apart doesn't have multiple factors contributing to orgasm from the "fullness" "deep stretch" they feel when being bottomed out on by a longer penis.
So, not to crap on anyone's natural size .. because here we have the tools to change all that, -- and using the term 'Ideal' rather than 'Wrong', .. if we're causing these states ourselves (altering our natural sizes to some particular goal) .. (and moreso if that goal is to create a magic orgasm rod for using on the largest pool of actual chicks)
-long and thin is not ideal,
-short and fat is not ideal,
-long and almost-fat is closer to ideal,
-and, if achievable, with a slight curve to better-hit all their eroticized sections along the anterior vaginal wall from the perspective of your favorite positions, down from the rear, up from the front.
[Saying all of this as an 8.8x6.0 tail-getting bastard, whose experimenting with deconstructing down from my earlier 9.0x6.2, .. so not saying
anything theoretically, but, $.02]