kyomoto
0
So a while ago I read that people masturbated when doing PE. Most said it didn't matter as long as you had a routine you did in the first place.
I tested this idea by stopping my length exercises a month ago (Basically I masturbated 3-4 times a week for a month), but while still proceeding with one of the jelqs i thought of and masturbated 3-4 times a week (Each time on a different way)
What I found is that I lost a quarter inch from my length gains. So I decided to establish that masturbation is counterproductive to actual length gains because if you're aiming for length and you're masturbating some # of times a week then it won't do you much good.
Of course this was a test I did myself and perhaps your experience is different.
I'd like for you guys to tell me your experience with masturbation and LENGTH gains or routines.
CLARIFICATION~People misunderstand what I mean~
Lets say that masturbation and length training both have a 100% effort range.
Masturbation in this case decreases length
Length training increases length
So if both give 100% doing them together must still equal to 100% and have to share part of the whole 100%
Lets say you're doing little to minimal effort in Length training.
0%-30% effort in Length training VS 100%-70% effort in masturbation
---Your result will be that you could slowly lose length because masturbation is taking over the percentage
Now lets say you're doing both equally.
50% length training intensity VS 50% masturbation
---Your results will be an equilibrium of no gain and no loss
Lastly lets say you're doing a MORE INTENSE Length routine (surpasses masturbation reduction size)
70%-100% length training VS 30%-0% masturbation
---Your results will be gains in length
This is why many people report gains even with constant masturbation. Because their length routines are far more intense than masturbation can reduce. Therefore length results.
***Note masturbation will always be 100% in effectiveness because you can't count ejaculation causing fatigue as fractions. You can only do so with incremental intensity in length training and no such thing applies to masturbation
The only plausible thing that could apply in terms of increments for masturbation would be how many days you do it***
Details on why masturbation is 100% always and why it is not always represented as 100% above in the clarification:
Example of what I mean. Bill can not masturbate any more intense than the next guy because ejaculation + the fatigue afterwards is the total 100%
You can't have 40% masturbation effectiveness. That's not how it works.
In my demonstration the percentages for masturbation aren't always 100% because the percentage is STATIC (non-changing) and the only increasing factor is the intensity in a routine.
Because masturbation is a static variable the % will always be 100%. But since length can surpass and be degraded to such an extent the range length intensity has is 200%.
Technically the #'s would be:
Demonstration 1) (0% through 90%) -100%= -10% through -100% (loss in size because negative)
Demonstration 2) 100% - 100%= 0% (equilibrium, no size change)
Demonstration 3) (200% through 110%) - 100%= +10% through +90% (gain in size)
I tested this idea by stopping my length exercises a month ago (Basically I masturbated 3-4 times a week for a month), but while still proceeding with one of the jelqs i thought of and masturbated 3-4 times a week (Each time on a different way)
What I found is that I lost a quarter inch from my length gains. So I decided to establish that masturbation is counterproductive to actual length gains because if you're aiming for length and you're masturbating some # of times a week then it won't do you much good.
Of course this was a test I did myself and perhaps your experience is different.
I'd like for you guys to tell me your experience with masturbation and LENGTH gains or routines.
CLARIFICATION~People misunderstand what I mean~
Lets say that masturbation and length training both have a 100% effort range.
Masturbation in this case decreases length
Length training increases length
So if both give 100% doing them together must still equal to 100% and have to share part of the whole 100%
Lets say you're doing little to minimal effort in Length training.
0%-30% effort in Length training VS 100%-70% effort in masturbation
---Your result will be that you could slowly lose length because masturbation is taking over the percentage
Now lets say you're doing both equally.
50% length training intensity VS 50% masturbation
---Your results will be an equilibrium of no gain and no loss
Lastly lets say you're doing a MORE INTENSE Length routine (surpasses masturbation reduction size)
70%-100% length training VS 30%-0% masturbation
---Your results will be gains in length
This is why many people report gains even with constant masturbation. Because their length routines are far more intense than masturbation can reduce. Therefore length results.
***Note masturbation will always be 100% in effectiveness because you can't count ejaculation causing fatigue as fractions. You can only do so with incremental intensity in length training and no such thing applies to masturbation
The only plausible thing that could apply in terms of increments for masturbation would be how many days you do it***
Details on why masturbation is 100% always and why it is not always represented as 100% above in the clarification:
Example of what I mean. Bill can not masturbate any more intense than the next guy because ejaculation + the fatigue afterwards is the total 100%
You can't have 40% masturbation effectiveness. That's not how it works.
In my demonstration the percentages for masturbation aren't always 100% because the percentage is STATIC (non-changing) and the only increasing factor is the intensity in a routine.
Because masturbation is a static variable the % will always be 100%. But since length can surpass and be degraded to such an extent the range length intensity has is 200%.
Technically the #'s would be:
Demonstration 1) (0% through 90%) -100%= -10% through -100% (loss in size because negative)
Demonstration 2) 100% - 100%= 0% (equilibrium, no size change)
Demonstration 3) (200% through 110%) - 100%= +10% through +90% (gain in size)
Last edited: