Why do we grow at different rates?

Will it take longer on average for a noob 4inch girth guy to reach 5 than a noob 5 inch girth guy to reach 6?

My girth is only 4 inches and since i have less stuff to work with than the average guy will it take me longer to reach that magic inch gain. I know every guy heals and increases in their own time i just want to know on average.


Also wheres my tunica?

Growth in lenght or girth varies from person to person. Some gain girth fast while others length. Yet, others struggle with both. It boils down to consistent exercising with intensity and dedication in the long run. Belief in what you are doing in a must. Each progress at different rates so trying to say one way or another is almost impossible. Just apply yourself, thats what makes the difference. Keep us informed as you progress and don't hesitate to ask questions along the way.Good luck in you Penis Enlargement adventure.

Thanks for the reply. I guess ill have to be patient, if it takes a year to add an inch in girth and length it will worth it.

Some of the smaller guys can pack girth on quicker. Remember, the VOLUME difference going from 4 to 5 inches will be a lot less than the volume increase from 5 to 6. You can do it!

I almost forgot, the tunica is like a bag that incases all the tissue of the penis. It's right under the skin.

Totally right

I am really commited so hopefully see gains in a couple of months also I have to learn to stop measuring every day lol. Cheers dudes for the replies and the encouragement I really apreciate it

Originally posted by Gandolf
Some of the smaller guys can pack girth on quicker. Remember, the VOLUME difference going from 4 to 5 inches will be a lot less than the volume increase from 5 to 6. You can do it!

Click to expand...

That's a completely logical argument, but I look at it like this:
If you slice the shaft up the side and lay it out, it would be like a rectangular sheet, with the 5" girth obviously 1" longer than the 4". So in order to gain 1" girth, both sheets must stretch 1". It seems that it would be easier for the larger sheet to stretch that length, as the stretch per unit area would be smaller than that of the smaller sheet, ie requiring less stretch -> less time.

Originally posted by quijjiboo
That's a completely logical argument, but I look at it like this:
If you slice the shaft up the side and lay it out, it would be like a rectangular sheet, with the 5" girth obviously 1" longer than the 4". So in order to gain 1" girth, both sheets must stretch 1". It seems that it would be easier for the larger sheet to stretch that length, as the stretch per unit area would be smaller than that of the smaller sheet, ie requiring less stretch -> less time.

Click to expand...

One way to look at it, and it has some validity. But I think there's more to it than just a "sheet." We have to build mass and add more tissue to the penis to cause a girth gain. And gaining an inch at 4 inches girth is less mass than gaining an inch at 5 inches girth. If you look around, most of the big girth gainers started small. Many went from 4 to 5, some went from 5 to 6, but almost none went from 6 to 7. Make sense?

That's not really indicative of ability though, after all, who wants to gain more, the 5" guy or the 6" guy...

quijjiboo;42814 said:

That's not really indicative of ability though, after all, who wants to gain more, the 5" guy or the 6" guy...

Click to expand...

They both do, but the 6' inch guy in my opinion doesn't need the extra girth as much the 5' inch guy. Most women would consider 6' girth or a width of around 2 inches to be ideal anyways.

Also anotherway to look at this would be this example.

Subject A has a penis 7 x 5
Subject B has a penis 8 x 5
Subject C has a penis 9 x 5
Subject D has a penis 6 x 5

All are different lengths from 6 inches to 9 inches in erection but the same girth at 5 inches.

Now from my experience in this field on myself and from observations of others, it would be easier in terms of the speed of growth and how it began to manifest for Subject D than it would be for the others, with Subject C being the one that would see the slowest gains in girth compared to the others.

However this has its problems. This theory isnt air tight and you have to take into consideration everything else relative such as intensity, rest and health of the subject et cetera et cetera. However if all four subjects were to train EXACTLY the same, have the same rest days and be of 'normal' good health for a male than I would speculate to say that the smaller sized subject would see the faster girth gains.

Why is this? well its simple geometry and firstl lets find the area of each subjects penises.

Subject A's area = 35
Subject B's area = 40
Subject C's area = 45
Subject D's area = 30

So the 9 incher has an area of 45 while the 6 incher has an area of 30. The lesser area makes it quicker for the girth gains to manifest as it doesnt have as much area to cover and have to grow into. For the guy whos bigger, than he has to grow MORE penis, this is obvious but we dont think like this often enough and just see that 1/2 inch in everyone, when its more to it than that.

Say for someone who is 11 x 5 than his area would be 55 which is a whopping great big dick but he will find it difficult to see overall girth gains in a short space of time.

Bigger guys like that ''could'' be more susceptable to odd or uneven girth growth, as it will take longer for the growth to occur uniform that it starts more at one end of the penis than the other ... this is again my theory and not a fact.

I just hope what I have written makes more sense as to why guys gain at such different rates and sure lots more to it than just being longer [As I have said] but the longer you are than it will be harder in my opinion to get that overall result in girth because of the increased space needed for that extra growth to manifest into.

This can also be reversed for length gains too.

Example

Subject A = 5 x 7
Subject B= 6 x 7
Subject C = 7 x 7
Subject D = 8 x7

My penis would be around the Subject D's stats. Its the biggest out of the subjects but I would find it more difficult to gain more length than the other subjects as my penis has more surface area and covers more volume than the rest, so more growth is needed.

Area of the subjects

Subject A = 35
Subject B = 42
Subject C = 49
Subject D = 56

As you can see, Subject D has allot more area than Subject A and so would need more growth to occur to see that length increase.

you make a lot of sense redzulu

Englander;350429 said:

you make a lot of sense redzulu <img src="img src="http://www.images-avsforum.com/avs/n/P.jpg" onerror="this.src='http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/3636/greyssk.jpg'">

Click to expand...

Agree :D some amazing info here thanks

I'm wondering though, I recall DLD saying SSJ's would give him .75 inches growth for girth (let me know if I'm wrong) in a workout. I can only get about .25.

Because my girth is just over 5 inches, and DLD's is at least 7 (again, correct me if I'm wrong), it makes sense that he can make his dick thicker doing this exercise because he's got more length to contract to for girth.

So maybe this ability to gain does follow Red's logical volume chart, but I think knowing what exercising work for you, and which you need to do for their different advantages can offset these numbers.

crd11;366061 said:

I'm wondering though, I recall DLD saying SSJ's would give him .75 inches growth for girth (let me know if I'm wrong) in a workout. I can only get about .25.

Because my girth is just over 5 inches, and DLD's is at least 7 (again, correct me if I'm wrong), it makes sense that he can make his dick thicker doing this exercise because he's got more length to contract to for girth.

So maybe this ability to gain does follow Red's logical volume chart, but I think knowing what exercising work for you, and which you need to do for their different advantages can offset these numbers.

Click to expand...

i agree. he has more blood in his penis, so i would imagine that he could use that for greater expansion than almost anyone else

Makes sense. If guys want to add to it, please do.

I'm not sure about the theory that says less volume/area = more gains.

The way that I see it is by assuming that every other variables are equal (health/workout intensity and so on), if the micro-tears density is equal, the penis with more volume will have more micro tears that may be later filled with new cells.

I think that more micro-tears = more gains

but again, this is only speculation... Who knows...

REDZULU2003 said:

Makes sense. If guys want to add to it, please do.

Click to expand...

Wow I the Dmoney came back! He was such a blast, he used to be the authority on all things ghetto fabulous ?