Length before Girth Theory!

Longth;669901 said:

They're just not mutually exclusive. Routines like that are about bigger, rather than thicker or longer, so there's a synergy between the two where each helps the other. For the majority, it's more appropriate to go for a flat out volume routine. The only exceptions being those extraordinarily thick or long already.

I honestly think volume building routines are the best bet to make the largest gains in overall size most efficiently. But that's one of the oldest debates in pe. So we have some doing SRT for length or girth specifically. Really though, as long as the thing gets bigger the opinion is right enough right?

Click to expand...

ChilDsh said:

Never heard about this theory , it's bullshit if you ask me..length and girth complement each other , you will gain a bit of length doing girth work,and a bit of girth doing length work.Working on both length and girth would be more productive than working on length only or girth only if you ask me.

So the theory says that you can't stretch your dick properly if you have a thick flaccid? ( since you worked on girth and you increased the girth of your flaccid ) . I call bullshit again....imo there are two times when you can't stretch properly,one when you are expanded after girth work,and two when you are semi erect - erect ( no talking about erect stretching here ) , otherwise , you could have a 7" girth flaccid,you will stretch it.

The tissue , cells , etc , in your dick will be stretched . There might be a bit of truth in this theory, but i wouldn't waste my time with it.

So in the end,i think it's much better to work both length and girth , than working length only until you hit your goal,and then work on girth.Plus you are wasting tons of time.

My opinion,don't throw rocks at me

Click to expand...