I am uncut and I am fine with it. I had a couple of women tell me that the only real difference is the preference of the woman. Most of them said that they like the cut dicks better when they are sucking on it and only a few said that they like the uncut dicks. But they also told me that once they hopped on top that a dick was a dick and that size only mattered then.
so lets put this matter to rest
:blowjob:
 
Why does everyone feel uncomfortable talking about this? I think it is kind of telling that it makes alot of men freak out. Everyone goes on and on about thrombos and clamping and whatnot, but whenever circumcision comes up, there seems to be this reaction where everyone states their opinion and then says "That's it. Let's not talk about this anymore." I wonder why that is? What is so wrong about discussing being cut and uncut and the pros and cons? It's okay to talk about enlarging the penis, and stretching the balls.
 
kong1971 said:
Why does everyone feel uncomfortable talking about this? I think it is kind of telling that it makes alot of men freak out. Everyone goes on and on about thrombos and clamping and whatnot, but whenever circumcision comes up, there seems to be this reaction where everyone states their opinion and then says "That's it. Let's not talk about this anymore." I wonder why that is? What is so wrong about discussing being cut and uncut and the pros and cons? It's okay to talk about enlarging the penis, and stretching the balls.

Bingo. It is worth talking about and it is NOT worth getting upset about. If this subject angers you, seek therapy cause the world can be a cruel place.
 
Let me ask 1 question to all you guys who are cut. If it was your choice will you get cut or not.
How about when you guys have kids, would you have them cut?
 
I would have been uncut, if it had been my choice. God (or evolution) put that foreskin there for a reason, and I have been trying for the last four months to restore using skin expansion techniques.

In the last four months, I have discovered that there is a whole spectrum of sexual sensation that I was missing out on due to keratinization of the glans, and that alot of the problems I had with my penis were due to my tight cut (from turkey neck, to my small starting size and occasional E.D.)

Good news is, it is partially restorable. I'll never be able to get my frenelum or the frenar bands back, but I can make myself look normal, and the return in sensitivity of my glans is incredible all in itself. I feel so happy about it that I want to share this with everyone, but alot of guys here don't want to talk about it. They remind me of kids who plug their ears and go, "Don't want to listen! Lalalalala!" It's just so sad that we can talk about stretching our nuts or taking pills to have big loads, but everyone is so touchy about circumcision -- especially when it is essentially reversible, if they are unhappy with their status.

For all you guys who are uncut and feel like oddities here in the US, be proud of what you got! 85% of the world is uncut. You are natural born and untampered with, and will enjoy a lifetime of sensation that the cut will never know.

If you are cut and my message upsets you, don't take it out on me. I am just telling the honest, backed-up-by-fact truth. FACT: most of the world is uncut. FACT: circumcision has no medical benefit. FACT: circumcision removes 50% of the skin of the penis. FACT: circumcision removes 90% of the specialized sexual nerves endings of the penis. FACT: circumcision is the reason men lose interest in sex as they get older...no sensitivity. FACT: uncut men are, on average, larger than cut men. Less skin and scarring causes 20% of the penis to be held inside the abdomen. FACT: there is a movement here in the US of thousands of men and (yes) women who were circumcised who are trying to have this practice banned by law. In 1994, female circumcision was outlawed, and rightfully so, but keeping our sons from getting cut up is a tougher sell, apparently. I think it is because men here are considered disposable. Cut em up and send em off to war is pretty much the motto. Anyone who sees the truth and dares speak it is knocked down by all the rest of the happy little drones.

Call me names if you want. I have been called crazy, stupid, gay and a liar just here on MOS for speaking the truth, but fact is fact.

Now I leave the floor open. I'm sure we're about to see several "I'm cut and loving it" posts.
 
I have heard of female circumcision and I would think that the equivelant would be removal of the clitoral hood but I heard that they remove the whole clitoris which is sick.
 
XCALET said:
Let me ask 1 question to all you guys who are cut. If it was your choice will you get cut or not.
How about when you guys have kids, would you have them cut?

That's interesting. Seeing as how I am seemingly chick repellent, in terms of appearance, the sexual benefits are of minimal advantage to me. I have no problem getting fullly aroused or anything else, when the rare moment surfaces, after cleaning the cobwebs of my inactive dick. Appearance wise, I think a cut penis looks better. That, of course, is nothing more than my opinion. Therefore, I am going to say that all things being equal, I would go with cut. However, there seems to be credible information that suggests all things may not be equal, that much is lost, as Kong elaborated on. I would like to get more medical opinions on the matter before I can really say. Some of the things I've read from sites like www.norm.org seem a little fishy to me, but I know some of the information is legitimate. When it's all said and done, I really can't say right now what I'd do if I could go back in time.

In the highly unlikely scenario that I actually do have a son, again I can't answer that right now today. I promise you that I would read and research it heavily during the pregnancy period and get informed about it. Once a person is cut, it cannot be reversed, completely. However, circumcision is a barbaric procedure later in life, from what I've heard. Of course, it is less so when done under the proper hospital procedure.

Here is the final verdict right now: *shrug*
 
I think cut looks better but I'd rather stay uncut and if I have any sons they will not get snipped either.
 
Bigd, I saw your photos and your cock looks awesome. Like a ���� star. In fact, alot of ���� stars are uncut, if you look closely. There just isn't much difference visually when a man is aroused because the penis elongates and the skin pulls back from the glans. You actually have to look close sometimes, unless the ���� star has a really dark scar. I'm glad you don't want to get snipped, and will spare your sons, too, if you have any. I would love to trade my dick for your uncut ladysplitter!!!
 
kong1971 said:
Why does everyone feel uncomfortable talking about this? I think it is kind of telling that it makes alot of men freak out. Everyone goes on and on about thrombos and clamping and whatnot, but whenever circumcision comes up, there seems to be this reaction where everyone states their opinion and then says "That's it. Let's not talk about this anymore." I wonder why that is? What is so wrong about discussing being cut and uncut and the pros and cons? It's okay to talk about enlarging the penis, and stretching the balls.

The arguements about cut or uncut just waste time and it is just a matter of preference. I said lets end this because some people get very heated about this subject matter
 
At the same time, being cut and restoring my foreskin makes me very interested in the viewpoints of both sides and hungry for new info. I read all circumcision related posts because I am restoring, just like a hanger reads all hanging posts. I get agitated when people like you, whether you are cut or uncut, want to cut off my info. It is almost like being discriminated against. You could really help guys like me, who are working very hard to have an approximation of what you enjoy, with your lifelong experience of having an intact cock. Why do you want to shut off my sources of info and inspiration? I just want to have an intact cock-- or as close to one as I can get. It is hard enough to keep working on it when it sometimes takes years to restore, and so many people try to discourage or silence you.

Are you from the US? Are you ashamed of your intact foreskin, because you are in the minority in our country? You shouldn't be ashamed or embarassed, because there is a movement underway towards limiting circumcision, and soon, the US, like the rest of the world, will be mostly uncut. There are already states where the percentage of uncut men is getting close to 50/50 or better! Perhaps, being intact, you are disturbed when you hear about other men discussing their genital mutilation.

Whatever your situation, please stop calling for us to be silenced. Maybe you are uninterested...but there are plenty of us who are!
 
kong1971 said:
Bigd, I saw your photos and your cock looks awesome. Like a ���� star. In fact, alot of ���� stars are uncut, if you look closely. There just isn't much difference visually when a man is aroused because the penis elongates and the skin pulls back from the glans. You actually have to look close sometimes, unless the ���� star has a really dark scar. I'm glad you don't want to get snipped, and will spare your sons, too, if you have any. I would love to trade my dick for your uncut ladysplitter!!!
Yea it looks a lot better now thanx to Penis Enlargement. Before I used to have an extra long droopy foreskin that in my opinion looked horrible but since I got bigger, the foreskin fits better now and I wouldn't have it any other way.
 
Kong I agree with you man.
I have heard alot of crap towards uncut men. From they are always dirtier to they give urinary track infections to women. I have even heard that uncut men give cervical cancer to women. If you are born with it should be for a reason. I have been with my wife 5 years. She has never gotten a urinary track infection.

I have 2 little boys and no they are not cut. I think the way that kids get cut is plain and simple brutal. Thats just my opinion. I cant seem to put my few days old child under the knife just because of what it normal for others. I'm sorry but not me.
 
Now that I think about it, I would be pretty angry if I was intact and had to put up with such discriminatory remarks. Intact men are called dirty, smelly, ugly and are blamed for UTIs and even cervical cancer...all lies propagated by the medical industry so that they can continue making money off the practice of circumcision.
 
I don't have a problem with the topic. I am happy that i am uncut. I feel sorry for the people that had "part of their manhood taken away from them"
I think that was unfair. There are ways to get back the extra skin that you have lost. I have to say that just stretching and dry jelqing are the best ways to stretch the skin around the top of the shaft. Dry jelqing works the best when you have fully erect penis. More blood to begin with and by jelqing you force more blood into it. Just becareful not to do it too fast or you will burst blood vessels.
 
Thanks, getbig.

I never really considered how discriminated against you intact men are here in the US. Does it make you sore when you hear people talk about you being nasty and smelly and that you give women pussy cancer? I know I would get sore about it, cause it just ain't true.

Thanks for the advice, too, about dry jelqing. I don't jelq anymore, but I do clamp, and it seems to give a good stretch to the skin.

I have been restoring 4 months now and have a little roll right behind the glans when flaccid. When I sit down, my skin rolls over almost completely now, but I still have no coverage when standing or moving about. It is still going to take me at least 12 more months to get flaccid coverage, from what I have learned doing research on restoration time, but for me, it is time well-spent. The more coverage I get, the more whole I feel. I plan to keep restoring until I look like a natural, intact man.

When I started, I had a 5 1/2 inch penis with a bad curve, and was cut so tight that my erections could actually be painful if I got really hard or had rough intercourse. Now I am 7.75" long, can pull the skin up halfway over the head when erect and can pound away for a hour and still get it up again 20 minutes later...very big difference!!! Can you blame me for being so big on restoring and so anti-circumcision?
 
kong1971 said:
When I started, I had a 5 1/2 inch penis with a bad curve, and was cut so tight that my erections could actually be painful if I got really hard or had rough intercourse. Now I am 7.75" long, can pull the skin up halfway over the head when erect and can pound away for a hour and still get it up again 20 minutes later...very big difference!!! Can you blame me for being so big on restoring and so anti-circumcision?

Sounds amazing. How does it make such a profound difference?

BTW Kong, looking at your measurements in your sig line, you're growing like a beast these days. Congrats!
 
its not like it is that big of a deal anyway, the majority of cut men come from religious families, don't they...like catholocism or judaism...or is that just a stereotype?
 
My wife and all the chicks that i ever had a relationship with always preferred cut cocks. Their only reason was that uncut cocks smelled and cut cocks didn't.
 
Back
Top Bottom