DLD

Double Long Daddy, The Guru
Staff member
Super Moderator
Do you think there is a difference in SIZE and RACE?

This is the burning question. Let me know your opinions and experiences. The world wants to know. Please state your RACE and SIZE for the fun of it.

I'm Italian and I have a 10.5" Cock
 
See but, that's POST Penis Enlargement. I'm half Greek and, started with around 6x5. Small flaccid too. Now, I hang soft nearly 6" and am 8.25" erect. Size in races? Hard to say. I've yet to personally see any CONCRETE studies pointing to facts showing size differences between races. Sure we've all heard the stereotypes. In any big crowd of men regardless of race, there will be average, small, and bigger than average...then, the occasional huge guy.
 
I would say on average Black men are larger then other races... I was in the Military and spent 2 years at a private boarding school. The largest limp dick I ever saw on anyone was this black guy and flacid he was approx 3 inches from his knee! Granted it was skinny and didn't have much girth to it but long as hell...

I'm a natural 8 x 6.5 midshaft and while it may be impressive I've seen MUCH larger then that... The largest girth I've ever seen was on an Italian guy, I'd estimate 9.5 NBPenis EnlargementL x an easy 8 or so at the midshaft! I should know because he helped me tag team this nasty bitch I was trying to loose and I could see up close and personal how much trouble she had trying to deal with it.. Funny thing about the Italian guy was that his flacid was dwarfed by mine! Still trying to figure that out..

There ya go, I'd say that Blacks and Italian men fair better in size then do the other races, but thats just my point.

My Family is from Norway BTW...
 
Originally posted by treepapaniner
There ya go, I'd say that Blacks and Italian men fair better in size then do the other races, but thats just my point.

I like the way you think:D
 
I am slightly above 8.5''x5.75'' (BPenis EnlargementL) and white. I do think that mediterranian based males and black males are a bit bigger than the other races on the average. There are huge guys from other races, but probability of finding a larger guy from mediterranians or blacks is higher. But it is also important that some blacks are big due to some medical problems and they must be excluded from healthy and normal blacks. I share DLD's opinion on size, anything above 7'' or 8'' size must probably be a Penis Enlargemented one or there is a medical problem.
 
I'm very curious as to what type of medical problem would cause a larger than average sized penis? Other than elaphantiasis (sp??).
 
I don't know if elephantiasis is something different from sickle cell anemia (one fourth of african americans are carriers of this disease). Also I heard somewhere that hormonal imbalancies cause such cases.
 
Well being a Mungral myself :) I have Scottish, Irish, Welsh, English, French and Cypriot blood in me I can't say if I have inherited anything from one place etc.

My gut instinct is this however:
From all the guys I saw...naked thru' showers and groupies in my madder days, I would say that the Blacks are the biggest on average, and also the Scandanavians are also pretty big, anyone with Scandanavian blood MAY have an advantage, but who knows.

This topic is a weird one, one that can't be proved DAMM, but a very interesting one.
I also reckon the Pacific Islanders hold some of the worlds biggest cocks.
 
Originally posted by teoman
I don't know if elephantiasis is something different from sickle cell anemia (one fourth of african americans are carriers of this disease). Also I heard somewhere that hormonal imbalancies cause such cases.

:thinking:
*runs off to catch sickle cell anemia and some hormonal imbalances*
 
Originally posted by REDZULU2003


My gut instinct is this however:
From all the guys I saw...naked thru' showers and groupies in my madder days, I would say that the Blacks are the biggest on average, and also the Scandanavians are also pretty big, anyone with Scandanavian blood MAY have an advantage, but who knows.


Someone over at other discussion site mainintained something about Scandanavians, in particular men from Denmark being larger then average, *on average*:confused:

I'm 2nd generation from Norway and while I've got some comments from girls as to it being big, for some reason I still don't see it that way. If you try to do a search of google you mostly get a bunch of shit sites trying to sell a pill to pop... Perhaps someone with more time could find some information about this... Never heard about Pacific Isl'ers being huge but come to think about it I've never seen one naked either so who knows.. My wife said the biggest she ever saw was her first boyfriend who was American Indian so maybe those guys are the ones packing the serious meat.. I ended up #2 on the list of approx 30 guys. but I was by far the thickest. Oh, yes, I actually asked this pathetic question because I wanted to know where I would be on the size scale, funny thing she never answered that question the way I thought she would.

RWG
 
I'm Italian and Danish and well average size..

If you buy into all the hype, media, internet, books, movies, TV, Rap videos, etc etc..

All Blacks are Hung like horses..

According to one French army surgeon, who presumably traveled a lot. The best answer to this is that black men are indeed bigger than whites - but not by a lot. Only a half inch or so on average. The perceived difference seems to come from the fact that there are a comparatively many more black men who have much larger than average erect and soft penises - I guess these images stand out in the memory more! What is almost certainly true is that Asian men are about half an inch smaller on average when erect, and Native Americans, for example, tend to be a bit smaller still. One interesting thing about this is that the vagina of each of these races is built to perfectly fit the penis of the corresponding male.
~~
This is another survey:
In the Dr. Jacobus survey definite penis size differences on a basis of race were detected. The largest Arab penises were found to be between eight and ten inches; but it was among the Muslim Sudanese that Jacobus found "the most developed phallus" - notably "one of the maximum dimensions, being nearly 12 in. in length, by a diameter of 2- in." The hardy researcher remarked that this was "a terrific machine" - "more likely the penis of a donkey than of a man." He concluded that the "Sudanese Negro possesses the largest genital organ of all the races of mankind". In a less extensive survey, but equally interesting, Dr. Robert Chartham measured erect penises for groups of men of various nationalities. The largest organs for each nationality were as follows: English - 10½ in.; West German - 8½ in.; Negro - 7½ in.; French - 7¾ in.; Danish 8 in.; American - 7¾ in.; and Swedish 7¾ in. The groups were small, ranging from only 9 to 121 individuals; nevertheless the data acquired are not without significance.





:hammerhea
 
It has been proven that it is possible to enlarge the penis. So, we witness the birth of a new olympic sport: penis development or penis building :) Since there are big sportmen from different races, there will also be big Penis Enlargementers from all the races no matter what the average is for ordinary male from different races. Now, this question must be revised as ''Who will be the biggest personally?'' Of course, my favorite is DLD. :)

If there are 10000 white males with 10''+ dick, if there are 20000 scandinavian males with 10+ dicks, who cares which race is bigger? So, as DLD said, biggest race is the race of Penis Enlargementers.
 
Originally posted by stillwantmore
I'm very curious as to what type of medical problem would cause a larger than average sized penis? Other than elaphantiasis (sp??).
:clapper:
 
Originally posted by teoman
It has been proven that it is possible to enlarge the penis. So, we witness the birth of a new olympic sport: penis development or penis building :)

If there are 10000 white males with 10''+ dick, if there are 20000 scandinavian males with 10+ dicks, who cares which race is bigger? So, as DLD said, biggest race is the race of Penis Enlargementers.

So pretty soon we will all get questions like are you natural or a Penis Enlargement,er when will pull out the meat..( For single guys getting new woman).... :biggrin2:
 
mmmh, pornstar's world have a lot of black impressive man, many white man and well I don't remember asian pornstar.

We could investigate...

But I think is nature that decides, my brother is sure bigger than me. :o

But soon I WILL be bigger, longer .... I'll win ;)
 
Originally posted by cableman
But I think is nature that decides, my brother is sure bigger than me. :o

But soon I WILL be bigger, longer .... I'll win ;)

I love your comments!
 
I think there is probably a little bit of difference, though it has likely been exaggerated by myths and stereotypes.

For the record, I'm caucasian and 6.5" EBP.
 
There was a study I read a while back that stated black males are 6.5x4.75 on average. They have a much longer flaccid length than white males though. Also, blacks tend to be large more than whites. Something like 23% had larger than 7 inches, while whites only had something like 12%. This could explain the extra 1/2 inch on average. Asians were also in the study and averaged 5.5 bpel, dont remember the girth.

and DLD, you're one lucky italian! i lived with an italian that had about a 5incher. I guess cock size can widely vary by race. But I guess the race issue is thrown out the door when someone discovers Penis Enlargement.

As for me, I'm a big mutt, but mainly scottish. Damn scotts. I got stuck with a 6x4 originally. Yeah, it was a beanpole, still is, but i'm working on it!
 
Originally posted by penguinsfan
What do you mean by the 23% compared to 12%? You must be talking about whites having less standard deviation.

23% or so of blacks had a penis size larger than 7" compared to something like 12% of whites having a penis size over 7". Sorry for the confusion.
 
Hey all, I'm new to DLD's site and to NPenis Enlargement but I hope to make considerable gains over the next few years.

I don't know about 'other' races, but being Oriental I come in at a lowly 5.25 erect length x 4.5 erect girth! Although I only strictly date Oriental girls, I can honestly say that I have never had a single complaint from the girls. Maybe that holds true about the females of each race having vaginas that are actually designed to perfectly fit the males of that specific race.

After reading n2growing's thread, I came to the conclusion as to why I had never had any complaints. Well, hopefully within a few years time I can proudly become one of a very few Oriental guys with a bigger than average Oriental cock.
 
Just a thought,skin colour can effect how we perceive size,take bodybuilding as an example the guys go for a very deep tan when competing because it helps show of the smallest detail and helps create the illusion of size.

You look at a pic of a white dick and a black dick of the same size and i bet the black dick looks visually bigger and more impressive,notice how the veins on a black guys dick look a lot more prominent than they do on a white guys dick.
 
yeah the lighter the skin the less muscle definition there will be in comparison to someone with about the same build and fitness level and with darker complexion.
 
as much as we like to doubt it, the average black male's got a bigger piece than the rest of the world, BUT! I believe that when you get to the really big dick-sizes, the white will have bigger girths. for the record i'm 6"NBPenis EnlargementL and 4.6" EG, I think I'll stop when I'm 7"NBPenis EnlargementL and 5.8EG. I'm mostly english, scottish and a little french...P.S, if you have a really good routine throw it in here (the server won't let me start new threads for some reason.)
 
There's definitely a difference (on average) b/t races as mentioned before in this thread.

I'm Hungarian...started 6.3'' BPenis EnlargementL 5'' midshaft EG
 
My race is considered other according to the SATs I took lol. I'm Pacific Islander/Asian at 5.0" x 5.0"

I'm just starting to Penis Enlargement. How long will it usually take to add 2 inches in length and 1 inch in girth?

I hope I won't have to Penis Enlargement for more than a year to obtain this, but if I have to then I will.
 
Wishing|Average said:
My race is considered other according to the SATs I took lol. I'm Pacific Islander/Asian at 5.0" x 5.0"

I'm just starting to Penis Enlargement. How long will it usually take to add 2 inches in length and 1 inch in girth?

I hope I won't have to Penis Enlargement for more than a year to obtain this, but if I have to then I will.

You're already at average girth...length is a bit lower than average. If you have a consistent routine and stick with it you could realistically acheive those gains in 6 months to a year. Gains vary though...it could possibly take over a year...
 
Im all mixed up of European mixes, mainly German, and English, with Scottish too. Which is now White-American. I started with 7.5bp and 5.5in girth. Guess I was lucky?
 
I'm a real mixed up mutt too. I started at 7.75" but with a thick girth. My grandson has inherited it too, lucky little so and so.

I had an Italian pal I used to work out with at the gym. His hung almost to his knees. I doubt very much if he practiced P.E.
 
I'm asian (e.g. chinese with a little bit of german) born with a stat of 7X5. What exactly is the average for east asian (e.g. chinese, korean, japanese, etc.)? My german side comes from my mom side, so how does race play a part in size? Since supposely (correct me if I'm wrong) penis size is herediate from your dad and not your mom. Maybe diet can play a role in size?
 
From my experiences, I think that the "size" of the erection is not simply length, alone. Nobody I've seen here has yet mentioned this expression from which you are able to measure size. So first, I'll explain, and then I'll give you my opinion as to race and size :cool:

I think there's a different way to measure that's better. Try this for a change. Measure your average circumference and square that figure, or in other words, multiply it by itself, then multiply that by the length, and finally multiply that product by .08, and you get a figure in cubic inches that represents the displacement of your cock in a woman. D = C (squared) L x .08. This is what she actually reacts to, at least, initially. (She can be re-educated to like just about anything, actually.)

Women love to be filled up, but if the penis is too long, or if it is too fat, it is less than erotic to her. She doesn't look at it quite the same way that we do. It's better to be a little less than ideal than too big, in that case. But the thicker you are, the less length she is able to take, so you bottom out sooner. If you have a long skinny erection, you stab her cervix every time you thrust, and some women don't like that either.

What I am going for is a perfect balance (to my mind) between length and girth. I am a little too thick right now for my length. This simple equation shows that a very small increase in thickness increases the displacement in a woman more than length alone. The length increases the mass of the penis linearly, while the girth increases the mass of the penis by the square of the change of girth.

So back now to the question: I think that average black penises tend to be longer but skinnier, while average white penises tend to be shorter and thicker. But were you to take a measurement, like how much water such a penis displaces, the top .025% of white penises would displace more water than the top .025% of black penises.

Then again, we have to realize that there are about 3 times more whites than blacks to choose from, so that isn't a fair sample group, is it?

We are very impressed with length, which is by far the most impressive-looking and photogenic. However, when women have a choice, they will chose the guy who has about an inch more than they can take, length-wise, and who can fill them up, side-to-side. That way, that penis can drive them mad in any position. They want that friction and a strong, solid cock, I think.

There is no question that the black race seems to represent the extremes in the races, physically. They seem to represent the longest, tallest, fastest, quickest, most athletic, etc. etc. And that's fine. But there are also extremes in every race, and since the black race doesn't have the largest number of males by a long shot, the overwhelming number of males in the white race will always win the size contest simply because there's so many more of them.

I am a white male and don't think we begrudge any race their strength. I don't. I like to see it, frankly. It's good that they excel. On the other hand, adult entertainment stars with big cocks are almost always the blacks and I think they pride themselves in that and put a higher value on their mystique, whereas white men, some of whom have as large or larger hard-ons, have a different nature and are not so inclined to even get into adult entertainment. White guys seem to have nothing to prove, and black guys seem to enjoy what they see as their superiority.

There are white guys with such huge cocks that not even the biggest women want to try to take them! Those same men eventually lose interst in sex, being turned down all the time. The producers also know that once they showcase these guys then their hunt is on to find some woman who wants to screw them. That's a problem, because now you've got a guy that nobody can watch anymore because no woman can manage him. So he isn't hired to begin with. They aren't going to whet everybody's appetite and then not deliver.

So we're back to square one. The best cock (to a woman) is the best proportioned, hard and long-lived cock that fully fills her up, brings her to orgasm every time, and gets her begging for more. The most photogenic cock is the long, hard, thin (proportionally) black one. But that isn't the one women usually prefer on a daily basis, except to make money on, in a porno flick.

I think the blacks, overall, beat the white guys in length, but mainly because they are driven to compete that way. I say, more power to 'em. Frankly, I like to see a powerful cock, far more than a huge, floppy one.
 
what we got to remember is that not all black people are the same there are many different tribes in africa, the same goes for asians. i think we generalize to much. also up until 100 years ago most white people-europeans (italians, greeks, croatians, germans etc.) would have married someone from there village or nieghbouring village. now that alot of those people have moved to america, australia, england-wherever shit gets all mixed up. in italy men from certain areas say sicily might be bigger then men from calabria (this example can be used for any country) but now people are fucking people from all over (mixed-marriage) that it's hard too say which race or tribe or area or village has big ones

^hope that makes sense

me i'm half italian half australian started 6 x 5.5 but my dad and uncle are 7 inches and over. talk about getting the short end of the stick

i personally think that everybodies the same, every race has it's large and small guys some races just have more guys that are large
 
Formysweetie said:
From my experiences, I think that the "size" of the erection is not simply length, alone. Nobody I've seen here has yet mentioned this expression from which you are able to measure size. So first, I'll explain, and then I'll give you my opinion as to race and size :cool:

I think there's a different way to measure that's better. Try this for a change. Measure your average circumference and square that figure, or in other words, multiply it by itself, then multiply that by the length, and finally multiply that product by .08, and you get a figure in cubic inches that represents the displacement of your cock in a woman. D = C (squared) L x .08. This is what she actually reacts to, at least, initially. (She can be re-educated to like just about anything, actually.)

Women love to be filled up, but if the penis is too long, or if it is too fat, it is less than erotic to her. She doesn't look at it quite the same way that we do. It's better to be a little less than ideal than too big, in that case. But the thicker you are, the less length she is able to take, so you bottom out sooner. If you have a long skinny erection, you stab her cervix every time you thrust, and some women don't like that either.

What I am going for is a perfect balance (to my mind) between length and girth. I am a little too thick right now for my length. This simple equation shows that a very small increase in thickness increases the displacement in a woman more than length alone. The length increases the mass of the penis linearly, while the girth increases the mass of the penis by the square of the change of girth.

So back now to the question: I think that average black penises tend to be longer but skinnier, while average white penises tend to be shorter and thicker. But were you to take a measurement, like how much water such a penis displaces, the top .025% of white penises would displace more water than the top .025% of black penises.

Then again, we have to realize that there are about 3 times more whites than blacks to choose from, so that isn't a fair sample group, is it?

We are very impressed with length, which is by far the most impressive-looking and photogenic. However, when women have a choice, they will chose the guy who has about an inch more than they can take, length-wise, and who can fill them up, side-to-side. That way, that penis can drive them mad in any position. They want that friction and a strong, solid cock, I think.

There is no question that the black race seems to represent the extremes in the races, physically. They seem to represent the longest, tallest, fastest, quickest, most athletic, etc. etc. And that's fine. But there are also extremes in every race, and since the black race doesn't have the largest number of males by a long shot, the overwhelming number of males in the white race will always win the size contest simply because there's so many more of them.

I am a white male and don't think we begrudge any race their strength. I don't. I like to see it, frankly. It's good that they excel. On the other hand, adult entertainment stars with big cocks are almost always the blacks and I think they pride themselves in that and put a higher value on their mystique, whereas white men, some of whom have as large or larger hard-ons, have a different nature and are not so inclined to even get into adult entertainment. White guys seem to have nothing to prove, and black guys seem to enjoy what they see as their superiority.

There are white guys with such huge cocks that not even the biggest women want to try to take them! Those same men eventually lose interst in sex, being turned down all the time. The producers also know that once they showcase these guys then their hunt is on to find some woman who wants to screw them. That's a problem, because now you've got a guy that nobody can watch anymore because no woman can manage him. So he isn't hired to begin with. They aren't going to whet everybody's appetite and then not deliver.

So we're back to square one. The best cock (to a woman) is the best proportioned, hard and long-lived cock that fully fills her up, brings her to orgasm every time, and gets her begging for more. The most photogenic cock is the long, hard, thin (proportionally) black one. But that isn't the one women usually prefer on a daily basis, except to make money on, in a porno flick.

I think the blacks, overall, beat the white guys in length, but mainly because they are driven to compete that way. I say, more power to 'em. Frankly, I like to see a powerful cock, far more than a huge, floppy one.

Nice post. Added to your rep points.
 
Formysweetie said:
From my experiences, I think that the "size" of the erection is not simply length, alone. Nobody I've seen here has yet mentioned this expression from which you are able to measure size. So first, I'll explain, and then I'll give you my opinion as to race and size :cool:

I think there's a different way to measure that's better. Try this for a change. Measure your average circumference and square that figure, or in other words, multiply it by itself, then multiply that by the length, and finally multiply that product by .08, and you get a figure in cubic inches that represents the displacement of your cock in a woman. D = C (squared) L x .08. This is what she actually reacts to, at least, initially. (She can be re-educated to like just about anything, actually.)

Women love to be filled up, but if the penis is too long, or if it is too fat, it is less than erotic to her. She doesn't look at it quite the same way that we do. It's better to be a little less than ideal than too big, in that case. But the thicker you are, the less length she is able to take, so you bottom out sooner. If you have a long skinny erection, you stab her cervix every time you thrust, and some women don't like that either.

What I am going for is a perfect balance (to my mind) between length and girth. I am a little too thick right now for my length. This simple equation shows that a very small increase in thickness increases the displacement in a woman more than length alone. The length increases the mass of the penis linearly, while the girth increases the mass of the penis by the square of the change of girth.

So back now to the question: I think that average black penises tend to be longer but skinnier, while average white penises tend to be shorter and thicker. But were you to take a measurement, like how much water such a penis displaces, the top .025% of white penises would displace more water than the top .025% of black penises.

Then again, we have to realize that there are about 3 times more whites than blacks to choose from, so that isn't a fair sample group, is it?

We are very impressed with length, which is by far the most impressive-looking and photogenic. However, when women have a choice, they will chose the guy who has about an inch more than they can take, length-wise, and who can fill them up, side-to-side. That way, that penis can drive them mad in any position. They want that friction and a strong, solid cock, I think.

There is no question that the black race seems to represent the extremes in the races, physically. They seem to represent the longest, tallest, fastest, quickest, most athletic, etc. etc. And that's fine. But there are also extremes in every race, and since the black race doesn't have the largest number of males by a long shot, the overwhelming number of males in the white race will always win the size contest simply because there's so many more of them.

I am a white male and don't think we begrudge any race their strength. I don't. I like to see it, frankly. It's good that they excel. On the other hand, adult entertainment stars with big cocks are almost always the blacks and I think they pride themselves in that and put a higher value on their mystique, whereas white men, some of whom have as large or larger hard-ons, have a different nature and are not so inclined to even get into adult entertainment. White guys seem to have nothing to prove, and black guys seem to enjoy what they see as their superiority.

There are white guys with such huge cocks that not even the biggest women want to try to take them! Those same men eventually lose interst in sex, being turned down all the time. The producers also know that once they showcase these guys then their hunt is on to find some woman who wants to screw them. That's a problem, because now you've got a guy that nobody can watch anymore because no woman can manage him. So he isn't hired to begin with. They aren't going to whet everybody's appetite and then not deliver.

So we're back to square one. The best cock (to a woman) is the best proportioned, hard and long-lived cock that fully fills her up, brings her to orgasm every time, and gets her begging for more. The most photogenic cock is the long, hard, thin (proportionally) black one. But that isn't the one women usually prefer on a daily basis, except to make money on, in a porno flick.

I think the blacks, overall, beat the white guys in length, but mainly because they are driven to compete that way. I say, more power to 'em. Frankly, I like to see a powerful cock, far more than a huge, floppy one.


ForMySweetie,

So according to your forumula, what should we shoot for in cubic inches?
 
From everything that I know about this stuff, I believe that anywhere from 21.5 to 28 cubic inches is ideal. You can expand that a bit and say that 20-30 ci is great, but a little more than 20 and less than 30, is ideal. If you want to narrow it down even further, you can say 25-28 ci, but that's probably too large when considering all women out there. Fair enough? After all, there are some really tight pussies out there that would barely even be able to take the lower end of the ideal- and only with a ton of lube. Still, she'd cum like crazy with that kind of size.
goinfor11x7 said:
ForMySweetie,

So according to your forumula, what should we shoot for in cubic inches?
 
Back
Top