Deep Penetration Experiment - With Dildo and Woman

WildTiger;524233 said:
Actually tester 1, who is 8 inches shorter than tester 2 was able to take half an inch more.

This actually relates to something I discovered while looking at data from my site. I noticed that while height made little difference to max desired length on female profiles, body type had an impact. Not a massive one, but a significantly higher proportion of the women who stated their body type as "voluptuous" or "very voluptuous" wanted dicks 9" or over. Yes the athletic or skinny women wanted them too, but to a noticably lesser degree. Height seemed to almost no role at all. But this is sample group of about 500 women.
Click to expand...

Now we have some data proving the black guy, fat white chicks thing. I always assumed larger girls (wider hips) could take more cock.

I thought you wrote that tester 1 could take 7.5" only and tester 2 took the whole 8"?
 
MikeShlort;524278 said:
Now we have some data proving the black guy, fat white chicks thing. I always assumed larger girls (wider hips) could take more cock.

I thought you wrote that tester 1 could take 7.5" only and tester 2 took the whole 8"?
Click to expand...

Well firstly, despite the suggestion because of the dildo's colour, tester 1 isn't interested in black guys. She purchased the dildo because it got great reviews, and was the best on the market.
When I sent her the one I made, the threw out the Lex dildo because it wasn't nearly as realistic as the one I made her. Race doesn't determine penis size. Any evolutionary feature a given ethnicity has,
was developed via environmental pressure. I can't see anything preventing African men with small or average penises getting African women pregnant. There would have to be some reproductive advantage
for well endowed African men for this to happen. It certainly wasn't based on female selection, as women have never had any real power in Africa, and even in Western nations where they do have many more
rights, they haven't had them long enough for a female preference toward larger penises to impact upon the spread of the gene. A look at average penis size in 500 years might be a worthy study. Evolution takes a very long time.

I wrote that tester 1 originally could only take 7.5 comfortably, and she was using a 9 x 5.5 toy. She then tried to stretch herself to take 8" and she did it, but said it was quite uncomfortable. Tester 2 was using an 8 x 6. She only managed 7.5" of the toy, but its early days, and she might manage the whole thing given time. I'm going to make a new 9 x 6 super-realistic toy for both testers, and see how they go.
 
anth1225;492192 said:
All this talk about women having babies as if there is no limit is not dealing with reality.

When a woman gives birth her hips displace and hormones are flooded in her so the baby can be delivered. It is an extra normal event and the body reacts extra normally if you will.
Yes those sexy woman's hips and how they walk; those things that attract us is the very thing that enables them to give birth.

Women have different lengths. You can bottom out in some hitting the cervix; no fun.
Some may have a culdesac so length is a real good thing there;
some have the g-spot: girth applies here and some just enjoy clitoral orgasms.
Click to expand...

I didnt realize that "some may have a culdesac"
So they dont all have it?

My wife cums really will via clitoral or g spot or vaginally, which makes me lucky.

But the culdesac is rather intriguing to me. I am 8" if i cram the ruler into my fat pad down to the bone and flatten out my curve, but realistically during sex she's prob getting 6.5 most days and maybe 7 some days.

If we have had awesome simultaneous orgazims with out me touching her clit or g spot (just fucking) is it possible i was hitting the culdesac and didnt know what i was doing?

2ndly, what length goal would i shoot for to hit that baby?
AND
whats the best sex position?angle to hit it?

at 8X5.75, i'm also really interested in the idea of making her squirt and fining that inside her, i'm assuming that more length and possibly the culdesac would achieve this?

Thanks gentlemen, this site is fantastic
 
Last edited:
Capt.thick posted this before in this thread (didnt notice it.)

"""Like this description I've found on a womanshealthforum ?
"Before you penetrate her, massage her clit and labia with the head and shaft of your penis. Once inside, lift yourself up against her G-spot and then sink in deeply so the head of your cock goes under her cervix to her backstop, if you can reach that far. Hold yourself in balls deep, and then nudgefuck her deep spot without withdrawing, grinding against her clit at the same time. Stay high and in deep with her knees pulled up near her breasts. Gently bump her whole vulva and get your cock up inside her so that she can feel the head up in her gut and her heart, then increase the strength of your pounding as she loosens up and her deepest juices start to flow around your cock."""""""

maybe this is the description on how to hit culdesac?

DLD you made jen squirt all the time after u hit 8.5. did it matter what position you guys used?

thanks
 
This thread is one of my absolute favorites. Both very informative and absolutely hilarious!! Thank you to all that have contibuted.
 
After reading through this thread, I feel like I have to add a 1/2" to my length goals! Fuck it, YOLO right? Changing goals right now!
 
Ezskanken;547911 said:
After reading through this thread, I feel like I have to add a 1/2" to my length goals! Fuck it, YOLO right? Changing goals right now!
Click to expand...

Yup, I guess you did:)
 
Just a small update. While there have been no more tests, I have managed to discover one of the key differences between dicks and dildos in terms of how easily a woman takes it.
Its actually head softness. The main issue with tester 1 getting any of the toys into the posterior fornix has been that the heads were too hard. So tester 1 will be using 3 different sized toys this time around.

All toys are 8 inches in length, but the girths will be, 5.5, 6, and a larger size she is yet to choose. There will also be some variation in head width/depth. Work and study have kept me busy so haven't had a lot of time to make the new ones, but once she decides on the last girth, I'll start creating them. Tester 2 might be out of the game, not sure. Will report back in a few weeks.
 
The cervix is only 3"-4" inside the vagina and during arousal, the canal elongates and the cervix retracts (some more than others) and this allows for deeper penetration. If she's not fully aroused, that's when the cervix is 'in play' and can cause discomfort. The anterior fornix is toward the front and can easily be reached with a 7" toy/cock/whatever but the posterior fornix is where the true magic happens (in my experience) and that is in the 7 1/2"-8 1/2" range (with variations for woman to woman). If you're long enough to reach that spot and girthy enough to rub the G-spot (which is only 2"-3" inside on the front wall), then you can lean-back and watch to fireworks (and sometimes the 'waterworks') happen
 
My wife had a cervix that was very shallow at about 4 inches while my ex-girlfriend was able take over 8 1/2 inches before I hit her cervix. And now hearing what Big has said I wonder about the elongation and if that played a role. What I do know this if you can get around the cervix You can hit the cul-de-sac and make her squirt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top