Deep Penetration Experiment - With Dildo and Woman

doublelongdaddy;492718 said:
The Cul De Sak?
Click to expand...

Exactly.

Nudgefucking, because you get in the cul de sac, stay there, nudge your dick up in it and grind away at her clit or use a toy.

Supposedly a very powerful orgasm.

Your experiences?
 
Like this description I've found on a womanshealthforum ?
"Before you penetrate her, massage her clit and labia with the head and shaft of your penis. Once inside, lift yourself up against her G-spot and then sink in deeply so the head of your cock goes under her cervix to her backstop, if you can reach that far. Hold yourself in balls deep, and then nudgefuck her deep spot without withdrawing, grinding against her clit at the same time. Stay high and in deep with her knees pulled up near her breasts. Gently bump her whole vulva and get your cock up inside her so that she can feel the head up in her gut and her heart, then increase the strength of your pounding as she loosens up and her deepest juices start to flow around your cock.

Gaze into her eyes and time it with her breathing so you are thrusting against her as she breaths out, making love to her where she lives in her deepest most intimate places.

It is such a great, emotional, deeply striking way to love her."

And about the never ending discussion that women can take large girths without problems because they can deliver babies, I think this post from a woman says it all : http://www.lpsg.com/4074160-post64.html

I love her conclusion : "STOP TRYING TO MAKE YOUR COCKS COMPenis EnlargementTE WITH BABIES. It hurt's like a mother fucker to have one. We'd rather have a pleasurable experience and not be looking for something that came out of our vag that should be crying and have a head full of hair." rofl
 
Captain.Thick;492730 said:
I love her conclusion : "STOP TRYING TO MAKE YOUR COCKS COMPenis EnlargementTE WITH BABIES. It hurt's like a mother fucker to have one. We'd rather have a pleasurable experience and not be looking for something that came out of our vag that should be crying and have a head full of hair." rofl
Click to expand...

That makes the most sense!
 
To a degree the girth will determine how much length a woman can take comfortably too. If you have ever fisted a woman you know how much shallower she becomes. Obviously the difference between 6" and 6.5" in girth will not result in a LOT of depth reduction compared to a fist but you get the point.
 
Powersnake12;492696 said:
Any other updates to report?

Touching on the idea of massaging the deep spot, I recently heard of nudgefucking.

Getting in that deep spot and staying there applying pressure to the clitoris with your pelvis.

Can you ask your experimenter to try that and report on the sensations?
Click to expand...

I read that reaching this spot with your hand, penis or a toy and stimulating it for a few minutes can help a girl who has trouble getting wet. It could also make a woman squirt. For instance, if your girl does not get particularly wet during sex, you could try stimulating this spot for say 10 minutes, then she should have more fluid. That's what the article proposed. I think that's why many women like longer penises, because they stimulate this spot. I also read that the most intense orgasms come from the deep spot (a-spot), which is this cul de sac I believe. The second most are g-spot, then clitoral. Also, sometimes with anal you can hit this deep spot from her rectum. I guess that's why there are videos of girls having anal sex then squirting from their vagina. It seems like it would be fun to try, but I don't have a surplus of willing women, especially ones that would like me put it in their ass. Maybe we should ask kingsnake to try a test.
 
Captain.Thick;492730 said:
Like this description I've found on a womanshealthforum ?
"Before you penetrate her, massage her clit and labia with the head and shaft of your penis. Once inside, lift yourself up against her G-spot and then sink in deeply so the head of your cock goes under her cervix to her backstop, if you can reach that far. Hold yourself in balls deep, and then nudgefuck her deep spot without withdrawing, grinding against her clit at the same time. Stay high and in deep with her knees pulled up near her breasts. Gently bump her whole vulva and get your cock up inside her so that she can feel the head up in her gut and her heart, then increase the strength of your pounding as she loosens up and her deepest juices start to flow around your cock.

Gaze into her eyes and time it with her breathing so you are thrusting against her as she breaths out, making love to her where she lives in her deepest most intimate places.

It is such a great, emotional, deeply striking way to love her."

And about the never ending discussion that women can take large girths without problems because they can deliver babies, I think this post from a woman says it all : http://www.lpsg.com/4074160-post64.html

I love her conclusion : "STOP TRYING TO MAKE YOUR COCKS COMPenis EnlargementTE WITH BABIES. It hurt's like a mother fucker to have one. We'd rather have a pleasurable experience and not be looking for something that came out of our vag that should be crying and have a head full of hair." rofl
Click to expand...

Amazing post, thanks
 
kiwipete;492845 said:
To a degree the girth will determine how much length a woman can take comfortably too. If you have ever fisted a woman you know how much shallower she becomes. Obviously the difference between 6" and 6.5" in girth will not result in a LOT of depth reduction compared to a fist but you get the point.
Click to expand...

That's an interesting point. The vagina does tent depending on arousal levels.

How big around is your fist?

Now I've got to try and make my fist bigger too. :s
 
Powersnake12;492896 said:
That's an interesting point. The vagina does tent depending on arousal levels.

How big around is your fist?

Now I've got to try and make my fist bigger too. :s
Click to expand...


You could always use your foot:)
 
doublelongdaddy;492897 said:
You could always use your foot:)
Click to expand...

Pretty soon I'll be trying to get my whole body in there. :O

Women, we come out of them once and spend the rest of our lives trying to get back into them. :P
 
Powersnake12;492896 said:
That's an interesting point. The vagina does tent depending on arousal levels.

How big around is your fist?

Now I've got to try and make my fist bigger too. :s
Click to expand...

Before I started Penis Enlargement I was convinced I'd have to cut off my hand to be able to please a woman.
 
MikeShlort;493020 said:
Before I started Penis Enlargement I was convinced I'd have to cut off my hand to be able to please a woman.
Click to expand...

Thank god you started then, or we'd be finding quivering masses of women saying, "I just got stump fucked to the most unbelievable orgasm ever......."

:s
 
MikeShlort;493020 said:
Before I started Penis Enlargement I was convinced I'd have to cut off my hand to be able to please a woman.
Click to expand...


That is not true? Oh no, I just hacked a hand off!:)
 
Okay another update. We've identified the problem. It wasn't the girth, it was the head. Too big. After a long talk with her, we figured out that if the head is too big, it can prevent the toy/dick getting in deep, especially in a really tight girl like the one in this experiment. If no decent depth can be reached, it can be difficult to get any significant arousal. Its a catch 22. She wasn't aroused enough to take it deep yet, but she won't get aroused enough for serious depth unless its a decent depth already.

The toy used (not the one with the "flying saucer" shaped head) had a head width of 2.5 inches, and was 8 x 6. Going to send her two more models, one 8 x 5.5 and one 8 x 6. Both with 2 inch wide heads, as she took that size fine before, but the toy wasn't stiff enough to push under the cervix for posterior fornix (deep spot) penetration.
 
WildTiger;493423 said:
Okay another update. We've identified the problem. It wasn't the girth, it was the head. Too big. After a long talk with her, we figured out that if the head is too big, it can prevent the toy/dick getting in deep, especially in a really tight girl like the one in this experiment. If no decent depth can be reached, it can be difficult to get any significant arousal. Its a catch 22. She wasn't aroused enough to take it deep yet, but she won't get aroused enough for serious depth unless its a decent depth already.

The toy used (not the one with the "flying saucer" shaped head) had a head width of 2.5 inches, and was 8 x 6. Going to send her two more models, one 8 x 5.5 and one 8 x 6. Both with 2 inch wide heads, as she took that size fine before, but the toy wasn't stiff enough to push under the cervix for posterior fornix (deep spot) penetration.
Click to expand...

I wish I had a friend like her..
 
wildtiger;493423 said:
the toy used (not the one with the "flying saucer" shaped head) had a head width of 2.5 inches, and was 8 x 6. Going to send her two more models, one 8 x 5.5 and one 8 x 6. Both with 2 inch wide heads, as she took that size fine before, but the toy wasn't stiff enough to push under the cervix for posterior fornix (deep spot) penetration.
Click to expand...


squirt
 
Okay the first tester has dropped off a bit, due to the stressful job she is doing, but she will be moving to a new job in a the next month, so we are likely to hear from her again. Good news is there is a new tester. She's 28, Caucasian, 6ft tall, and has a curvy (but not overly so) and fit frame.

She will be testing a 9 x 6 toy which is shaped like a regular dick. I'll have the results in about 5 weeks as she needs a month to text before proper results can be achieved.

Stay tuned!
 
Wang Chung;521492 said:
you are like some mad penis scientist haha
Click to expand...

Mad? Perhaps, dedicated is more like it :)

Anyhow, I have prepared a multiple choice questionnaire for her once she's been using it for a month and has adjusted to it. I'm looking for feedback from you guys. Do you think it needs anymore questions, or perhaps different phrasing?


Question 1

What was the maximum length you were able to take?

1: 7 inches

2: 8 inches

3: 9 inches

Answer:





Question 2

How did you find the girth:


1: It was much too big.

2: It was too big, but only by a little.

3: It was too big at first, then it was good once I got used to it.

4: It was the ideal thickness

5: It was quite good, but a little thicker would have been better.

6: It was okay, a lot thicker would have been better

7: It was too thin.

Answer:





Question 3

How did the texture feel?

1: It was okay, nothing special.

2: It didn't feel much different to other toys.

3 : It felt good.

4: It felt really good, but not close to the real thing.

5: It felt really good, and fairly close to the real thing.

6: It felt really good, and very close to the real thing.

Answer:





Question 4:

How did the head feel?

1: The shape was fine, but it was too big.

2: The size was fine, but the shape could have been better.

3: The size was okay, but bigger would have been better.

4: The size was too small, a lot bigger would have been better.

5: The size was too small, wider would have been better.

6: The size was too small, deeper (vertical width) would have been better.

7: The size was too big, thinner would have been better.

8: The size was too small, shallower (vertical width) would have been better.

9: The shape and size felt good.

10: The shape and size felt great

Answer:





Question 5:

How was the flexibililty?

1: It was too rigid, this made it uncomfortable to take to full depth.

2: It was too rigid. This prevented me taking it to full depth.

3: It was fine, but could be more flexible.

4: It was good, it felt fairly realistic.

5: It was great, very close to the real thing.

6: It wasn't rigid enough. It bent too much during vigorous use.

Answer:





Question 6:

How was the material?

1: It wasn't any different to others toys.

2: It felt more life-like than other toys.

3: It was fairly close to the real thing.

4: It was very close to the real thing.

5: It was too hard, not that life-like.

6: It was too soft, needs to be firmer to be more life-like.

Answer:



Question 7:

What was your experience when taking the toy to maximum depth?

1: I enjoyed deep penetration.

2: I enjoyed deep penetration, but only once I got used to it.

3: I enjoyed deep penetration a lot.

4: I enjoyed deep penetration a lot, but only once I got used to it.

5: Deep penetration was OMG amazing.

6: Deep penetration was OMG amazing, but only once I got used to it.

7: I didn't like deep penetration.

8: I hated deep penetration.

9: I didn't like deep penetration, but only because the size of the head made it uncomfortable.

10: I didn't like deep penetration, but only because the toy is too rigid.

11: I didn't like deep penetration, but only because the girth is too big.

Answer:


In an overall rating 1-10, 1 being totally unrealistic, and not enjoyable at all, and 10 being a real penis, how did the toy score?

Answer:




Marketability section:

What is the most you would pay for a professionally made, realistic flesh coloured version of the toy?

1:$30

2:$50

3:$80

4:$120


Answer:
 
Good questions.

Another question I might add is what was the maximum depth you were able to take it once you were fully aroused? How deep?

Then, which positions were you able to get it the deepest? How deep?
Which positions the shallowest? How deep?

This would be great information that could be applied to sex
 
The failings of most commercial dildos are two fold. Most of the large ones are not realistic in feel. They are either too rigid or too floppy. The first tester identified rigidity as the issue preventing deep penetration when she used the Lexington Steele dildo, and when she tried the home made ones from me, said that she was able to get it significantly deeper because there was some flexibility.

The floppy dildos bend to a woman's internal shape well, but they often don't have any semi rigid part in them which is needed for thrusting, and giving the dildo enough firmness to push under the cervix and enter the Posterior Fornix. I don't know much about the Shane dildo, but I guess it would have the same issues as most commercial dildos.

I should write up a step by step process of how to make a quality home made dildo which reflects the physical qualities of a real penis in a fully erect state.

There are certain percentages of silicone binary mixture ratio to silicone oil to achieve the right firmness, yet be soft enough to bend a bit. There's also the trick of casting the rods in the middle of the toy to give it firmness against bending when force is applied to the end of the toy.
 
WildTiger;522378 said:
The failings of most commercial dildos are two fold. Most of the large ones are not realistic in feel. They are either too rigid or too floppy. The first tester identified rigidity as the issue preventing deep penetration when she used the Lexington Steele dildo, and when she tried the home made ones from me, said that she was able to get it significantly deeper because there was some flexibility.

The floppy dildos bend to a woman's internal shape well, but they often don't have any semi rigid part in them which is needed for thrusting, and giving the dildo enough firmness to push under the cervix and enter the Posterior Fornix. I don't know much about the Shane dildo, but I guess it would have the same issues as most commercial dildos.

I should write up a step by step process of how to make a quality home made dildo which reflects the physical qualities of a real penis in a fully erect state.

There are certain percentages of silicone binary mixture ratio to silicone oil to achieve the right firmness, yet be soft enough to bend a bit. There's also the trick of casting the rods in the middle of the toy to give it firmness against bending when force is applied to the end of the toy.
Click to expand...

I used two different dildos for the [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]Matters of Size[/words] [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/mosdvd.htm]DVD[/words] shoot we did this past few months. One was 7.5" x 5.25" and the other was 5" x 4.5". I do not know the brand but they were super realistic. One thing that reall blew my mind was how much larger the 7.5 was compared to the 5...It was a MASSIVE size difference. I thought to myself, wow, this is what most people come to [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words] with and what most leave with:) Truly amazing, off topic, but amazing:)
 
WildTiger;522378 said:
The failings of most commercial dildos are two fold. Most of the large ones are not realistic in feel. They are either too rigid or too floppy. The first tester identified rigidity as the issue preventing deep penetration when she used the Lexington Steele dildo, and when she tried the home made ones from me, said that she was able to get it significantly deeper because there was some flexibility.

The floppy dildos bend to a woman's internal shape well, but they often don't have any semi rigid part in them which is needed for thrusting, and giving the dildo enough firmness to push under the cervix and enter the Posterior Fornix. I don't know much about the Shane dildo, but I guess it would have the same issues as most commercial dildos.

I should write up a step by step process of how to make a quality home made dildo which reflects the physical qualities of a real penis in a fully erect state.

There are certain percentages of silicone binary mixture ratio to silicone oil to achieve the right firmness, yet be soft enough to bend a bit. There's also the trick of casting the rods in the middle of the toy to give it firmness against bending when force is applied to the end of the toy.
Click to expand...

I think that in pursuing simplicity in manufacturing the dildo they have to compromise on the firmness and softness of it. If they make it too firm then the outside will not feel soft like a real penis, but if they make it soft then the thing just isnt firm enough for good penetration. I think the solution would be to either put in some sort of skeleton in the center of a soft dildo to get both rigidity and the outside softness, or perhaps make the center of the dildo with the firm kind of silicone and then cover just the outside with a more soft kind.
 
Progress update.

Tester 1 has been using the 8 x 5.5 again, and has managed to take the whole length. That is half an inch more than the previous max record. However she did say that it was uncomfortable. The dildo was taken in front of her cervix, the Anterior Fornix, which is most women, is not as deep as the Posterior Fornix. She had to stretch the tissue to get the entire length in. So far she's been unable to get the right angle to get into the Posterior Fornix, so I can only speculate that perhaps she might be able to take 8 inches there without discomfort. Tester 2 gets her dildo in a few days, and will begin soon.
 
doublelongdaddy;522874 said:
How many testers do you have?:)
Click to expand...

Haha, just 2 at this stage. I plan to run a big test with 50 or more, but that will take some time to organise. The goal is to find out the average depth and girth vaginal capacity of women aged 18-40. That said it will be the capacity they can handle and still be feeling pleasure. I'm sure the vagina could be distended an inch or so past that, but if everybody isn't having fun, whats the point. Plus distending isn't really penetrating into unfilled space, its just stretching already filled space. With girth, that can be a good thing, with length, there isn't a big margin for it before pain kicks in.
 
Tester 2 has now used her toy, which is 8 x 6. I originally planned a 9 x 6 to factor in unusual depth, but ran out of silicone. This one was fairly realistic, but didn't have the normal mixed ratio of 35% silicone oil for the head, and 25% for the shaft (silicone oil determines the softness of the material). When I get tester 2's answers, I will post them here, then I shall do a follow up questionnaire of the same toy in 2 weeks, and see if anything has changed.
 
WildTiger;522845 said:
Progress update.

Tester 1 has been using the 8 x 5.5 again, and has managed to take the whole length. That is half an inch more than the previous max record. However she did say that it was uncomfortable. The dildo was taken in front of her cervix, the Anterior Fornix, which is most women, is not as deep as the Posterior Fornix. She had to stretch the tissue to get the entire length in. So far she's been unable to get the right angle to get into the Posterior Fornix, so I can only speculate that perhaps she might be able to take 8 inches there without discomfort. Tester 2 gets her dildo in a few days, and will begin soon.
Click to expand...

You're doing the Lord's work, my friend.

Next time some asshole gives me shit for wanting 9x7 and being unhappy with my current size, I will refer them to here.
 
MikeShlort;523867 said:
You're doing the Lord's work, my friend.

Next time some asshole gives me shit for wanting 9x7 and being unhappy with my current size, I will refer them to here.
Click to expand...

Here's the truth of it. Most women can take an 8 inch dick, as long as you go for the deep spot, which tester 1 wasn't able to get to, most women will handle 8 inches fine given time to adjust. 9 inches is significently rarer. I once knew a woman who could handle 10.25 inches, and had a boyfriend who was 9 inches (she measured properly), and he slept with a lot of women, and she was the only one so far who had been able to take him balls deep.

As for girth, I think 7 inches is prohibitive to a lot of women. I think 6.5 absolute max for compatibility with most women.
 
Just on a side note, when tester 1 took the 8 inches, she said it was uncomfortable and not enjoyable. She said 7.5 in the Anterior Fornix was comfortable and she enjoyed that.
 
WildTiger;523883 said:
Just on a side note, when tester 1 took the 8 inches, she said it was uncomfortable and not enjoyable. She said 7.5 in the Anterior Fornix was comfortable and she enjoyed that.
Click to expand...

But the question is, how far could it have gone if it had been in the posterior fornix?

And of course, how do you reach the posterior fornix? Anterior fornix? Do you just thrust away and hope to hit some spots, or is there a technique to it?
 
MikeShlort;523991 said:
But the question is, how far could it have gone if it had been in the posterior fornix?

And of course, how do you reach the posterior fornix? Anterior fornix? Do you just thrust away and hope to hit some spots, or is there a technique to it?
Click to expand...

That is something tester 1 will try to find out with the next toy version, which is still life-like, but built to push the cervix out of the way, and gain access to the Poster Fornix. Her current toy's head is too floppy, and tends to bend to the path of least resistance, while the shaft is fairly strong (the core rod doesn't reach into the head section, which is a mistake I have not fixed in the new version, giving the head some resistance against pressure)
 
The answers are in! Tester 2 has finished her questionnaire, and these are her answsers after using an 8 x 6 toy twice.



Question 1

What was the maximum length you were able to take?

1: 6.5 inches

2: 7 inches

3: 7.5 inches

4: The whole length

5: More than the whole length. (there was a thin handle to grab, since I ran out of silicone for the full length)


Answer:


3


Question 2

How did you find the girth:


1: It was much too big.

2: It was too big, but only by a little.

3: It was too big at first, then it was good once I got used to it.

4: It was the ideal thickness

5: It was quite good, but a little thicker would have been better.

6: It was okay, a lot thicker would have been better

7: It was too thin.

Answer:


3 only i would say slightly too big, not too big.


Question 3

How did the texture feel?

1: It was okay, nothing special.

2: It didn't feel much different to other toys.

3 : It felt good.

4: It felt really good, but not close to the real thing.

5: It felt really good, and fairly close to the real thing.

6: It felt really good, and very close to the real thing.

Answer:

4/ 5 it was closer to the real thing than anything else, you will never be able to completly replicate the real thing, but it gets the job done. The texture needs to change slightly.




Question 4:

How did the head feel?

1: The shape was fine, but it was too big.

2: The size was fine, but the shape could have been better.

3: The size was okay, but bigger would have been better.

4: The size was too small, a lot bigger would have been better.

5: The size was too small, wider would have been better.

6: The size was too small, deeper (vertical width) would have been better.

7: The size was too big, thinner would have been better.

8: The size was too small, shallower (vertical width) would have been better.

9: The shape and size felt good.

10: The shape and size felt great

Answer:

9, if it was mm smaller



Question 5:

How was the flexibililty?

1: It was too rigid, this made it uncomfortable to take to full depth.

2: It was too rigid. This prevented me taking it to full depth.

3: It was fine, but could be more flexible.

4: It was good, it felt fairly realistic.

5: It was great, very close to the real thing.

6: It wasn't rigid enough. It bent too much during vigorous use.

Answer:
5 ( i want to meet the crazy fucker that chooses 6)




Question 6:

How was the material?

1: It wasn't any different to others toys.

2: It felt more life-like than other toys.

3: It was fairly close to the real thing.

4: It was very close to the real thing.

5: It was too hard, not that life-like.

6: It was too soft, needs to be firmer to be more life-like.

Answer:

4, again just need to slightly change the texture, shape and size are pretty spot on, but this is only one persons perspective


Question 7:

What was your experience when taking the toy to maximum depth?

1: I enjoyed deep penetration.

2: I enjoyed deep penetration, but only once I got used to it.

3: I enjoyed deep penetration a lot.

4: I enjoyed deep penetration a lot, but only once I got used to it.

5: Deep penetration was OMG amazing.

6: Deep penetration was OMG amazing, but only once I got used to it.

7: I didn't like deep penetration.

8: I hated deep penetration.

9: I didn't like deep penetration, but only because the size of the head made it uncomfortable.

10: I didn't like deep penetration, but only because the toy is too rigid.

11: I didn't like deep penetration, but only because the girth is too big.

Answer:

5, YOLO

In an overall rating 1-10, 1 being totally unrealistic, and not enjoyable at all, and 10 being a real penis, how did the toy score?

Answer:

8.5 as mentioned previously it was pretty much spot on with regards to girth and length, if possible it could be slghtly less ridgit and slightly smaller head
 
WildTiger;524007 said:
That is something tester 1 will try to find out with the next toy version, which is still life-like, but built to push the cervix out of the way, and gain access to the Poster Fornix. Her current toy's head is too floppy, and tends to bend to the path of least resistance, while the shaft is fairly strong (the core rod doesn't reach into the head section, which is a mistake I have not fixed in the new version, giving the head some resistance against pressure)
Click to expand...

Could you please upload photos of the prototype dildos they are using so I have an idea of what shape is causing this deep penetration? Thanks
 
What is the height, weight, age, body type, hip width, ethnicity of the testers? Number of past sexual partners? Average size of penis encountered from past sexual partners? This is all relevant information.
 
MikeShlort;524015 said:
Could you please upload photos of the prototype dildos they are using so I have an idea of what shape is causing this deep penetration? Thanks
Click to expand...

I don't have any pics, but tester 1's dildo is 9 x 5.5, and tester 2's dildo is 8 x 6. I've had sex with tester 1 quite a few times, and she is very tight. Never with tester 2 though.

The head on tester 1's toy is deeper, and has a much deeper ridge than on tester 2's, but they are both the same width. Tester 1's toy also has a more flexible shaft and has more silicone oil which means the material is softer too. Apart from that, the toys are just normal dick shapes. They are also dead straight when no pressure is being applied to them.
 
MikeShlort;524021 said:
What is the height, weight, age, body type, hip width, ethnicity of the testers? Number of past sexual partners? Average size of penis encountered from past sexual partners? This is all relevant information.
Click to expand...

Both women are caucasian. Tester 1 is 32 years of age, 5'3, and very curvy. She has wider than average hips. She has had 5 partners including me.

Tester 2 is 28 years of age, is 5'11, and has an athletic but more curvy than average build. I would say her hip width is a bit above average. She has had 7 past partners.

No idea of the dick sizes encountered for tester 2, but tester 1 told me I'm the only one who's ever gotten into her Posterior Fornix, and I'm 7.5 x 6 BP.

Now when I went balls deep in tester 1, I could feel a small amount of pressure against the top of the head, indicating that I was pressing against the top back wall.

I think what may have happened with the dildo when she took 8 inches of it in the more shallow part of her vagina, was that because that toy is more flexible that a real dick with a hard erection, it may have bowed a bit, as she said she had to use force to get it that deep, and it would push back out half an inch if she let go of it. So that extra half inch might have been stretching, or simply the bending of the toy.
 
i can just see it...

tester #1-50, comments: you sure i have to return my toy now that the test is done? *sniff sniff*
wish i knew a guy this size...

"well miss, yes toy must be disected and analyzed... Im sorry to have to cut you of from your source of deep pleasure... but i happen to know a man of this size... would you like to meet him? *grins*

tester x "oh would I..."
 
Very good stuff, Tiger. I appreciate this.

This kinda holds up the theory that taller girls have deeper vaginas, but it's only one girl, so it's not conclusive evidence.

Either way, amazing stuff. This information is priceless.
 
MikeShlort;524108 said:
Very good stuff, Tiger. I appreciate this.

This kinda holds up the theory that taller girls have deeper vaginas, but it's only one girl, so it's not conclusive evidence.

Either way, amazing stuff. This information is priceless.
Click to expand...

Actually tester 1, who is 8 inches shorter than tester 2 was able to take half an inch more.

This actually relates to something I discovered while looking at data from my site. I noticed that while height made little difference to max desired length on female profiles, body type had an impact. Not a massive one, but a significantly higher proportion of the women who stated their body type as "voluptuous" or "very voluptuous" wanted dicks 9" or over. Yes the athletic or skinny women wanted them too, but to a noticably lesser degree. Height seemed to almost no role at all. But this is sample group of about 500 women.
 
This is the Lexington Steele dildo. It was the first one tester 1 tried out. Its 9.5 inches long, and 6.3 in girth. However only 8.5 of the length is usable for penetration.

Now I can say without a doubt, tester 1 is the tightest girl I've ever had. Seriously amazing to fuck. Had this dildo not been so rigid, she might have been able to take 8" of it, but she found it took a fair while to adjust to the girth, but as I said, she's pretty tight, so an average woman might find it easier. Took her a month of regular use just to take 7 inches of it.

View attachment 26518 View attachment 26519 View attachment 26520
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top