Super

Well-known member
Registered
Joined
Dec 5, 2003
Messages
7,301
Well been at this almost 10 years on and off and I have to say with as much time as I have spent here and in the Penis Enlargement community, nobody gains like uncut guys do. Not only are there starting sizes bigger but they gain hella fast to? Why, cause they have so much extra skin to grow into. When we are circumcised we loose about 12-15" of skin that is cut off. That really hinders your size for the rest of your life. Its sad to say it but uncut guys are always bigger.

When translating into Penis Enlargement, uncut have the advantage because the penis is in its natural state, heals quicker and has more beef on it to begin with. Look at some of our top gainers, DLD excluded, cause hes a freak. Fedora and Bannaboy have made huge gains while being uncut. I myself have gained a lot because if my extensive FR routine in Penis Enlargement. I dont think I could have done it without it. My skin was to tight. With your foreskin you have a double layer of skin, so thats twice the amount that cut guys have, that equals a lot of extra length and girth.

I dont think I have ever seen a smal guy that is small. And I mean ever, in the locker room, �naked people movies� or on MOS. It just does not really happen. I think we are all born with big dicks and the doctors screw us over for a quick $500.
 
Yeah but dude you just gained 3/4" in 2 months and u r cut!
I have seen lots of uncut guys who have small dicks.

Ur probably right tho that uncut guys gain faster in general.I know from experience they can cum in half the time of cut guys if they want to because they have more nerve endings and sensitivity.
Supra;446266 said:
Well been at this almost 10 years on and off and I have to say with as much time as I have spent here and in the Penis Enlargement community, nobody gains like uncut guys do. Not only are there starting sizes bigger but they gain hella fast to? Why, cause they have so much extra skin to grow into. When we are circumcised we loose about 12-15" of skin that is cut off. That really hinders your size for the rest of your life. Its sad to say it but uncut guys are always bigger.

When translating into Penis Enlargement, uncut have the advantage because the penis is in its natural state, heals quicker and has more beef on it to begin with. Look at some of our top gainers, DLD excluded, cause hes a freak. Fedora and Bannaboy have made huge gains while being uncut. I myself have gained a lot because if my extensive FR routine in Penis Enlargement. I dont think I could have done it without it. My skin was to tight. With your foreskin you have a double layer of skin, so thats twice the amount that cut guys have, that equals a lot of extra length and girth.

I dont think I have ever seen a smal guy that is small. And I mean ever, in the locker room, �naked people movies� or on MOS. It just does not really happen. I think we are all born with big dicks and the doctors screw us over for a quick $500.
 
You've never seen a small guy that is small?
Do you mean an uncut guy that is small?

They're there. The majority of the people here (Germany) is uncut, so of course most are average. I was cut at young age and turned out - average.
There's big cut guys as well, look at kingsnake for instance.

I don't see where you're going with this. Is there any evidence?
 
I would say it is great to be uncut, i have so much more skin plus recovery is better.
 
I think you have to adjust to Penis Enlargement either way, maybe it's a bit easier for cut guys because the skin under the glans (where you place your grip when you're stretching) is not as sensitive. Uncut guys may have a small advantage when it comes to girth work, because they can do a lot of dry stuff (using the foreskin). On the other hand, when it comes to discoloration it looks worse on an uncut penis, as there's more foreskin. Bottom line, I don't think it has any influence on possible gains, it's just that you have to find the right technique that allows your dick to grow.
 
When u look at an uncut cock the head does look very restricted. It's possible that this stunts the growth of the penis as u are growing up. I still can't believe circumcision is happening in this day and age(religous reasons excluded). There is no need for it! Uncut cocks look better too :D
 
celttank;446287 said:
When u look at an uncut cock the head does look very restricted. It's possible that this stunts the growth of the penis as u are growing up. I still can't believe circumcision is happening in this day and age(religous reasons excluded). There is no need for it! Uncut cocks look better too :D

nailed it!
 
SirKyle;446271 said:
You've never seen a small guy that is small?
Do you mean an uncut guy that is small?

They're there. The majority of the people here (Germany) is uncut, so of course most are average. I was cut at young age and turned out - average.
There's big cut guys as well, look at kingsnake for instance.

I don't see where you're going with this. Is there any evidence?

There is plenty of evidence, personal I know that I would have prolly been 9-10" if I had not been cut the way I was and so tightly. Think about it, if the skin is so tight, that is going to restrict growth in a major way, its pure science. A small organ that is very sensitive like that under immense pressure against itself is not always full of blood will be stunted. Its not hard to figure out. And plus, were not born with foreskin? Why do you think that it needs to be cut off, it was put there for a reason..right?
 
celttank;446287 said:
When u look at an uncut cock the head does look very restricted. It's possible that this stunts the growth of the penis as u are growing up. I still can't believe circumcision is happening in this day and age(religous reasons excluded). There is no need for it! Uncut cocks look better too :D

Uncut looks better, feels better and actually when inside a girl it feels bigger too because of the sliding effect in and out of itself because of the double skin.
 
lazyhanger;446283 said:
I think you have to adjust to Penis Enlargement either way, maybe it's a bit easier for cut guys because the skin under the glans (where you place your grip when you're stretching) is not as sensitive. Uncut guys may have a small advantage when it comes to girth work, because they can do a lot of dry stuff (using the foreskin). On the other hand, when it comes to discoloration it looks worse on an uncut penis, as there's more foreskin. Bottom line, I don't think it has any influence on possible gains, it's just that you have to find the right technique that allows your dick to grow.

It definitely can have influence on gains. Think about the penis being in its natural state vs. a un natural state
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Alex78;446305 said:
nailed it!

There's still a strong social stigma in "developed", western influenced cultures that un circumcised penises are "dirty", "ugly", "more prone to diseases", etc. Even though real studies from non-biased (not funded by pro-circumcision sources) agencies prove otherwise.
 
Last edited:
stillwantmore2;446315 said:
There's still a strong social stigma in "developed", western influenced cultures that un circumcised penises are "dirty", "ugly", "more prone to diseases", etc. Even though real studies from non-biased (not funded by pro-circumcision sources) agencies prove otherwise.

never had any diseases and when cold it protects my skin!
Maybe in worm countries it was a medical measure, but where cold strikes you better have skin!
 
I'm a big believer in keeping things natural and if I had the choice I'd have stayed uncut... but I don't think there's any science behind the statement "if the skin is so tight, that is going to restrict growth in a major way, its pure science" - if that was the case none of us would be able to get massive expansion from clamping or Bathmate or anything like that. Skin is ridiculously pliable. It has no problem whatsoever stretching 3/4 of an inch if I wanted to just blow myself up with fluid retention. Likewise, I have no fat on my calves or anything to make that skin anything other than very taut, yet when I ran over a bees nest with the lawnmower and the calf tripled in size from the swelling, the skin had no issue accommodating that (and then re-forming).

That said, I hate it. Mine was done tight too and it's a real challenge getting my balls to hang far enough out of the way. They don't go low, they don't look as good, and they get in the way of the Bathmate. I would love to have another inch of slack there in the center piece that creates the turkey neck. It doesn't seem all that willing to stretch in that direction, or if it does, it hurts like hell.

So perhaps skin is much more willing to expand for swelling, but not so much to extend the length.
 
being uncut is shit for pe, exercises are way more difficult, the sensitivity causes pain, always more slipping, why do you never see uncut guys anywhere on web making demo vids for us uncut pe"ers?

even any pe hardware demo by the big companies never a uncut guy is it.
 
fonic;446337 said:
being uncut is shit for pe, exercises are way more difficult, the sensitivity causes pain, always more slipping, why do you never see uncut guys anywhere on web making demo vids for us uncut pe"ers?

even any pe hardware demo by the big companies never a uncut guy is it.

I actually think being uncut is better for pe. I am uncut and find pe pretty easy(but tedious). I would imagine pe hurts more for a cut guy as there is no skin to protect the glans. If u are in so much pain maybe your wrapping technique is bad. The only pain i get is a slight burning pain after being in the extender for 1.5+ hours and my extender has a force of 3000g+.
 
Supra;446311 said:
Uncut looks better, feels better and actually when inside a girl it feels bigger too because of the sliding effect in and out of itself because of the double skin.

An opinion doesn't make it true or a fact. I am uncut btw. Hopefully I make some gains quick :). If measured correctly, I have gained .25 in my first month.
 
fonic;446337 said:
being uncut is shit for pe, exercises are way more difficult, the sensitivity causes pain, always more slipping, why do you never see uncut guys anywhere on web making demo vids for us uncut pe"ers?

even any pe hardware demo by the big companies never a uncut guy is it.

I agree. Some of the stretches hurt or feel uncomfortable because of the skin under the glans.
 
BackMask;446346 said:
An opinion doesn't make it true or a fact. I am uncut btw. Hopefully I make some gains quick :). If measured correctly, I have gained .25 in my first month.

Your lucky to be uncut, sex must feel amazing all the time. Half the time I feel shit and the other half the time I am focusing on just trying to cum.
 
fonic;446337 said:
being uncut is shit for pe, exercises are way more difficult, the sensitivity causes pain, always more slipping, why do you never see uncut guys anywhere on web making demo vids for us uncut pe"ers?

even any pe hardware demo by the big companies never a uncut guy is it.

It is just a coincidence that most of the guys shooting pr Penis Enlargement videos are all cut? Truth is more cut guys care about be than Uncut. Why? Because every cut guy feels robbed and is looking for a bigger sensation. Penis Enlargement companies will sell you a load of shit telling you bigger is better and means more pleasure, but you would be fine if you did not have all your nerve endings cut off at birth right when you came out of the wound. How can you think its ok to just go cutting on an infants body right when he is born. Look at every guy here 98% of them are cut, the other 2% and uncut, and start bigger than the rest of us. Why is there hardly any uncut guys here? Cause they dont care, sex is great for them and whoever they are having it with, they could care less about Penis Enlargement. All we are trying to do with Penis Enlargement is make up for what we dont have, which is our foreskin. You might totally disagree and it might not even be in your mind, but it is still there regardless of your opinion on cut or uncut, your looking for something, Since you never knew you had foreskin, you dont know what its like so your looking for something else to take the place. Its very easy to understand.
 
OneWeekIn;446332 said:
I'm a big believer in keeping things natural and if I had the choice I'd have stayed uncut... but I don't think there's any science behind the statement "if the skin is so tight, that is going to restrict growth in a major way, its pure science" - if that was the case none of us would be able to get massive expansion from clamping or Bathmate or anything like that. Skin is ridiculously pliable. It has no problem whatsoever stretching 3/4 of an inch if I wanted to just blow myself up with fluid retention. Likewise, I have no fat on my calves or anything to make that skin anything other than very taut, yet when I ran over a bees nest with the lawnmower and the calf tripled in size from the swelling, the skin had no issue accommodating that (and then re-forming).

That said, I hate it. Mine was done tight too and it's a real challenge getting my balls to hang far enough out of the way. They don't go low, they don't look as good, and they get in the way of the Bathmate. I would love to have another inch of slack there in the center piece that creates the turkey neck. It doesn't seem all that willing to stretch in that direction, or if it does, it hurts like hell.

So perhaps skin is much more willing to expand for swelling, but not so much to extend the length.

A muscle is different than a penis, whoever keeps saying muscles and penis are the same thing, they dont know what they are talking about. Muscles have muscle fibers, fat and other organic compounds, penis is completely different. You cant treat your penis the same way you treat your calves. Ive been at this for almost 10 years now, I know a thing or two.
 
Back
Top Bottom