I also nominate Threak. Hope he accepts
Keeping Up With Rocky
rocky1243;717211 said:Ok so I pmed possible judges to see if they accept the task of judge for this competition. Because no one actually replied saying "Yes dude" or "Fuck yeah" or "Aight mane fasho" to this thread.
START NOMINATING PEOPLE TO WIN THIS COMPETITION NOW
YOU CAN FIND THE LIST OF PEOPLE PARTICIPATING ON THIS COMPETITION ON THE FIRST POST OF THIS THREAD
GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF WHAT IT IS LIKE TO ORGANIZE A COMPETITION WITH YOU GUYS:
I thought the winner was the biggest gainer
flaccid,erect, girth
So the nominates go to the "finals"? some like that?
Last edited:
Big Schwanz Acht
@Big Schwanz Acht
Do you still need nominees? I'll throw my d!ck in the ring, lol
T
templnite
Guest
rocky1243;717222 said:
Me too
the boss!;717495 said:
You can nominate yourself, I was expecting people to do so.
BSA is in it!
This competition is not only about the gains, its about consistency. You will be judge primarily on your journal, this is why the pictures are not necessary.
Everyone submit their measurements tomorrow!
Alrighty boys so here's what happened over the last 30 or so days...
Starting...
BPFSL: 7.9"
BPEL: 7.5"
MSEG: 5"
Current...
BPFSL: 8.1"
BPEL: 7.5"
MSEG: 5"
Got a solid .2" gain in BPFSL which is not bad to see, especially in just a month!
So for my vote... As much as I would love to vote for myself, I simply cannot. The reasons being is that 1) I just won the poster of the month and would like to give someone else a chance to win the prize, and 2) I have not been as consistent as some others in this competition.
So with that being said I vote for nerd-since-92!!
Starting...
BPFSL: 7.9"
BPEL: 7.5"
MSEG: 5"
Current...
BPFSL: 8.1"
BPEL: 7.5"
MSEG: 5"
Got a solid .2" gain in BPFSL which is not bad to see, especially in just a month!
So for my vote... As much as I would love to vote for myself, I simply cannot. The reasons being is that 1) I just won the poster of the month and would like to give someone else a chance to win the prize, and 2) I have not been as consistent as some others in this competition.
So with that being said I vote for nerd-since-92!!
kyomoto
0
eugine8plz;717538 said:Alrighty boys so here's what happened over the last 30 or so days...
Starting...
BPFSL: 7.9"
BPEL: 7.5"
MSEG: 5"
Current...
BPFSL: 8.1"
BPEL: 7.5"
MSEG: 5"
Got a solid .2" gain in BPFSL which is not bad to see, especially in just a month!
So for my vote... As much as I would love to vote for myself, I simply cannot. The reasons being is that 1) I just won the poster of the month and would like to give someone else a chance to win the prize, and 2) I have not been as consistent as some others in this competition.
So with that being said I vote for nerd-since-92!!
Remember to mzke your BPEL reach your BPFSL do erect stretching if you haven't already
Ill post my stats tonight
Big Schwanz Acht
@Big Schwanz Acht
well this is disappointing...no change for me, still 7 3/4" BPEL and 6 3/4" MSEG. EQ was an issue cuz I'm rushing-around to get outta town for a couple of days, but it is what it is
Starting measurment : 6" NBPEL
Today: 6-1/8" NBPEL
Not as productive as my previous months but still a gain.
Today: 6-1/8" NBPEL
Not as productive as my previous months but still a gain.
Current
Measurements
BPEL 5 7/8
MEG 4 1/2
BEG 5 1/8
Started
BPEL 5 7/8
MEG 4 1/2
BEG 5 1/4
-No gains....yet.
Measurements
BPEL 5 7/8
MEG 4 1/2
BEG 5 1/8
Started
BPEL 5 7/8
MEG 4 1/2
BEG 5 1/4
-No gains....yet.
Sorry for the delay, guys!
No gains for me!
NPBEL: 17cm;
BPEL: 17,3cm;
MEG: 14,5cm.
Let's keep rocking!
No gains for me!
NPBEL: 17cm;
BPEL: 17,3cm;
MEG: 14,5cm.
Let's keep rocking!
Some of us made gains, some haven't seen gains do not get discouraged guys. Just because you have not seen gains does not mean there's no gains to come. Ive been following all your journals for the past month and everybody has been fairly consistent, this month has set a great precedence for the months to come.
That being said as far as the judging goes, the actual gains are only one criteria of judging and in my opinion the one with the less weight. The main two are 1. Consistency 2. Routine quality, then there's 3. Gains.
I will contact the judges to make sure the judging process begins and hopefully get a decision in the following days.
That being said as far as the judging goes, the actual gains are only one criteria of judging and in my opinion the one with the less weight. The main two are 1. Consistency 2. Routine quality, then there's 3. Gains.
I will contact the judges to make sure the judging process begins and hopefully get a decision in the following days.
I'm currently hitting 5.9 at full EQ, that's a gain!
Hitting 6.8 flaccid(bone pressed), this is encouraging ! that's a gain!
On average EQ I'm not sure, think I made an actual gain of .08 but these days i've beeen on hold with everything, it sucks I had a little dick constriction issue a few days back nothing too serious but still affected.
Girth unfortunately I can't measure, I need paper ruler for that, I tried with a flexible ruler but keeps pinching me, and results are not optimal results. This is where I probably gained.
Not huge results yet but I'm happy I know sooner than later they'll come.
Hitting 6.8 flaccid(bone pressed), this is encouraging ! that's a gain!
On average EQ I'm not sure, think I made an actual gain of .08 but these days i've beeen on hold with everything, it sucks I had a little dick constriction issue a few days back nothing too serious but still affected.
Girth unfortunately I can't measure, I need paper ruler for that, I tried with a flexible ruler but keeps pinching me, and results are not optimal results. This is where I probably gained.
Not huge results yet but I'm happy I know sooner than later they'll come.
Last edited:
8" bpfsl
LONGERDICK7+
Active Member
joaobigdick;717606 said:
well if you look at a ruler and see how big 7 inches is i wouldnt be that dissapointed..
ROUTINE OF THE WEEK
CONGRATS TO NERD!
CONGRATS TO NERD!
Big Schwanz Acht
@Big Schwanz Acht
Looks like there have been several 'successes' within the competition...congratulations gentlemen!
Thanks DLD, if the guys are up for it again I will keep it going.doublelongdaddy;717688 said:
kyomoto;717764 said:
Do I hear an echo?
Do I hear an echo?
Do I hear an echo?
Do I hear an echo?
Do I hear an echo?
Do I hear an echo?
Do I hear an echo?
Anyways I heard back from one of our judges, Arkailija. He really stepped up and gave a thorough reply on his thought process, he explained very clearly how came to decide who should win the competition. I don't want to disclose this information yet so I do not influence the other judges.
We are still waiting on longstretch and templ, so BSA put some pressure on your niggles so he doesn't slack off.
Last edited:
I know I don't have too and it's not needed but because I've made a substantial gain I have recorded myself taking a measurement just like I did before the comp. I will add the video to my progress thread for anyone interested as soon as it uploads to my online drive.
I have done this to keep myself accountable for the claims I have made.
Peace
I have done this to keep myself accountable for the claims I have made.
Peace
Thanks for the kind words Rocky!
And one thing, a shame that you weren't nominated beardedbaldy; I checked your log as well and it is very well made. Congratulations on your gains, keep progressing! Especially your video parts are a big thing in this community, in my opinion.
Now, let's hear from the other judges pronto!
And one thing, a shame that you weren't nominated beardedbaldy; I checked your log as well and it is very well made. Congratulations on your gains, keep progressing! Especially your video parts are a big thing in this community, in my opinion.
Now, let's hear from the other judges pronto!
rocky1243;717783 said:
Keep it going! Keep it going! Look what a great service you have done for everyone involved, you have been a driving force behind gains and it looks like everyone involved got a taste of that. Good work to all and excellent idea to Rocky.
arkailija;717802 said:
I know! I feel like people either werent diligent about nominating or a little shy. Not to worry, if you didnt get it this time you will get it next time. We will keep this comp going.
The most important thing here is the process, I think everyone got something out of this.
arkailija;717802 said:
Nominated for what , the competition? As far as I'm aware I'm in the competition but I've never been nominated for the routine of the week.
beardedbaldy;717816 said:
I asked numerous times on previous posts to nominate people to win the monthly competition so we could narrow down the conteders. This way the judges didnt have to go through ten journals to decide upon a winner. You could have nominated yourself.
I try to make this a democracy, but its usually the same 3-4 suspects giving input.
Last edited:
rocky1243;717842 said:
So im not part if the competition because I wasn't nominated to be in it? There wasn't much point in asking people to join if that's how it's going to be done. I've not exactly been active on here of late because of work and family commitments so the fact I've been excluded for not nominating myself to be judged in a competition I'm already apart of is ridiculous .
beardedbaldy;717846 said:
You do understand theres ten journals going on? And you do realize that the judges give out of their own time to do this task, many already turned down the position because it was too much work even after narrowing down.
You werent excluded, you were considered. You just werent a runner up for the final group. Had you nominated yourself you would probably had made it to that last group. I understand you were busy, I am busy too. Yet I take the time to reply to every journal asking for measurements, come here and ask for people to nominate who wins "this", "that", who the judges should be, Pm possible judges, Pm judges info, do a bit of graphic design for the certificates etc. Sometimes my efforts are taken a little for granted by people who just skim through, and give one sentece replies that are completely off topic. Im not a kid, I have a full time job and pay rent like the rest of us.
So I think you are being a little inconsiderate.
rocky1243;717850 said:
So for a competition that more 10 people signed up for an submitted starting stats have been excluded by vote? Why do judges have to check journals when competitors could post their results in this thread? This comp was set up for gains in 30 days and on reading back on previous posts things changed to the competition being based on journal entries being added each day which I cannot do and I'm sure that would be the same for other people who entered the competition.
Because I can't add to my journal every day I'm automatically excluded as are others in the same situation. I'm completely lost on the whole concept of this competition to be honest and it's feels like favouritism has taken over .
You say your are not a kid and neither am I but I have two of them who I make priority in the evenings . I post on here when ever I can grab a spare minute and some of my responses will be short but I still make an effort. If that makes me inconsiderate then I guess I am.
Big Schwanz Acht
@Big Schwanz Acht
This is a brand-new idea that Rocky has put together, so expect some 'growing pains' with regard to all the nuts and bolts of how the competition is conducted. This being the 1st actual month of judging, I think a little slack can be afforded if it's a tad bumpy. Nominating one person out of the ten participants for the monthly portion of the show seems to add an additional layer that may not be necessary, (if there were over 25 players, then I could see how things could become daunting for our judges) so my thought is that everyone that's 'in' should be automatically 'in' for the monthly. As far as the weekly suggestions, I don't think that needs any tweaking.
Like I said, anytime new-ground is being plowed there will be some hiccups.
Onward to January 10th, my Brothers!!
Like I said, anytime new-ground is being plowed there will be some hiccups.
Onward to January 10th, my Brothers!!
beardedbaldy;717858 said:
The competition started as a motivation, no pictures where required because the emphasis was on the process. Plus we have participants on different levels, it is not fair to compare the gains of someone who is starting out vs someone who already gained 2". Nobody said you are automatically excluded if you don't post everyday. I thought this was clear. What makes you inconsiderate is not the fact that you don't reply or give input. What makes you inconsiderate is that I am putting the time and you shit and criticize my efforts because you didnt have time to nominate yourself. If you don't have the time to fully participate in the descision making process accept the consequences. How has "favoritism"? If theres one thing Ive done is consult you guys on everything. Who do you claim is getting benefited from this favoritism?
"You say your are not a kid and neither am I but I have two of them who I make priority in the evenings ."
And I have a life and I chose to take out of my time to do this. This competition does need to exist, matter of fact if I didnt push it it wouldve fallen into the background and be forgotten quickly like most of them.
@BSA its 10 journals with 30 daily logs atleast. It doesnt need to get to 25 for it to be daunting, if you think otherwise go ahead and find the judges. I couldnt.
Last edited:
Big Schwanz Acht
@Big Schwanz Acht
Let's take a few steps back and gain some perspective...I appreciate all the efforts you've (Rocky) expended in setting this up and keeping it fresh, (I'm sure it's like herding cats). We are all in this together with the same goals, (getting bigger, healthier, better in a facets) so there's really no need to go from Defcon 1 to Defcon 5 over what seems to be a simple misunderstanding.
I know having put-forth the time and enduring the frustration, then having to field criticism isn't any fun...but I know BB wasn't attacking you and just wasn't completely certain of the protocol...obviously I struggled as well, but after explaining what a PITA it would be to try and review/audit everyone involved, I can see your point.
I know having put-forth the time and enduring the frustration, then having to field criticism isn't any fun...but I know BB wasn't attacking you and just wasn't completely certain of the protocol...obviously I struggled as well, but after explaining what a PITA it would be to try and review/audit everyone involved, I can see your point.
rocky1243;717871 said:
Whatever dude remove me , unsububscibe me I'm done.
beardedbaldy;717877 said:
Well thats unfortunate, but if you dont want to participate on the next one you dont have to.
Lets remember guys the only prize that was promised at the beginning was your own gains. Half way through DLD was generous enough to offer up a [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/showthread.php?83577-Length-master-official-order-thread-now-shipping-06-16-2014!!!]LM[/words] or [words=https://officialhydromaxpump.com/?uid=6&oid=2&affid=98]Bathmate[/words] to the winner, but that is a bonus. The mission of this competition was to keep everyone motivated, and I think the mission was accomplished. We had 10 journals all of which were active, these are things that will be saved in the database and 5-10 years from now some kid will be reading and learning from. So everybody should be proud of that.
I apologize if it was a but bumpy, and the guidelines sort of changed a little bit along the way. But it is expected, this was the first time running this competition. Hopefully next time around things go smoother.
And by the way we are still waiting on templnite and longstretch to hand in their descisions.
I apologize if it was a but bumpy, and the guidelines sort of changed a little bit along the way. But it is expected, this was the first time running this competition. Hopefully next time around things go smoother.
And by the way we are still waiting on templnite and longstretch to hand in their descisions.
kyomoto
0
I have no idea what's going on but lets not behave immature [haha]. Rocky I've not seen anyone really nominate judges like templ or shortdick more than people have nominated threak. So what the hey, where's Threak, did he not accept? And why does 1 nomination guarantee a place as a judge.
[haha]. Rocky I've not seen anyone really nominate judges like templ or shortdick more than people have nominated threak. So what the hey, where's Threak, did he not accept? And why does 1 nomination guarantee a place as a judge.kyomoto;717887 said:I have no idea what's going on but lets not behave immature
ThreakX did not accept. One nomination guarantees the place as a judge because we don't have many options/time. Plus not many nominations were made, and the ones that were made I already tried. That being said I do think we have a nice group of judges. We can start the hunt for judges on the next competition earlier, because its not easy to find them believe me.
Anyways, for the next competition now that we know the basic structure I think we can figure out specific dates of what needs to happen when so everyone knows beforehand.
Last edited:
Big Schwanz Acht
@Big Schwanz Acht
(I am writing this from the perspective of wanting to help in any way that I can, and in no way am I trying to take-away the amount of time, effort, creativity, patience that you've exhibited putting this together)
Hey Rock...just a side-note for us guys that don't either have the time or inclination to update our routine threads, maybe we can simplify the entire procedure and have the primary competition overall gains made? The reason I raise this option is due to the fact that I rarely go into my thread because my routine is ever-evolving but also remains basically the same...so re-writing it daily doesn't do it for me and I wouldn't start just for this, (or any other reason, for that matter).
We all have our own 'style' and 'availability' and trying to make it 'fit' is a huge challenge, so I'm just suggesting to simplifying to "Gains" since that's the common denominator here.
Feel free to tell me to eff-off
Hey Rock...just a side-note for us guys that don't either have the time or inclination to update our routine threads, maybe we can simplify the entire procedure and have the primary competition overall gains made? The reason I raise this option is due to the fact that I rarely go into my thread because my routine is ever-evolving but also remains basically the same...so re-writing it daily doesn't do it for me and I wouldn't start just for this, (or any other reason, for that matter).
We all have our own 'style' and 'availability' and trying to make it 'fit' is a huge challenge, so I'm just suggesting to simplifying to "Gains" since that's the common denominator here.
Feel free to tell me to eff-off
kyomoto
0
Big Schwanz Acht;717981 said:(I am writing this from the perspective of wanting to help in any way that I can, and in no way am I trying to take-away the amount of time, effort, creativity, patience that you've exhibited putting this together)
Hey Rock...just a side-note for us guys that don't either have the time or inclination to update our routine threads, maybe we can simplify the entire procedure and have the primary competition overall gains made? The reason I raise this option is due to the fact that I rarely go into my thread because my routine is ever-evolving but also remains basically the same...so re-writing it daily doesn't do it for me and I wouldn't start just for this, (or any other reason, for that matter).
We all have our own 'style' and 'availability' and trying to make it 'fit' is a huge challenge, so I'm just suggesting to simplifying to "Gains" since that's the common denominator here.
Feel free to tell me to eff-off
Rocky turned to hard ass mother fucker lmao. Jk thats a good suggestion though. I recommend it too.
We could simplify and say, "ok the best gains win". That does bring up other sort of problems, we would now require pictures etc. Cause anybody can come after a month claim a .5" and whos gonna argue otherwise? The journal sort of prevents that to an extent.
Anyhow the updating your journal everyday is a guideline not a rule. I don't think any of us did that this month. Could we consider thorough weekly updates to have the same value as daily updates? Theres ways we can go about it, I dont think straight up gains is it. It too easy to cheat and most importantly it takes the emphasis off the process. But if that is what the people want, we can do that.
Anyhow the updating your journal everyday is a guideline not a rule. I don't think any of us did that this month. Could we consider thorough weekly updates to have the same value as daily updates? Theres ways we can go about it, I dont think straight up gains is it. It too easy to cheat and most importantly it takes the emphasis off the process. But if that is what the people want, we can do that.
Big Schwanz Acht
@Big Schwanz Acht
funny what happens when you have an 'incentive' "If you want something to proliferate, subsidize it", can't remember who penned that and I believe it was in reference to either welfare or government supported housing (no matter) the saying holds-true to this situation too. I really don't care if someone's ego is too big to be honest and claim the 'winning' gain, the competition isn't about that for me and I'm pretty certain a lot of us...it's the fact that we're fileting ourselves in front of The Brotherhood (warts and all) for the opportunity to make some serious gains. It may happen faster for some, but the goal is the same...so if there's someone fudging for recognition (or a nominal prize) so be it. Just my $0.02
"If you want something to proliferate, subsidize it", can't remember who penned that and I believe it was in reference to either welfare or government supported housing (no matter) the saying holds-true to this situation too. I really don't care if someone's ego is too big to be honest and claim the 'winning' gain, the competition isn't about that for me and I'm pretty certain a lot of us...it's the fact that we're fileting ourselves in front of The Brotherhood (warts and all) for the opportunity to make some serious gains. It may happen faster for some, but the goal is the same...so if there's someone fudging for recognition (or a nominal prize) so be it. Just my $0.02kyomoto;718012 said:
Right, but now there is a prize. This month's winner wins a [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/showthread.php?83577-Length-master-official-order-thread-now-shipping-06-16-2014!!!]length master[/words] or a [words=https://officialhydromaxpump.com/?uid=6&oid=2&affid=98]bathmate[/words], DLD agreed to donate one every two months we schedule this comp. I don't want to throw that act of generosity away like that, unless you guys do think it is best to leave it without prize. Then we can go back to that.
And I think we need to start searching for backup judges for this month's competition, temp hasn't replied and neither has longstretch. If they don't reply in the next week or so, we could take it to a vote.
Big Schwanz Acht;718025 said:funny what happens when you have an 'incentive'
There is a prize... If there wasn't I doubt the argument would have happened in the first place.
Last edited:
Big Schwanz Acht
@Big Schwanz Acht
I don't think that little disagreement had anything to do with having a prize or not having a prize...water under the bridge. The Competition that you've graciously soldiered to The Troops, in its purest sense, is collectively gathering a like-minded group for a friendly challenge...for me, that's the beauty.
Big Schwanz Acht;718032 said:
That is the beauty, but like you said before " I really don't care if someone's ego is too big to be honest and claim the 'winning' gain," yeah nobody would really give a shit. But you add a prize and things are different, this was my hesistation with that at first.
So lets deal with the situation at hand, there is a prize and there will be a prize thanks to DLD. I don't think we should through that away, I am sure many members out on this forum will benefit from that. And in a way I feel this competition sort filters the guys a little bit and makes sure whoever wins is a person that will put that tool into good use. So given that we have a prize, how do you suppose we can go about deciding a winner? Because just judging gains blindly is not good enough.
Lets hear some ideas.