How big Big is Rico Strong

doublelongdaddy;359347 said:
His penis is the size of that bitches head:)
Click to expand...

The average female head is around 8" I believe or around 1/8 of height. It's always nice to see "big dicks" in adult entertainment that don't even cover the face of a 5' female.

I was just watching a Mandingo group scene, and by paying attention I definitely saw his true size for what it was and the distortion from angles and the small female holding it,etc. I watched it go from looking 12" to looking ~9 in the same scene. Specifically changing from a wide angle BJ to him jerking off at the end ( barely 2 hander). I also tried to get a perspective of the other guys in the scene. He dwarfed them, even though they were big guys. Well that's because they were probably pretty big at 7" and above average girth- which is big. But even a true 8x6 will probably look huge compared to a 7x5. Dealing with penis size, 1 inch is a huge difference %wise.
 
bigbutnottoo;359406 said:
FWIW, I am just over 8" bone-pressed. I am somewhere in the 7s non-bonepressed, depending on where you start and what degree you press at all. And I can get both my hands on the shaft and I can jerk with both hands ( stroking under the head) slightly.

.
Click to expand...

Well, that's what I am saying too. If you are around 8" your dick is the same size of Mandingo's one. Because that's what the images in his videos show. He can hold his dick with both hands withouth bone pressing hands against his ballsac and he can jerk his dick using both hands in the way you described here. This pics from the video "Mandingo vs Chiquita Lopez" just shows that.

http://yfrog.com/13holdingandjerkingwithtwj

And I also can jerk my dick (7.75" NBP) using both hands

http://yfrog.com/16condosmanos2j

So, why so many guys and girls think Mandingo's dick is 10, 12 or 14" (as he claims) long?. Because in adult entertainment EVERYBODY lies and exaggerate about their dick size. The guy who is 6 tells he is 8. The guy who is 6.5 tells he is 9 and the guy who is 8" (very very few adult entertainment actors are so big) tell he is 12 or 14" as Mandingo does in his videos.

Due to all those lies and exaggeration some people think that 8" isn't a very big dick, because the dicks they think are 8" are actually 6 or 6.5" long.

A real 8" dick measured on top of the shaft is a MONSTER dick. And that's why the guys in adult entertainment who are around 8" long look so freaking huge. Simple as that.
 
I would say that he´s at least ten inches in length, because I´m 5´7, have an athletic frame and an 8 inch cock and looking at it from the side it doesn´t look nearly as big as Mandingo´s.

When I hold a towel paper roll that is about 10.5 long at my pubic bone it looks about what he´s carrying around.

Try it out for yourself and see.

I would say that Lex is in between 8.5 and 9 but Mandingo is a whole different story.
 
large1;359472 said:
I would say that he´s at least ten inches in length, because I´m 5´7, have an athletic frame and an 8 inch cock and looking at it from the side it doesn´t look nearly as big as Mandingo´s.

When I hold a towel paper roll that is about 10.5 long at my pubic bone it looks about what he´s carrying around.

Try it out for yourself and see.

.
Click to expand...

Your method of estimation don't make any sense at all. Also, you shouldn't look at the whole body in order to estimate penis length.

You should look AT THE HANDS of the penis owner when it comes to guess size in adult entertainment videos.

You should use as an element of reference to estimate penis length a part of the body (hands) that everybody has and whose average hand width has been studied and is 3.3" wide (8.45 cms).

http://www.ispub.com/ostia/index.php...ol1n2/hand.xml

Mandingo's dick length is 3.32" (hand) + 3.32" (hand) + 1.37" (approximate length of glans in adult males) = around 8".

In the pics each arrow represents the width of the hand.

http://yfrog.com/ekcomparison3j

His dick has similar size to my dick (7.75" NBP) as the images show.

http://yfrog.com/6ecomparison4j

I am using ADULT MALE'S HAND to estimate the length of the penis.

You can't use the tiny small hands from the girls on the videos to do that because they are too small.

For instance, oriental girls like the ones featured in many Mandingo's videos are known for being really tiny and have very small hands.

According to this forensic study:

http://www.ispub.com/ostia/index.php...ol1n2/hand.xml

... tiny girls (like the ones featured in most Mandingo's videos) can have hands as small as 6.7 cms hand width (2.63").

So, when it looks like these girls need 3 hands to fully cover the entire Mandingo's dick, actually it is like this:

2.63" (hand width) + 2.63" (hand width) + 2.63" (hand width) = 7.89 inches.

7.4 cms (2.91") is the AVERAGE hand width on adult females. But petite tiny girls (like the ones featured in adult entertainment, specially the oriental ones) have hands smaller than the average female.
 
8x5. Have you ever seen one of his films with him talking before it? He is a odd motherfucker(no pun intended) but then again I would assume there are not to many pornstars out there without some screws missing.
 
rjf,

The glaring critical flaw I see in your argument concerns the source of your hand size reference which you seem to treat as absolute and irrefutable.

The study you cite was generated by a forensic study done, as far as I can tell, on the island of Mauritius. Nowhere was there mention of the level of decay or dessication exhibited on these corpses. Nor any reference to the height, weight or habitus of the cohort.

Without any meaningful reference for your reference your data is, ultimately, flawed and subjective.
 
MAXAMEYES;359484 said:
rjf,

The glaring critical flaw I see in your argument concerns the source of your hand size reference which you seem to treat as absolute and irrefutable.

The study you cite was generated by a forensic study done, as far as I can tell, on the island of Mauritius. Nowhere was there mention of the level of decay or dessication exhibited on these corpses. Nor any reference to the height, weight or habitus of the cohort.

Without any meaningful reference for your reference your data is, ultimately, flawed and subjective.
Click to expand...

What is the width of your hand when measured this way?

http://yfrog.com/6ugraficomanosj

Is it too different to the ones stated in that study?

What is a "meaningful reference" to you? To say Mandingo is 10" at least because everybody tell so?.

That study was published in a SERIOUS SCIENTIFICAL MEDICAL FORENSIC magazine, written by doctors and distrubited among professional of forensic medicine worlwide?.

Does it sound more credible to you the "14 inches" claimed in Mandingo's [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/mosdvd.htm]DVD[/words] covers? roflroflrofl

You say that because you want to believe Mandingo's dick is 10, 11 or more inches. That's the reason you rather questioning the scientifical studies provided hare and believe all the bullshit around those exaggerated dick sizes of pornstars like Mandingo. Simple as that.
 
Last edited:
Im guessing Rico Strong at 8.5x5.75.

Ok, just to give an example on how looks can be deceiving: As I am only 5'8'' I do have very small hands (a tip above 2.9 inches width). Now if you add a tricky camera angle and with your first hand you reach into your scrotum... tadaaa: a real 7.25-7.5 goes 9 inches.

ps: The index finger from a friend of mine is 4.5 long (me 2.9). His hands are the size of a frikkin spaceship. USA shoesize 19 1/2. No joke. He'll never do adult entertainment.
 
8iG;359499 said:
Im guessing Rico Strong at 8.5x5.75.

Ok, just to give an example on how looks can be deceiving: As I am only 5'8'' I do have very small hands (a tip above 2.9 inches width). Now if you add a tricky camera angle and with your first hand you reach into your scrotum... tadaaa: a real 7.25-7.5 goes 9 inches.

ps: The index finger from a friend of mine is 4.5 long (me 2.9). His hands are the size of a frikkin spaceship. USA shoesize 19 1/2. No joke. He'll never do adult entertainment.
Click to expand...

In that pic you are pressing your hands against your balls so heavily that your ballsac is almost exploding?. This way you have JUST YOUR THUMB AND INDEX FINGER around the base of your dick. The rest of your fingers are over your scrotum. This is the old trick used by everybody to pretend that they have a big dick. rofl

I don't want to fool anybody using such tricks. That's why I show my dick with hands no pressing and pressing against the pubic bone/ballsac to allow people to see the difference.

http://yfrog.com/16condosmanos2j

In my pics posted, neither Mandingo or myself aren't pressing hands against the pubic bone and ballsac in the heavy way you do in that photo you posted.

As you say, they are countless tricks used in adult entertainment to make dicks look much larger than actually are.
 
Last edited:
rfj;359498 said:
What is the width of your hand when measured this way?

http://yfrog.com/6ugraficomanosj

1) Is it too different to the ones stated in that study?

2) What is a "meaningful reference" to you? To say Mandingo is 10" at least because everybody tell so?.

3) That study was published in a SERIOUS SCIENTIFICAL MEDICAL FORENSIC magazine, written by doctors and distrubited among professional of forensic medicine worlwide?.

4) Does it sound more credible to you the "14 inches" claimed in Mandingo's [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/mosdvd.htm]DVD[/words] covers? roflroflrofl

5) You say that because you want to believe Mandingo's dick is 10, 11 or more inches. That's the reason you rather questioning the scientifical studies provided hare and believe all the bullshit around those exaggerated dick sizes of pornstars like Mandingo. Simple as that.
Click to expand...

ANSWERS:
1) Reference line "C" = 4.5 inches, as previously stated.
2) Meaningful reference means this: citing just one anthropometric statistic has no meaning whatsoever if you have no idea of the:
a. condition of the bodies when these measurements were taken-necrosis, dessication, consumption by scavengers, manner of death; i.e. fire, starvation, etc. all have substantial effects on the post mortem condition
b. the population base from which these bodies were derived- according to the current CIA factbook: Indo-Mauritian 68%, Creole 27%, Sino-Mauritian 3%, Franco-Mauritian 2%, now look at the average sizes of source and geographically similar populations:

Chart showing the average height of males and females in various world countries.
<TABLE width=600><TBODY><TR><TD>Country</TD><TD>Average male height</TD><TD>Average female height</TD></TR><TR><TD>Argentina</TD><TD>174.46 cm (5 ft 8.6 in)</TD><TD>161.03 cm (5 ft 3.4 in)</TD></TR><TR><TD>Australia</TD><TD>178.4 cm (5' 10.2")</TD><TD>163.9 cm (5' 4.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Bahrain</TD><TD>165.1 cm (5' 5")</TD><TD>154.7 cm (5' 1")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Belgium</TD><TD>176.6 cm (5' 9.5")</TD><TD>163.3 cm (5' 4.3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Brazil</TD><TD>169.0 cm (5' 6.5")</TD><TD>158.0 cm (5' 2.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Cameroon</TD><TD>170.6 cm (5' 7.2")</TD><TD>161.3 cm (5' 3.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Canada</TD><TD>174 cm (5' 8.5")</TD><TD>161.0 cm (5' 3.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>China (PRC)</TD><TD>164.8 cm (5' 4.9")</TD><TD>154.5 cm (5' 0.8")</TD></TR><TR><TD>China</TD><TD>169.4 cm (5' 6.7")</TD><TD>158.6 cm (5' 2.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Colombia</TD><TD>170.64 cm (5' 7.2")</TD><TD>158.65 cm (5' 2.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>C&#244;te d&#8217;Ivoire</TD><TD>170.1 cm (5' 7")</TD><TD>159.1 cm (5' 2.7")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Czech Republic</TD><TD>180.3 cm (5' 11")</TD><TD>167.3 cm (5' 6.0")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Denmark</TD><TD>180.6 cm (5' 11.1")</TD><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD>Dinaric Alps</TD><TD>185.6 cm (6' 1.0")</TD><TD>171.0 cm (5' 7.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Estonia</TD><TD>179.1 cm (5' 10.5")</TD><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD>Finland</TD><TD>178.2 cm (5' 10")</TD><TD>164.7 cm (5' 4.7")</TD></TR><TR><TD>France</TD><TD>174.1 cm (5' 8.5")</TD><TD>161.9 cm (5' 3.7")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Ghana</TD><TD>169.46 cm (5' 6.7")</TD><TD>158.53 cm (5' 2.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Gambia</TD><TD>168.0 cm (5' 6.1")</TD><TD>157.8 cm (5' 2.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Germany</TD><TD>178.1 cm (5' 10")</TD><TD>165 cm (5' 4.9")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Guatemala (Maya people)</TD><TD>157.5 cm (5' 2")</TD><TD>142.2 cm (4' 6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Hong Kong</TD><TD>170 cm (5' 7")</TD><TD>158.8 cm (5' 2.6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Hungary, Debrecen</TD><TD>179.14 cm (5' 10.4")</TD><TD>165.84 cm (5' 5.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Iceland</TD><TD>181.7 cm (5' 11.5")</TD><TD>167.6 cm (5' 6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>India</TD><TD>165.3 cm (5' 5")</TD><TD>165.3 cm (5' 5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Indonesia</TD><TD>158.0 cm (5' 2.2")</TD><TD>147.0 cm (4' 10.0")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Indonesia, East Bali</TD><TD>162.4 cm (5' 3.9")</TD><TD>151.3 cm (4' 11.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Iran</TD><TD>174.24 cm (5' 8.6")</TD><TD>160.0 cm (5' 3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Iraq</TD><TD>165.4 cm (5' 5.1")</TD><TD>155.8 cm (5' 1.3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Israel</TD><TD>175.6 cm (5' 9.2")</TD><TD>162.7 cm (5' 4.1")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Italy - Middle & North</TD><TD>176.9 cm (5' 9.7")</TD><TD>163.2 cm (5' 4.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Italy - South</TD><TD>174.2 cm (5' 8.0")</TD><TD>160.8 cm (5' 3.3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Japan</TD><TD>171.2 cm (5' 7.4")</TD><TD>158.8 cm (5' 2.6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Korea, South</TD><TD>175.26 cm (5' 9")</TD><TD>162.56 cm (5' 4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Lithuania</TD><TD>176.3 cm (5' 9.4")</TD><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD>Malaysia</TD><TD>164.7 cm (5' 4.8")</TD><TD>153.3 cm (5' 0.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Malta</TD><TD>169 cm (5' 6.5")</TD><TD>159 cm (5' 2.6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Malawi</TD><TD>166 cm (5' 5.3")</TD><TD>155 cm (5' 1.1")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Mali</TD><TD>171.3 cm (5' 7.4")</TD><TD>160.4 cm (5' 3.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Mexico, State of Morelos</TD><TD>167 cm (5' 5.7")</TD><TD>155 cm (5' 1.1")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Netherlands</TD><TD>184.8 cm (6' 0.8")</TD><TD>168.7 cm (5' 6.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>New Zealand</TD><TD>177.0 cm (5' 9.7")</TD><TD>165.0 cm (5' 5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Nigeria</TD><TD>163.8 cm (5' 4.5")</TD><TD>157.8 cm (5' 2.1")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Norway</TD><TD>179.9 cm (5' 10.8")</TD><TD>167.2 cm (5' 5.9")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Philippines</TD><TD>163.5 cm (5' 4.4")</TD><TD>151.8 cm (4' 11.8")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Portugal</TD><TD>172.8 cm (5' 8")</TD><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD>Singapore</TD><TD>170.6 cm (5' 7.2")</TD><TD>160 cm (5' 3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>South Africa</TD><TD>169.0 cm (5' 6.5")</TD><TD>159.0 cm (5' 2.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Spain</TD><TD>170 cm (5' 7")</TD><TD>161 cm (5' 3.3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Sweden</TD><TD>180 cm (5' 10.9")</TD><TD>166.9 cm (5' 5.7")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Switzerland</TD><TD>175.5 cm (5' 9")</TD><TD>164.0 cm (5' 3.8")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Taiwan</TD><TD>171.45 cm (5' 7.5")</TD><TD>159.68 cm (5' 2.75")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Thailand</TD><TD>167.5 cm (5' 5.9")</TD><TD>157.3 cm (5' 1.9")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Turkey</TD><TD>173.74 cm (5' 8.4")</TD><TD>161.4 cm (5' 3.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>United Kingdom</TD><TD>176.8 cm (5' 9.6")</TD><TD>163.7 cm (5' 4.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>U.S.</TD><TD>178.2 cm (5' 10.2")</TD><TD>164.1 cm (5' 4.6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Vietnam</TD><TD>167 cm</TD><TD>156 cm
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


c. the overall size of the bodies being measured-smaller bodies= smaller hands
d. the sample size of the cohort- too small a sample yields skewed results
3) the vehicle of publication is entirely a non-sequitur, the point of contention is your data referents, not the manner, nor location, of their publication
4) Neither, actually
5) Wrong, as usual. I have no concern whatsoever about Mandingo's claimed or actual size. I do have a concern, however, about someone using faulty and incomplete data in a completely arbitrary fashion along with faulty methodology rife with inaccuracies to perpetuate some capricious personal agenda.

Do not ascribe motives to me based upon your own prejudices or fears.

I say that your methodology is inaccurate, because it is.
I say that your data is incomplete, because it is. I say the conclusions you draw are spurious, because they are.

Basically: you have no idea who got measured, what their body size was, the condition of that body, their size in comparison to a larger population base. Actually all you have is one statement of one measurement. Which, all by itself, is absolutely meaningless.

Correct your "science".

That is simple.
 
Last edited:
savageblue;359553 said:
wow, this has turned into quite a discussion...
Click to expand...

Yeah, to an extent. I'm of the opinion that if you state something as a fact; it simply should be a fact. Plus, I'm not a guy who takes kindly to some twerp stating matter of factly, "You said (or did, or implied, or though etc. etc.) this because of that...."

That little guy has no clue what my thought process or motivation is, he can only suppose and surmise.

Most any time that someone seeks to impose a moral or behavioral imperative on someone else they are attempting to bolster a position they themselves know to be tenuous.

I say: don't let anyone misinterpret or control one's own thought processes.
 
MAXAMEYES;359529 said:
ANSWERS:
1) Reference line "C" = 4.5 inches, as previously stated.
2) Meaningful reference means this: citing just one anthropometric statistic has no meaning whatsoever if you have no idea of the:
a. condition of the bodies when these measurements were taken-necrosis, dessication, consumption by scavengers, manner of death; i.e. fire, starvation, etc. all have substantial effects on the post mortem condition
b. the population base from which these bodies were derived- according to the current CIA factbook: Indo-Mauritian 68%, Creole 27%, Sino-Mauritian 3%, Franco-Mauritian 2%, now look at the average sizes of source and geographically similar populations:

Chart showing the average height of males and females in various world countries.
<TABLE width=600><TBODY><TR><TD>Country</TD><TD>Average male height</TD><TD>Average female height</TD></TR><TR><TD>Argentina</TD><TD>174.46 cm (5 ft 8.6 in)</TD><TD>161.03 cm (5 ft 3.4 in)</TD></TR><TR><TD>Australia</TD><TD>178.4 cm (5' 10.2")</TD><TD>163.9 cm (5' 4.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Bahrain</TD><TD>165.1 cm (5' 5")</TD><TD>154.7 cm (5' 1")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Belgium</TD><TD>176.6 cm (5' 9.5")</TD><TD>163.3 cm (5' 4.3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Brazil</TD><TD>169.0 cm (5' 6.5")</TD><TD>158.0 cm (5' 2.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Cameroon</TD><TD>170.6 cm (5' 7.2")</TD><TD>161.3 cm (5' 3.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Canada</TD><TD>174 cm (5' 8.5")</TD><TD>161.0 cm (5' 3.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>China (PRC)</TD><TD>164.8 cm (5' 4.9")</TD><TD>154.5 cm (5' 0.8")</TD></TR><TR><TD>China</TD><TD>169.4 cm (5' 6.7")</TD><TD>158.6 cm (5' 2.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Colombia</TD><TD>170.64 cm (5' 7.2")</TD><TD>158.65 cm (5' 2.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Côte d’Ivoire</TD><TD>170.1 cm (5' 7")</TD><TD>159.1 cm (5' 2.7")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Czech Republic</TD><TD>180.3 cm (5' 11")</TD><TD>167.3 cm (5' 6.0")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Denmark</TD><TD>180.6 cm (5' 11.1")</TD><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD>Dinaric Alps</TD><TD>185.6 cm (6' 1.0")</TD><TD>171.0 cm (5' 7.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Estonia</TD><TD>179.1 cm (5' 10.5")</TD><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD>Finland</TD><TD>178.2 cm (5' 10")</TD><TD>164.7 cm (5' 4.7")</TD></TR><TR><TD>France</TD><TD>174.1 cm (5' 8.5")</TD><TD>161.9 cm (5' 3.7")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Ghana</TD><TD>169.46 cm (5' 6.7")</TD><TD>158.53 cm (5' 2.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Gambia</TD><TD>168.0 cm (5' 6.1")</TD><TD>157.8 cm (5' 2.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Germany</TD><TD>178.1 cm (5' 10")</TD><TD>165 cm (5' 4.9")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Guatemala (Maya people)</TD><TD>157.5 cm (5' 2")</TD><TD>142.2 cm (4' 6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Hong Kong</TD><TD>170 cm (5' 7")</TD><TD>158.8 cm (5' 2.6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Hungary, Debrecen</TD><TD>179.14 cm (5' 10.4")</TD><TD>165.84 cm (5' 5.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Iceland</TD><TD>181.7 cm (5' 11.5")</TD><TD>167.6 cm (5' 6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>India</TD><TD>165.3 cm (5' 5")</TD><TD>165.3 cm (5' 5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Indonesia</TD><TD>158.0 cm (5' 2.2")</TD><TD>147.0 cm (4' 10.0")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Indonesia, East Bali</TD><TD>162.4 cm (5' 3.9")</TD><TD>151.3 cm (4' 11.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Iran</TD><TD>174.24 cm (5' 8.6")</TD><TD>160.0 cm (5' 3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Iraq</TD><TD>165.4 cm (5' 5.1")</TD><TD>155.8 cm (5' 1.3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Israel</TD><TD>175.6 cm (5' 9.2")</TD><TD>162.7 cm (5' 4.1")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Italy - Middle & North</TD><TD>176.9 cm (5' 9.7")</TD><TD>163.2 cm (5' 4.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Italy - South</TD><TD>174.2 cm (5' 8.0")</TD><TD>160.8 cm (5' 3.3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Japan</TD><TD>171.2 cm (5' 7.4")</TD><TD>158.8 cm (5' 2.6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Korea, South</TD><TD>175.26 cm (5' 9")</TD><TD>162.56 cm (5' 4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Lithuania</TD><TD>176.3 cm (5' 9.4")</TD><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD>Malaysia</TD><TD>164.7 cm (5' 4.8")</TD><TD>153.3 cm (5' 0.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Malta</TD><TD>169 cm (5' 6.5")</TD><TD>159 cm (5' 2.6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Malawi</TD><TD>166 cm (5' 5.3")</TD><TD>155 cm (5' 1.1")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Mali</TD><TD>171.3 cm (5' 7.4")</TD><TD>160.4 cm (5' 3.2")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Mexico, State of Morelos</TD><TD>167 cm (5' 5.7")</TD><TD>155 cm (5' 1.1")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Netherlands</TD><TD>184.8 cm (6' 0.8")</TD><TD>168.7 cm (5' 6.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>New Zealand</TD><TD>177.0 cm (5' 9.7")</TD><TD>165.0 cm (5' 5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Nigeria</TD><TD>163.8 cm (5' 4.5")</TD><TD>157.8 cm (5' 2.1")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Norway</TD><TD>179.9 cm (5' 10.8")</TD><TD>167.2 cm (5' 5.9")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Philippines</TD><TD>163.5 cm (5' 4.4")</TD><TD>151.8 cm (4' 11.8")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Portugal</TD><TD>172.8 cm (5' 8")</TD><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD>Singapore</TD><TD>170.6 cm (5' 7.2")</TD><TD>160 cm (5' 3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>South Africa</TD><TD>169.0 cm (5' 6.5")</TD><TD>159.0 cm (5' 2.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Spain</TD><TD>170 cm (5' 7")</TD><TD>161 cm (5' 3.3")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Sweden</TD><TD>180 cm (5' 10.9")</TD><TD>166.9 cm (5' 5.7")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Switzerland</TD><TD>175.5 cm (5' 9")</TD><TD>164.0 cm (5' 3.8")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Taiwan</TD><TD>171.45 cm (5' 7.5")</TD><TD>159.68 cm (5' 2.75")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Thailand</TD><TD>167.5 cm (5' 5.9")</TD><TD>157.3 cm (5' 1.9")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Turkey</TD><TD>173.74 cm (5' 8.4")</TD><TD>161.4 cm (5' 3.5")</TD></TR><TR><TD>United Kingdom</TD><TD>176.8 cm (5' 9.6")</TD><TD>163.7 cm (5' 4.4")</TD></TR><TR><TD>U.S.</TD><TD>178.2 cm (5' 10.2")</TD><TD>164.1 cm (5' 4.6")</TD></TR><TR><TD>Vietnam</TD><TD>167 cm</TD><TD>156 cm
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


c. the overall size of the bodies being measured-smaller bodies= smaller hands
d. the sample size of the cohort- too small a sample yields skewed results
3) the vehicle of publication is entirely a non-sequitur, the point of contention is your data referents, not the manner, nor location, of their publication
4) Neither, actually
5) Wrong, as usual. I have no concern whatsoever about Mandingo's claimed or actual size. I do have a concern, however, about someone using faulty and incomplete data in a completely arbitrary fashion along with faulty methodology rife with inaccuracies to perpetuate some capricious personal agenda.

Do not ascribe motives to me based upon your own prejudices or fears.

I say that your methodology is inaccurate, because it is.
I say that your data is incomplete, because it is. I say the conclusions you draw are spurious, because they are.

Basically: you have no idea who got measured, what their body size was, the condition of that body, their size in comparison to a larger population base. Actually all you have is one statement of one measurement. Which, all by itself, is absolutely meaningless.

Correct your "science".

That is simple.
Click to expand...


It's not true that tall men have always bigger hands than short men. There is no correlation between body size and hand size except when we are talking about very tall people (like NBA players).

Also, what is your hand width?. Is it too distant from the ones described in that study?.

Do you seriously think that your hand size depends on wich part of the world you live in?

I live in Spain (Europe). Let's do this: tell what is your hand width and I'll tell you what is mine and we'll check if the distance among our countries translate into a difference in our hand size.

The biggest dicks in adult entertainment are Mandingo, Jack Napier (Manaconda) Rico Strong and a few others like MR. 18 inches. This guy is Mr 18. and claims to be 18 inches.

http://yfrog.com/ebimage262j

And see what happens when we take a look at his dick. Its length equals the width of both hands plus the length of the glans. Each arrow represents the width of his hand.

http://yfrog.com/55mr18j

Look at this pic featuring the dicks of some of the biggest dick in adult entertainment. In all cases the length of the dicks equals the width of both hands plus the length of the glans. Is it coincidence? Why people say that Mandingo has a larger dick than Lexington Steele?. Is it because they have seen both dicks properly measured or maybe is because when Lexington Steele holds his dick using both hands THE ENTIRE dick is fully covered while in Mandingo's dick there is the glans showing outside the hands?. Think about it. People know that Mandingo's dick is larger than Lexington's one because it looks larger when compared with their hands and don't need any ruler at all to see that.

http://yfrog.com/eqcomparison2j

All of those hung pornstars featured in the pic above claim different huge sizes (10, 11 or 14 inches) but their dicks look THE SAME length when holding them with their hand. How do you explain that?. Would you say it's because all of them have hands much bigger than the rest of adult males?.

Now think about the following:

Mandingo's dick, Richard Mann's dick, Mr. 18 inch's dick, Jack Napier's dick...: THE BIGGEST DICK IN adult entertainment. The length of the dicks from those hung pornstars equals the width of both hands with the glans showing outside the hands. How can you explain that?. Is it coincidence?. Is it because all of them have hands much bigger than the rest of men?. NO. It is because the biggest dicks seen in adult entertainment are around 8" long. And a real 8" dick is a huge dick when compared with the dicks of most men (average penis length according to several studies is 5.5 inches). Everybody exaggerates their penis size, in adult entertainment and in Internet forums like this. Don't forget that.

Or maybe would you say that all guys featured in adult entertainment have huge hands much bigger than the average hand size? rofl

This image shows the clear difference in size when comparing the dicks of average sized adult entertainment actors (around 5.5" long) with the dick of Mandingo or my own dick (both around 8" long).

Ver Imagen: mandi41os55rb.jpg

http://www.imaxenes.com/imagen/mandi41os55rb.jpg.html

This pic clearly explains why people who watch adult entertainment don't need "truthful measurements" to see wich pornstars have the biggest dicks.

If you need "thuthful measurements" using a ruler to estimate the size of a dick, how can you know that Mandingo's dick is larger than yours? It's impossible because you never have seen Mandingo's dick being properly measured using a ruler so you don't know how many inches long his dick is. Think about it.

People know that Mandingo's dick is a very large one. But they don't know that because they see "the inches" in his dick. They know that because he can hold his dick using both hands WITHOUT PRESSING THEM AGAINST THE Penis EnlargementLVIC BONE and very few man have dicks large enough to do that.

Do you really think that a girl need to use a ruler (truthful measurement) to know if the dick of her partner is big?. No. Just by holding it with one or both hands is more than enough to know if a dick is big. At least people who watch adult entertainment videos can't use any ruler on those dicks shown to estimate their size and it seems that they don't need to do that to see that those dicks are noticeable bigger than the dicks of most men just by comparing their size with other parts of the body (like hands). Then again, think about it.
 
Last edited:
MAXAMEYES;359529 said:
ANSWERS:
1) Reference line "C" = 4.5 inches, as previously stated.
2) Meaningful reference means this: citing just one anthropometric statistic has no meaning whatsoever if you have no idea of the:
a. condition of the bodies when these measurements were taken-necrosis, dessication, consumption by scavengers, manner of death; i.e. fire, starvation, etc. all have substantial effects on the post mortem condition
b. the population base from which these bodies were derived- according to the current CIA factbook: Indo-Mauritian 68%, Creole 27%, Sino-Mauritian 3%, Franco-Mauritian 2%, now look at the average sizes of source and geographically similar populations:
Click to expand...

I see. And we should believe that simply because you tell so. There are also thousands of guys at internet forums saying "my dick is 10 inches", but that's it: they just say it (and words don't prove nothing specially in Internet).

If that is true you have huge hands bearing in mind that the average hand width is 3.3". And this is stated in an study. A study endorsed by a proffesional medical forensic magazine distributed among forensic doctors worldwide and done usen scientifical methodology according to UNE standards. It is a study at least as valid and respectable as the one you quoted about average human height on different parts of the world.

You simply say isn't a valid study because you don't like the results shown on it. And you don't like the results of that study because you need to believe that most people have big hands because just that will explain that Mandingo can fully cover 9 or 10" of shaft with just the width of two hands.

Everybody who hold a 9 or 10" ruler with his hands will see that it certainly takes more than two hands width to reach the 9 or 10" mark in the ruler. Simple as that.

This is a catalog from an european based manufacturer of surgical equipment to be used in different parts of human body including hand protheses and surgical gloves to be selled in Europe and America.

http://www.orliman.com/AdaptingSystem/Intercambio/AdaptingShop/docs/d1224ER.pdf

According to that catalog 9 cms (3.55") hand width is a Large size and 9.5 cms hand width (3.74") is a XL size. So if your hand width truly is 4.5" (11.43 cms) it exceeds far the XL hand size. With a width of 4.5" your hands are frankly uncommon because they are much bigger than the hand size of most men.

Maximum hand width on adult males measured in the study: 9.45 cms.

XL hand width size according to gloves manufacturers oscillates between 9 and 10 cms.

So both sources of information tell the same: a human hand width above 10 cms. wide is extremely uncommon. So, as I said, if it's true your hand width is 4.5" you have truly huge hands.

By the way, my hand width is 9.2 cms (3.62").

You say that my methodology is inaccurate. Well, at least is based upon a logic method of guessing: using the hand of the width to guess penis length.

Funny that you question the accuracy of my methodology while you and others just say "I'm 8 inches and Mandingo looks far bigger than me".

I've used the hand width of those actors (biggest dicks in adult entertainment industry) as seen in the pics featured to show that the length of their dicks equals the width of both hands plus the length of the glans in all cases. Can you do something better in order to estimate the length of their penises?.

My data isn't incomplete at all. It comes from a medical study done by scientifical methods according to UNE standards on stadistical surveys. If this study is "incomplete" the study you quoted could also be considered as "incomplete"too.

The condition, the size of the body haven't no correlation with the size of the hand.

You only can tell for sure that certain people who are extremely tall have big hands for sure: like basketball players.

But Mandingo is far from being a tall guy. He is 170 cms. tall. I've even seen two girls on his videos who where taller than him.

http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=Mandingo/gender=m

It's you the one who should "correct your science" since you are confronting an study on human heigth whith an study about the hand size on adult males and females. And there isn't correlation between heigth and hand size. There are short people whose hands are bigger than the ones of tall people and viceversa and everybody know this is true.

To me, the only one who is suppliying inconsistent data here it's you when you claim that hand size depends on body heigth or on the different parts of the world people live in. If that were true my hands will be bigger than Mandingo's ones since I'm 192 cms. tall.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Back
    Top