savageblue;359298 said:
rfj, it wasn't my intention to acuse anyone of anything. I believe your photos are real. I believe the guys showed in the pics are trully endowed. What I meant was that you don't necessarily have to be huge in order to hold your dick with both hands and still show some glans.

Let's talk about the biggest dick in adult entertainment: Mandingo.

As you can see the length of his dick equals the width of both hands (each arrow represents the width of the hand) plus the length of the glans. And his hands are around the shaft, not pressing against his balls.

http://yfrog.com/6ecomparison4j

This is because Mandingo is around 8" long. And a real MEASURED ON TOP OF THE SHAFT 8" dick is a huge dick.

All the biggest dicks in adult entertainment (Mandingo, Richard Mann, Jack Napier, Rico Strong) have a thing in common: the length of their dicks equals the width of both hands plus the length of the glans.

Mandingo, Richard Mann or Jack Napier have larger dicks than Lexington Steele. This is known for many adult entertainment aficionados and this picture visually explains this. Lex fully covers his dick using both hands while in Mandingo or Jack Napier's dicks there is the glans showing outside

http://yfrog.com/eqcomparison2j

Most big dicks shown in adult entertainment are in the 6.5 - 7.5 inches range.
 
Last edited:
Most big dicks shown in adult entertainment are in the 6.5-7.5 inches range??? Really??? :O

That means... I can still get a career in adult entertainment, woohoooooo... rofl

You just made my day, eheheh.
 
savageblue;359301 said:
Most big dicks shown in adult entertainment are in the 6.5-7.5 inches range??? Really??? :O

That means... I can still get a career in adult entertainment, woohoooooo... rofl

You just made my day, eheheh.

Yes they are. Fish-eye lenses and tricky camera angles make them look larger than actually are.

Not to mention the tiny girls used in adult entertainment videos (like those asian girls with very small hands so popular in big-dicked adult entertainment).

Just look at the pics I posted using the male hand (instead of those small hands from tiny girls in adult entertainment) as an element of reference to estimate penis length
 
Last edited:
rfj;359261 said:
Your hand "is 5 inches wide", because you are measuring bad the width of your hand.

For your information: this is the right way to measure hand width. It should be measured at the C point in the graph

http://yfrog.com/6ugraficomanosj

You'll need to have at least 7 fingers on each hand to have a hand width of 5".roflrofl

Wrong.
OK, across the plantar surface, at the knuckles, I'm a mere 4.5" hand width. If you had actually read my post I stated I measured across the palm from the base of the thumb; which, if most men are gripping their own penises will be the most common view from a top-down perspective.
The metacarpal-phalangal joint region will be obscured by the shaft of the penis.

My smallest finger is 1.25" at the first knuckle.
 
Last edited:
MAXAMEYES;359305 said:
Wrong.
OK, across the plantar surface, at the knuckles, I'm a mere 4.5" hand width. If you had actually read my post I stated I measured across the palm from the base of the thumb; which, if most men are gripping their own penises will be the most common view from a top-down perspective.
The metacarpal-phalangal joint region will be obscured by the shaft of the penis.

My smallest finger is 1.25" at the first knuckle.

If your hand width is 4.5" as you say, your hands are extraordinary huge.
 
bigbutnottoo posted:
Most guys can probably get 2 hands under the glans on a 7incher.

To which I replied:
I'm 6,49 inches long and I can get my two hands under the glans If I want to. Remember that, if you grab it as seen on the photos, some part of the back hand will probably be near your scrotum, which can give you and extra half inch or so.
If you really want to see how many hands-long your dick is, even bone pressed, grab it with both hands, with the back of your hand facing up (the inner side of your thumb touching the pubic bone, instead of the outer side of your pinky).
When you do that, if you still can get two hands and have the glans showing, then you can brag at will rotfl


Just to try and explain a bit better what my point is, here are a couple of pictures (the ones with the ruler are in centimeters. If you need to convert it, go to http://www.onlineconversion.com/length_common.htm :P).

First of all, as you can see in the picture named PalmMeasurement, my palm measures 8,5 cms = 3.34 inches wide.
My BPenis EnlargementL is 16,5 cms = 6.49 inches. The picture named MyStats is, obviously, my EL, not bone pressed.

As you can see from pic TwoHands 1, I can grab my penis with both hands and still leave my glans out. However, in picture TwoHands 2, grabing it the other way around, the length of my both hands covers up the glans. That's why I gave the aforementioned reply to bigbutnottoo.

;)
 
savageblue;359319 said:
As you can see from pic TwoHands 1, I can grab my penis with both hands and still leave my glans out. However, in picture TwoHands 2, grabing it the other way around, the length of my both hands covers up the glans. That's why I gave the aforementioned reply to bigbutnottoo.

;)


In this pic your upper hand partially overlaps your lower hand. And your hands are heavily pressed against the pubic bone. That's why you can use both hands to hold it.

http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=21401&d=1257446567

In this pic your upper hand don't overlap your lower hand.

http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=21402&d=1257446567

That's why here both hands cover the whole penis including the glans. You need a penis around 8" long in order to hold it with both hands (NOT PRESSING AGAINST PUBIC BONE NOR OVERLAPING ONE HAND OVER THE OTHER) and leave the glans showing outside them.

But in the pics of Mandingo I've posted he isn't overlapping his hands and he isn't pressing them against his pubic bone in the way you do in your pics.
 
Last edited:
LOL, we have quite a debate going on here, rotfl.

If you look carefully, you'll notice that, in the first picture, my left pinky is right after my right index finger, which means I didn't overlap my hand.

However, you are right when you say they were heavily pressed against the pubic bone.

I never meant to say that Mandingo isn't big (I'd have to be blind and in great denial to make such a statement :P). I never even meant to say anything about anyone's size. My whole point here was to show that, just because you can fit X number of hands around your penis, it doesn't necessarily make you Y inches long. And that I believe was clear with the video I linked afterwards. :)

Now, if I didn't have any kind of issue with penis size to start with, I wouldn't be a member here. So, these are just my opinions ;)
 
savageblue;359319 said:
As you can see from pic TwoHands 1, I can grab my penis with both hands and still leave my glans out.
;)

Just compare the way you hold your dick with the way in wich Mandingo hold his dick using both hands. You'll see at a glance that the way you hold your penis looks clearly forced and also Mandingo's dick looks clearly bigger when compared with the size of his hand.

http://yfrog.com/j6compar5j
 
That's an irrefutable fact :) And your dick is also bigger than mine. I can tell from the way yours seems to reach your navel.

Still, I just don't see how that makes my statement any less valid. :)
 
savageblue;359330 said:
That's an irrefutable fact :) And your dick is also bigger than mine. I can tell from the way yours seems to reach your navel.

Still, I just don't see how that makes my statement any less valid. :)

Your statement is valid if you are saying that you can force the positioning of your hands to create the illusion that you need two or more hands to hold your penis.

But what shows that Mandingo's dick is noticeable larger than most men penises is the fact that he can hold it without pressing hands and leave part of it (glans) uncovered by the hands. And very few men (Mandingo, Jack Napier, Richard Mann in adult entertainment) can do that.

It's because details like this that everybody can see Mandingo's dick is a very large one.
 
HAH! You can only say that if you know for sure how big Mandingo's hands are! :P Just kidding.
I know precisely what you mean.

One other thing to tell it is, like I said for your picture, to compare the distante between the glans and the navel when the erect penis is lying on the guy's pubic area. If the guy's glans reaches his navel, he is unquestionably big, I think.
 
His penis is the size of that bitches head:)
 
savageblue;359340 said:
One other thing to tell it is, like I said for your picture, to compare the distante between the glans and the navel when the erect penis is lying on the guy's pubic area. If the guy's glans reaches his navel, he is unquestionably big, I think.

You are rigth. Those are the main indicators of how really big a dick is, since adult entertainment actors don't measure themselves in videos (at least in a proper and accurate way) and all of them greatly exaggerate their size claims.
 
I wonder why the hell they need to exaggerate their size claims. They are already banging more girls than all of us together :P
 
savageblue;359350 said:
I wonder why the hell they need to exaggerate their size claims. They are already banging more girls than all of us together :P


That is how the adult industry works. If someone is 8 they claim 12...Holmes was rumored to be 13" when he is closer to 8". People have a tendency to believe hype without question...we live in a society of sheep following sheep.
 
savageblue;359298 said:
rfj, it wasn't my intention to acuse anyone of anything. I believe your photos are real. I believe the guys showed in the pics are trully endowed. What I meant was that you don't necessarily have to be huge in order to hold your dick with both hands and still show some glans.

I'll try and take a picture myself to see if I can explain what I'm saying.
If I manage to take the picture (which, since I will have both hands grabbing my dick will be kind of dificult:P) I will post it here, along with my measurements.

Peace and growth.

I got what you are saying, which is essentially what I was saying. Just because you can get 2 ( or 3) hands ( especially female) on your dick somehow, it doesn't mean you have some outrageous 9-10 inch ( or whatever) measurement. If you can get 2 hands on it at all, you are pretty big for sure, but you could be 7 inches or even less.

BTW I saw that Johnny Sins guy measured somewhere and it was right around 7". He is on the thin side and also very lean body so he looks longer than he is. This is the case with many of these adult entertainment guys.
 
rfj;359324 said:
In this pic your upper hand partially overlaps your lower hand. And your hands are heavily pressed against the pubic bone. That's why you can use both hands to hold it.

http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=21401&d=1257446567

In this pic your upper hand don't overlap your lower hand.

http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=21402&d=1257446567

That's why here both hands cover the whole penis including the glans. You need a penis around 8" long in order to hold it with both hands (NOT PRESSING AGAINST PUBIC BONE NOR OVERLAPING ONE HAND OVER THE OTHER) and leave the glans showing outside them.

But in the pics of Mandingo I've posted he isn't overlapping his hands and he isn't pressing them against his pubic bone in the way you do in your pics.

Well, your penis measurement goes to your pubic bone, at least if you are measuring consistently, especially if you basically have no fat pad. Most of these " big dick" adult entertainment guys have basically "ripped" pubic areas with no fat, both adding to the illusion of size as well as making their NBP pretty much = BP.

Therefore, your measurements using the hand sizes should go to the pubic bone, especially in the case of guys who have no fat there. I don't see how someone pressing the pubic bone to get 2 hands on is "cheating" or whatever. Any way, the point isn't whether Mandingo presses his hand to his pubic bone when he grabs his dick. You are the one using hand measurements to create your own "ruler" and that ruler should be from the pubic bone to the end of the glans- not starting at some arbitrary point in front of the pubic bone. Right?

As an aside, my NBP is as long as a lot of these adult entertainment guys BP, but I look smaller because my fat pad isn't ripped. In fact, if I fully shave or trim to low I probably look smaller because I have a clear ending point to my dick. These guys tend to have no pubic fat combined with hairless and it makes it look bigger.

Your arguments almost defeat your initial premise. You want to say that almost no one is over 7-8" but at the same time say no one under 8" can get 2 hands on their dick. What? A lot of guys can get 2 hands on their dick and are a lot smaller than Mandingo. So are all those guys smaller than or bigger than 8"? They are all as big as Mandingo?

I agree to an extent with your point about adult entertainment size exaggeration. My point about 2 handers AGREES with your premise, but then you want to argue both ways.

FWIW, I am just over 8" bone-pressed. I am somewhere in the 7s non-bonepressed, depending on where you start and what degree you press at all. And I can get both my hands on the shaft and I can jerk with both hands ( stroking under the head) slightly.

My point was that not every adult entertainment star with a 2 hander is some huge measurement. It seems like you took that personally as far as your own size and pics, instead of taking at what it is. I personally am not concerned with how I size up compared to Mandingo, but I am interested in truthful measurements.
 
Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Back
    Top