NewGuy311 said:
Hes not bone pressed there, he has the ruler resting against the fat pad. No where do i see a bone press there. Id say hes 10 bone pressed if he pushed all the way in, if not larger.

True...plus he doesnt look 100 percent hard in the measured shot....

Thing is though he doesnt look nearly as long in the side pics..or is it just me?
 
bigbuttlover said:
True...plus he doesnt look 100 percent hard in the measured shot....

Thing is though he doesnt look nearly as long in the side pics..or is it just me?


Man to me, it looks long no matter what. It could be the insane girth thats overshadowing it.
 
NewGuy311 said:
Holmes admitted that he was only 5 inches flaccid and 8.75 inches when erect in terms of real stats and not adult entertainment stats, so this dude has him beat by .5 in length and in terms of girth this guy beats him there to. It looks like the girth of one of the mini baseball bats ive got. Hes not all that far ahead of Holmes, but he is bigger. If this guy was to do adult entertainment, hed make alot of money, hed be like the next Ron Jeremy, only uglier and with a much bigger dick.
Really he was "only" 8.75? Thats still huge but I thought he was at least 9.5. Hmm, but what about Holmes girth? I thought it was like 7. His girth at least looks bigger than this guy's, but that could just be adult entertainment tricks.
 
A bona fide 9" non bone pressed erect penis is extremely, extremely rare. This guy, although huge, is not that large. The measuring tape tells the tale.
 
I beg to differ. He is measuring from the side and that last inch, from my perspective, (and let's face it, it has a lot to do with our imdividual perspective), that last inch on the tape measure is definitely below the cut-off point for non-bone pressed usable dick. I'd like to see the same pic with the tape on the top and down the very middle of his penis. That would tell the tale better.

It's awfully hard to judge where the bone is when there is fat there as well. And we can be a skinny shit and still have fat there.
 
goinfor11x7 said:
I beg to differ. He is measuring from the side and that last inch, from my perspective, (and let's face it, it has a lot to do with our imdividual perspective), that last inch on the tape measure is definitely below the cut-off point for non-bone pressed usable dick. I'd like to see the same pic with the tape on the top and down the very middle of his penis. That would tell the tale better.

It's awfully hard to judge where the bone is when there is fat there as well. And we can be a skinny shit and still have fat there.



Looks like hes measuring it right to me, although not directly from the top he is measuring it correctly, its not directly from the side, more like a top side measurement which is pretty much the same thing.
 
bIgjOe said:
Really he was "only" 8.75? Thats still huge but I thought he was at least 9.5. Hmm, but what about Holmes girth? I thought it was like 7. His girth at least looks bigger than this guy's, but that could just be adult entertainment tricks.


I never said only 8.75, i said that was his admitted real size, i said he was only 5 flaccid.
 
NewGuy311 said:
I never said only 8.75, i said that was his admitted real size, i said he was only 5 flaccid.
lol I know the quotation marks were confusing. I only put them there because I felt stupid talking about 8.75 like it was small, not because I thought you said it. I still think his girth is slightly bigger than this guy's though. That shit looked at least 6.75-7" around.
 
goinfor11x7 said:
I beg to differ. He is measuring from the side and that last inch, from my perspective, (and let's face it, it has a lot to do with our imdividual perspective), that last inch on the tape measure is definitely below the cut-off point for non-bone pressed usable dick. I'd like to see the same pic with the tape on the top and down the very middle of his penis. That would tell the tale better.

It's awfully hard to judge where the bone is when there is fat there as well. And we can be a skinny shit and still have fat there.


You can hardly say anything about the way this guy measures with the pics you have posted dude.
 
Pretty insane. I'd say he's about 8.5 NBP x 7 midshaft. He's helping out in that length measure by measuring slightly to the size and also have his dick point down. It'd measure a bit less if it were parallel to the floor and with the ruler centered. With the fat gut I'm guessing he has a fatpad of 1-2 inches. I'd guess his BPenis EnlargementL is atleast 10 inches.
 
NewGuy311 said:
Holmes admitted that he was only 5 inches flaccid and 8.75 inches when erect in terms of real stats and not adult entertainment stats, so this dude has him beat by .5 in length and in terms of girth this guy beats him there to. It looks like the girth of one of the mini baseball bats ive got. Hes not all that far ahead of Holmes, but he is bigger. If this guy was to do adult entertainment, hed make alot of money, hed be like the next Ron Jeremy, only uglier and with a much bigger dick.
lol an ugly version of Ron Jeremy? I never thought I'd see the day...
 
goinfor11x7 said:
As I was saying, 8" non bone pressed--9" bone pressed. His girth makes him look even bigger. Ugly bastard.

Jeez, you are so critical. The guy is big and has a clear ruler shot.
He is not claiming any size that he cannot back up (like some do).

It was the original poster who mentioned the numbers.
You say he is ugly, not everyone is blessed with your film star looks.
 
desiel_dick said:
Anyone who thinks that is real is retarded. not because its so big it's impossible hat it is real, but because it is just blantently photoshoped. Im no pro at this shit, but i know for sure that it is fake. look at the pic!!!!
BUt to answer the sizequestion///weather it is fake or not....immaq say he looks 8 by 6

I think it is real.

"Blatantly photo-shopped". ? point out the blatant photo-shopping to us lesser mortals.
 
bIgjOe said:
lol I know the quotation marks were confusing. I only put them there because I felt stupid talking about 8.75 like it was small, not because I thought you said it. I still think his girth is slightly bigger than this guy's though. That shit looked at least 6.75-7" around.


8.75 is monstrous dude, no ifs [words=http://www.phallosan.com/shop/catalog/default.php?z=eNortjIxtVKyL0pNszWxMFcrSSxKTy2JL0hMT7U1UisoykyxtbBQSy4tLsnPjS8uKcrMS7dVsgZcMMpbEbo%2C]ans[/words] or buts. Think about it, 8.75 is probably a penis that no woman would want to even look at. Also, the guy was a bean pole. Put 8.75 on a real skinny guy and you got yourself 12 inches on camera. I've seen some shots of him COMPLETELY flaccid and 5 seems right for him, then there are shots of him when his erection subsided and his flaccid of course looked bigger, because it wasnt truely flaccid. Either way the guy had a huge, not big, HUGE dick. I disagree on the girth though, we need some comparision shots to realy draw a conclusion on that. This guys dick to me looks thicker mainly because it sort of has a cone shape to it. Holmes had a completely different shape which makes his look a little less in girth.
 
dogsdoodahs said:
Jeez, you are so critical. The guy is big and has a clear ruler shot.
He is not claiming any size that he cannot back up (like some do).

It was the original poster who mentioned the numbers.
You say he is ugly, not everyone is blessed with your film star looks.


I agree, to me he looks like he has a good ruler shot. Even if he moved it directly in the middle, it wouldnt realy change the measurement much if at all. It all depends on the person. Looks the length it reads to me, and i think it would read an even 9 inches if moved directly in the middle. Also in that ruler shot, he doesnt even look 100% hard.
 
Back
Top