Actually based on the picture, the cervix is located at around the area where buttocks begins (the upper portion). So logically speaking, do you think that maybe the depth of a woman´s vagina can be estimated by the size/length (vertical) of her butt cheecks?After seeing Magnetic Resonance Imaging images of a couple having sex, I decided to draw up a similar diagram, as I could not find one on Google that accurately showed the difference between anterior and posterior fornix (known in layman's terms as the "deep spot", and also inaccurately called the "cul de sac") during penetration.
I wanted the members of my site to have an understanding of the mechanics of the whole thing, which was the original reason I made this graphic, and thought I would post a copy here for the benefit of the other members who might be confused as to what is going on when they hit those areas.
Now I'm no doctor, but I tried to follow the angles of the MRI images from the study, so this diagram might not be completely accurate, but it gets the general idea across.
Hope some of you find it useful.
View attachment 25085
Actually based on the picture, the cervix is located at around the area where buttocks begins (the upper portion). So logically speaking, do you think that maybe the depth of a woman´s vagina can be estimated by the size/length (vertical) of her butt cheecks?
Dr. Pek Van Andel, who won an Ig Nobel Prize for making the first MRI images of a couple's sex organs while those organs were in use, also made a video of the phenomenon. Here, more or less, is the world premiere of that video.
During female sexual arousal without intercourse the uterus rises and the anterior vaginal wall lengthens.
Look at all that internal penis!Here is the research paper.
View attachment 1832843
(Located on my OneDrive storage)Microsoft OneDrive
1drv.ms
Important finding (stated at page 6):
Explonation:
View attachment 1832844
Source: Sexual Response Cycle – Your Complete Guide - Health and Wellness Blog
Just pull it out with the LengthMaster - Penis Bundle Stretcher & Weight Hanging.Look at all that internal penis!
One of the biggest reasons I made the lengthmasterJust pull it out with the lengthmaster.
So awesome you made that device.One of the biggest reasons I made the lengthmaster
Well I have only been with 11 women, so its not a large enough sample group to get an exact average out of, but I either bottom out, or almost bottomed out most of them all of them.
For the ones I didn't manage to bottom out , during sex I tested a dildo on them, and none of them took more than 8 inches (the dildos were realistic ones, so no hard pvc or plastic to skew the comparison).
This is just in my experience. However I have met a few true size queens in my time, and these women were able to handle from 9-10.5 inches. And yes I made sure it wasn't skewed perception.
They mentioned the names of the dildos they had fully taken, and I checked the sizes. Don't let that discourage you though, many women can handle very big girth, but the percentage that can take over 8 inches is a small minority of women.
Thats why my ultimate goal is 8 x 6.5. Anything bigger, in my opinion, will give you trouble with the vast majority of women.
I found a picture that explains all of this very clear, and how you are supposed to get to the: cul-de-sac.Here is the research paper.
View attachment 1832843
(Located on my OneDrive storage)Microsoft OneDrive
1drv.ms
Important finding (stated at page 6):
Explonation:
View attachment 1832844
Source: Sexual Response Cycle – Your Complete Guide - Health and Wellness Blog
If you hit their cervix it is very painful but in certain postions u can go around the cervix and hit the cul de sac and this is what makes a woman squirt
That was my goal, too, to be able to reach the cul de sak and make my girl squirt. I was able at 8.5 inches
Just found this after my post on depth earlier. Using a phone so i don’t know how to link but this explains a lot more obviously you were in this thread but a good refresherHere's the thread you need to read, if you want to learn about deep penetration.
Yes! I rejuvenated this thread. All the pictures was gone.Just found this after my post on depth earlier. Using a phone so i don’t know how to link but this explains a lot more obviously you were in this thread but a good refresher
Yes! I rejuvenated this thread. All the pictures was gone.
But now we have the findings of the research paper that was done, and the techniques for deep penetration. You should try to get to the posterior fornix.
I already did this some time ago.Can these pictures Be redone by someone else?
ExcellentI already did this some time ago.
If you scroll up you will find these picures in posts above (these picures are only links/URL's to these pictures).