Super

Well-known member
Well been at this almost 10 years on and off and I have to say with as much time as I have spent here and in the Penis Enlargement community, nobody gains like uncut guys do. Not only are there starting sizes bigger but they gain hella fast to? Why, cause they have so much extra skin to grow into. When we are circumcised we loose about 12-15" of skin that is cut off. That really hinders your size for the rest of your life. Its sad to say it but uncut guys are always bigger.

When translating into Penis Enlargement, uncut have the advantage because the penis is in its natural state, heals quicker and has more beef on it to begin with. Look at some of our top gainers, DLD excluded, cause hes a freak. Fedora and Bannaboy have made huge gains while being uncut. I myself have gained a lot because if my extensive FR routine in Penis Enlargement. I dont think I could have done it without it. My skin was to tight. With your foreskin you have a double layer of skin, so thats twice the amount that cut guys have, that equals a lot of extra length and girth.

I dont think I have ever seen a smal guy that is small. And I mean ever, in the locker room, adult entertainment or on [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words]. It just does not really happen. I think we are all born with big dicks and the doctors screw us over for a quick $500.
 
Yeah but dude you just gained 3/4" in 2 months and u r cut!
I have seen lots of uncut guys who have small dicks.

Ur probably right tho that uncut guys gain faster in general.I know from experience they can cum in half the time of cut guys if they want to because they have more nerve endings and sensitivity.
Supra;446266 said:
Well been at this almost 10 years on and off and I have to say with as much time as I have spent here and in the Penis Enlargement community, nobody gains like uncut guys do. Not only are there starting sizes bigger but they gain hella fast to? Why, cause they have so much extra skin to grow into. When we are circumcised we loose about 12-15" of skin that is cut off. That really hinders your size for the rest of your life. Its sad to say it but uncut guys are always bigger.

When translating into Penis Enlargement, uncut have the advantage because the penis is in its natural state, heals quicker and has more beef on it to begin with. Look at some of our top gainers, DLD excluded, cause hes a freak. Fedora and Bannaboy have made huge gains while being uncut. I myself have gained a lot because if my extensive FR routine in Penis Enlargement. I dont think I could have done it without it. My skin was to tight. With your foreskin you have a double layer of skin, so thats twice the amount that cut guys have, that equals a lot of extra length and girth.

I dont think I have ever seen a smal guy that is small. And I mean ever, in the locker room, adult entertainment or on [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words]. It just does not really happen. I think we are all born with big dicks and the doctors screw us over for a quick $500.
 
You've never seen a small guy that is small?
Do you mean an uncut guy that is small?

They're there. The majority of the people here (Germany) is uncut, so of course most are average. I was cut at young age and turned out - average.
There's big cut guys as well, look at kingsnake for instance.

I don't see where you're going with this. Is there any evidence?
 
I think you have to adjust to Penis Enlargement either way, maybe it's a bit easier for cut guys because the skin under the glans (where you place your grip when you're stretching) is not as sensitive. Uncut guys may have a small advantage when it comes to girth work, because they can do a lot of dry stuff (using the foreskin). On the other hand, when it comes to discoloration it looks worse on an uncut penis, as there's more foreskin. Bottom line, I don't think it has any influence on possible gains, it's just that you have to find the right technique that allows your dick to grow.
 
When u look at an uncut cock the head does look very restricted. It's possible that this stunts the growth of the penis as u are growing up. I still can't believe circumcision is happening in this day and age(religous reasons excluded). There is no need for it! Uncut cocks look better too :D
 
celttank;446287 said:
When u look at an uncut cock the head does look very restricted. It's possible that this stunts the growth of the penis as u are growing up. I still can't believe circumcision is happening in this day and age(religous reasons excluded). There is no need for it! Uncut cocks look better too :D

nailed it!
 
SirKyle;446271 said:
You've never seen a small guy that is small?
Do you mean an uncut guy that is small?

They're there. The majority of the people here (Germany) is uncut, so of course most are average. I was cut at young age and turned out - average.
There's big cut guys as well, look at kingsnake for instance.

I don't see where you're going with this. Is there any evidence?

There is plenty of evidence, personal I know that I would have prolly been 9-10" if I had not been cut the way I was and so tightly. Think about it, if the skin is so tight, that is going to restrict growth in a major way, its pure science. A small organ that is very sensitive like that under immense pressure against itself is not always full of blood will be stunted. Its not hard to figure out. And plus, were not born with foreskin? Why do you think that it needs to be cut off, it was put there for a reason..right?
 
celttank;446287 said:
When u look at an uncut cock the head does look very restricted. It's possible that this stunts the growth of the penis as u are growing up. I still can't believe circumcision is happening in this day and age(religous reasons excluded). There is no need for it! Uncut cocks look better too :D

Uncut looks better, feels better and actually when inside a girl it feels bigger too because of the sliding effect in and out of itself because of the double skin.
 
lazyhanger;446283 said:
I think you have to adjust to Penis Enlargement either way, maybe it's a bit easier for cut guys because the skin under the glans (where you place your grip when you're stretching) is not as sensitive. Uncut guys may have a small advantage when it comes to girth work, because they can do a lot of dry stuff (using the foreskin). On the other hand, when it comes to discoloration it looks worse on an uncut penis, as there's more foreskin. Bottom line, I don't think it has any influence on possible gains, it's just that you have to find the right technique that allows your dick to grow.

It definitely can have influence on gains. Think about the penis being in its natural state vs. a un natural state
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Alex78;446305 said:
nailed it!

There's still a strong social stigma in "developed", western influenced cultures that un circumcised penises are "dirty", "ugly", "more prone to diseases", etc. Even though real studies from non-biased (not funded by pro-circumcision sources) agencies prove otherwise.
 
Last edited:
stillwantmore2;446315 said:
There's still a strong social stigma in "developed", western influenced cultures that un circumcised penises are "dirty", "ugly", "more prone to diseases", etc. Even though real studies from non-biased (not funded by pro-circumcision sources) agencies prove otherwise.

never had any diseases and when cold it protects my skin!
Maybe in worm countries it was a medical measure, but where cold strikes you better have skin!
 
I'm a big believer in keeping things natural and if I had the choice I'd have stayed uncut... but I don't think there's any science behind the statement "if the skin is so tight, that is going to restrict growth in a major way, its pure science" - if that was the case none of us would be able to get massive expansion from clamping or [words=https://officialhydromaxpump.com/?uid=6&oid=2&affid=98 ]Bathmate[/words] or anything like that. Skin is ridiculously pliable. It has no problem whatsoever stretching 3/4 of an inch if I wanted to just blow myself up with fluid retention. Likewise, I have no fat on my calves or anything to make that skin anything other than very taut, yet when I ran over a bees nest with the lawnmower and the calf tripled in size from the swelling, the skin had no issue accommodating that (and then re-forming).

That said, I hate it. Mine was done tight too and it's a real challenge getting my balls to hang far enough out of the way. They don't go low, they don't look as good, and they get in the way of the [words=https://officialhydromaxpump.com/?uid=6&oid=2&affid=98 ]Bathmate[/words]. I would love to have another inch of slack there in the center piece that creates the turkey neck. It doesn't seem all that willing to stretch in that direction, or if it does, it hurts like hell.

So perhaps skin is much more willing to expand for swelling, but not so much to extend the length.
 
being uncut is shit for pe, exercises are way more difficult, the sensitivity causes pain, always more slipping, why do you never see uncut guys anywhere on web making demo vids for us uncut pe"ers?

even any pe hardware demo by the big companies never a uncut guy is it.
 
fonic;446337 said:
being uncut is shit for pe, exercises are way more difficult, the sensitivity causes pain, always more slipping, why do you never see uncut guys anywhere on web making demo vids for us uncut pe"ers?

even any pe hardware demo by the big companies never a uncut guy is it.

I actually think being uncut is better for pe. I am uncut and find pe pretty easy(but tedious). I would imagine pe hurts more for a cut guy as there is no skin to protect the glans. If u are in so much pain maybe your wrapping technique is bad. The only pain i get is a slight burning pain after being in the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]extender[/words] for 1.5+ hours and my [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]extender[/words] has a force of 3000g+.
 
Supra;446311 said:
Uncut looks better, feels better and actually when inside a girl it feels bigger too because of the sliding effect in and out of itself because of the double skin.

An opinion doesn't make it true or a fact. I am uncut btw. Hopefully I make some gains quick :). If measured correctly, I have gained .25 in my first month.
 
fonic;446337 said:
being uncut is shit for pe, exercises are way more difficult, the sensitivity causes pain, always more slipping, why do you never see uncut guys anywhere on web making demo vids for us uncut pe"ers?

even any pe hardware demo by the big companies never a uncut guy is it.

I agree. Some of the stretches hurt or feel uncomfortable because of the skin under the glans.
 
BackMask;446346 said:
An opinion doesn't make it true or a fact. I am uncut btw. Hopefully I make some gains quick :). If measured correctly, I have gained .25 in my first month.

Your lucky to be uncut, sex must feel amazing all the time. Half the time I feel shit and the other half the time I am focusing on just trying to cum.
 
fonic;446337 said:
being uncut is shit for pe, exercises are way more difficult, the sensitivity causes pain, always more slipping, why do you never see uncut guys anywhere on web making demo vids for us uncut pe"ers?

even any pe hardware demo by the big companies never a uncut guy is it.

It is just a coincidence that most of the guys shooting pr Penis Enlargement videos are all cut? Truth is more cut guys care about be than Uncut. Why? Because every cut guy feels robbed and is looking for a bigger sensation. Penis Enlargement companies will sell you a load of shit telling you bigger is better and means more pleasure, but you would be fine if you did not have all your nerve endings cut off at birth right when you came out of the wound. How can you think its ok to just go cutting on an infants body right when he is born. Look at every guy here 98% of them are cut, the other 2% and uncut, and start bigger than the rest of us. Why is there hardly any uncut guys here? Cause they dont care, sex is great for them and whoever they are having it with, they could care less about Penis Enlargement. All we are trying to do with Penis Enlargement is make up for what we dont have, which is our foreskin. You might totally disagree and it might not even be in your mind, but it is still there regardless of your opinion on cut or uncut, your looking for something, Since you never knew you had foreskin, you dont know what its like so your looking for something else to take the place. Its very easy to understand.
 
OneWeekIn;446332 said:
I'm a big believer in keeping things natural and if I had the choice I'd have stayed uncut... but I don't think there's any science behind the statement "if the skin is so tight, that is going to restrict growth in a major way, its pure science" - if that was the case none of us would be able to get massive expansion from clamping or [words=https://officialhydromaxpump.com/?uid=6&oid=2&affid=98 ]Bathmate[/words] or anything like that. Skin is ridiculously pliable. It has no problem whatsoever stretching 3/4 of an inch if I wanted to just blow myself up with fluid retention. Likewise, I have no fat on my calves or anything to make that skin anything other than very taut, yet when I ran over a bees nest with the lawnmower and the calf tripled in size from the swelling, the skin had no issue accommodating that (and then re-forming).

That said, I hate it. Mine was done tight too and it's a real challenge getting my balls to hang far enough out of the way. They don't go low, they don't look as good, and they get in the way of the [words=https://officialhydromaxpump.com/?uid=6&oid=2&affid=98 ]Bathmate[/words]. I would love to have another inch of slack there in the center piece that creates the turkey neck. It doesn't seem all that willing to stretch in that direction, or if it does, it hurts like hell.

So perhaps skin is much more willing to expand for swelling, but not so much to extend the length.

A muscle is different than a penis, whoever keeps saying muscles and penis are the same thing, they dont know what they are talking about. Muscles have muscle fibers, fat and other organic compounds, penis is completely different. You cant treat your penis the same way you treat your calves. Ive been at this for almost 10 years now, I know a thing or two.
 
I wasn't talking about muscle expansion, just that the skin inflated around it when my leg swelled up to be the size of a tree. You're making an argument that tighter skin is hindering gains. Penis Enlargement expansion and swelling are just two very quick top-of-head examples of the pliability of skin that makes me think there's probably more to it than that.
 
celttank;446343 said:
I actually think being uncut is better for pe. I am uncut and find pe pretty easy(but tedious). I would imagine pe hurts more for a cut guy as there is no skin to protect the glans. If u are in so much pain maybe your wrapping technique is bad. The only pain i get is a slight burning pain after being in the [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]extender[/words] for 1.5+ hours and my [words=https://shop.mattersofsize.com/products/sizegenetics-penis-extender]extender[/words] has a force of 3000g+.

I could not agree with you more.
 
Im uncut obviously cuz Im from a country in europe where they dont cut when kids are born. If im correct they cut all kids in the US cuz of the hygiene thingy? Makes sense tho

Anyhow, being uncut is really annoying sometimes, most excersizes could really be hard to do cuz of the skin making your penis head really sensetive. This allows uncut people to gain slower cuz they need to be more careful I guess. :/
 
OneWeekIn;446332 said:
... but I don't think there's any science behind the statement "if the skin is so tight, that is going to restrict growth in a major way, its pure science" - ... Skin is ridiculously pliable.

I completely agree with you. Skin is amazingly pliable and is the first thing to grow when doing Penis Enlargement. This is why we see gains in flaccid length before we see gains in erect length. We see skin expanding to accommodate swelling in all parts of the body, including after using the [words=https://officialhydromaxpump.com/?uid=6&oid=2&affid=98 ]Bathmate[/words]. We see it in common culture in earlobes. We see it with the tribes that wear rings around their necks. They are not stretching the bones or muscles of their necks. If they were doing that, they would be growing taller, which they don't. They are simply pushing their shoulder bones down into the body. The only thing that stretches is skin.


Stretching the skin is not the challenge with Penis Enlargement. It's stretching the rest of the penile tissue that takes so much time and effort.
 
This is especially true with phimosis, which is when the foreskin has the inability to retract. The erect girth of my glans is less the half of that of my midshaft girth and I feel my glans would have grown another 1/4" further in length had I not has phimosis. For my first couple years of puberty the glans of my penis were squished to a 1/2"-3/4" square area each time I recieved an erection and I can only image this has contributed to my pathetic glans size. My brother and grandpa also recieved phimosis.
 
Its funny how every cut guy comes out to argue his point about how he loves being cut. I used to be cut and now I am halfway in between because I have grown so much skin back. Once you have the skin you can feel what sex is supposed to feel like, until then you have little stance on the issue.
 
GettingTo9;446363 said:
Whether you prefer cut or uncut is purely a matter of personal preference. I am cut and am happy about it. If you are not happy about being cut, you can actually do something about it. I'm sure there is a forum thread on here somewhere about foreskin restoration. You can also check out: http://www.foreskin-restoration.net/forum/

Yea I am familiar with FR since that is a big part of my routine. Thanks
 
How can you be for getting cut when that was the way you are born, why dont doctors just cut one eye and ear off everyone, you do have two pairs of them you could still see and hear with one eye and ear. But you only have one foreskin, and they cut it off and throw it in the trash. And then for the rest of your life you will never feel sex like it was originally intended.
 
Supra;446368 said:
Its funny how every cut guy comes out to argue his point about how he loves being cut. I used to be cut and now I am halfway in between because I have grown so much skin back. Once you have the skin you can feel what sex is supposed to feel like, until then you have little stance on the issue.

Well, I was uncut until I was in my early 20's, so I think I am in quite a good position to form an opinion on this issue.

Don't dismiss someone just because they don't agree with you. They might actually know more about it than you do.
 
As opposed to......
.....snake countries?

Alex78;446320 said:
never had any diseases and when cold it protects my skin!
Maybe in worm countries it was a medical measure, but where cold strikes you better have skin!
 
Again, I think cut vs uncut is a personal preference. I personally don't think there is much of a difference in feel while having sex between being cut or uncut. I do think, however, that it would be the right thing to do to give a boy or man the right to make that decision for himself.

There is some evidence, though, that being cut can provide some health benefits: "Circumcised men have less risks of contracting HIV/AIDS than their uncircumcised counterparts who account for the majority of all men."

http://www.thehivnews.com/hivnews/circumcised-men-safer-than-their-uncut-buddies-from-hiv-aids/
 
Ok so please tell what the difference you notice is. I am really interested to know the difference before and after and what the difference is in sex and life in general.
 
Supra, do you need some love bro?

free%20hugs.jpg
 
I was cut loose enough that i can pull the skin almost completely over my glans, but i came out as average as possible, 6.5" (i've hit about 7.1 or so but lost those gains)
 
Supra;446387 said:
Ok so please tell what the difference you notice is. I am really interested to know the difference before and after and what the difference is in sex and life in general.

I'd be happy to. I just wrote a long and detailed response, but when clicked on the "post" button, I got a message saying that I had been logged out and lost everything that I had written. This site seems to do that a lot. It has logged me out several times when I was writing a post. I'll get around to responding to your question when I have more time. Sorry about that. I tried! lol
 
GettingTo9;446416 said:
I'd be happy to. I just wrote a long and detailed response, but when clicked on the "post" button, I got a message saying that I had been logged out and lost everything that I had written. This site seems to do that a lot. It has logged me out several times when I was writing a post. I'll get around to responding to your question when I have more time. Sorry about that. I tried! lol

i had that, first you must click to confirm to remember your password! Then you will never need to do this again!
 
opa;446357 said:
Im uncut obviously cuz Im from a country in europe where they dont cut when kids are born. If im correct they cut all kids in the US cuz of the hygiene thingy? Makes sense tho

Anyhow, being uncut is really annoying sometimes, most excersizes could really be hard to do cuz of the skin making your penis head really sensetive. This allows uncut people to gain slower cuz they need to be more careful I guess. :/

Opa when are u getting pain when doing pe? I am uncut and never get any pain, maybe i can help?
 
Supra;446387 said:
Ok so please tell what the difference you notice is. I am really interested to know the difference before and after and what the difference is in sex and life in general.

I'd be happy to tell you. First, I want to say that I understand your frustration. I know several guys who feel cheated by having their foreskin removed as a child. I guess I was lucky, in that I was able to make that decision for myself as an adult.

My Experience in the Difference between Being Uncut and Cut

Aesthetics:
Although this is simply a matter of personal preference, I simply like the look of cut better. Also, I have a big head, and I simply think my dick looks better without the additional skin there. My partner at the time also preferred cut, so I was more than happy to oblige.

Cleanliness:
Smegma/Headcheese: One thing all uncut guys have to deal with is smegma and the odor associated with it. Some guys have it worse than others. The underside of the foreskin produces a substance that keeps the head moist. Unfortunately, the combination of this moisture and the dead skin cells under the foreskin can give an odor and can build up and look like crumbly white cheese. It's not exactly pleasant looking and definitely not sexy. It's completely harmless (and some say it's actually good for the skin of your dickhead), so it's not a huge deal and you get very used to it. If you keep it clean, it doesn't build up a lot, but even just a few hours after bathing, you can smell it again. Was very happy not to have to deal with smegma again!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smegma

Pearly Penile Papules: These are little pimple-like growths that can form along the ridge of your dickhead, usually in a straight line. I've seen some that actually grew to about 1/4" spikes. I got them when I was uncut, but they never got as long as that. Mine was just like a row of small pimples. They completely went away when I got cut. They are completely harmless and are not contagious, but it's never comfortable being on a date and having to say, "Oh, don't worry, you can trust me, it's not an std." lol
http://pearlypenilepapules.net/

Sex:
There is no question that by removing the foreskin and the smegma, and letting the head of your dick be exposed to air and rub against the fabric of your shorts, the skin of your dickhead will dry out and become a little less sensitive. This has in no way affected my enjoyment of sex, though. I still love the feeling of thrusting and the feeling of cumming just as much cut as I ever did uncut. I've never heard anything to suggest that cut men have a hard time "feeling it" when having sex or have a hard time cumming. I've also never heard that uncut guys are more likely to be premature ejaculators, because they are more "sensitive." Sex is awesome and the dickhead is plenty sensitive, whether you're cut or not.

Oral Sex:
I do think that being cut might have affected my enjoyment of oral sex. It's hard to tell. That being said, my recent ex could sometimes make me cum in as little as 1 minute. Talk about talent! It's all a matter of technique, and how horny I was! lol I have to admit, though, that since oral sex has so much less friction than fucking, maybe for some guys, it might make a difference there.

Masturbation:
There is a difference here. With a foreskin, I could beat off and my hand would never touch my dickhead directly. The skin would move up and down along the shaft and head. It was a lot quieter and never required lube. Without a foreskin, I either have to use lube or I have to be careful not to beat off too often or for too long. The callouses on my hand can rub my dick skin raw. The upside is that I really like the feel of my hand directly on my dickhead.

Daily Life:
In general, when my dick is in my pants, being cut or uncut is not something I think about. I guess I am aware of it, though, at these times:
(1) When I take a leak - it's very nice not to have to deal with pulling the foreskin back and smelling that odor and getting a drop or two of urine trapped in the foreskin.
(2) When I wear boxers or boardshorts, I definitely feel my dickhead against the fabric more. I definitely like this feeling, but it means I have to be a bit more discreet! lol I definitely have to wear a jock to the gym under my gymshorts rather than boxers.
(3) When I shower, I don't have to deal with pulling the foreskin back and taking the time to clean the smegma.
(4) In briefs, and in boxers in my dress pants, you can definitely make out the shape of my head more clearly now. I don't want to be indiscreet at work, but I have to admit, I sort of like this. I don't go out of my way to hide the fact that I have a dick swinging in boxers under my trousers.

I hope this answers your questions. Feel free to ask me anything else. This is simply my experience. Other guys might have a different experience. I am very happy that I choose to get cut. I have never regretted it. At the same time, I respect other people's decisions and sympathize with you that your choice was taken away from you.

Good luck with the foreskin restoration. I hope it works for you. I am interested, though, in learning whether you start producing smegma once you get your foreskin back.
 
GettingTo9;446599 said:
I'd be happy to tell you. First, I want to say that I understand your frustration. I know several guys who feel cheated by having their foreskin removed as a child. I guess I was lucky, in that I was able to make that decision for myself as an adult.

My Experience in the Difference between Being Uncut and Cut

Aesthetics:
Although this is simply a matter of personal preference, I simply like the look of cut better. Also, I have a big head, and I simply think my dick looks better without the additional skin there. My partner at the time also preferred cut, so I was more than happy to oblige.

Cleanliness:
Smegma/Headcheese: One thing all uncut guys have to deal with is smegma and the odor associated with it. Some guys have it worse than others. The underside of the foreskin produces a substance that keeps the head moist. Unfortunately, the combination of this moisture and the dead skin cells under the foreskin can give an odor and can build up and look like crumbly white cheese. It's not exactly pleasant looking and definitely not sexy. It's completely harmless (and some say it's actually good for the skin of your dickhead), so it's not a huge deal and you get very used to it. If you keep it clean, it doesn't build up a lot, but even just a few hours after bathing, you can smell it again. Was very happy not to have to deal with smegma again!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smegma

Pearly Penile Papules: These are little pimple-like growths that can form along the ridge of your dickhead, usually in a straight line. I've seen some that actually grew to about 1/4" spikes. I got them when I was uncut, but they never got as long as that. Mine was just like a row of small pimples. They completely went away when I got cut. They are completely harmless and are not contagious, but it's never comfortable being on a date and having to say, "Oh, don't worry, you can trust me, it's not an std." lol
http://pearlypenilepapules.net/

Sex:
There is no question that by removing the foreskin and the smegma, and letting the head of your dick be exposed to air and rub against the fabric of your shorts, the skin of your dickhead will dry out and become a little less sensitive. This has in no way affected my enjoyment of sex, though. I still love the feeling of thrusting and the feeling of cumming just as much cut as I ever did uncut. I've never heard anything to suggest that cut men have a hard time "feeling it" when having sex or have a hard time cumming. I've also never heard that uncut guys are more likely to be premature ejaculators, because they are more "sensitive." Sex is awesome and the dickhead is plenty sensitive, whether you're cut or not.

Oral Sex:
I do think that being cut might have affected my enjoyment of oral sex. It's hard to tell. That being said, my recent ex could sometimes make me cum in as little as 1 minute. Talk about talent! It's all a matter of technique, and how horny I was! lol I have to admit, though, that since oral sex has so much less friction than fucking, maybe for some guys, it might make a difference there.

Masturbation:
There is a difference here. With a foreskin, I could beat off and my hand would never touch my dickhead directly. The skin would move up and down along the shaft and head. It was a lot quieter and never required lube. Without a foreskin, I either have to use lube or I have to be careful not to beat off too often or for too long. The callouses on my hand can rub my dick skin raw. The upside is that I really like the feel of my hand directly on my dickhead.

Daily Life:
In general, when my dick is in my pants, being cut or uncut is not something I think about. I guess I am aware of it, though, at these times:
(1) When I take a leak - it's very nice not to have to deal with pulling the foreskin back and smelling that odor and getting a drop or two of urine trapped in the foreskin.
(2) When I wear boxers or boardshorts, I definitely feel my dickhead against the fabric more. I definitely like this feeling, but it means I have to be a bit more discreet! lol I definitely have to wear a jock to the gym under my gymshorts rather than boxers.
(3) When I shower, I don't have to deal with pulling the foreskin back and taking the time to clean the smegma.
(4) In briefs, and in boxers in my dress pants, you can definitely make out the shape of my head more clearly now. I don't want to be indiscreet at work, but I have to admit, I sort of like this. I don't go out of my way to hide the fact that I have a dick swinging in boxers under my trousers.

I hope this answers your questions. Feel free to ask me anything else. This is simply my experience. Other guys might have a different experience. I am very happy that I choose to get cut. I have never regretted it. At the same time, I respect other people's decisions and sympathize with you that your choice was taken away from you.

Good luck with the foreskin restoration. I hope it works for you. I am interested, though, in learning whether you start producing smegma once you get your foreskin back.

I'm glad you posted that. Makes me feel better about being cut at birth
 
I myself am uncut and had great gains in the length department and I always did wonder wether it had to do with being uncut. I don't know if the top gainers have been uncut or not but it kind of makes sense Supra, having more skin to grow into probably helps in Penis Enlargement.

Another thing I have noticed is that most mushroom head cocks belong to the cut guys. Foreskin probably constricts the head or glans from expanding. I want a bigger head though so I've been clamping and doing [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/forum/penis-enlargement-forum/12539-slow-squash-jelq-nothing-give-me-better-expansion.html]SSJ[/words]'s (holding the OK sign in the middle of my cock instead of the base) in hopes of creating a bigger head/glans.
 
I was 37 when I got cut, Done it at same time as vasectomy reversal. It was done differently than an at birth circ. I only lost the skin around the head, nothing sown the shaft. My wife says that it is one of, if not the best looking cock that she has ever seen (in person or pics)
 
Why did u do it?

I am about to start to restore mine!
For the past year I have been taping my foreskin with first aid tape and then pull it over my glans to protect it.
This has brought better sensitivity to my dick head and looks better -not dried out from rubbing on my clothes all day.
If i had the choice i would never be circumsized but I didn't have the choice..not trying to make u feel bad or anything man!
Juan Strokes;446701 said:
I got circumcised when I was 12 and I kind of regret it now.
 
Juan Strokes;446701 said:
I got circumcised when I was 12 and I kind of regret it now.

Nothing to regret. Getting your foreskin back is very easy with Penis Enlargement. I was cut as a baby and today I have much of my foreskin back.
 
This thread inspired me to have a conversation about this with the wife and girlfriend about it this past weekend. My wife had only been with one uncut guy. They both seemed downright disgusted by the idea of an uncut penis.

I think they're probably pretty conservative and traditional about this (aside from the whole relationship we have, which is the opposite, heh) and maybe not all that representative. I felt like I made a pretty good argument in favor of being uncut, but neither was buying it.

Overall I agree that uncut looks a bit better, but I'm still very much in favor of nature, and I'm still very angry that my skin was sewn back up so tight.
 
Back
Top