Gee, thanks a lot negative for posting those pictures. I didn't even plan on checking out the website and was just going to read from other people's post about how gross it was.:O Now that I have seen them, why in the hell would anyone want to do that to themselves!!!! Oh, and what's up with the caption explaining how "you will have achieved length and some width naturally and permanently", there is no way in hell that that can be described as natural. Please if you guys know anyone that is thinking about that kind a surgery, in good conscience you should refer them to this site.
penis girth procedure - PLGA SCAFFOLD
"Eventually your body’s cells will grow through the porous substances
and you will have achieved length and some width naturally..."
HAHA
Its actually not as bad I as expected based on your reactions, any surgery will look horrific halfway through. Breast implants are conceptually not too far off.
and you will have achieved length and some width naturally..."
HAHA
Its actually not as bad I as expected based on your reactions, any surgery will look horrific halfway through. Breast implants are conceptually not too far off.
Last edited:
ok well I'm gonna go against the typical reaction and say the following:
(first of all, for those who missed me, :s sorry for not having been on [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]mos[/words] for the past month, been really busy and also have been experimenting with some routines which I will be reporting on either April 14th, or May 2nd. So far the only thing to report is my girth which has gone from an EG of 15 cm to 16 cm and a clamped girth that has gone from 15.5 cm to 17.2 cm. These gains have been over the past month and I have nothing to say about their permenancy. I have developed a ruler fobia and refuse to measure my length until either of the above mentioned dates. <
)
I think this is extremely interesting. Irrelevent to NPenis Enlargement is a risky surgery like this. If someone has the balls to try it and the wallet to spend the cash, good for them. RELEVANT to NPenis Enlargement, however, is understanding the principle which this surgery utilizes and using it for our advantage.
First thing that comes to mind is, assuming the scaffolds are put in place with no complications, why would the tissue 'grow out and multiply'? what stress would cause this growth. Since there's no internal pressure like that of clamping/jelqing, then what is it that causes this growth?
I would, (based on the above mentioned question and the NPenis Enlargement mentality that introducing internal pressure via constricting/jelqing blood into the C.C and C.S cause them to expand and hold more blood, etc.) dismiss their reasoning as total BULLSHIT.
HOWEVER, and this is where it gets interesting: I TRUELY believe that after a newbie boost, the CC and CS have absolutely no contribution to size. The fraudulent and often uneducated penis pill companies and Penis Enlargement websites that know nothing about Penis Enlargement other than what they're read on some general [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words] forums, use the CC/CS arguement to sound 'scientific' and lure some impatient hopeful guys in search of the holy grail: a penis 1-2 inches bigger than the one they already have.
I truely believe that post noobie gains are the product of one thing and one thing only: TUNICA Growth. Still the same, our mentality is that the tunica will grow if we force it to grow from within. But what if tunica growth also happens externally? that is, what if tunica grows to maintain its contact with the skin??? I've read many pumpers say 'I don't know how but I swear after a while that fluid build up girth turns into actual penis tissue' . COUNTLESS of them reporting this, our own REDZULU one of them. well fluid never turns into tissue, just as big muscles will never turn into fat (my dad's argument why I shouldn't do lift weights: when you stop lifting that muscle will turn into fat
) What might explain the phenomenon is the very topic of my thread.
Seeing this procedure would confirm this theory. our own DLD has told us that the ony effective girth work outs are the ones with the 'temporary girth boost'. well that boost seperates the skin from the tunica, and maybe, just maybe, that is the golden point we're all missing. That this seperation of skin and tunica forces the tunica to grow. If this surgery actually yields results, then there is a good chance this is true.
(first of all, for those who missed me, :s sorry for not having been on [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]mos[/words] for the past month, been really busy and also have been experimenting with some routines which I will be reporting on either April 14th, or May 2nd. So far the only thing to report is my girth which has gone from an EG of 15 cm to 16 cm and a clamped girth that has gone from 15.5 cm to 17.2 cm. These gains have been over the past month and I have nothing to say about their permenancy. I have developed a ruler fobia and refuse to measure my length until either of the above mentioned dates. <
)I think this is extremely interesting. Irrelevent to NPenis Enlargement is a risky surgery like this. If someone has the balls to try it and the wallet to spend the cash, good for them. RELEVANT to NPenis Enlargement, however, is understanding the principle which this surgery utilizes and using it for our advantage.
First thing that comes to mind is, assuming the scaffolds are put in place with no complications, why would the tissue 'grow out and multiply'? what stress would cause this growth. Since there's no internal pressure like that of clamping/jelqing, then what is it that causes this growth?
I would, (based on the above mentioned question and the NPenis Enlargement mentality that introducing internal pressure via constricting/jelqing blood into the C.C and C.S cause them to expand and hold more blood, etc.) dismiss their reasoning as total BULLSHIT.
HOWEVER, and this is where it gets interesting: I TRUELY believe that after a newbie boost, the CC and CS have absolutely no contribution to size. The fraudulent and often uneducated penis pill companies and Penis Enlargement websites that know nothing about Penis Enlargement other than what they're read on some general [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words] forums, use the CC/CS arguement to sound 'scientific' and lure some impatient hopeful guys in search of the holy grail: a penis 1-2 inches bigger than the one they already have.
I truely believe that post noobie gains are the product of one thing and one thing only: TUNICA Growth. Still the same, our mentality is that the tunica will grow if we force it to grow from within. But what if tunica growth also happens externally? that is, what if tunica grows to maintain its contact with the skin??? I've read many pumpers say 'I don't know how but I swear after a while that fluid build up girth turns into actual penis tissue' . COUNTLESS of them reporting this, our own REDZULU one of them. well fluid never turns into tissue, just as big muscles will never turn into fat (my dad's argument why I shouldn't do lift weights: when you stop lifting that muscle will turn into fat
) What might explain the phenomenon is the very topic of my thread. Seeing this procedure would confirm this theory. our own DLD has told us that the ony effective girth work outs are the ones with the 'temporary girth boost'. well that boost seperates the skin from the tunica, and maybe, just maybe, that is the golden point we're all missing. That this seperation of skin and tunica forces the tunica to grow. If this surgery actually yields results, then there is a good chance this is true.
Last edited:
Exacellent read v knight! It sounds like it could be true. I wonder what others think
REDZULU2003
New member
Great insight V-Kay, makes sense.
:clap:
Open a penis enlargement investigation institution and let us know lol
Seriously, great insight though. I don't know if the fluid itself is what causes the growth, but to offer an alternative theory, maybe only workouts that cause fluid build-up have the amount of intensity to cause girth gains....
Open a penis enlargement investigation institution and let us know lol
Seriously, great insight though. I don't know if the fluid itself is what causes the growth, but to offer an alternative theory, maybe only workouts that cause fluid build-up have the amount of intensity to cause girth gains....
lol thanks for the comments guys.
and yes gold.. we'll initiate the PBI (Penis Bureau of Investigation).
and yes gold.. we'll initiate the PBI (Penis Bureau of Investigation).
VK, That is indeed interesting. What thread are you talking about???
I have noticed post pumping that my girth is more "firm" even with a bit of fluid buildup. I have also noticed that even after a short respite from pumping, usually 2-3 days, that I have gained a bit of girth or length. It really is interesting to feel after a few days off how heavy the cock is and how little fluid buildup there is after the first 2-3 sets on that first day back. It feels very solid and rigid after I go through my warmdown with erect massage. Any more thoughts on this?
I have noticed post pumping that my girth is more "firm" even with a bit of fluid buildup. I have also noticed that even after a short respite from pumping, usually 2-3 days, that I have gained a bit of girth or length. It really is interesting to feel after a few days off how heavy the cock is and how little fluid buildup there is after the first 2-3 sets on that first day back. It feels very solid and rigid after I go through my warmdown with erect massage. Any more thoughts on this?