- Joined
- Jun 1, 2009
- Messages
- 1,479
I'm sure these questions might pop up for a few people(myself included), so I wanted to ask here.
I read the PMP thread(all 50 pages) and came to the conclusion that a few people(seems everyone that also has the VLC) are getting a more effective stretch than with the VLC that they own.
The VLC thread also has 50+ pages and also seems to be very successful. However, some people state that it mainly only did things for skin restoration and some seem to have noticed nothing in regards to length(the majority did however notice gains).
Maybe this will spark a discussion or maybe it wont, but here are some questions that pop into my mind that hopefully a few(or even 1) people can answer or share insight on.
-----
Questions:
1. Is the PMP only slightly more effective than the SizeGenetics? In regards to their method of stretching. Given that the PMP seems to be designed to mitigate the effects of having your head slip/get cold and blisters that may result of this(even though some report blisters from the PMP), thus giving you the ability to wear it for longer durations(which I guess is where the VLC would also come in).
2. How would you rate the method(science) of the stretch in regards to VLC vs PMP? Superior in terms of justifying the price difference?
-----
The cost seems to be a big issue, but if the PMP is truly more effective than the VLC, then it would seem that justifies it. Not too mention some people replace their VLC heads after a certain duration. I'm sure there are some people that don't even have an extender, so the price essentially is only around $100-$120(including the discount) more(compared to SG/VLC) to get the whole PMP package. The upgrade price is intense.
Maybe a few others can ask questions in regards to the VLC vs PMP. I had a list of more questions in my head, but went completely brain-dead(?) and forgot them when I got to question #2.
I read the PMP thread(all 50 pages) and came to the conclusion that a few people(seems everyone that also has the VLC) are getting a more effective stretch than with the VLC that they own.
The VLC thread also has 50+ pages and also seems to be very successful. However, some people state that it mainly only did things for skin restoration and some seem to have noticed nothing in regards to length(the majority did however notice gains).
Maybe this will spark a discussion or maybe it wont, but here are some questions that pop into my mind that hopefully a few(or even 1) people can answer or share insight on.
-----
Questions:
1. Is the PMP only slightly more effective than the SizeGenetics? In regards to their method of stretching. Given that the PMP seems to be designed to mitigate the effects of having your head slip/get cold and blisters that may result of this(even though some report blisters from the PMP), thus giving you the ability to wear it for longer durations(which I guess is where the VLC would also come in).
2. How would you rate the method(science) of the stretch in regards to VLC vs PMP? Superior in terms of justifying the price difference?
-----
The cost seems to be a big issue, but if the PMP is truly more effective than the VLC, then it would seem that justifies it. Not too mention some people replace their VLC heads after a certain duration. I'm sure there are some people that don't even have an extender, so the price essentially is only around $100-$120(including the discount) more(compared to SG/VLC) to get the whole PMP package. The upgrade price is intense.
Maybe a few others can ask questions in regards to the VLC vs PMP. I had a list of more questions in my head, but went completely brain-dead(?) and forgot them when I got to question #2.