Alpha Blade--release Delay--please Read!!!

Glad to see he´ll be going home soon. He is strong and will overcome this as he has overcome other shit.

Get well soon Mike, all my energy to you.
 
nicobocabitch said:
What makes it sound like he did it on purpose?
Click to expand...


I think it was the general mystery of DLDs injuries. Cutting your arm is a suicide attempt. So this is what we guessed as we did not know the reason.
 
nicobocabitch said:
And actually I believe most of his body went through the glass Payne.


What makes it sound like he did it on purpose?
Click to expand...
Just the way u described it thats all. I didn't mean he cut himself i thought maybe he was upset and punched the window. As men we have all been there u know "punching something u know"
 
I totally understand I never thought you meant suicide or anything like that.


Ive punched a few my self and kicked one or two
 
Let's all hope Mike is on the road to a full recovery.

I assume this was an accident?
 
The BTC Killer said:
...DLD, I support you no matter what...
Click to expand...

Which would mean you support him even if this whole Alpha Blade thing is a scam, etc. Even if he came out and admitted the setbacks were false... By your own admission, you would still support him.


Wow.
 
endokrin said:
Which would mean you support him even if this whole Alpha Blade thing is a scam, etc. Even if he came out and admitted the setbacks were false... By your own admission, you would still support him.


Wow.
Click to expand...
What have you done for the P.E. community lately?
 
Yaa i was just doing a background check on him.


what is the purpose of this post except to arouse problems?
 
The BTC Killer said:
What have you done for the P.E. community lately?
Click to expand...


A question cant be answered with a question. Thats merely an attempt to deflect (not answer the question) the question.
 
Ghosting said:
A question cant be answered with a question. Thats merely an attempt to deflect (not answer the question) the question.
Click to expand...
Socratic Method



The oldest, and still the most powerful, teaching tactic for fostering

critical thinking is Socratic teaching. In Socratic teaching we focus on

giving students questions, not answers. We model an inquiring, probing mind

by continually probing into the subject with questions. Fortunately, the

abilities we gain by focusing on the elements of reasoning in a disciplined

and self-assessing way, and the logical relationships that result from such

disciplined thought, prepare us for Socratic questioning.



Thankfully, there is a predictable set of relationships that hold for all

subjects and disciplines. This is given in the general logic of reasoning,

since every subject has been developed by those who had:



* shared goals and objectives (which defined the subject focus)

* shared questions and problems (whose solution they pursued)

* shared information and data (which they used as an empirical basis)

* shared modes of interpreting or judging that information

* shared specialized concepts and ideas (which they used to help them

organize their data)

* shared key assumptions (that gave them a basis from which to

collectively begin)

* a shared point of view (which enabled them to pursue common goals from

a common framework)



Each of the elements represents a dimension into which one can delve in

questioning a person. We can question goals and purposes. We can probe into

the nature of the question, problem, or issue that is on the floor. We can

inquire into whether or not we have relevant data and information. We can

consider alternative interpretations of the data and information. We can

analyze key concepts and ideas. We can question assumptions being made. We

can ask students to trace out the implications and consequences of what they

are saying. We can consider alternative points of view. All of these, and

more, are the proper focus of the Socratic questioner.



As a tactic and approach, Socratic questioning is a highly disciplined

process. The Socratic questioner acts as the logical equivalent of the inner

critical voice which the mind develops when it develops critical thinking

abilities. The contributions from the members of the class are like so many

thoughts in the mind. All of the thoughts must be dealt with and they must

be dealt with carefully and fairly. By following up all answers with further

questions, and by selecting questions which advance the discussion, the

Socratic questioner forces the class to think in a disciplined,

intellectually responsible manner, while yet continually aiding the students

by posing facilitating questions.



A Socratic questioner should:

a) keep the discussion focused

b) keep the discussion intellectually responsible

c) stimulate the discussion with probing questions

d) periodically summarize what has and what has not been dealt with and/or

resolved

e) draw as many students as possible into the discussion.
 
Ghosting said:
A question cant be answered with a question. Thats merely an attempt to deflect (not answer the question) the question.
Click to expand...

IMO by not answering the ? he answered it.

Not that it needed answering anyway.
 
Last edited:
nicobocabitch said:
Yaa i was just doing a background check on him.
Click to expand...


To discredit him? Character assasination? I think he had a valid question, yet you seem intent on harassing anyone everytime anyone questions anything. Thats like a blind follower. I dont want to see DLD hurt as much as the next guy, but your attitude is disturbing. Am I the only person who can remain objective? Your responses say you want to turn things ugly as soon as anyone drops a question.
 
nicobocabitch said:
IMO by not answering the ? he answered it.

Not that it needed answering anyway.
Click to expand...


Umm, saying "what have you done for the Penis Enlargement community" was not a direct answer to his question. It was saying, "since I invented the Vax-Max, I care more for the Penis Enlargement community, and therefor dont need to justify my response." So I see, anyone who invents something cares more. I gotcha.
 
Ghosting said:
To discredit him? Character assasination? I think he had a valid question, yet you seem intent on harassing anyone everytime anyone questions anything. Thats like a blind follower. I dont want to see DLD hurt as much as the next guy, but your attitude is disturbing. Am I the only person who can remain objective? Your responses say you want to turn things ugly as soon as anyone drops a question.
Click to expand...


No after looking into his bacround i can see he is regesterd under more than one name that he almost never posts which tells me he is probably a troll.
 
nicobocabitch said:
No after looking into his bacround i can see he is regesterd under more than one name that he almost never posts which tells me he is probably a troll.
Click to expand...


Troll or not, he still asked a valid question. Ok, Im no troll, have the same question, and I dont have multiple user names. Can I get a response?
 
Ghosting said:
Umm, saying "what have you done for the Penis Enlargement community" was not a direct answer to his question. It was saying, "since I invented the Vax-Max, I care more for the Penis Enlargement community, and therefor dont need to justify my response." So I see, anyone who invents something cares more. I gotcha.
Click to expand...
It's MaX-Vac by the way, and I'm saying DLD is bigger than DLD. He is M.O.S., he is Alphablade. We all are. Making a interrogatory remark of what if it's a scam, or he lied is irrelevant. DLD doesn't EXPenis EnlargementCT anyone to do anything, but we put the expectations all on him. It doesn't seem balanced. So, what have you done for the P.E. community has nothing to do with me. It is directed at the ones who expect, demand, and irrationalize.
 
The BTC Killer said:
Socratic Method



The oldest, and still the most powerful, teaching tactic for fostering

critical thinking is Socratic teaching. In Socratic teaching we focus on

giving students questions, not answers. We model an inquiring, probing mind

by continually probing into the subject with questions. Fortunately, the

abilities we gain by focusing on the elements of reasoning in a disciplined

and self-assessing way, and the logical relationships that result from such

disciplined thought, prepare us for Socratic questioning.



Thankfully, there is a predictable set of relationships that hold for all

subjects and disciplines. This is given in the general logic of reasoning,

since every subject has been developed by those who had:



* shared goals and objectives (which defined the subject focus)

* shared questions and problems (whose solution they pursued)

* shared information and data (which they used as an empirical basis)

* shared modes of interpreting or judging that information

* shared specialized concepts and ideas (which they used to help them

organize their data)

* shared key assumptions (that gave them a basis from which to

collectively begin)

* a shared point of view (which enabled them to pursue common goals from

a common framework)



Each of the elements represents a dimension into which one can delve in

questioning a person. We can question goals and purposes. We can probe into

the nature of the question, problem, or issue that is on the floor. We can

inquire into whether or not we have relevant data and information. We can

consider alternative interpretations of the data and information. We can

analyze key concepts and ideas. We can question assumptions being made. We

can ask students to trace out the implications and consequences of what they

are saying. We can consider alternative points of view. All of these, and

more, are the proper focus of the Socratic questioner.



As a tactic and approach, Socratic questioning is a highly disciplined

process. The Socratic questioner acts as the logical equivalent of the inner

critical voice which the mind develops when it develops critical thinking

abilities. The contributions from the members of the class are like so many

thoughts in the mind. All of the thoughts must be dealt with and they must

be dealt with carefully and fairly. By following up all answers with further

questions, and by selecting questions which advance the discussion, the

Socratic questioner forces the class to think in a disciplined,

intellectually responsible manner, while yet continually aiding the students

by posing facilitating questions.



A Socratic questioner should:

a) keep the discussion focused

b) keep the discussion intellectually responsible

c) stimulate the discussion with probing questions

d) periodically summarize what has and what has not been dealt with and/or

resolved

e) draw as many students as possible into the discussion.
Click to expand...


Thanks for the lesson and thanks YET AGAIN for no answer. I have to take myself off this thread. You clearly already stated how you feel, and are now dodging the question by posting everything but a proper response. Good bye guys.
 
Ghosting said:
Troll or not, he still asked a valid question. Ok, Im no troll, have the same question, and I dont have multiple user names. Can I get a response?
Click to expand...


No because is was a cheap tactic to start problems and from the looks of it it worked there is no real answer to this question do you want him to say YES, Did he not show how he feels about it buy not giving into the trap.

You have a pretty little supporter logo but i have my suspicions about your true intentions
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

DLD
I told everyone not to post products in the main forum! PLEASE READ!
3 4 5
Replies
84
Views
6K
DLD
DLD
DLD
G
Hanging weight behind the balls (Iron Crotch)
2 3
Replies
49
Views
13K
H
huge-girth
H
DLD
Understanding How Size is Gained: Penis Enlargement Exercise, Routine and Equipment
2 3 4
Replies
72
Views
12K
DLD
DLD
DLD
D
The Celebrity MOS Black Book. Wtf:
4 5 6
Replies
118
Views
19K
H
huge-girth
H
S
Heavy strength training and it's influence on the PC muscles
2 3
Replies
58
Views
5K
H
huge-girth
H
Back
Top Bottom