P
pullups
Guest
what is everyones opinion on them? should only people who are athletes, body builders, etc use them? are they worth the risk?
EVO said:i have been on a few steroids myself:- testex, decanoate, oxy bolone, napasims, provirones, hcg, testivirone. my advice is this:- know what you are doing! many of my friends still do them and moan to me that their balls are shrinking. but they cant come off steroids because then their muscle mass will suffer. its a lose - lose situation. i recommended that my friend do the following cycle though - 2 months of decanoate and testivirone, one month on just hcg. then repeat. - take the next 6 months off. this is a years routine! the hcg is there to prevent your balls giving in! i do not recomend the use of steroids as the results are only temporary (some would disagee...) but if you do - i suggest a cycle as above...
EVO said:what does pct mean? ?
WRONG... HCG helps to kickstarts the testes which will help with recovery but you don't seem to understand what's really going on. When you increase test levels exogenously, estrogen levels will increase also to maintain the test/estro ratio... when you come off steroids, test levels drop off pretty quick because your body is no longer producing it but estro levels are still high. This is when you're most prone to estrogen sides. It is imperative that you take a good anti-estrogen to block it's effects 'til your natty test levels come back. Clomid/Nolva are estrogn blockers that will block the effects of estro and also encourage your HTPA to begin working again. You also don't want to take HCG post cycle because it is also suppressive and will inhibit recovery.EVO said:rofl think thats basically what the hcg does....
That article is good but the HCG part is a little dated... lower doses run throughout the cycle works better.prince Albert said:Lol thats the reason your gains are only temperary mate
PCT is post cycle therapy.
little article that will give you a basic idea
http://www.muscletalk.co.uk/clomid-hcg.asp
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...f&pmid=15713727
LOW DOSE HUMAN CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN MAINTAINS INTRATESTICULAR TESTOSTERONE IN NORMAL MEN WITH TESTOSTERONE INDUCED GONADOTROPIN SUPPRESSION.
Coviello AD, Matsumoto AM, Bremner WJ, Herbst KL, Amory JK, Anawalt BD, Sutton PR, Wright WW, Brown TR, Yan X, Zirkin BR, Jarow JP.
Center for Research in Reproduction and Contraception, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veteran Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System (AMM), and Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine (ADC, WJB, JKA, BDA, PLS), Seattle, WA; Department of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University (KLH), Los Angeles, CA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (XY, JPJ), Baltimore, MD; Division of Reproductive Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health (WWW, TRB, XY, BRZ, JPJ), Baltimore, MD.
In previous studies of testicular biopsy tissue from healthy men, intratesticular testosterone (ITT) has been shown to be much higher than serum testosterone (T), suggesting that high ITT is needed relative to serum T for normal spermatogenesis in men. However, the quantitative relationship between ITT and spermatogenesis is not known. To begin to address this issue experimentally we sought to determine the dose response relationship between human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and ITT to determine the minimum dose needed to maintain ITT in the normal range. Twenty-nine men with normal reproductive physiology were randomized to receive 200 mg T enanthate (TE) weekly in combination with either saline placebo or hCG 125 IU, 250 IU, or 500 IU every other day for 3 weeks. ITT was assessed in testicular fluid obtained by percutaneous fine needle aspiration at baseline and the end of treatment. Baseline serum T (14.1 nmol/L) was 1.2% of ITT (1174 nmol/L). LH and FSH were profoundly suppressed to 5% and 3% of baseline respectively, and ITT was suppressed by 94% (1234 nmol/L to 72 nmol/L) in the TE/placebo group. ITT increased linearly with increasing hCG dose (P < 0.001). Post-treatment ITT was 25% less than baseline in the 125 IU hCG group, 7% less than baseline in the 250 IU hCG group, and 26% greater than baseline in the 500 IU hCG group. These results demonstrate that relatively low dose hCG maintains ITT within the normal range in healthy men with gonadotropin suppression. Extensions of this study will allow determination of the ITT concentration threshold required to maintain spermatogenesis in man.
sikdogg said:You also don't want to take HCG post cycle because it is also suppressive and will inhibit recovery.
EVO said:what does it suppress sikdogg? can you post this info, cheers
You mean to tell me you've done cycles without even knowing how it affects your endocrine system?? When guys like you screw themselves with up AAS and/or other hormones, the rest of the bodybuilding world takes the heat...EVO said:...sorry but i want to get this right incase i ever decide to go back on them....
swolejah said:Steroids aren't worth it. I have plenty of info to back up if someone forces me to explain.
Once you get off of steroids, you shrink. No matter what anyone tells you.
swolejah said:Steroids aren't worth it. I have plenty of info to back up if someone forces me to explain.
Once you get off of steroids, you shrink. No matter what anyone tells you.
Well, i guess 90% of all amateur and pro BB'ers as well as most if not all College and NFL players are all wimps cuz they rely on AAS to get huge... Wow, at only 18yo you're more of a man than all of them. :banghead:swolejah said:They are for wimps. I've been lifting for 6 years and do fine without them. Why depend on a drug to get you huge? Real men don't use roids.
no, but you insinuated that real men don't use AAS... since you don't use AAS then you must be a real man and everyone else who uses isn't...swolejah said:Never did I say I was more of a man than all of them.
It's a personal choice like drugs, sex, and the music you listen to... just because they don't agree with you doesn't make them less of a man. And for the record, calling AAS users less of a man is just plain ignorant and does little to dissuade people from using it. If you want to make a difference, try using a convincing arguemnt like it's side effects to make your point and convince people from using it.And I knew someone was going to say that about the bodybuilders, someone always does and I believe it's a lousy thing to mention. The more people accept steroids the more it will likely become more common among teens and individuals.
Get real bro... if they didn't take steroids to get big then they wouldn't take it at all. You think the pros take it because they like the pimples, receding hairline, and all the other side effects?? Grow up and smell the coffee...Still, why would you depend on a drug? Bodybuilding and weights aren't about taking steroids and seeing who can get the biggest and have the most muscle separation. Also notice that alot of those guys look similar only in that they are massive and ripped. If nobody took them and they start caring more about testing for them in IFBB, I believe it would be more of a challenge.
Yea, i have so what?? If you knew a little more about BB'ing, you'd be able to watch videos of each and and see a big difference between them.Have you ever seen Ronnie's videos, Jay's video's, and Markus Ruhl's?
swolejah said:Never did I say I was more of a man than all of them.
And I knew someone was going to say that about the bodybuilders, someone always does and I believe it's a lousy thing to mention. The more people accept steroids the more it will likely become more common among teens and individuals.
Still, why would you depend on a drug? Bodybuilding and weights aren't about taking steroids and seeing who can get the biggest and have the most muscle separation. Also notice that alot of those guys look similar only in that they are massive and ripped. If nobody took them and they start caring more about testing for them in IFBB, I believe it would be more of a challenge.
Have you ever seen Ronnie's videos, Jay's video's, and Markus Ruhl's?
AlreadyPackin' said:Steroids are a crutch, just like bench shirts. I don't care what anybody says, or what kind of PCT you use, you are going to lose your gains once you come off the juice. I personally know at least 5 guys who shrunk as fast as Mario after getting hit by Bowser. Does it always happen that fast? No. You may hold on to them for a minute, but you won't for long.
Unless you are pro bodybuilder, in the WWE, or the NFL. 'roids are pretty much a waste of your time. You aren't going to get back any of the money you shelled out for them, and you aren't going to keep what you got from them. What cracks me up is all the 'Roidboys, 50 or 60 lbs heavier than me, using the same or less weight than I am, and I don't even take a protein supplement right now. I just keep a well-balanced diet, with a little extra protein.
It is pretty silly to try and get ppl to believe that you can become a shredded-up 245 lb. behemoth without drugs. A personal choice it may be, like music, but listening to your music versus someone else's doesn't give you a bigass advantage over them. As for BB'ing, yeah, a few of them look distinctive but many starting to run together, just like the fitness models. "Skinny chic with implants #1, # 2 or #3?"
As for side effeects, well that depends. If you can afford the best stuff, you won't have as many to deal with, and counteracting them won't be a problem. Unless you can't stick yourself and decide to pickle your liver with orals. The physical stuff won't be too bad, but I have heard of some pros who now have so much scar tissue they can barely walk(no names mentioned there). But the ex-users I know say that the worst part is the psychological effect of being a sliver of what they were on the drugs.
swolejah said:Steroids aren't worth it. I have plenty of info to back up if someone forces me to explain.
Once you get off of steroids, you shrink. No matter what anyone tells you.
No one is forcing you to backup your statement... we're asking you to. I'm always interested in reading any/all studies regarding the pro's and con's of AAS use.swolejah said:Steroids aren't worth it. I have plenty of info to back up if someone forces me to explain.
Once you get off of steroids, you shrink. No matter what anyone tells you.
prince Albert said:Explain how they are a crutch?,if you have never used steroids how can you say all the gains are lost,i'm much heavier and leaner off cycle than i ever was after 10 years of being natural.
If someone is using aas for bb then strength isn't really important to them so you may well be able to out lift them but you compare your lifts to a steroid using powerlifter and it will be a different matter.
aas can actually workout cheaper to buy than alot of over the counter supps that produce little to no gains.
sikdogg said:No one is forcing you to backup your statement... we're asking you to. I'm always interested in reading any/all studies regarding the pro's and con's of AAS use.
Yes it's true that one will always lose a good amount of size once they go off AAS because alot of gains come from water and glycogen, but the loss can be minimized by carefull planning. Granted that most of the size that pro's carry will go away once they come off AAS because their gains are beyond what the body can sustain on its own. Without the additional protein synthesis from AAS, they just can't maintain their size. For most us mere mortals, the gains made thru AAS use can be sustained naturally with a very strict diet and exercize plan.
AlreadyPackin' said:It would also be different if I were a powerlifter. Strength is not my main goal. Regardless, a big muscular dude getting outlifted by a much smaller, more muscular dude doesn't look right, and ppl are like "Huh?" You said you are leaner and heavier off-cycle than you ever were without, so have you quit using permanently, or do you mean just between cycles? Honest question, not a jab.
I should clarify my position a little better, though. I believe you can responsibly and reasonably use steroids. But I don't feel as if you're really earning what you get as opposed to not using them. In that sense they are a crutch. Also, having been in the scene for some time, I'm sure you meet those clowns who rely totally on the gear, and don't think they have to work that hard. Or those who just outright use them because they don't feel adequate. They're not magic, of course, but they provide more of an edge than most people comprehend. Around here, the cost of an average 5 or 600 mg a week cycle, with all the proper accoutrement costs a lot more than some whey and creatine. But you are definitely right, steroids have gotten way cheaper. I've seen Super-Drol for $28 a bottle.
REDZULU2003 said:Okay I'm interested in taking steroids, so anyone got any advice on which ones to take? which ones are the best, when to take, how much, where to buy, dosage, whatelse needs to be taken alongside.
REDZULU2003 said:Okay I'm interested in taking steroids, so anyone got any advice on which ones to take? which ones are the best, when to take, how much, where to buy, dosage, whatelse needs to be taken alongside.