I'm uncut and my wife loves it. She says that cut penis are ugly and she doen not like them. On the other hand I have heard women say that they love cut penis.


So whats the difference between a cut or uncut penis. It still a penis.
Right or wrong?
 
I am uncut and before coming to these threads I felt that it was better to be cut. Some of the cut members here have been talking about foreskin restoration and the benefits of having one so now I am glad that I am cut.

It feels better during sex being uncut anyways. A guy who is cut doesn't get the extra stimulation of his skin rolling back and forth over his head as he thrusts. Also being cut would reduce stimulation to the glans as it is always exposed.

You are uncut and be damn proud of it! I am now.
 
LETS NOT GO HERE AGAIN! Seriously, we just had this discussion a while ago and here's how it goes;

All CUT guys say CUT is best
All UNCUT guys say UNCUT is best
All women from countries where men are CUT say CUT is best
All women from countries where men are UNCUT say UNCUT is best

If anyone wants to relive the argument/debate go looking for it. I have a personal problem with these type of threads as no-ones opinion will ever be changed and people can get wound up by them.

Xcalet finished this thread in his opening post imho,

So whats the difference between a cut or uncut penis. It still a penis.

Damn right. End of story :)
 
"All CUT guys say CUT is best
All UNCUT guys say UNCUT is best
All women from countries where men are CUT say CUT is best
All women from countries where men are UNCUT say UNCUT is best"

I think this is right on. I'm from the US and everyone around me of my friends is cut. In highschool thats what girls liked, if a kid was uncut it was "wierd" to a lot of girls becuase they didn't see many uncut dicks. In countries in europe, i'm sure more girls like uncut because thats the norm. But hey a dick is a dick, so if its used right then i don't think it really matters. I personally am glad im cut and if i ever have kids ill have them cut too but others feel the opposite.
 
You guys are tards. Saying a dick is a dick, whether it is cut or uncut, is no different than saying size doesn't matter, just deal with what you got! Now that we know that the foreskin can, in essence, be restored with skin expansion techniques, I think that only those who have had it both ways can really answer this question, guys and girls included.

Ask my wife, who has had sex with me thousands of times, which she prefers. Do you think she would like to go back to the way I used to be, back when I was 5.5 inches long and very curved? I know for a fact that she wouldn't, because she says it feels so much better now that I am 7.5 inches long, about a half inch thicker around, less curved and with enough loose skin to glide inside her comfortably so that she no longer has problems with drying out halfway through or soreness afterwards.

If you are cut and happy with it, I am glad for you. I have presented my case over and over, so you have been exposed to the truth and there isn't anything else I can say that will change your mind.

levista and stiff...you guys have always kind of dogged my message. I think there is a little bit of denial there, but hey, that's your perogative. You guys decided once to ignore the "experts" who say that Penis Enlargement doesn't work, yet here you are doing to same thing to Foreskin Restoration. I just hope you do not discourage someone who might benefit from it-- someone who's circumcision was too tight or who suffer from loss of sensitivity! It would be a shame.
 
stiff4ever4u said:
Just a pic I forund of a hot chick from Ghana. I posted in this section. I didn't try and edit the pic or anything. The part about banging her was obviously bullshit, as was obvious in the original post.


wow, no need to get so defensive. he was only saying, oh and how is it bullshit that you could be banging a bird from ghana? it wasnt obvious apart from the picture.
 
KONG,

in your post you said "deal with what you got" so here is my question to you.
Why are you Penis Enlargementing if all you got to do is deal with what you got?
Its just a question man.
 
Needs to be a jpg or gif file, no bigger than 100 pixels by 100 pixels, with a maximum filesize of about 80kb (last bit off the top of my head).
Whats the exact problem?
 
Thank you, Penguinsfan! I don't understand why everyone gets so heated about it either. I'm not even going to comment on Xcalet's last post, because he obviously does not know me and did not read my post carefully. I think alot of the strong feelings comes from a deepseated feeling of anger. We are circumcised as babies and had no choice in the matter, and for men, that can be hard to deal with. Also, I think when I talk about circumcision in a negative way, some men take it as me saying that there is something wrong with their penis. There's not anything wrong with a circumcised penis. My beef is that it is done without consent of the human being it is being performed on. If given a choice, I would have opted to keep mine, because I believe that God made human beings a certain way, and if he intended us to have no foreskins, he would have made us without em.

Yes, restoration will not bring back all the nerves and blood vessels and structures of the foreskin that is taken away. You are correct in that. But the regained sensitivity is significant. It is mainly in the glans, and in the inner foreskin area that most of the feeling returns when restoring, and it is pretty intense, and something you won't believe til you try it yourself.

The skin expansion techniques can also be applied to Penis Enlargement, as well, which makes it a legitimate part of penis enlargement, especially if it corrects scar damage or lack of skin, which may be limiting the gains of some men.
 
Kong
I respect what you say but I guess I took it differently. My bad man.
On your first post you said something about drying out and soreness afterwards.
Wha t is the cause of that?
 
No problem, dude. I meant that saying circumcision doesn't matter is like saying size doesn't matter, when in fact, BOTH matter a great deal and are important issues.

The foreskin is designed so that it allows the penis to pump in and out of the vagina without actually rubbing against it. All the loose skin sort of rolls back and forth inside the woman when she is with an uncut man. It also sort of makes a seal. Instead of the penis sliding in, getting wet, then pulling that lubrication out to dry with each thrust, all the wetness stays inside. Your gal stays moister, and doesn't get rubbed raw when you're pounding her.

I have enough loose skin now for there to be a little bit of gliding during intercourse, and my wife says she likes it so much better. We can do it longer and rougher without her drying out or being as sore afterwards.

What is so wonderful is that both can be changed if you are willing to learn how and put the time and effort in.

In about year, I have grown my penis about 2" and have regenerated about an equal ammount (maybe less) of extra skin.

Before I quit all this, I intend to have 8" NBP with a functional foreskin!
 
Im not cut and my wife does get sore only if we go on and on and on. She never gets dry though. Last time she was sore it was about 2-3 days ago. We went at it. I busted 6 times. She always remains wet. Is there a way that I can make her squirt?
 
I've been cut for seven months now and I love it, however I think that if I was born cut I'd probably be on my way restoring my foresking right now. I guess never being satisfied is a part of human nature.
 
For me, it is more of an ethical issue than just never being satisfied with what you got. I am pretty happy with myself in all other aspects. Of course, there is always room for improvement (my weight, my peter size) but it is not dissatisfaction, really, just desire for self-improvement.
 
While I think Kong is onto something about tight circumcisions limiting penis size, I kind of thought of this as a double-edged sword. From what I've heard, some men that are uncut have a difficult time adjusting to Penis Enlargement, because they have to peel the foreskin back to get a good stretching grip and it is often painfully sensitive. I kind of think if I ever decide to try FR, I want to wait till that little SOB gets a lot bigger.
 
I am uncut and I am fine with it. I had a couple of women tell me that the only real difference is the preference of the woman. Most of them said that they like the cut dicks better when they are sucking on it and only a few said that they like the uncut dicks. But they also told me that once they hopped on top that a dick was a dick and that size only mattered then.
so lets put this matter to rest
:blowjob:
 
Why does everyone feel uncomfortable talking about this? I think it is kind of telling that it makes alot of men freak out. Everyone goes on and on about thrombos and clamping and whatnot, but whenever circumcision comes up, there seems to be this reaction where everyone states their opinion and then says "That's it. Let's not talk about this anymore." I wonder why that is? What is so wrong about discussing being cut and uncut and the pros and cons? It's okay to talk about enlarging the penis, and stretching the balls.
 
kong1971 said:
Why does everyone feel uncomfortable talking about this? I think it is kind of telling that it makes alot of men freak out. Everyone goes on and on about thrombos and clamping and whatnot, but whenever circumcision comes up, there seems to be this reaction where everyone states their opinion and then says "That's it. Let's not talk about this anymore." I wonder why that is? What is so wrong about discussing being cut and uncut and the pros and cons? It's okay to talk about enlarging the penis, and stretching the balls.

Bingo. It is worth talking about and it is NOT worth getting upset about. If this subject angers you, seek therapy cause the world can be a cruel place.
 
Let me ask 1 question to all you guys who are cut. If it was your choice will you get cut or not.
How about when you guys have kids, would you have them cut?
 
I would have been uncut, if it had been my choice. God (or evolution) put that foreskin there for a reason, and I have been trying for the last four months to restore using skin expansion techniques.

In the last four months, I have discovered that there is a whole spectrum of sexual sensation that I was missing out on due to keratinization of the glans, and that alot of the problems I had with my penis were due to my tight cut (from turkey neck, to my small starting size and occasional E.D.)

Good news is, it is partially restorable. I'll never be able to get my frenelum or the frenar bands back, but I can make myself look normal, and the return in sensitivity of my glans is incredible all in itself. I feel so happy about it that I want to share this with everyone, but alot of guys here don't want to talk about it. They remind me of kids who plug their ears and go, "Don't want to listen! Lalalalala!" It's just so sad that we can talk about stretching our nuts or taking pills to have big loads, but everyone is so touchy about circumcision -- especially when it is essentially reversible, if they are unhappy with their status.

For all you guys who are uncut and feel like oddities here in the US, be proud of what you got! 85% of the world is uncut. You are natural born and untampered with, and will enjoy a lifetime of sensation that the cut will never know.

If you are cut and my message upsets you, don't take it out on me. I am just telling the honest, backed-up-by-fact truth. FACT: most of the world is uncut. FACT: circumcision has no medical benefit. FACT: circumcision removes 50% of the skin of the penis. FACT: circumcision removes 90% of the specialized sexual nerves endings of the penis. FACT: circumcision is the reason men lose interest in sex as they get older...no sensitivity. FACT: uncut men are, on average, larger than cut men. Less skin and scarring causes 20% of the penis to be held inside the abdomen. FACT: there is a movement here in the US of thousands of men and (yes) women who were circumcised who are trying to have this practice banned by law. In 1994, female circumcision was outlawed, and rightfully so, but keeping our sons from getting cut up is a tougher sell, apparently. I think it is because men here are considered disposable. Cut em up and send em off to war is pretty much the motto. Anyone who sees the truth and dares speak it is knocked down by all the rest of the happy little drones.

Call me names if you want. I have been called crazy, stupid, gay and a liar just here on [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words] for speaking the truth, but fact is fact.

Now I leave the floor open. I'm sure we're about to see several "I'm cut and loving it" posts.
 
I have heard of female circumcision and I would think that the equivelant would be removal of the clitoral hood but I heard that they remove the whole clitoris which is sick.
 
XCALET said:
Let me ask 1 question to all you guys who are cut. If it was your choice will you get cut or not.
How about when you guys have kids, would you have them cut?

That's interesting. Seeing as how I am seemingly chick repellent, in terms of appearance, the sexual benefits are of minimal advantage to me. I have no problem getting fullly aroused or anything else, when the rare moment surfaces, after cleaning the cobwebs of my inactive dick. Appearance wise, I think a cut penis looks better. That, of course, is nothing more than my opinion. Therefore, I am going to say that all things being equal, I would go with cut. However, there seems to be credible information that suggests all things may not be equal, that much is lost, as Kong elaborated on. I would like to get more medical opinions on the matter before I can really say. Some of the things I've read from sites like www.norm.org seem a little fishy to me, but I know some of the information is legitimate. When it's all said and done, I really can't say right now what I'd do if I could go back in time.

In the highly unlikely scenario that I actually do have a son, again I can't answer that right now today. I promise you that I would read and research it heavily during the pregnancy period and get informed about it. Once a person is cut, it cannot be reversed, completely. However, circumcision is a barbaric procedure later in life, from what I've heard. Of course, it is less so when done under the proper hospital procedure.

Here is the final verdict right now: *shrug*
 
Bigd, I saw your photos and your cock looks awesome. Like a adult entertainment star. In fact, alot of adult entertainment stars are uncut, if you look closely. There just isn't much difference visually when a man is aroused because the penis elongates and the skin pulls back from the glans. You actually have to look close sometimes, unless the adult entertainment star has a really dark scar. I'm glad you don't want to get snipped, and will spare your sons, too, if you have any. I would love to trade my dick for your uncut ladysplitter!!!
 
kong1971 said:
Why does everyone feel uncomfortable talking about this? I think it is kind of telling that it makes alot of men freak out. Everyone goes on and on about thrombos and clamping and whatnot, but whenever circumcision comes up, there seems to be this reaction where everyone states their opinion and then says "That's it. Let's not talk about this anymore." I wonder why that is? What is so wrong about discussing being cut and uncut and the pros and cons? It's okay to talk about enlarging the penis, and stretching the balls.

The arguements about cut or uncut just waste time and it is just a matter of preference. I said lets end this because some people get very heated about this subject matter
 
At the same time, being cut and restoring my foreskin makes me very interested in the viewpoints of both sides and hungry for new info. I read all circumcision related posts because I am restoring, just like a hanger reads all hanging posts. I get agitated when people like you, whether you are cut or uncut, want to cut off my info. It is almost like being discriminated against. You could really help guys like me, who are working very hard to have an approximation of what you enjoy, with your lifelong experience of having an intact cock. Why do you want to shut off my sources of info and inspiration? I just want to have an intact cock-- or as close to one as I can get. It is hard enough to keep working on it when it sometimes takes years to restore, and so many people try to discourage or silence you.

Are you from the US? Are you ashamed of your intact foreskin, because you are in the minority in our country? You shouldn't be ashamed or embarassed, because there is a movement underway towards limiting circumcision, and soon, the US, like the rest of the world, will be mostly uncut. There are already states where the percentage of uncut men is getting close to 50/50 or better! Perhaps, being intact, you are disturbed when you hear about other men discussing their genital mutilation.

Whatever your situation, please stop calling for us to be silenced. Maybe you are uninterested...but there are plenty of us who are!
 
kong1971 said:
Bigd, I saw your photos and your cock looks awesome. Like a adult entertainment star. In fact, alot of adult entertainment stars are uncut, if you look closely. There just isn't much difference visually when a man is aroused because the penis elongates and the skin pulls back from the glans. You actually have to look close sometimes, unless the adult entertainment star has a really dark scar. I'm glad you don't want to get snipped, and will spare your sons, too, if you have any. I would love to trade my dick for your uncut ladysplitter!!!
Yea it looks a lot better now thanx to Penis Enlargement. Before I used to have an extra long droopy foreskin that in my opinion looked horrible but since I got bigger, the foreskin fits better now and I wouldn't have it any other way.
 
Kong I agree with you man.
I have heard alot of crap towards uncut men. From they are always dirtier to they give urinary track infections to women. I have even heard that uncut men give cervical cancer to women. If you are born with it should be for a reason. I have been with my wife 5 years. She has never gotten a urinary track infection.

I have 2 little boys and no they are not cut. I think the way that kids get cut is plain and simple brutal. Thats just my opinion. I cant seem to put my few days old child under the knife just because of what it normal for others. I'm sorry but not me.
 
Now that I think about it, I would be pretty angry if I was intact and had to put up with such discriminatory remarks. Intact men are called dirty, smelly, ugly and are blamed for UTIs and even cervical cancer...all lies propagated by the medical industry so that they can continue making money off the practice of circumcision.
 
I don't have a problem with the topic. I am happy that i am uncut. I feel sorry for the people that had "part of their manhood taken away from them"
I think that was unfair. There are ways to get back the extra skin that you have lost. I have to say that just stretching and dry jelqing are the best ways to stretch the skin around the top of the shaft. Dry jelqing works the best when you have fully erect penis. More blood to begin with and by jelqing you force more blood into it. Just becareful not to do it too fast or you will burst blood vessels.
 
Thanks, getbig.

I never really considered how discriminated against you intact men are here in the US. Does it make you sore when you hear people talk about you being nasty and smelly and that you give women pussy cancer? I know I would get sore about it, cause it just ain't true.

Thanks for the advice, too, about dry jelqing. I don't jelq anymore, but I do clamp, and it seems to give a good stretch to the skin.

I have been restoring 4 months now and have a little roll right behind the glans when flaccid. When I sit down, my skin rolls over almost completely now, but I still have no coverage when standing or moving about. It is still going to take me at least 12 more months to get flaccid coverage, from what I have learned doing research on restoration time, but for me, it is time well-spent. The more coverage I get, the more whole I feel. I plan to keep restoring until I look like a natural, intact man.

When I started, I had a 5 1/2 inch penis with a bad curve, and was cut so tight that my erections could actually be painful if I got really hard or had rough intercourse. Now I am 7.75" long, can pull the skin up halfway over the head when erect and can pound away for a hour and still get it up again 20 minutes later...very big difference!!! Can you blame me for being so big on restoring and so anti-circumcision?
 
kong1971 said:
When I started, I had a 5 1/2 inch penis with a bad curve, and was cut so tight that my erections could actually be painful if I got really hard or had rough intercourse. Now I am 7.75" long, can pull the skin up halfway over the head when erect and can pound away for a hour and still get it up again 20 minutes later...very big difference!!! Can you blame me for being so big on restoring and so anti-circumcision?

Sounds amazing. How does it make such a profound difference?

BTW Kong, looking at your measurements in your sig line, you're growing like a beast these days. Congrats!
 
its not like it is that big of a deal anyway, the majority of cut men come from religious families, don't they...like catholocism or judaism...or is that just a stereotype?
 
My wife and all the chicks that i ever had a relationship with always preferred cut cocks. Their only reason was that uncut cocks smelled and cut cocks didn't.
 
I work in public, so I see alot of people. I can always tell the uncut guys when they come in my store because of all the flies and the horrid stench of nasty cock. :D

Seriously, tho, when I started restoring, my wife had alot of reservations about it. Not that she had ever actually fucked an uncut guy, but she said she'd HEARD alot of bad stuff about it. That it smelled. That it gave women yeast infections. That it was dirty. Admittedly, I have a long way to go before I am restored, but I can tell you a few factual things from my experience so far...

Yes, there is a smell. When I stay taped for a long period of time, my glans is moistened by all those natural emollients and stuff like it is supposed to be. When I untape to clean myself, I have smelled it. It doesn't smell bad or good. Just smells like a dick, I guess. It's better than sweaty balls or BO, but not as good as, say, apple pie.

I have heard that there are pheromones in that stuff, so I did a little experiment on my wife to see if there was something to it. WARNING: GROSS KONG STORY TO FOLLOW!!! So, to see if there were really sex pheromones there, I did not clean myself one day. I took some of the secretions from my inner mucosal tissue and put it on my shirt and neck, like cologne. Did it work? Actually, crazy as it may sound, I think it did. I am not bullshitting you, either. I was reading some posts on [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]mos[/words] later that evening, and my wife came up to me and started licking and kissing my neck and shoulders. Now, I guess she just could have been horny...cause, God knows, I'm one sexy motherfucker... but I thought it was an interesting result. She doesn't lick me without provocation very often.

I have also found that my wife likes playing with my loose skin. She likes to pull it up over the head and lick it. Gives her something extra to do with my dick...and I can tell you for myself that I LOVE the feel of the skin sliding up and down over the head. It feels fantastic. I get hard really, really fast and stay hard. I can't wait for my skin to grow long enough to always cover the head. I want 100% erect coverage. It's still a long way away, cause I keep getting bigger every day from Penis Enlargement, but I recommend it to everyone.
 
I am cut. It wasn't my decision. Parents got it done when I was a kid. About 7.
I was cut because of religion. Some girls I talk to say they like it cut. Therefore, I am not sad.
 
Back
Top