rabbit, deer, or elephant.

This is a question more for the guys who have had more than 3 woman. Is there any indications beside having sex with them if they are a rabbit, deer or elephant. I am sure you have all heard the shoe size correlation when it comes to men. I wonder if the same can be said about woman. This question's relevance to Penis Enlargement is as follows: If we allowed natural selection to eliminate elephant woman from the gen pool, (IE: do not make babies with them to prevent the large pussy gen from being passed on.), would this eliminate the desire for Penis Enlargement. I think I know the answer, just wondering what everyone may have observer or thinks.

I do not think eugenics is a good solution to our issues with penis size. I think a better alternative would be to accept the actual real-world statistics concerning cock size (i.e. anything over 6" NBP is a big cock) and stick to our Penis Enlargement programs if you come up short. I am, however, going to take this post as a joke. Hahahaha... good one.

This gives me a good idea....(sorry to post off topic)...Idk if we ever did a poll on foot size and the penis, or hand size and the penis before...It could be interesting (maybe a waste of time) but its just an Idea (looks at Kong, the poll master).

No it was not a joke. The average woman can take 9.5" according to this penis size debate website. If the average man is 6", something besides sexual pleasure is driving that difference. (I am assuming a smaller vagina is more pleasurable for the average guy. But I have had very limited experience.) It could be as simple as vaginas are more elastic to accommodate child birth and a penis. With advances in medicine, vaginal births can be eliminated. That being the case, we men can select women based on her vagina size. If men decided to do that, what would be our indicators of her size without having sex with her. That is my question. I thought more experienced men may have found a correlation.

Although the vagina can stretch to accomodate the passage of an actual newborn child, I do not know of any women who found the experience pleasurable.

I think, if you research the information correctly, you will discover that the vagina is an expandable organ. Unarroused, a female's vagina is only 3 to 5 inches deep. When arroused, the vagina "tents" and lubricates to accomodate a penis comfortably. The vagina can expand to accept larger than average penises, but it is not comfortable and pleasurable in ALL cases, as some women are smaller than others.

So, to sum up, the vagina can expand from pinky size to baby size... cool, huh?

As far as your other ideas, I would discard them if I were you. Ceasarean sections are more dangerous than vaginal birth, and leave the woman scarred. There is also a higher incidence of complications with C-sections later in life. My wife had 2 C-sections because she had problems carrying to full term. She ended up needing a complete hysterectomy because of all the scarring and problems with her ovaries and bleeding.

I selected my wife as a partner because 1) our personalities mesh very well and we respect one another 2) I enjoy talking to her 3) I think she's beautiful and sexy and fun and 4) we are sexually compatible and enjoy making love with one another. That's the four basic ingedients of a good relationship.

I don't know of any way to tell if someone has a big pussy or small pussy without actually having sex with them.

I've had tight, loose , sweet and not so sweet ; there's no such thing as bad pussy. Kind of a good better best thing imo

6'' is big i thought it was average.

Good question.....hard ot answer...I have had about 90-100 women...lots of White, Latin and mixed...I think the myth of black women being larger to accomodate black men is BS - most black or black/moixed women I have had were very tight..in fact all the dominican women (who are very mixed with black) were amazingly tight, even those with children.

Sometimes its vaginal wetness and other factors that affect how it feels...too wet and it wont feel as good...I've had virgins who felt loose...probably from lax PC muscles...many factors affect it...just like with us! Sex isnt so cut and dried!

my current gf is mix too....has large hands for a small girl and she feels like medium to me...(I am 7.5" x 5.5 eg)

If there's any correlation, it's to height... and only then for small girls.

I've never seen anyone in the 5'2 range who was larger than large-rabbit/small-deer. After about 5'5 you get pot luck: 5'6 with elephant, 5'10 with small-deer, 5'7 chunky you'd think would be an elephant, total rabbit ... random random random.

*

There's no correlation to body size and vagina or penis size. A 7 foot tall man could have a 5 incher. A 5 foot tall guy could have a 7 incher. Same for women. A petite gal could be a gaping canyon and a big fat chick tight as hell. Another interesting thing is that tightness also varies with time of month, how wet she is, and how turned on she is. Sometimes my wife is so tight I have to use a little spit and thrust to get in, and sometimes she is so tented and wet I just slop right in. She expands right before she cums and gets tighter afterwards. Just go for the gals you like and worry about the pussy size later... Like rod said, it's all good, baby!

The largest girl i have banged had the titest pussy out of all of them.. not the smallest,.. though the tighest.

I put myself through college working in nightclubs, so was lucky enough to pick up a few hundred girls over the course of my 5 years there. All shapes and sizes have all shapes and sizes. I have been with 4'10" gymnasts with average sized vaginas, 5'5" fat girls so tight I couldn't get it, and girls more than 6' tall that couldn't accomodate my skinny 6 inches. On the other end I have been with the most average sized girls that had vaginas so big I was happy just to slap the sides (imagine asking "Am I in yet"). Generally, the better in shape a girl is, the tighter, but that is due to good muscle contraction. Nothing can predict how deep. I like the thin petite ones b/c it is easier to hit the clit, but that is also pretty random as far as size and angle. The only predicter I have noticed is that the "big boned" girls tend to be larger on average, but still within a normal range.

I hope this helps.

Anybody explain rabbit, deer, or elephant,is it an american saying?

My girlfriend is the shortest woman I've ever dated (5'2") and has the largest vagina I've ever experienced. Fairly tight, but deep. She had 3 children by C-section. All weighed over 9 lbs. I've dated women 5'10" with shallow ones that you could tap bottom on all night.

However, the vagina, as explained above, can expand to 3 or 4 times its normal 3 to 4 inch depth to accomodate. Obviously, some can expand more than others.

I don't think there is any corelation between female size, and vagina size. My last GF was 6,2, and I bottomed if I went for Oil, (balls deep), and she would put her hands on my hips, to limit my penetration. She was also very tight. My wife on the other hand is 5,2, and I only bottom out when she is close to her period, she can easily accomodate my girth of 5.25, and 5.5 at the base. Even without much foreplay. It does take a minute or two to ease it in. As I stated i a "picture proof" thread. We recently bought a 4 inch Extention, from Cyber-skin, measuring 9.5inch EL, by 6.5EG, with me inserted, and she took it no problem. Even commented on " how fuckin good does that feel"....I've been with hundreds of women, stature, and vaginal accomodation have no- corelation....

Prince Albert: Rabbit, Deer and Elephant are terms from the Kama Sutra, albiet a bit obscure. They corolate to the size of a woman's vagina: Rabbit is small/tight, Deer is average and Elephant is large. The same terms apply to men and the size of their penis. I'm sure there's a science to the original terms, but essentially A rabbit can take another rabbit or a deer, a deer can take a deer or an elephant, and an elephant... well, anyway...

I do believe there is a correlation, though you will find many exceptions. I've have smaller frame girls with large vaginas... my most recent ex for example. I had sex with her last when I was 7.5" bpel and I still couldn't bottom out! However, I've also had somewhat more curvy girls with very small, tight pussies. There really is no way to predict what a woman's vagina will be like from outer appearance.

Juggers said:

This gives me a good idea....(sorry to post off topic)...Idk if we ever did a poll on foot size and the penis, or hand size and the penis before...It could be interesting (maybe a waste of time) but its just an Idea (looks at Kong, the poll master).

Click to expand...

This very myth has been a major source of bullshit insecurity in my life. For a guy, 5'7" 180-190 lbs, I have small hands and feet. I've even had rude chics say I've got a small one because my hands and feet are small. But the truth is I've got a 7 1/2x 51/4 dick. Hardly huge, but in no way do my hands and feet reflect the size of my dick. It's pure bullshit. But what a way to make a guy feel totally inadequate.

I have a friend who became a Dr. He said that all the organs, the penis being one, can be anything on anyone from a size renge from 1 to 10. IOW, a guy could have a 10 bladder but a 1 penis, or a 5 foot but a 10 heart. Judging size of organs is all bullshit. It can't be done. All one can say is it could be anything from a 1 to a 10 on anyone.

So from what you all are saying is, you have to try as many woman as you can. I guess if you end up liking the woman you may stick around. If not, try more. Seems intuitive, but in this day of age, what guy would want to test drive a 100 woman? Also, what about us poor bastards who have small features. This "try until you find what you like" approach is not going to work for us. I have small features for my size but I have an average size dick. Above average girth according to the kong survey. I think this small feet stereotype has prevented me from having many opportunities. In fact, I have been to night clubs and asked woman to dance. They first look at my face, then my feet. Seriously! Then they say no. Almost always it has worked this way. I guess the woman who say yes, know they have a small pussy and so dick size does not matter. (So in a way, I guess I am lucky.) My brother who has proportional feet to his size has had more than his share of woman. And I know he is not any bigger than I am and he even treats woman like shit, but they are not in short supply for him.
I guess I have a deep hostile resentment toward woman for their, "he is a nice guy with small feet -- don't fuck him attitude." I figure if they should use that stereotype on us, we men should do the same. But men are so f'ing opportunistic it is hard to organize them against woman. (That is why we have a feminist problem in the US -- off the topic.)
Thanks guys. Just as I thought -- no way to tell.

I really wish there were correlations between outward appearances and genitalia, breast, etc, size but in my vast experience there is none. I used to think girls with huge boobs would have flat asses or girls with big lips would have a fat pussy...tall woman with huge holes and dark skin girls with dark ariolas. Unfortunately none of this is true. I have tiny feel and a massive dick so feet watchers look out, you may come across a huge faux-pa when you open my zipper.