2slow;722855 said:
If you would of used me to try it out i would of answered your email already. How rude. 😆

It's got nothing to do with me, to clear things up. Speaking of being "rude". It's between Jaz and DLD now. I reviewed the extender and emailed the review as I was asked to. Quit making assumptions and demands.
 
2slow;722860 said:
Not making assumtions and demands just anxious like everyone else..tired of the same old same old equipment and would like to see something new come out. It time for a break through in p.e...peace my bro

I'm sure we won't be disappointed. I see no reason why you can't be patient.
 
This wait isnt bad at all. Its been less than a month and possible release in 4? Its not nearly as bad as Julian from Phallosan keep telling he will be giving updates on the new products for the last two years and never will respond or follow up.
 
stillwantmore2;722858 said:
It's got nothing to do with me, to clear things up. Speaking of being "rude". It's between Jaz and DLD now. I reviewed the extender and emailed the review as I was asked to. Quit making assumptions and demands.


Still and LIGHTNING are discussing improvements and such so there will be a bit more time to release review. No one is sleeping on this, this is just how the process works. We need to test, improve (if necessary) and from there it will go onto to being sold. I would expect the full review within 2-3 days.
 
Today is the day for the review. It's Friday I'm staying positive
 
ma999;723354 said:
Today is the day for the review. It's Friday I'm staying positive

Just shot Him a text, hopefully he will hit us off.
 
Munto;723469 said:
I can't wait either, but be patient :)!
The base broke on mine last night! Sux! I don't want so spend all that, on another Size Genetics, knowing this is coming.......I'm either gonna have to do that, or find somebody with a spare base laying around......hell, I don't care if it's one of those Chinese ones, just to get me by, till this one comes out!
 
stillwantmore2;722858 said:
It's got nothing to do with me, to clear things up. Speaking of being "rude". It's between Jaz and DLD now. I reviewed the extender and emailed the review as I was asked to. Quit making assumptions and demands.

Still, LIGHTNING wants to talk with you. I will send you his phone number. There is more work to be done as we are reviewing a second choice or addition possibly. I will PM you His number.

To the rest of the Brotherhood, good stuff is happening but patience is important here, we will not put out equipment unless it is completely and thoroughly been reviewed and improved or modified, if necessary.
 
doublelongdaddy;723548 said:
To the rest of the Brotherhood, good stuff is happening but patience is important here, we will not put out equipment unless it is completely and thoroughly been reviewed and improved or modified, if necessary.

I wouldn't think anything otherwise...thanks Mike!
 
doublelongdaddy;723548 said:
Still, LIGHTNING wants to talk with you. I will send you his phone number. There is more work to be done as we are reviewing a second choice or addition possibly. I will PM you His number.

To the rest of the Brotherhood, good stuff is happening but patience is important here, we will not put out equipment unless it is completely and thoroughly been reviewed and improved or modified, if necessary.

I'm sure it'll be worth the wait!!
 
I would like to ask if it's possible to comment and influence additions or modifications to the equipment even if there's only a few people testing them. For example. Let's say stillwantmore makes a review of the device and is revealed of what the device looks like and works like. But then a brother realizes more potential in the device and asks for a modification or two. Can people who read the review influence modifications to the device? Simply put. Or was that the original plan?
 
Jaz and I texted earlier, will talk more tomorrow. I DO like the original test device, but we have a few things to fine tune as DLD has hinted at above.
 
kyomoto;723559 said:
I would like to ask if it's possible to comment and influence additions or modifications to the equipment even if there's only a few people testing them. For example. Let's say stillwantmore makes a review of the device and is revealed of what the device looks like and works like. But then a brother realizes more potential in the device and asks for a modification or two. Can people who read the review influence modifications to the device? Simply put. Or was that the original plan?

As it is, still is the only one that dld chose to test the device. We just have to go by the words of dld, he knows what he is doing. We just hope for the best and nothing less.
 
huge-girth;723593 said:
As it is, still is the only one that dld chose to test the device. We just have to go by the words of dld, he knows what he is doing. We just hope for the best and nothing less.

There will be a review I'm assuming. If I'm wrong correct me Stillwantmore2. But if there is then the members should be able to provide some possible additions to add onto the device. I believe this would help most people see if there could be potential flaws or potential openings to add to the device. This does not negate the testing at all because they're testing what is made thus far which is good so that the base model or if complete can be ready for production. But I want to know what the device is like and how it works so that if I see room for improvement then it could be possibly added. I want to be able to comment on a product in testing so that the developers MAY or MAY NOT take the ideas. I just want it to be more open is all.
 
Last edited:
kyomoto;723616 said:
There will be a review I'm assuming. If I'm wrong correct me Stillwantmore2. But if there is then the members should be able to provide some possible additions to add onto the device. I believe this would help most people see if there could be potential flaws or potential openings to add to the device. This does not negate the testing at all because they're testing what is made thus far which is good so that the base model or if complete can be ready for production. But I want to know what the device is like and how it works so that if I see room for improvement then it could be possibly added. I want to be able to comment on a product in testing so that the developers MAY or MAY NOT take the ideas. I just want it to be more open is all.

I understand your point. If there is need for this, dld will do what needs to be done by opening a chance for review on the product.
 
stillwantmore2;723574 said:
Jaz and I texted earlier, will talk more tomorrow. I DO like the original test device, but we have a few things to fine tune as DLD has hinted at above.

Exactly and thank you for posting.

Patience is a virtue here, no one wants us to rush a release of a new tool when there are still things to do to perfect it. We do not put out unthoughtful junk.
 
Back
Top Bottom