In my session today I was puzzling with a question. Reminds me a little bit of math class, but it could be interesting to explore.
Let's assume that when we begin PE we start with 100% penis size by volume. Let's say we are consistent and have a session every single day that yields exactly the same amount of penis size growth by volume. Let's imagine our growth each day is 0.1% of initial penis volume.
So, after day 1 our penis size is now 100.1% of initial penis volume. Day two yields another .1% getting us to 100.2% initial penis volume. By day ten we are now bigger than we started by 1% (remembering that our values are just assumptions).
What is interesting to me is that in the assumptions of this model, even though our growth is constant day to day, we are getting diminishing returns in our volume growth as compared to our initial penis size. So, even though we are growing at a constant rate, we might imagine that our growth is slowing or stagnating, even though it actually stays exactly the same.
Imagine we work for 1000 days, and reach a penis size by volume of 200% of initial penis size. The next day we do our session and once it is done we have gained .1% of initial penis volume. However, we have only gained .05% of Day 1000 penis size by volume.
In a different imagined model, penis size by volume gains are 0.1% of every days new size. Meaning that if I gain 0.1% of that days penis size my penis is now .1% bigger. However, the next day I call my penis size 100% and gain another 0.1% of that total. This means my volume gains are increasing each day along with the growth of my penis day to day.
The biology of PE is not fully understood at a lot of levels. We have mostly anecdotal reports of men permanently increasing the size of the erect and flaccid penis over time. I would be interested to have a better understanding of what the processes are that are occurring when we increase the size of our penis.
I have built a slightly better understanding for myself of the processes occurring in foreskin restoration. We put tension on the skin (analogous to a growing body, a pregnant belly, a post-mastectomy reconstructive balloon for growing breasts, a person gaining lots of weight) and this triggers the cells to divide. One mother cell becomes two daughter cells, effectively doubling the skin on the cellular level. To grow a new foreskin we must put consistent tension on the skin over a period of time to see that cellular growth visible on the gross level.
In PE, I assume we are also trying to grow the penis tissues on a gross level, by triggering division of the cells in all the tissues of the penis. This, anyway, is my assumption. Alternatives are increasing the capacity for blood to fill the penis, and also creating other new tissues like scarring.
In my foreskin restoration efforts, I make certain assumptions about the process. I assume that a certain amount of cells in the foreskin are available at any one time to divide, and they must have tension on them to a certain degree and a certain time in order to be encouraged to divide into new cells. I assume that not all cells are always available to be triggered, and that new cells have a window in which they cannot yet be triggered for division. This means, that we are not always growing new cells from the whole foreskin, but only certain cells within it at any given time. Over a period however, say, a month, we can trigger all cells as they are available to be triggered. This means consistent applications of the techniques of restoration.
In PE, I assume some of the same variables apply. How many cells are available within the penis tissues at any given time, and are ready to divide into new cells (growth). What types of tension are needed on those cells, and for how long, in order to encourage them to divide?
In foreskin restoration, we often see that men who start with looser circumcisions restore faster than those with very tight circumcisions. I believe this is because they have fewer cells to start with, and therefore growth takes longer, as fewer cells are being triggered by the techniques each session. Similarly, some notice that as they get closer to the end of their restorations, the rate of growth appears to increase at the gross level.
So, in our two models of growth at the beginning of the post, one where gains occur as a certain constant percentage of the initial volume, and the other model wherein gains occur as a certain constant percentage of the new daily volume, which one is closest to reality? Are all cells in the penis tissues available at all times to divide? Are some cells always available to divide (growth)? Are all cells only sometimes available to divide? How do we maximize the targeting of cells for division? Are certain applications of tension more effective at triggering the most amount of cells in every session? Are long periods of tension needed to maximize cell division? Are shorter sessions effective at targeting all possible cells in a given time frame/window? Do different types of penile tissue respond differently to different tensions?
If we want to maximize the growth of our penis, we want to be triggering as many cells as we can, as often as they are available to divide. Meaning, the closer we can get to the second model of growth the faster we will grow. Or in other words, the bigger we will become in a smaller amount of time.
Also, as interesting as these questions are to me, I have seen some growth from my routine already. Meaning that, as much as we try to optimize our sessions and routines, if we see growth over time we can know it is working. In this case persistence is key. Many thousands of men have grown their penis (or foreskin) without knowing anything at all about cells or cell division.
I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts on this!
Let's assume that when we begin PE we start with 100% penis size by volume. Let's say we are consistent and have a session every single day that yields exactly the same amount of penis size growth by volume. Let's imagine our growth each day is 0.1% of initial penis volume.
So, after day 1 our penis size is now 100.1% of initial penis volume. Day two yields another .1% getting us to 100.2% initial penis volume. By day ten we are now bigger than we started by 1% (remembering that our values are just assumptions).
What is interesting to me is that in the assumptions of this model, even though our growth is constant day to day, we are getting diminishing returns in our volume growth as compared to our initial penis size. So, even though we are growing at a constant rate, we might imagine that our growth is slowing or stagnating, even though it actually stays exactly the same.
Imagine we work for 1000 days, and reach a penis size by volume of 200% of initial penis size. The next day we do our session and once it is done we have gained .1% of initial penis volume. However, we have only gained .05% of Day 1000 penis size by volume.
In a different imagined model, penis size by volume gains are 0.1% of every days new size. Meaning that if I gain 0.1% of that days penis size my penis is now .1% bigger. However, the next day I call my penis size 100% and gain another 0.1% of that total. This means my volume gains are increasing each day along with the growth of my penis day to day.
The biology of PE is not fully understood at a lot of levels. We have mostly anecdotal reports of men permanently increasing the size of the erect and flaccid penis over time. I would be interested to have a better understanding of what the processes are that are occurring when we increase the size of our penis.
I have built a slightly better understanding for myself of the processes occurring in foreskin restoration. We put tension on the skin (analogous to a growing body, a pregnant belly, a post-mastectomy reconstructive balloon for growing breasts, a person gaining lots of weight) and this triggers the cells to divide. One mother cell becomes two daughter cells, effectively doubling the skin on the cellular level. To grow a new foreskin we must put consistent tension on the skin over a period of time to see that cellular growth visible on the gross level.
In PE, I assume we are also trying to grow the penis tissues on a gross level, by triggering division of the cells in all the tissues of the penis. This, anyway, is my assumption. Alternatives are increasing the capacity for blood to fill the penis, and also creating other new tissues like scarring.
In my foreskin restoration efforts, I make certain assumptions about the process. I assume that a certain amount of cells in the foreskin are available at any one time to divide, and they must have tension on them to a certain degree and a certain time in order to be encouraged to divide into new cells. I assume that not all cells are always available to be triggered, and that new cells have a window in which they cannot yet be triggered for division. This means, that we are not always growing new cells from the whole foreskin, but only certain cells within it at any given time. Over a period however, say, a month, we can trigger all cells as they are available to be triggered. This means consistent applications of the techniques of restoration.
In PE, I assume some of the same variables apply. How many cells are available within the penis tissues at any given time, and are ready to divide into new cells (growth). What types of tension are needed on those cells, and for how long, in order to encourage them to divide?
In foreskin restoration, we often see that men who start with looser circumcisions restore faster than those with very tight circumcisions. I believe this is because they have fewer cells to start with, and therefore growth takes longer, as fewer cells are being triggered by the techniques each session. Similarly, some notice that as they get closer to the end of their restorations, the rate of growth appears to increase at the gross level.
So, in our two models of growth at the beginning of the post, one where gains occur as a certain constant percentage of the initial volume, and the other model wherein gains occur as a certain constant percentage of the new daily volume, which one is closest to reality? Are all cells in the penis tissues available at all times to divide? Are some cells always available to divide (growth)? Are all cells only sometimes available to divide? How do we maximize the targeting of cells for division? Are certain applications of tension more effective at triggering the most amount of cells in every session? Are long periods of tension needed to maximize cell division? Are shorter sessions effective at targeting all possible cells in a given time frame/window? Do different types of penile tissue respond differently to different tensions?
If we want to maximize the growth of our penis, we want to be triggering as many cells as we can, as often as they are available to divide. Meaning, the closer we can get to the second model of growth the faster we will grow. Or in other words, the bigger we will become in a smaller amount of time.
Also, as interesting as these questions are to me, I have seen some growth from my routine already. Meaning that, as much as we try to optimize our sessions and routines, if we see growth over time we can know it is working. In this case persistence is key. Many thousands of men have grown their penis (or foreskin) without knowing anything at all about cells or cell division.
I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts on this!
