youknowme123321;609690 said:
YES THEY DO!!!! i think every woman has been fucked by a guy with a mushroom head loved it

A mushroom head would be the equivalent of a massive clit:)
 
doublelongdaddy;610061 said:
A mushroom head would be the equivalent of a massive clit:)

dmoney101;610085 said:
Except it's not weird looking lol

right!! and a massive clit would give me NOOOOO pleasure like a mushroom head will do for women. a massive clit is more equivalent to a glans covered in herpes lesions. BLAH
 
dmoney101;610085 said:
Except it's not weird looking lol

At one point it does become disturbing, like a mini-cock sticking out:)
 
I feel it's definitely got the capability of fluid retention. I practice 'tubing'. When removing the tube, I sometimes retain bit of fluid behind the glans. Removing it is slow and high-pressure, which ends up pushing that fluid into the glans in a VERY noticeable but even bubble (much like what a burn bubble looks like, with the extremely smooth-looking skin). This is also where Lipen is placed, in Dr. Cho's glans-enhancements (directly over what is called the lamina propria and under the outer epithelial layer).
 
Syd Kitten;611849 said:
I feel it's definitely got the capability of fluid retention. I practice 'tubing'. When removing the tube, I sometimes retain bit of fluid behind the glans. Removing it is slow and high-pressure, which ends up pushing that fluid into the glans in a VERY noticeable but even bubble (much like what a burn bubble looks like, with the extremely smooth-looking skin). This is also where Lipen is placed, in Dr. Cho's glans-enhancements (directly over what is called the lamina propria and under the outer epithelial layer).

Yes, you can cause blisters on the glans but any expansion that happens will go to increasing the size. Fluid retention needs a skin to hold it in, since the head is a glans it does not have an outer skin covering so water can't be retained. This is good news to those who believe head expansion was due to retention, knowing that it is authentic tissue expansion in a relief.
 
interesting. can't say i fully agree or disagree. i would believe that fluid retention must be possible in the glans but maybe for the glans it is more difficult to get fluid retention for the reason you stated. it would probably take a high vacuum pressure directly to the glans for however long of a time. and also since it is more difficult for fluid retention to occur there the temporary increase in glans size will contribute to permanent gains in the future.

That's just my first though on the subject. not 100% certain.

Up till this day, no one has every come forward to say they got fluid retention at the glans. I think DLD is right.
 
Back
Top Bottom