J
Juhox
Guest
This might be an old question but worth discussion.
On PE forums people say that small diameter tube and then packing unlocks the success to length gains. But what is the science behind this "obvious" claim? If you have your penis in a tube with constant pressure P, then there is a constant force F = A*P acting on the skin, where A is the area that is facing towards (vector) force F. So, if you are not packing and you use constant pressure P, then there is a lengthwise force A(glands)*P that stretches your penis. And if you are packing and you again use constant pressure P, then the result is exactly the same. So what makes the difference in gaining?
I have never been really packing my tube but still I have gained in length. Can you guys share some experince and tell if packing has been helpful in your own PE training?
On PE forums people say that small diameter tube and then packing unlocks the success to length gains. But what is the science behind this "obvious" claim? If you have your penis in a tube with constant pressure P, then there is a constant force F = A*P acting on the skin, where A is the area that is facing towards (vector) force F. So, if you are not packing and you use constant pressure P, then there is a lengthwise force A(glands)*P that stretches your penis. And if you are packing and you again use constant pressure P, then the result is exactly the same. So what makes the difference in gaining?
I have never been really packing my tube but still I have gained in length. Can you guys share some experince and tell if packing has been helpful in your own PE training?