sikdogg said:Actually, doing burst cycles back-to-back is better than the alternative of running 2 or 3 longer cycles per year. If you take the average gearhead, he'll run fewer cycles but fior much longer. Over a years time, he will probably be on close to 6 months and off for 6. The problem with the conventional cycling methodologies is that they suppress you way too much that recovery can easily take 3 months. Suppression of HPTA is directly proportional to the time on, more so than the amount of gear that you use.
Burst cycles allow you to make smaller gains and recover quicker due to the short time you're exposed to exogenous androgens. Since i've done burst cycles, i'm able to keep my gains better, recover faster, and experience less sides. I'll never go back to long cycles.
This is one of the guys that got me started on doing burst cycles:
Man I can post almost nething from the net which will prove my point and so can u....u can find about proof to support either side on ne issue..unless its smth written in stone...
Do what you want man...its your bod not mine...I was just giving out advice thats all