My Method
by Frank Senne
Whether the description "Method" is justified or not may be left at your discretion. I am not aware of (consciously) practicing any muscle or mental training or for that matter any other technique, as described in the majority of books on this subject. Maybe it is a disposition of some kind, if such a thing is possible, or I am just not aware of applying a method.
My own multi orgasmic experience has existed with nearly no interruption since the onset of puberty, was somewhat reduced at the age of 28 and returned and stayed to this day.
During puberty I had my first experience of it happening (puberty induced masturbation contests) and I soon found out that my sexual capacity was sufficient for up to 15 ejaculations a day without being reduced on the day after. Later, during my first sexual partner experiences, I too was able to achieve an almost unlimited number of ejaculations.
At the age of 28 I experienced the refractory phase and another coitus had to wait for about 20 minutes. This situation remained stable for a period of about one or two years, disappearing without my conscious involvement.
My current orgasmic optimum is about 4-6 orgasms (within about 90-120 minutes). Of these, 3-5 are without ejaculation, with a final ejaculation that, depending on the number and intensity of the previous orgasms, is more or less forceful. The strength of this ejaculation varies from a slow "spilling", to a gently pulsating ejaculation, up to powerful expulsions. This is inverse proportional to the number and strength of previous orgasms.
Physiological Cause: Unknown. But I did find out that my ability to reach a high number of orgasms without ejaculation is again inverse proportional to the intensity of the stimulation (i.e. the tighter the vaginas mucous tissue fit, the longer the coitus and the higher my orgasmic count until the final ejaculation. Another significant influence seems to be the amount of vaginal lubrication present inside the vagina. The more, the shorter the coitus. I suspect a reduced receptivity due to hypersensitivity).
Psychological Cause: Unknown.
Here now is a short description of what happens.
Note:
After receiving several emails, especially from women, regarding the statements above and further below, I would like to make clear that these are purely personal experiences, which may NOT be applicable to you. This holds especially true for the remarks on the amount of female lubrication, as well as tightness of the vaginal mucous tissue and their connection to the overall coital duration. Thank you for the hints.
* With continued stimulation (manual, oral, prostate, coital or a combination thereof) the first orgasm usually sets in after approx. 10 minutes (this is where Hartman/Fithian with their erotic "Richter
Scale" come in very handy. I have varied it to suit my requirements by giving marks for the intensity of the orgasm (1-10) and marks for judging the level of arousal (1-10). From 9.5 the highest level is reached and 9.9 being the point-of-no-return. This first orgasm I would rate at a 6 for intensity.
* Intermediate stage, no refraction, full erection, at an arousal level varying from 9.5 to 9.9 (point-of-no-return).
* Second orgasm, timing variable, mark 7 (increasing orgasmic intensity).
* Intermediate stage, no refraction, full erection, at an arousal level varying from 9.5 to 9.9 (point-of-no-return).
* Third orgasm, timing variable, mark 8 (increasing orgasmic intensity).
* And so on until intensity level 10 is reached.
* Final orgasm, timing variable, mark 8 (decreasing orgasmic intensity), followed by a concluding ejaculation)
And now you ask yourself: What does that guy do to make "it" happen. I simply turn off the feeling of physical stimulation in my head. What is left is a sensation I would describe as similar to "the shaking of hands". All I feel of the stimulation is a completely "neutral" touch lacking any arousing effect (which has no impact on the orgasmic experience whatsoever). This too is part of the background to the questionnaire. I have no "technique" or help to offer, as I myself am at a loss for a rational or other explanation. I guess I must have studied (nearly) all available literature on the subject ever published, just to find out which "method" I practice. So far: Nothing. Positive effect of all that reading was that I was able to learn everything about the PC muscles functions, something I use as a prophylactic for possible later ailments (incontinence, prostate problems, erectile dysfunction, etc.).
MoS Notifier:
@
oldandlively:
we all want to be peter north's
