Women are not victims, they are selfish.

Kal-el said:

And more if a women "sleeps around", she is labeled things like "slut", "whore", and so forth. How can a person who meets another among the billions populating the planet suddenly say to himself, "Here is the only individual with whom I shall have intimate relations, and even if I meet others who appear to correspond to my tastes, I shall stay faithful to the first girl, for the one and only reason that luck had it that they were the first." That in a nutshell is "fidelity".

Click to expand...

A woman is a slut if she sleeps around, becasue she holds the power of sex. She is the one that determines of the sex happens or not. Take a girl and have her try adn pick up 10 guys in a row to have sex with. Likely she'll get 10/10. Have a guy try and pick up 10 girls in a row, hes more likely to get 5/10 at the MOST. Thats why girls who sleep around are considered sluts, becuase it takes no effort for a girl to get sex, while a guy who sleeps around is considered a "pimp/player/stud", becuase a considerable more ammount of work is needed to get a woman to sleep with you. As far as the fidelity thing. Yes it is natural to sleep around. That's what people are hardwired for, but if you want to use that case then we all might as well be doing whatever our urges desire. Becoming animals if you will. Monogamy I think is a rational agreement between two people. Going around sleeping with other people just completly complicates things. Emotions are generally involved and as logical as someone may try and reason it. No one wants to see their mate go and sleep with someone else.

originally posted by thefranchise:

A woman is a slut if she sleeps around, becasue she holds the power of sex. She is the one that determines of the sex happens or not. Take a girl and have her try adn pick up 10 guys in a row to have sex with. Likely she'll get 10/10. Have a guy try and pick up 10 girls in a row, hes more likely to get 5/10 at the MOST. Thats why girls who sleep around are considered sluts, becuase it takes no effort for a girl to get sex, while a guy who sleeps around is considered a "pimp/player/stud", becuase a considerable more ammount of work is needed to get a woman to sleep with you. As far as the fidelity thing. Yes it is natural to sleep around. That's what people are hardwired for, but if you want to use that case then we all might as well be doing whatever our urges desire. Becoming animals if you will. Monogamy I think is a rational agreement between two people. Going around sleeping with other people just completly complicates things. Emotions are generally involved and as logical as someone may try and reason it. No one wants to see their mate go and sleep with someone else.

Click to expand...

That first comparison might not hold. For example, lets just say a less than good looking, or "ugly" female picks up 10 guys. She's probably lucky to bump 1 or 2.

As for fidelity,freedom of doing something and obligation are two different things which must'nt be confused. A couple who love eachother deeply, where both partners do not wish to "share" eachother, should stay together. If they are happy being with eachother without the need to expierence others, fine. As far as sexual contacts are concerned, everything is possible, and permitted. I insist on the word Penis EnlargementRMITTED for it dosen't mean MANDATORY.

That first comparison might not hold. For example, lets just say a less than good looking, or "ugly" female picks up 10 guys. She's probably lucky to bump 1 or 2.

Unless she goes after "ugly" men. Hey, us ugly people like fucking, too! It not just the Beautiful People who screw.

originally posted by 9cyclops9:

Another generalization on the church.

Click to expand...

It is the church, which devises infamous plans to ruin the poor so that those who are unable to understand, will remain faithful to it through the fear of "sin", or excommunication, or other such stupid things.While the poor try to plead their case, those who don't have the intellect to seize the truth stand up for the lies of the church at the church's bidding.

Let me point out some common mistakes of the Church:

When you pray, use not vain repetitions, as the pagans do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.

Click to expand...

Matthew 6:7

The Church makes humans feel guilty and making them pray without seeking to understand.

Provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your purses, nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet staves.

Click to expand...

Matthew 10: 9-19

How dare they, these men who are only men, indulge themselves in the wealth and luxury of the Vatican when the Gospels tell them to posess "neither gold, nor silver"- not even a spare coat.

I say unto you, that a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Click to expand...

Matthew 19: 23

They make up heavy packs and pile them on men's shoulder's; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. But all their works they do for to be seen of by men...and love the uppermost rooms at feasts...and greetings in the markets...For you have one master, and you are all brothers. Do not call any man on earth "Father", for you have one father, and he is in heaven. Nor must you be called "teacher", you have one teacher, the Christ. But the greatest among you must be your servant.

Click to expand...

Matthew 23: 4-11

That is all written in their own Gospels. So how dare the Church burden people with their so called "sins", which are basically different concepts of morality and lifestyles; how dare they speak of goodness while living it up in the Vatican when people are dying of hunger. Lastly, how dare they ask people to call them "Father", or "Your Holiness", when their own Gospels expressly forbid these things?

It is not "the Church." It is Roman Catholicism. I'll say again, you're lumping all of Christianity into one denomination. Catholicism is the only denomination I know of that refers to their priests/pope/whatever as "father." Catholicism is the only denomination I know of that dictates to it's followers what to believe rather than encouraging them to decide for themselves based on the Gospels and the teachings of Christ. I don't know of many legitimate Protestant pastors that are living a life of luxury. The ones that do, I have serious doubts about, not just because of their wealth, but other things I see in their teachings and behavior (one obvious example of this would be "televangelists").

It's so obvious that you're referring to Roman Catholicism (many mentions of the Vatican), so why not clear that up instead of throwing the baby (all of Christianity) out with the bathwater (Roman Catholicism)? I, along with most other Protestants, am completely against the idea of the papacy and Catholicism, including their rites and their rules and nearly every other doctrine espoused by the Roman Catholic church. To assume all of Christianity is like Catholicism is chosen ignorance on your part (because I'm pretty confident that you know better).

Originally posted by 9clyclops9:

It's so obvious that you're referring to Roman Catholicism (many mentions of the Vatican), so why not clear that up instead of throwing the baby (all of Christianity) out with the bathwater (Roman Catholicism)?

Click to expand...

I'm refering MOSTLY to Roman Catholicism, as I believe if not for the Vatican, we would have already found the cures to all ills.

At the time of the end...if they shall take up serpents and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; and they shall lay hands upon the sick and they shall get well.

Click to expand...

Jesus as quoted by Mark 16:18

I believe this quote by Jesus refers to humanity discovering anti-venom serums and antidotes, and developing surgery and so on.

As for Christianity, I think all organized religion is just nothing but society-sanctioned brainwashing. Eventually, I believe the Church will collapse. In scientifically developed countries people are already consumed by a kind of cluelessness because they have nothing left to believe in. Nobody can believe in a "Supernatural God" any longer, perched upon a cloud with a white beard , omniscient and omnipotent, which is basically the same as believing in "Santa Claus". Neither can anyone believe in delightful little guardian angels, or in a devil with horns and hooves.

You guys are getting off the topic of the fact that women are selfish, image concerned sheep.

Going back to the topic... I hate the arguement "if women sleep around they are sluts, if men do they are studs"

In my experience, if a girl does sleep around, she was usually the most popular girl in the school (and not because she put out), or she was considered a slut.

If a man sleeps around he is instantly blacklabeled by every women in a 300km radius, every single girl has talked about him and told each other to not go near him because he will use you and kick you to the curb.

So pretty much, if a girl sleeps around, shes seen as a slut, if a guy sleeps around, he's seen as just as bad.


Yet chicks always keep saying men get it easy coz they can sleep around, fuck off, thats just a cliche bullshit argument that women throw in anywhere when they wanna take a shot at a man, noones even thought about it.

Here's one for you Shithead,

The only time in my life I've had character assignation attempts put on me was by a woman.

So far, these women haven't been able to actually destroy decades of relationships I've developed over time but have come close.

They prey on the fact that most men are really stupid when it comes to relationships. These women, who have seduced me, fucked like bunnies and let me put my dick in every orifice in their bodies, keep pretending they are the vestal virgins.

Yes they are selfish. It’s a proven fact. Read some history over the last 10 thousand years. It’s always me (the man) that’s the bad guy. I took advantage. They can’t admit even to themselves they are selfish, are human and want the best from life on their terms. Pity the poor guy that isn’t up to speed.

Remember the words, Hell Hath No Fury As A Woman’s Scorn?

If you are stupid enough to not believe it, the burn will follow.

What I say is true.

Falcon

falcon said:

Here's one for you Shithead,

The only time in my life I've had character assignation attempts put on me was by a woman.

So far, these women haven't been able to actually destroy decades of relationships I've developed over time but have come close.

They prey on the fact that most men are really stupid when it comes to relationships. These women, who have seduced me, fucked like bunnies and let me put my dick in every orifice in their bodies, keep pretending they are the vestal virgins.

Yes they are selfish. It’s a proven fact. Read some history over the last 10 thousand years. It’s always me (the man) that’s the bad guy. I took advantage. They can’t admit even to themselves they are selfish, are human and want the best from life on their terms. Pity the poor guy that isn’t up to speed.

Remember the words, Hell Hath No Fury As A Woman’s Scorn?

If you are stupid enough to not believe it, the burn will follow.

What I say is true.

Falcon

Click to expand...

I totally agree, accept on one point. I don't think women consciously prey on men in any way, i really don't think women are aware of their own selfishness.

Shithead said:

I totally agree, accept on one point. I don't think women consciously prey on men in any way, i really don't think women are aware of their own selfishness.

Click to expand...

Absolutely! They don't know the level of their own selfisness, just comes with the gender. Still, I love them all....

Falcon

Kal-El please keep the thread on topic , otherwise it will be split.

Red, not to start an arguement but I'm not the only one on this thread that was off-topic. Why am I being singled out? Treat everyone the same. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Everyone tends to be somewhat selfish from time to time. The problem is that a lot of people give in to others selfish tendencies by getting walked all over. I've seen this time and time again.

Men are the more logical creatures.
Woman are the more emotional creatures.

Men are providers while women are nurturers. Sure some women deviate and try to become more of a provider than a nurturer, but us as men aren't attracted to this. No wonder you see more and more lesbians or bisexual women. This leads me to a post over at sosuave.com that states 95% are worthless. I really believe a lot of women are worthless to me in a direct sense. Maybe not indirectly but surely directly the vast majority of women are worthless to men.

Adopt the mindset that men want women, but women need men. Here's a thread for you people http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=19193&highlight=feminism

Wow. M. Your penis is large, but I don't think it has anything to do with shithead's original topic. Please just leave the giant penis pictures in the picture proof section. We'll look.

kong1971 said:

Wow. M. Your penis is large, but I don't think it has anything to do with shithead's original topic. Please just leave the giant penis pictures in the picture proof section. We'll look.

Click to expand...

Split it away from this thread - done.

Good subject

Victimhood has long been a powerful tool oppress people. Anyone who falls into victim status lives a less-fulfilling life.

Women are from a different universe, their needs are alien?????

Hello everone

I don't that anyone can say that all women are "whatever". Every women is a single person and has its own strengths and weaknesses..