- Joined
- Oct 11, 2008
- Messages
- 92
inserting the scrotum in wearing the size genetics extender???
- Thread starter commercial
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Messages
- 1,173
This style does allow a better stretch because you don't have that testicle skin pain. That's how the base of static heavy works. It's got a bigger opening though so that is the only problem with doing it with the SG.
I haven't used an SG in years, but I know my SS heavy fits the SG upper portion. Maybe SS will just sell you a base.
I haven't used an SG in years, but I know my SS heavy fits the SG upper portion. Maybe SS will just sell you a base.
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2008
- Messages
- 92
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Messages
- 1,173
You ought to just contact SS: "This patented base allows the highest amount of pulling force without discomfort."doublelongdaddy;439386 said:
Maybe they can work with you to make a MOS exclusive product which combines the SG and the SS base or other thoughts you might have. I've always liked dealing with them.
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Messages
- 1,173
I was actually referring to Static Stretcher because they state they have a patent on the base design. I was suggesting you create a custom MOS-exclusive combination with them. I think SizeGenetics sells to a lot of different people and would probably do so with any changes they make.doublelongdaddy;439525 said:
- Joined
- May 11, 2008
- Messages
- 627
andddd turkey neck?
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Messages
- 1,173
That's not true actually. You'd be surprised at what can be patented if it's spelled out. Market-specific, purpose-specific patents are held up all the time.
Priceline patented their sales techniques and won in court against competitors. It's specific to selling over the internet.
IGT owns the patent for putting a PC inside a slot machine. It's specific to putting it inside a gambling device.
A man owns a patent for using touch-tones to control *any* remote device. He was clever enough to put the various devices in separate claims. He has made millions off of it. It's was a 1980's patent. I would've thought: "Hey the reason they invented touch-tones in the 1930's was to control a remote device: the phone system." But who am I to second-guess the madness of our patent office and the court system.
You're thinking too sensibly and logically. The court system is neither of those. Remember they argued the meaning of the word "is".
Priceline patented their sales techniques and won in court against competitors. It's specific to selling over the internet.
IGT owns the patent for putting a PC inside a slot machine. It's specific to putting it inside a gambling device.
A man owns a patent for using touch-tones to control *any* remote device. He was clever enough to put the various devices in separate claims. He has made millions off of it. It's was a 1980's patent. I would've thought: "Hey the reason they invented touch-tones in the 1930's was to control a remote device: the phone system." But who am I to second-guess the madness of our patent office and the court system.
You're thinking too sensibly and logically. The court system is neither of those. Remember they argued the meaning of the word "is".
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Messages
- 126,803
MoreGains123;439795 said:
Technically you are right, but in all actuality Penis Enlargement knockoffs are rarely pursued in a court, in most cases (as I have experienced with my affiliates) it is too expensive to pursue these elusive fools.
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Messages
- 1,173
Once I was having an email discussion with the guy at SS and he said they got contacted by some company that started with an 'A' (from Spain, but I don't remember who it was) about company A's Penis Enlargement patent. SS showed them patented prior art dating back to 1901 which would invalidate their patent. They never heard from them again.
He said Penis Enlargement patents are as old as the patent office. Older ones are disguised using other wording but they are obvious in nature. The patent from 1901 had a noose, a spring and a base but stated it was a medical device for correcting penile issues. He said they were hard to find (mis-titled) but very amusing to read as they tried to disguise their purpose so the patent office wouldn't consider them obscene.
He said Penis Enlargement patents are as old as the patent office. Older ones are disguised using other wording but they are obvious in nature. The patent from 1901 had a noose, a spring and a base but stated it was a medical device for correcting penile issues. He said they were hard to find (mis-titled) but very amusing to read as they tried to disguise their purpose so the patent office wouldn't consider them obscene.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Sticky
Equipment modification
Modification to Bathmate HydroXtreme 7 with a pressure gauge
- Sticky
- Sticky