Inches Vs centimeters

Since Penis Enlargement is about gains and long term process i must say that people who are on the Imperial system of measurements should try out Metric.
When you see that you need time to develop, gains are the only stimulation, ok plus the harder erection, but my point is that for an inch you get 2.54cm and a unit is a unit!
Your mind perceives numbers numbers and not actual gains that are hard to be seen!
It's easy to be discouraged when all you see is 0,2inch of a gain or 0,3, 0,5....get my drift?
That zero is a zero and your mind sees it that way, while one inch is more that twice the centimeter!

I'm not trying to beat up on Inches in general i just think in Penis Enlargement terms it should come as a blessing that centimeters exist!

Look at it this way, imagine that one inch would be twice the amount it is now!
How would you feel while gaining?
The smaller the unit the more one feels empowered while making progress!
Just a thought...

I tend to agree that it can in fact "feel" better to see a "bigger" unit of measure when it comes to Penis Enlargement. Good idea.

I agree with you. I'm a metric user, and I must say I'm pretty happy to say that it's possible for me to gain 5 of something, rather than 2 of something when the gains in distance are the same. It's much more satisfying to se "1" gain, rather than ".5". Also, mm is much more accurate than doing the 1/8 of an inch thing.

Yea, i think metric is better in Penis Enlargement. I always get the feeling 1 inch is not that much but as you said, it's 2.54 cm! Thats a lot! When i see people saying that they gained 0.5'', I tend to think it's not much, but it's actually 1.27 cm, which is a really good gain aswell.

I think that people that are ''risen up'' with inches, won't have that problem, since they see 1 inch already as something long/big(in Penis Enlargement)

But on the other hand, when my length was 6.1'', it always gave me the feeling it was something in the 16 cm, because of the 6. But actually it was 15.5 cm

I think cm and mm are more accurate than inches and for tracking gradual progress. Its something I will start to use in my system now. Inches is more 'rough' compared to the other two, because its harder to get it exact and having to use 1/8 or 1/14 of an inch means nothing really. We're dealing with fractions and its had to see 1/8 of an inch in our mind, without using various slide rules.

Millimetres and centimetres remove that and yes it can keep moral up when gains are seemingly flagging. This thread has made it occur to me that often those that measure - me incl - think they are not gaining because it hardly registers in the inches ruler, when in fact they have gained some mm's/cm's.

My last measurement of erect length was 8.3 inches but that's 210mm or 21.8cm. A 3mm gain would only be 0.12 inches and hardly register with regular inch users. Using mm is the best way to measure for progress & changes in penis enlargement with regards to length, especially when using the extender devices which take time to show progression in inches.

Regarding girth, I see inches as more useful on the whole but cm could be good idea to track changes when need be.

Here's a mind bender for you.
We all work on increasing length and girth.
The penis, technically is a cylinder.
Thus dick size should be reported as the volume of a cylinder.
The length x pi x radius squared
Check it out:
I am 40.67 cubic inches, that just sounds huge!

tester8888;403761 said:

Here's a mind bender for you.
We all work on increasing length and girth.
The penis, technically is a cylinder.
Thus dick size should be reported as the volume of a cylinder.
The length x pi x radius squared
Check it out:
I am 40.67 cubic inches, that just sounds huge!

Click to expand...

That measurement always blows my mind, an awesome way to see things and I am always blown away by the measurement.

tester8888;403761 said:

Here's a mind bender for you.
We all work on increasing length and girth.
The penis, technically is a cylinder.
Thus dick size should be reported as the volume of a cylinder.
The length x pi x radius squared
Check it out:
I am 40.67 cubic inches, that just sounds huge!

Click to expand...

Thats correct. Even slight changes boost this up because of the volume mass. So in reality we could or should use all four measurements - Inches, mm, cm and volume.

Great advice

I am working on the metric measurement myself, so much easier than worrying about a 1/4, 1/8th or 1/10th of something. Also the ruler is easier to read on the metric side.

robbie1953;404456 said:

I am working on the metric measurement myself, so much easier than worrying about a 1/4, 1/8th or 1/10th of something. Also the ruler is easier to read on the metric side.

Click to expand...

Yep not to mention quickness in gaining cm

Inches can be intimidating and even depressing when small increments are missed. I like this idea as it will help men see gains as they happen in smaller increments.

For those who don't have a ruller with both measurement systems, here's a great site that may be helpful. I use it all the time.

http://www.onlineconversion.com/length_common.htm

Unstuck. The OP was a douche-bag, plus any guy with a lick of sense will realize he can hop on Google and look up a conversion chart

Thats true

Its 25.4 mm in an inch....2.54 cm in an inch. You don't need a chart just a calculator. I like using metric to track gains but goals should be in inches. Say I want 4.08 cm of length sounds alot more than 2 inches. I understand the psychology of it but a gain is a gain. Length is not realitive it is constant. But ya it does make me feel great to get 5 mm in the Bathmate

I just google "# inches in cm"

Instant + no brain thinking for me! Win Win.