goinfor11x7

0
Registered
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
3,129
I have achieved the best of both worlds--the cut and the uncut. I'm circumcised, but the good doc left a lot of foreskin, and so after five years (next month) of stretching, pulling, edging, jelqing, and coaxing, my foreskin has completely stretched around my glans.

I swam an hour yesterday, and when I was changing in the locker room, I spotted my dick in the mirror, puckered up, and pulled over the head with just a small hole at the end--it looked exactly like an uncut cock.

How sweet is that?

:p
 
thats how mine looks after pe, well im not done yet but I totally know what you are talking about :D. But I still have a ways to go maybe another year and im good 1 1/2 years tops
 
That's a tough question to answer. I guess it's a question of what is aesthetically pleasing to the partner and to you. I've always been happy with my cut dick. But being who I am, I'm sure I would be just as happy with an uncut dick.

Other than that, It has been argued that it's easier to clean the area around the glans if you are circumcised. I don't know if I buy that. It has also been argued that one is desensitized by circumcision. That would tend to reduce premature ejaculation. I CAN buy that.

Does one get less pleasure if one is circumcised? I doubt that. But who knows? I have never experienced the other, so how can I say?

There is one argument that bears consideration, and this is an issue that affects women. I believe the research shows that a virus that is carried by men and when contracted by women, can lead to (I believe), I higher incidence of cancer of the cervix.. or one of the cancers of the female reproductive system. According to the study, women who are more likely to contract the virus from uncut men. That makes sense to me.
 
phraze!;313836 said:
thats how mine looks after pe, well im not done yet but I totally know what you are talking about :D. But I still have a ways to go maybe another year and im good 1 1/2 years tops

Good for you, phraze! :s
 
goinfor11x7;313858 said:
That's a tough question to answer. I guess it's a question of what is aesthetically pleasing to the partner and to you. I've always been happy with my cut dick. But being who I am, I'm sure I would be just as happy with an uncut dick.

Other than that, It has been argued that it's easier to clean the area around the glans if you are circumcised. I don't know if I buy that. It has also been argued that one is desensitized by circumcision. That would tend to reduce premature ejaculation. I CAN buy that.

Does one get less pleasure if one is circumcised? I doubt that. But who knows? I have never experienced the other, so how can I say?

There is one argument that bears consideration, and this is an issue that affects women. I believe the research shows that a virus that is carried by men and when contracted by women, can lead to (I believe), I higher incidence of cancer of the cervix.. or one of the cancers of the female reproductive system. According to the study, women who are more likely to contract the virus from uncut men. That makes sense to me.

I heard that, too, and I completely believe it. What makes it odd, for me though, is that being uncut is "natural." It is the way we are made. Oh, well. Just one more thing I'll discover when I die.:cool:
 
goinfor11x7;313858 said:
That's a tough question to answer. I guess it's a question of what is aesthetically pleasing to the partner and to you. I've always been happy with my cut dick. But being who I am, I'm sure I would be just as happy with an uncut dick.

Other than that, It has been argued that it's easier to clean the area around the glans if you are circumcised. I don't know if I buy that. It has also been argued that one is desensitized by circumcision. That would tend to reduce premature ejaculation. I CAN buy that.

Does one get less pleasure if one is circumcised? I doubt that. But who knows? I have never experienced the other, so how can I say?

There is one argument that bears consideration, and this is an issue that affects women. I believe the research shows that a virus that is carried by men and when contracted by women, can lead to (I believe), I higher incidence of cancer of the cervix.. or one of the cancers of the female reproductive system. According to the study, women who are more likely to contract the virus from uncut men. That makes sense to me.

You can believe the "research" if you want, you are free to do so, but the "research" has been proven wrong some time ago. More propaganda. The strains of virus you refer to are carried by both sexes, to begin with, so it's not the situation you've described. Anyhow, there's a vaccine now that combats those strains of virus. So, bad research (with an agenda) and only part of the picture at best. Not too strong a position to base beliefs on.
 
not to mention the fact that genital warts play a much larger role. other than that, good points.
 
goinfor11x7;313564 said:
I have achieved the best of both worlds--the cut and the uncut. I'm circumcised, but the good doc left a lot of foreskin, and so after five years (next month) of stretching, pulling, edging, jelqing, and coaxing, my foreskin has completely stretched around my glans.

I swam an hour yesterday, and when I was changing in the locker room, I spotted my dick in the mirror, puckered up, and pulled over the head with just a small hole at the end--it looked exactly like an uncut cock.

How sweet is that?

:p

So, what method did you use?
 
No one method--just continuous, consistent stretching over a long period of time--better than four years. I noticed the foreskin slowly pulling up over my glans after about two years of P.E., including jelqing, every stretch routine you can name and edging.

I don't think any one did it--it was simply a combination of all of them--plus the time factor. I takes a lot of time for this to happen.

An injury may have also been a factor. I injured those sensitive nerves around my circ. scar, and after that I started pulling my foreskin over that area every time I did any stretching to make sure that sensitive area was protected. I'm sure that helped as well.

Hope this is of some help.

Bob

P.S. Congrats on the gains. You've almost reached my length in no time at all. You gain fast. Good for you. Keep it up! If you have any foreskin intact at all, it will naturally stretch as you continue to practice P.E.

And good luck, as always.
 
Just as a side note: you've used the word "stretch" a bunch of times. You understand that you haven't "stretched" skin longer, right? That isn't how it all works.
 
Depends on how you look at it. If it's just more skin you want, then go for it, but you'll miss the other half of what this process means. But, like you imply, not everybody is up to understanding what's happened; can't, and even worse, don't want to. Me, I don't want to walk around not understanding what I've done. Who want's to be blind. But that's me.
 
Distalero;315834 said:
Depends on how you look at it. If it's just more skin you want, then go for it, but you'll miss the other half of what this process means. But, like you imply, not everybody is up to understanding what's happened; can't, and even worse, don't want to. Me, I don't want to walk around not understanding what I've done. Who want's to be blind. But that's me.

WTF are you talking about.
 
Well, that's the point, isn't it. He may have a skin tube, but he doesn't have a foreskin. A natural foreskin, assuming it's one that covers pretty much completely, does a whole lot more than hang there. Same for a skin tube grown by someone who was circumcised; it won't ever be a foreskin, so what it will do is much less, but even it too will do more than just hang there. What the covering does, in either case, supports a true change. But you'd have to actually have done that, to know what I'm referring to. You don't see references to what I'm talking about, or people understanding the reference, because not many guys who say they've "restored" have done anything of the sort.
 
ok. he now has skin, which will cover his glans when flaccid.

this will lead to greater sensetivity of the glans. a foreskin does that.

he also has a natural mechanical lubrication via a sliding 'skin tube'. a foreskin does that.

he may not have the rigid band, etc, but he is much better off than being regular cut.

agree?
 
Back
Top Bottom