sasquatch said:
HOW THE FUCK IS THAT EVEN POSSIBLE!! >:(

It's hormone balance test/estrogen gotta be all out of whack, now I'm just pissed off. Seriously WTF!! I've got nothing against a persons sexual expression but when a man wants to be a woman and does all the hormone injections and shit and has a cock like that, well....

ahem.....I don't think we want to know what "her" cock was like, BEFORE the hormones....
 
sasquatch said:
Who here's brave 'nuff to sign up on a tranny forum and ask some questions??

...all in the name of science of course

Consider me ONE... I'm highly interested scientifically and other aspects as well..
 
Look closer again dudes...

Too many "glitches" there as well...

A double shadow with 2 different tones... Physics say it's not possible.
The other one is a typical cut and past job.

Typical "buch'o'shop" and bad ones at that too...

Stay calm and always raise an eyebrow ...

Peace

Mike

View attachment 15341

View attachment 15342
 
LOL yeah somebody go undercover..DO a James Bond Move get the details and report back to your Penis Enlargement bruthas..LMFAO!!!!
 
8InchMIKE said:
Look closer again dudes...

Too many "glitches" there as well...

A double shadow with 2 different tones... Physics say it's not possible.
The other one is a typical cut and past job.

Typical "buch'o'shop" and bad ones at that too...

Stay calm and always raise an eyebrow ...

Peace

Mike


theres been people in the past who posted photoshopped pics here as well. and i was critisized by some less then knowledgeable tools here, when it was obvious to me that they were fake. rofl
 
WantsMore9 said:
umm u say there bad? it fooled all of us obviously but good job finding that out

Well i know that was NOT humble of me to say the least but i have 15 years of photoshop under my belt and i can say they are BAD cause i know bad when i analyse it. After a few years it just becomes second nature and you know where and how to look for inconsistencies, know what i mean mate ?

Yes i can relate to the fact that they can fool the majority of people but that is due inexperience with this kind of "art" and it's to be expected. Also when i have tools that analyse the spectrograph of an image's contents i can then determine if it was tempered with. And these here have TOTALY been messed with.

One more note on this mate, these trannys here are obviously paid professionals and these are still images so the purpose of them is selling. People will do anything to sell and make a buck. They prey on inocent victims and in this case it was ouer [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words] comunity that was hurting and I CAN'T HAVE THAT.

P.S. The other images of the first one i'm not even going to bother to say anything but i have looked at them closely and man oh man... worst even, these dudes didn't even try...But nevertheless if you wan't me to back it up just ask me and i will...

Peace

Mike
 
Last edited:
I am not doubting what 8 inch Mike is saying but I am sure I saw the first girl in a home mad video wanking off and it did look as big as the picture. Sorry for dragging this up again but she probably is a big girl.
 
these creatures are in deepshit, they can't fuck, can't take anymore,..
it is Adobe trick and it is fake ..

avoide this .
and take the real pussy ;)
 
bigjim7 said:
I am not doubting what 8 inch Mike is saying but I am sure I saw the first girl in a home mad video wanking off and it did look as big as the picture. Sorry for dragging this up again but she probably is a big girl.

Hey bigjim7, sup ?

she may be big but by my calculations she is no more than a 6.5" in a small body frame and lean as hell so that and the fact that tv's INCREASE size perception, i.e., things seem bigger and people look fater than in real life, is enough to cause you a misguided perception of one's size. I happen to know exactly where these were "touched" and i have rebuilt the pics eliminating excess penis and a 6.5" is what i saw afterwards. Granted that 6.5" on a small frame/hands/thin and lean body will be perceived has big BUT, it is only above average.

Besides, can you not see the circles i made where the "fishy" stuff is? Dude that is the clone tool way out of whack, someone did this "job" very, very half-assed and can you not see where there are pixels missing and others superimposed? Man it's all right there and don't forget they use fisheye lenses filming those videos and that alone can make something average seem HUGE.
Like i said, if you need proof just ask mate.

Peace

Mike
 
Last edited:
bigjim7 said:
I am not doubting what 8 inch Mike is saying but I am sure I saw the first girl in a home mad video wanking off and it did look as big as the picture. Sorry for dragging this up again but she probably is a big girl.

I second that. Nefertiti (the first black t-girl) has been on video a number of times and she is beyond-belief huge. I don't mean to take any credit away from 8InchMIKE's work but all three of those girls have done appearances at multiple sites and in several videos (not sure about Vanilla though, can't remember seeing any video on her) and they always look the same. So either there's some really big conspiracy with all the shemale sites involved going on and there's like one guy sitting around doing everyone's "augmentations" or they're actually quite large. From what I've seen it doesn't matter if they're solo or with some guy (most of whom should have severe inferiority complex next to these t-girls), they are huge. Come to think of that, there are larger shemales out there that I'd be more inclined to doubt. How about this one...
 
ebon00 said:
I second that. Nefertiti (the first black t-girl) has been on video a number of times and she is beyond-belief huge. I don't mean to take any credit away from 8InchMIKE's work but all three of those girls have done appearances at multiple sites and in several videos (not sure about Vanilla though, can't remember seeing any video on her) and they always look the same. So either there's some really big conspiracy with all the shemale sites involved going on and there's like one guy sitting around doing everyone's "augmentations" or they're actually quite large. From what I've seen it doesn't matter if they're solo or with some guy (most of whom should have severe inferiority complex next to these t-girls), they are huge. Come to think of that, there are larger shemales out there that I'd be more inclined to doubt. How about this one...

You really have to grasp the notion that the adult entertainment "industry" does in fact have on pay guys doing this kind of work. It is very important for them, money wise/selling a product wise, that they WILL go to any extent to make things more profitable.

Also there is NO DENYING possible in what regards these analyses that i've done cause the evidence is right there dudes, heck i even zoomed it and pointed out the marks that the image editing program used clone tool left behind on such a bad job. Believe what you want mates but...the truth is out there.

As for vids and such, well it's just to hard a work to do it frame by frame but then again if they just use a "fish-eye" lens then it all looks bigger in the center part of any image, which is where the genitals are usually in a video frame or a pic. There are all sorts of ways to fake stuff and lead people to believe it's real when it's in fact NOT REAL. She may be big but no THAT big, she may have a 6.5 or a 7 and that IS big but not as big as the pics try to make you believe.

As for this last pic you left, well i'll have to analyse it when i get a chance.

Peace

Mike
 
Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Back
    Top