Asanon said:
I'd be interested to see this study, but I'm not sure I buy into it 100%.
In the first place, nearly everything I've read about female preference states that around 8" is actually at the very outside range or beyond what they prefer in terms of length - despite the impression we get around here and other corners of the internet, not every woman enjoys ultra-deep penetration or having their cervixes thottled, whicn in many cases 8" is more than enough length to cause this to happen.
And, so far as being able to deeply penetrate is concerned, most studies show that women are more concerned with girth and friction over deep penetration. The vagina feels sensation after the first few inches, but it's roughly equal to how it feels to touch a part of your body that has gone numb from lack of circulation - there's a sensation of pressure, but nothing specific or distinct. Some women obviously enjoy the stimulus of feeling a deeper pressure, but as I mentioned before, most of what I've ever seen regarding female preference pretty clearly states that they're not looking for ultra-deep penetration.
Thirdly, I'd imagine that there is some sort of anatomical convergence here, meaning that vaginas that fall within the average range work fine with penises that fall within the average range. I promise you there are a good number of women that, if they do get off vaginally, and keep in mind that many who do are still orgasming from clitoral friction, they can easily do so without having their vaginas filled to nearly beyond capacity (lengthwise at least).
Also, the female orgasm is very much a psychological enterprise as well as physical. I'd say it's a very narrow view of how sex works and what makes it successful to suggest that simply inserting a longer member will automatically result in better and faster orgasms in any woman, which is part of what is being suggested here. If 8" is always better, I would just put out there that many [words=http://www.mattersofsize.com/join-now.html]MOS[/words] posters have linked articles stating that the best selling dildos purchased by women are always in 6-7" range, and in fact when women masturbate very few report penetrating themselves very deeply if at all. While this doesn't mean that deeper penetration isn't pleasurable for many women, it also strongly suggests that it's not the ultimate solution to abundant and easy orgasms, as many guys around here seem to think.
Ultimately I think that a woman's arrousal level, her attraction to the guy, his skill and [words=http://fleshlight.sjv.io/c/348327/302851/4702]stamina[/words] in fucking, and her comfort level, have a hell of a lot more to do with producing the orgasm than just the basic length of the penis, and in terms of physical factors I'd say girth is more important than length for most women.
Like I said, I'd be curious to see that study and I'm a little dubious as to how such research could even be accurately and reliably reported, but I'm not passing judgement yet. My point is simply that it seems pretty silly to me to suggest that a jump from 6" to 8" will somehow magically cut down orgasm time in by 2/3 - so does a 7" penis on average cut it down to 13 minutes? What about 7.5"? 11 minutes? Matching female sexual satisfaction strictly to the size of male anatomy just gets pretty silly when you start breaking it down. There are so many other factors involved. No doubt it's visually impressive and interesting for women, but some kind of magical orgasm solution and a skeleton key to any woman's pleasure? No way.
Last edited:
